diff --git a/.claude/artifacts/brainstorm-sentinel b/.claude/artifacts/brainstorm-sentinel new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..2b6649a365 --- /dev/null +++ b/.claude/artifacts/brainstorm-sentinel @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +brainstorm-complete diff --git a/AGENT_POINT_RESEARCH.md b/AGENT_POINT_RESEARCH.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..bbbd409039 --- /dev/null +++ b/AGENT_POINT_RESEARCH.md @@ -0,0 +1,411 @@ +# AGENT_POINT_RESEARCH.md — Session Research Log + +**Session**: 4eadd43a-ce61-435f-afd5-40bcfc367e94 +**Branch**: claude/agent-kudos-system-xeTRD +**Date**: 2026-04-09 +**Topic**: Kudos System — Process Reward Model for AI coding agents + +This file documents every research request made in this session, the steps taken, and the detailed findings. + +--- + +## Research 1: Epic Scrutiny Pipeline — Gap Analysis & Web Research (Pre-Compaction) + +### Context +The user asked to re-run the scrutiny pipeline on two Option A epics independently. The scrutiny pipeline (`plugins/dso/skills/shared/workflows/epic-scrutiny-pipeline.md`) runs 4 steps: Gap Analysis → Web Research → Scenario Analysis → Fidelity Review. + +### Research Steps (from prior session summary) + +**Step 1 — Gap Analysis**: +The gap analysis agent reviewed the epic specs against the success criteria and identified: +- Missing: session identity mechanism (who writes .kudos/session-id) +- Missing: explicit fail-open behavior for absent tools +- Missing: jscpd file-output integration detail (stdout vs file) + +**Step 2 — Web Research**: +Multiple web searches were performed on: + +1. **sg (ast-grep) --json=stream behavior** + - Query: "ast-grep sg --json=stream exit codes NDJSON" + - **Result**: Exit code 0=no matches, 1=matches found confirmed. NDJSON schema fields: path, range, text, rule_id + - Source: ast-grep CLI documentation + +2. **ruff --stdin-filename with absolute path** + - Query: "ruff check stdin-filename relative path pyproject.toml not found" + - **Result**: Found GitHub issue #17405 — relative paths silently drop pyproject.toml config. Fix: use `$(pwd)/$f` absolute path + - Source: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/17405 + +3. **Python AST subtree hashing for duplicate detection** + - Query: "Python AST subtree hashing duplicate code detection hashlib" + - **Result**: `hashlib.sha256(ast.dump(node).encode())` is the correct pattern. `ast.walk` visits all nodes; for targeted subtree detection, filter by node type. + - Source: Python 3 docs — ast.dump, hashlib + +4. **jscpd output format** + - Query: "jscpd JSON output file vs stdout reporters" + - **Result**: jscpd does NOT write JSON to stdout with `--reporters json`. Correct pattern: `REPORT_DIR=$(mktemp -d) && jscpd --reporters json --output $REPORT_DIR && cat $REPORT_DIR/jscpd-report.json` + - This was a CRITICAL finding that invalidated the original T13 approach (stdout assumption) + +5. **ast.NodeVisitor vs ast.walk for nesting depth** + - Query: "Python ast.walk nesting depth counter ast.NodeVisitor" + - **Result**: `ast.walk` does NOT track depth (flat traversal). `ast.NodeVisitor` with generic_visit override is correct for depth tracking. Pattern: increment counter in `visit_If`/`visit_For`/`visit_While`/`visit_With`/`visit_Try`, decrement after `generic_visit(node)` + - Source: Python docs, discussion forum responses + +6. **Process Reward Models for AI agents** + - Query: "process reward model AI coding agents 2025 step-level feedback" + - **Result**: 2025 research confirms step-level recognition reduces reasoning errors; immediate reward delivery is critical for behavioral linkage; design aligns with AgentPRM and PRIME findings + - Source: Multiple academic sources + +### Key Findings Summary +| Finding | Impact | Resolution | +|---------|--------|-----------| +| sg exit codes 0=no matches, 1=matches | T5/T11 implementation | Use in diff-to-sg-scope.sh | +| ruff #17405: relative path drops pyproject.toml | T9 implementation | Use absolute path `$(pwd)/$f` | +| jscpd writes to file not stdout | T13 fallback approach | mktemp + cat pattern | +| ast.walk doesn't track depth | T7 implementation | Use ast.NodeVisitor | +| jscpd absent from repo = new external dep | T13 risk | Spike S1 validates approach | + +--- + +## Research 2: Feasibility Reviewer — Pass 1 (Pre-Compaction) + +### Context +The feasibility reviewer agent (`dso:feasibility-reviewer`) was dispatched inline to evaluate Epic 1 technical feasibility and integration risk. + +### Research Steps +The agent read the epic spec and evaluated 2 dimensions: `technical_feasibility` and `integration_risk`. + +### Results (Pass 1) +- `technical_feasibility`: 2/5 +- `integration_risk`: 2/5 +- **Status**: FAIL (threshold is ≥4 on both) + +**Findings**: +1. `ruff --stdin-filename` with relative path silently drops pyproject.toml rules (issue #17405) +2. `ast.walk` does not track nesting depth (T7 needs ast.NodeVisitor) +3. jscpd writes to file not stdout (T13 fallback incorrectly assumed stdout) + +--- + +## Research 3: Feasibility Reviewer — Pass 2 + +### Context +After redesigning T7/T9/T13 based on Pass 1 findings, the feasibility reviewer was re-dispatched. + +### Changes Made Before Pass 2 +1. T9: Changed `--stdin-filename "$f"` to `--stdin-filename "$(pwd)/$f"` (absolute path) +2. T7: Changed `ast.walk` to `ast.NodeVisitor` with depth counter +3. T13: Changed jscpd stdout assumption to file-output pattern: `REPORT_DIR=$(mktemp -d) && jscpd --reporters json --output $REPORT_DIR && cat $REPORT_DIR/jscpd-report.json` + +### Results (Pass 2) +- `technical_feasibility`: 4/5 +- `integration_risk`: 3/5 +- **Status**: PARTIAL FAIL + +**Remaining finding** (integration_risk=3): +1. ruff absolute path fix not yet in spec text +2. ast.NodeVisitor pattern not fully specified +3. jscpd file-output confirmation still incomplete + +--- + +## Research 4: Feasibility Reviewer — Pass 3 (Targeted Inline Re-run) + +### Context +Third pass targeted the 3 specific integration_risk=3 findings. + +### Changes Made Before Pass 3 +1. Verified ruff absolute path `$(pwd)/$f` explicitly in T9 spec text +2. Specified ast.NodeVisitor exact pattern: `visit_If/For/While/With/Try increment, generic_visit decrement` +3. Confirmed jscpd integration: `REPORT_DIR=$(mktemp -d) && jscpd --reporters json --output $REPORT_DIR && cat $REPORT_DIR/jscpd-report.json` (file output, NOT stdout) + +### Results (Pass 3) +- `technical_feasibility`: 4/5 +- `integration_risk`: 4/5 +- **Status**: PASS ✓ +- **Findings**: Empty (no remaining findings) + +--- + +## Research 5: Fidelity Review — Epic 1 (4 Reviewers in Parallel) + +### Context +The fidelity review step dispatches 4 reviewers: Agent Clarity, Scope, Value Alignment, and Technical Feasibility. All dimensions must score ≥4. + +### Research Steps +Four reviewer agents evaluated Epic 1 against the approved spec. + +### Results +All 4 dimensions scored ≥4: +- Agent Clarity: 4/5 +- Scope: 4/5 +- Value Alignment: 5/5 +- Technical Feasibility: 4/5 (after 3 feasibility passes) + +**Status**: PASS ✓ + +Review JSON written to `/tmp/scrutiny-review-E1-5oew9w.json` + +--- + +## Research 6: Fidelity Review — Epic 2 (3 Reviewers) + +### Context +Epic 2 reviewed with 3 perspectives (no external integration requiring feasibility review). + +### Results +All dimensions ≥4: +- Agent Clarity: 4/5 +- Scope: 4/5 +- Value Alignment: 5/5 + +**Status**: PASS ✓ + +--- + +## Research 7: Complexity Evaluation — Epic 1 (dso:complexity-evaluator) + +### Context +After user approved both epic specs and said "proceed to complexity analysis on both," complexity evaluators were dispatched in parallel for both epics. + +### Research Steps +The complexity-evaluator agent (haiku model, read inline from `plugins/dso/agents/complexity-evaluator.md`) applied the 8-dimension rubric to Epic 1. + +### 8-Dimension Rubric Analysis for Epic 1 + +**Dimension 1 — Files**: 7+ files (commit-validate.sh, kudos-write-guard.sh, diff-to-sg-scope.sh, COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md, CLAUDE.md, dso-config.conf, integration test) → **COMPLEX signal (>3)** + +**Dimension 2 — Layers**: Shell scripts (plugin scripts layer) + hooks layer + workflow/documentation layer + config layer = 3+ layers → **COMPLEX signal (≥3)** + +**Dimension 3 — Interfaces**: New scripts (not modifying existing class/Protocol signatures) → **0 (neutral)** + +**Dimension 4 — Scope Certainty**: SCs are extremely detailed with field names, formulas, file paths, exit codes, fallback conditions → **High** + +**Dimension 5 — Confidence**: Files confirmed via Glob/Grep → **High** + +**Dimension 6 — Blast Radius**: `blast-radius-score.py` returned `complex_override=true` (blast_radius_score=7) → **Forces COMPLEX** + +**Dimension 7 — Pattern Familiarity**: PreToolUse write guard pattern exists (worktree-edit-guard.sh); JSONL ledger follows .review-events/ pattern; sg NDJSON parsing is new → **Medium** + +**Dimension 8 — External Boundary Count**: sg (ast-grep) external CLI = 1 → **1** + +**Epic Qualitative Overrides**: +- ✅ External integration: sg (ast-grep) is new external CLI tool with no existing usage in repo +- ✅ Success criteria overflow: 23 SCs > 6 threshold +- ✅ Single-concern failure: "infrastructure AND 10 triggers" = structural "and" + +### Result +```json +{ + "classification": "COMPLEX", + "confidence": "high", + "files_estimated": [ + "plugins/dso/scripts/commit-validate.sh", + "plugins/dso/hooks/tools/kudos-write-guard.sh", + "plugins/dso/scripts/diff-to-sg-scope.sh", + "plugins/dso/docs/workflows/COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md", + "CLAUDE.md", + ".claude/dso-config.conf", + "tests/integration/test-kudos-t9-end-to-end.sh" + ], + "qualitative_overrides": ["success_criteria_overflow", "external_integration", "single_concern_fail"], + "blast_radius_score": 7, + "pattern_familiarity": "medium", + "external_boundary_count": 1, + "feasibility_review_recommended": true +} +``` + +--- + +## Research 8: Complexity Evaluation — Epic 2 (dso:complexity-evaluator) + +### Research Steps +Applied 8-dimension rubric to Epic 2. + +### 8-Dimension Rubric Analysis for Epic 2 + +**Dimension 1 — Files**: 6 files (kudos-snapshot.sh, completion-verifier.md, approach-decision-maker.md, doc-writer.md, using-lockpick/SKILL.md, worktree-create.sh) → **COMPLEX signal (>3)** + +**Dimension 2 — Layers**: Skill/prompt/agent files = 0 architectural layers; plugin scripts = 0 architectural layers → **0 layers (SIMPLE signal)** + +**Dimension 3 — Interfaces**: No public method signatures changed → **0 (neutral)** + +**Dimension 4 — Scope Certainty**: Named file paths, exact behavior specs, measurable conditions → **High** + +**Dimension 5 — Confidence**: All specific files confirmed via Glob → **High** + +**Dimension 6 — Blast Radius**: `complex_override=false`, score=0 → **No forced escalation** + +**Dimension 7 — Pattern Familiarity**: flock usage exists in 20+ files; JSON snapshot files have precedents; text additions to agent md files are common → **Medium** (T4 AST hashing novel) + +**Dimension 8 — External Boundary Count**: No external APIs, reads local files only → **0** + +**Epic Qualitative Overrides**: +- ✅ Success criteria overflow: 9 SCs > 6 threshold +- ✅ Single-concern failure: "snapshot triggers AND agent contract updates" = structural "and" + +### Result +```json +{ + "classification": "COMPLEX", + "confidence": "high", + "files_estimated": [ + "plugins/dso/scripts/kudos-snapshot.sh", + "plugins/dso/agents/completion-verifier.md", + "plugins/dso/agents/approach-decision-maker.md", + "plugins/dso/agents/doc-writer.md", + "plugins/dso/skills/using-lockpick/SKILL.md", + "plugins/dso/scripts/worktree-create.sh" + ], + "qualitative_overrides": ["success_criteria_overflow", "single_concern_failure"], + "blast_radius_score": 0, + "pattern_familiarity": "medium", + "external_boundary_count": 0, + "feasibility_review_recommended": false +} +``` + +--- + +## Research 9: Red Team Adversarial Review — Epic 1 Story Map + +### Context +Phase 2.5 of `/dso:preplanning` for Epic 1. The dso:red-team-reviewer agent (opus model) attacked the drafted story map for cross-story blind spots, implicit assumptions, and interaction gaps. + +### Story Map Submitted for Review + +9 stories drafted for Epic 1: +- S0: Spike — validate sg --json=stream behavior +- S1: Spike — Python AST subtree hashing +- A: Core kudos ledger infrastructure (walking skeleton) +- B: diff-to-sg-scope.sh wrapper +- C: Shell triggers T6/T9/T12 + integration test +- D: Review workflow triggers T3/T14/T15 +- E: sg-based structural triggers T5/T11 +- F: AST-based complexity triggers T7/T13 +- H: Documentation (CLAUDE.md Kudos section) + +### Consumer Enumeration (Red Team Step) +The red team enumerated all consumers of systems being modified: +- `commit-validate.sh`: consumed by COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md, /dso:commit, /dso:sprint, /dso:fix-bug, /dso:debug-everything +- `COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md`: consumed by per-worktree-review-commit.md, merge-to-main.sh, all workflows +- `pre-edit-write-functions.sh` dispatcher: consumed by every Edit/Write tool call +- `reviewer-findings.json`: consumed by record-review.sh, review workflow (protected artifact) +- `.review-events/` JSONL: consumed by review stats, commit-validate.sh (T14/T15) +- `compute-diff-hash.sh`: consumed by pre-commit-review-gate.sh and pre-commit-test-gate.sh + +### Findings by Category + +**Critical (4)**: + +1. **CSIG-1**: commit-validate.sh has no defined integration point in the existing pre-commit hook chain or COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md step ordering + - Impact: All trigger stories depend on this but position in hook chain is unspecified + - Recommendation: Specify exact COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md step position, timeout budget, compute-diff-hash.sh interaction + +2. **CSIG-2**: kudos-write-guard.sh registration missing from consolidated PreToolUse dispatcher + - Impact: Guard cannot function without registration in pre-edit-write-functions.sh + - Recommendation: Specify dispatcher chain registration (6th function after existing 5) + +3. **FMBS-1**: Concurrent writes to ledger.jsonl will corrupt file in shared-directory mode + - Impact: Session ceiling check is a TOCTOU race; concurrent agents share ledger without protection + - Recommendation: flock-based atomic writes + +4. **CIA-1**: COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md is a safeguard file — modification impacts all workflows + - Impact: merge-to-main.sh ticket-sync commits, per-worktree-review-commit.md, checkpoint auto-saves all need exclusion + - Recommendation: Explicit cascade consumer exclusion list + +**Important (11)**: + +5. **CSIG-3**: T14 data source ambiguous — review-events JSONL only has aggregates, not individual finding events + - Resolution: T14 should read reviewer-findings.json for finding presence + review-events for resubmission + +6. **CSIG-4**: Session UUID producer ambiguous — SC-E1-7 says "at worktree creation" but SC-E1-6 says "first commit" + - Resolution: Commit-validate.sh creates on first run (fail-open if absent) + +7. **CSIG-5**: diff-to-sg-scope.sh output contract not specified for consumers (E and F) + - Resolution: Formal contract with exit codes + NDJSON format + grep fallback format + +8. **IA-1**: .kudos/ not in .gitignore causes review gate chicken-and-egg problem + - Resolution: Pre-seed in .gitignore during development, not at runtime + +9. **IA-2**: n=session-scoped not explicitly stated (could be cumulative) + - Resolution: Explicit session-scope clarification + +10. **IA-3**: T6 ticket timestamp resolution mechanism unspecified + - Resolution: `dso ticket show ` + created_at parsing; fail-open when unresolvable + +11. **IA-4**: T9 has no fail-open clause for missing/erroring ruff + - Resolution: Explicit skip when ruff absent or fails with non-lint errors + +12. **FMBS-3**: T12 "commented-out code" detection heuristic unspecified + - Resolution: Regex pattern: `^\s*#\s*(def |class |import |...)`, 2+ consecutive lines + +13. **FMBS-4**: T7 done-definition says "HAS >= 4 levels" — incentivizes writing complex code + - Resolution: Must detect REDUCTION (removed diff hunks >= 4 AND resulting file has lower depth) + +14. **FMBS-5**: commit-validate.sh timeout context not specified + - Resolution: COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md step with timeout: 600000 (not pre-commit hook) + +15. **TSG-1**: Integration test runs via git commit requires full hook chain setup + - Resolution: Direct invocation of commit-validate.sh (not via git commit) + +**Minor (3)**: +16. CIA-4: .kudos/** not in review-gate-allowlist.conf +17. SBV-3: grep fallback parity testing with sg not required +18. IA-5: Rank tier scope (session-scoped vs cumulative) not clarified + +### Blue Team Filter Results + +**22 accepted, 1 rejected**: +- Rejected: S0 fixture production (B can create its own fixtures) +- All 22 others accepted + +**New story added**: CLAUDE.md prohibition block (P1) — must ship before any trigger is active. Prohibition rules cannot be P4 (Story H) if they govern system behavior from first trigger onward. + +**Modified story map**: 10 stories (added PROHIBITION story, split from Story H) + +--- + +## Research 10: Red Team Adversarial Review — Epic 2 Story Map + +### Context +Phase 2.5 of `/dso:preplanning` for Epic 2. Currently running (agent ID: a56b6e456e8a67a50). + +### Story Map Submitted for Review + +6 stories drafted for Epic 2: +- J: kudos-snapshot.sh infrastructure (SC-E2-1, SC-E2-2) +- K: Snapshot-dependent triggers T1/T2 (SC-E2-3, SC-E2-4) +- L: T4 trigger — pre-session dedup reduction (SC-E2-5) +- M: Agent contract updates — completion-verifier, approach-decision-maker, doc-writer (SC-E2-6, SC-E2-7, SC-E2-8) +- N: SKILL.md kudos awareness — using-lockpick (SC-E2-9) +- H2: Documentation update + +### Consumer Enumeration (submitted to red team) +- test-gate-status file: record-test-status.sh (write), pre-commit-test-gate.sh (read), kudos-snapshot.sh (new reader) +- completion-verifier.md: /dso:sprint Step 10a and Phase 7 Step 0.75 +- approach-decision-maker.md: /dso:implementation-plan proposal resolution loop +- doc-writer.md: /dso:sprint doc stories, /dso:update-docs +- using-lockpick/SKILL.md: /dso:sprint and related orchestrators +- worktree-create.sh: /dso:sprint, /dso:fix-bug, /dso:debug-everything + +### Results +**STATUS: In progress** (agent a56b6e456e8a67a50 running) + +--- + +## Key Technical Decisions Made Based on Research + +| Decision | Research Basis | Spec Impact | +|----------|---------------|-------------| +| T9: absolute path `$(pwd)/$f` | ruff issue #17405 | Prevents silent pyproject.toml config drop | +| T7: ast.NodeVisitor, not ast.walk | Python docs + discussion | Enables depth tracking (ast.walk is flat) | +| T13: AST hashing primary, jscpd file-output as fallback | Spike S1 approach | hashlib.sha256(ast.dump(node).encode()) | +| jscpd: file output, not stdout | Research finding | mktemp + cat pattern required | +| sg absence: `command -v sg`, not exit code | sg CLI docs | Exit code 127 ≠ "absent", use command -v | +| commit-validate.sh: COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md step, not pre-commit hook | Red team FMBS-5 + CSIG-1 | timeout: 600000 available; avoids hook timeout | +| .gitignore: pre-seeded in dev commit | Red team IA-1 | Avoids chicken-and-egg with review gate | +| ledger writes: flock atomic | Red team FMBS-1 | Prevents corruption in shared-directory mode | +| T7 done definition: detect REDUCTION not presence | Red team FMBS-4 | Prevents perverse incentive (adding complex code for kudos) | +| CLAUDE.md prohibition block: P1 priority | Red team SBV-1 + new story | Rules must exist before first trigger ships | +| T14 data source: reviewer-findings.json + review-events | Red team CSIG-3 | review-events JSONL has only aggregates, not individual events | diff --git a/AGENT_POINT_SESSION.md b/AGENT_POINT_SESSION.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d7d125d16f --- /dev/null +++ b/AGENT_POINT_SESSION.md @@ -0,0 +1,5283 @@ +# AGENT_POINT_SESSION.md — Raw Session Transcript + +**Session ID**: 4eadd43a-ce61-435f-afd5-40bcfc367e94 +**Branch**: claude/agent-kudos-system-xeTRD +**Date**: 2026-04-09 + +> **Note**: This session was resumed from a prior compacted session. The pre-compaction portion of the session is represented by the context summary injected at the start (marked [PRIOR SESSION SUMMARY]). The post-compaction portion is the full live transcript. + +--- + +## [PRIOR SESSION SUMMARY] — 2026-04-09T01:04:03 + +This session is being continued from a previous conversation that ran out of context. The summary below covers the earlier portion of the conversation. + +Summary: +1. Primary Request and Intent: + +The session resumed from a prior context-compacted conversation. The user's request was: **"re-run the scrutiny pipeline on each option A epic independently."** + +The two Option A epics (designed in the prior session) are: +- **Epic 1**: "Kudos system: infrastructure and primary triggers" (10 triggers: T3, T5, T6, T7, T9, T11, T12, T13, T14, T15 + full infrastructure) +- **Epic 2**: "Kudos system: detection triggers and agent behavioral improvements" (3 snapshot-dependent triggers: T1, T2, T4 + 4 sub-agent SKILL.md updates) + +The scrutiny pipeline (`plugins/dso/skills/shared/workflows/epic-scrutiny-pipeline.md`) has 4 steps: Gap Analysis → Web Research → Scenario Analysis (red + blue teams) → Fidelity Review (4 reviewers). All must pass before ticket creation. The session goal was to run the full pipeline on both epics, resolve any failures, and prepare final specs for approval. + +2. Key Technical Concepts: + +- **Epic Scrutiny Pipeline**: 4-step quality gate: gap analysis → web research → scenario analysis (red/blue teams) → fidelity review (Agent Clarity, Scope, Value, Technical Feasibility reviewers). All fidelity dimensions must score ≥ 4. +- **Kudos System**: Process-level reward model for AI coding agents; awards computed purely by shell script (no LLM judgment); resists Goodhart's Law via deduplication, jitter (±20%), session ceiling, prohibition block +- **JSONL Ledger** (`.kudos/ledger.jsonl`): Append-only; fields: session_id, trigger_id, diff_hash, artifact_sha, verification_method, workflow_phase, message, points (integer), jitter_factor (float), timestamp (ISO-8601 UTC); all string fields JSON-escaped +- **Award Formula**: `Award(n) = round(BasePoints × (1/(n+1)) × jitter)`, jitter = uniform random float [0.8, 1.2], minimum 1 point; n = count of prior session ledger entries for this trigger_id +- **Deduplication**: by `(trigger_id, diff_hash)` per session; same code reviewed twice earns one award +- **Session Ceiling**: `kudos.session_ceiling` from `dso-config.conf` (default 100, validated >0; absent key uses default) +- **Session-scope anti-gaming invariant**: For T6, bug ticket creation timestamp must predate session branch creation (`git merge-base HEAD main`); for T15, test gate failure event must predate session merge-base +- **Contributor Rank**: Contributor (0–25), Consistent (26–75), Distinguished (76–150), Exemplary (151–300), Principal Contributor (301+) +- **sg (ast-grep)**: External CLI for AST pattern matching. **Feasibility finding**: sg is PARTIALLY VERIFIED for pattern matching (T5, T11); CONTRADICTED for nesting depth (T7) and autonomous clone detection (T13). Exit code when absent is 127 (not 2); use `command -v sg` pre-check. +- **T7 redesign**: Nesting depth detection switched from sg to Python stdlib `ast.walk` with depth tracking (no external dependency) +- **T13 redesign**: Spike S1 must evaluate Python AST subtree hashing (`hashlib.sha256(ast.dump(node).encode())`) as primary approach; sg removed from T13 +- **T9 redesign**: ruff staged-file checking corrected to stdin approach: `git show : | ruff check --stdin-filename -` (ruff maintainers declined native staged-file support; GitHub issue #4049) +- **kudos-snapshot.sh**: Reads local `test-gate-status` file (NOT remote CI; no gh CLI) at worktree creation; writes `.kudos/test-gate-snapshot.json`; runs BEFORE any `record-test-status.sh` invocation; uses `flock` for atomic read +- **T1 (proactive bug catch)**: Uses `.test-index` for source-to-test mapping; checks `created_at` field from `dso ticket show` output against session merge-base timestamp +- **T2 (pre-existing failure ownership)**: Only `failed`/`timeout` snapshot statuses qualify; `resource_exhaustion` explicitly excluded (transient, not developer action) +- **T4 (pre-session duplicate elimination)**: Compares HEAD vs `git merge-base HEAD main` (not HEAD~1 like T13); deleted files excluded from diff list; merge-base failure → skip +- **PreToolUse hook**: VERIFIED — kudos-write-guard.sh pattern matches the existing `hook_tickets_tracker_guard` pattern in `plugins/dso/hooks/lib/pre-edit-write-functions.sh` +- **diff-to-sg-scope.sh**: Uses `command -v sg` pre-check; exits 2 (skip signal) when sg absent; extracts changed files from `git diff --name-only HEAD~1`; checks HEAD~1 existence first (exits 2 if first commit) +- **Process Reward Model (PRM)**: Research (2025) confirms step-level recognition reduces reasoning errors; immediate reward delivery critical for behavioral linkage; Kudos design aligns with AgentPRM and PRIME findings +- **Soft coordination dependencies**: Epic 1 needs coordination with 1083-fb3d (local workflow simplification) for hook registration; Epic 2 SC-E2-6 (completion-verifier.md UNCERTAIN verdict) must be sequenced after or coordinated with 6068-cb2d and 53ee-a9ac + +3. Files and Code Sections: + +- **`plugins/dso/skills/shared/workflows/epic-scrutiny-pipeline.md`**: The 4-step scrutiny pipeline. Key: web research triggered by external integration (sg) and novel pattern (PRM); scenario analysis runs when ≥5 SCs or any integration signal (full mode, no cap); fidelity review dispatches 3-4 reviewers; pass threshold all dimensions ≥ 4. + +- **`plugins/dso/docs/REVIEW-SCHEMA.md`**: Standard JSON schema for review output. Fields: `subject`, `reviews[]` (perspective, status, dimensions, findings), `conflicts[]`. Dimensions are integers 1–5 or null. Pass: all dimensions ≥ 4. + +- **`plugins/dso/agents/feasibility-reviewer.md`**: Feasibility reviewer agent (read at session start). Key: only verifies external integrations and first-time internal platform features; 5-step procedure (parse signals → WebSearch docs → WebSearch GitHub → classify → score); two dimensions: `technical_feasibility` and `integration_risk`; score 5=low risk, 1=critical risk. + +- **`plugins/dso/skills/shared/docs/reviewers/agent-clarity.md`**: Agent Clarity reviewer. Dimensions: `self_contained` (planner can decompose without clarifying questions), `success_measurable` (every SC is pass/fail verifiable). + +- **`plugins/dso/skills/shared/docs/reviewers/scope.md`**: Scope reviewer. Dimensions: `right_sized`, `no_overlap`, `dependency_aware`. Key constraint: "Too-large signal: SCs serve 2+ distinct user goals that could ship independently." + +- **`plugins/dso/skills/shared/docs/reviewers/value.md`**: Value reviewer. Dimensions: `user_impact` (named human stakeholder + concrete problem), `validation_signal` (sprint-executable validation mechanism). Key: orchestrator agent IS a user; but primary human beneficiary framing required for score ≥ 4. + +- **`plugins/dso/skills/brainstorm/prompts/scenario-red-team.md`** and **`scenario-blue-team.md`**: Red team generates failure scenarios in 3 categories (runtime/deployment/configuration); blue team filters by 4 criteria (Possible/Actionable/Distinct/High-Confidence); fail-open policy (accept when uncertain). + +- **Background feasibility reviewer output** (at `/tmp/claude-0/.../tasks/a3e5ed934a0570ca6.output`): The redesigned feasibility re-run (with Python AST for T7/T13 and stdin approach for T9) is still running as background agent at time of summary. Prior run gave technical_feasibility=2, integration_risk=2. The redesigned run is expected to improve scores significantly. + +4. Errors and Fixes: + +- **dso:feasibility-reviewer subagent_type not found**: Agent type not registered as a named sub-agent. Fix: fell back to inline general-purpose agent with the feasibility-reviewer.md prompt embedded directly in the prompt parameter. Pipeline states: "On dispatch failure, read `plugins/dso/agents/.md` inline." + +- **E1 Scope right_sized=2 (CRITICAL)**: Reviewer argued that infrastructure (15 SCs) + 10 triggers was too large; proposed splitting into (A) infrastructure and (B) triggers. Fix: Added "Sprint Scope Rationale" to epic explaining: (1) infrastructure without triggers produces zero awards — not a valid stable state; (2) all 10 triggers serve ONE user goal (recognizing quality behaviors at commit time); (3) triggers are mechanically simple (5-30 lines each); (4) spike tasks are investigation prerequisites, not sprint work items. Re-run scored 4 (minor suggestion about spike-failure contingency). + +- **E1 Value validation_signal=2**: No SC validated that the system actually changes agent behavior. Fix: Added SC16 — integration test that seeds a synthetic T9-qualifying commit, runs `commit-validate.sh`, asserts `.kudos/ledger.jsonl` contains a T9 entry with points>0 AND stdout includes per-trigger breakdown. Re-run scored 5. + +- **E2 Agent Clarity self_contained=3**: Three gaps: T1 didn't define source-to-test mapping source, T1 didn't specify how ticket creation timestamp is read, T4 didn't define "block" counting. Fix: Added to T1: "source-file-to-test mapping resolved via `.test-index` (same file as Epic 1's T12); ticket creation timestamp from `dso ticket show ` output field `created_at` (ISO-8601)"; added to T4: "AST block definition and counting threshold governed by diff-to-sg-scope.sh's sg pattern — no additional minimum size filter applied." Also added note that UNCERTAIN verdict "treated identically to incomplete by the consuming orchestrator (sprint Phase 10a) — no orchestrator code change required." Re-run scored 4. + +- **E2 Scope right_sized=3, no_overlap=3**: Reviewer said sub-agent updates (SCs 8-11) could ship independently from snapshot triggers; completion-verifier.md changes overlap with 6068-cb2d and 53ee-a9ac. Fix: Added bundling rationale to Context (sub-agents encounter Kudos awards without context if framing ships separately; UNCERTAIN verdict becomes relevant specifically when T1/T2/T4 qualification is ambiguous); added explicit sequencing constraint for SC-E2-6 with 6068-cb2d and 53ee-a9ac. Re-run scored 4/4/5. + +- **E2 Value user_impact=3 (three rounds to fix)**: First pass: beneficiary class too abstract. Second pass: added specific stakeholder scenario but "orchestrator agent" is not a human. Third pass: engineering team member was protagonist but reviewer wanted human impact as leading framing, not agent behavior. Fix: Rewrote context to center "engineering team member who reviews the session's Kudos ledger" as primary beneficiary; described concrete problem ("cannot distinguish deliberate pre-existing debt remediation from accidental passes, eroding trust and forcing manual firefighting"). Final round scored 4. + +- **E1 Feasibility technical_feasibility=2, integration_risk=2 (CRITICAL)**: Background review revealed: + - **T7 nesting depth via sg: CONTRADICTED** — sg `inside` rule detects node containment but cannot produce numeric depth counts; no working example exists + - **T13 duplicate block detection via sg: CONTRADICTED** — sg requires a known search pattern; cannot autonomously enumerate all identical AST subtrees (this is a clone-detection problem requiring dedicated tools) + - **T9 ruff staged-file checking: CONTRADICTED** — ruff maintainers explicitly declined staged-file-only support (GitHub #4049); working-tree files are what get linted, not staged blobs + - **sg exit code when absent: wrong** — binary not found produces exit 127, not exit 2 as the spec assumed + - Fix applied: + - T7: Redesigned to use Python stdlib `ast.walk` with depth tracking (no external dependency); Python 3 already a project prerequisite + - T13 / Spike S1: Explicitly identifies Python AST subtree hashing (`hashlib.sha256(ast.dump(node).encode())`) as primary alternative; jscpd as secondary candidate; sg removed from T13 detection path + - T9: Corrected to stdin approach: `git show : | ruff check --stdin-filename -` + - diff-to-sg-scope.sh sg detection: changed from relying on exit code to `command -v sg` pre-check + - Feasibility re-run dispatched as background agent (a3e5ed934a0570ca6); result pending. + +5. Problem Solving: + +- **Stable state between epics**: Infrastructure + at least some triggers must ship together (Epic 1) to deliver any user value; infrastructure-only is not a stable state. This was the core design rationale for keeping the 2-epic structure rather than splitting into 3. + +- **sg capability limits**: The feasibility review uncovered that sg is not suitable for nesting depth computation or autonomous clone detection. Resolution: Python stdlib `ast` module (no external dependency) handles both T7 and T13 detection. This eliminates the external integration risk for those triggers. + +- **ruff staged-file checking**: The native ruff API doesn't support checking only staged blobs. The stdin workaround (`git show :path | ruff check --stdin-filename path -`) correctly reads the staged blob content, not the working-tree file. + +- **T1 gaming prevention**: T1 requires the bug ticket `created_at` timestamp to be AFTER the session merge-base timestamp (ticket was created in this session), AND the test failure must appear in the snapshot (failure predated the session). This ensures proactive detection, not ticket creation for pre-existing unfixed failures. + +- **T2/T4 resource_exhaustion exclusion**: `resource_exhaustion` status is transient (machine load-dependent), not a persistent test defect. Including it as a qualifying snapshot status would allow T2 to fire simply due to environmental improvement, not developer action. Explicitly excluded. + +- **E2 Value user_impact reframing**: The Value reviewer requires a named human stakeholder as protagonist. The engineering team member who reads the Kudos ledger to audit pre-existing debt remediation is the correct human protagonist, with the AI agent as the mechanism. + +6. All User Messages: + +- "re-run the scrutiny pipeline on each option A epic independently." (the session's only substantive user request before the summary) +- "CRITICAL: Respond with TEXT ONLY. Do NOT call any tools." (summary request with detailed instructions) + +7. Pending Tasks: + +- **E1 Feasibility re-run must complete**: Background agent a3e5ed934a0570ca6 is running the redesigned feasibility review (Python AST for T7/T13, stdin ruff for T9, command -v sg pre-check). Must score ≥ 4 on both `technical_feasibility` and `integration_risk`. +- **If E1 Feasibility passes**: Assemble final combined review JSON for both epics and validate via `.claude/scripts/dso validate-review-output.sh review-protocol --caller brainstorm` (caller schema hash: `f4e5f5a355e4c145`) +- **Emit review result events**: `.claude/scripts/dso emit-protocol-review-result.sh --review-type=brainstorm-fidelity --pass-fail= --revision-cycles=` for both epics +- **Update epic ticket 3e9b-afee**: Replace original single-epic spec with revised Epic 1 spec (or create two new tickets for the 2-epic split) +- **Update placeholder ticket 16df-b0a2**: Remains correct (user-awarded points placeholder), stays as-is +- **Present final revised specs for user approval**: Both epic specs with all scenario analysis sections, research findings, and all review-driven revisions +- **Record planning-intelligence log entry on approval** +- **Dispatch complexity evaluator and route to /dso:preplanning** + +8. Current Work: + +Immediately before the summary request, the session was waiting for the E1 Feasibility re-run to complete. The background agent (a3e5ed934a0570ca6) was launched with a redesigned spec that: +- Removes sg from T7 (nesting depth) — replaced with Python stdlib `ast.walk` +- Removes sg from T13 (clone detection) — Spike S1 must evaluate Python AST subtree hashing as primary; jscpd as fallback +- Corrects T9 ruff invocation to stdin approach: `git show : | ruff check --stdin-filename -` +- Corrects sg absence detection to use `command -v sg` pre-check instead of relying on exit code + +The background agent's output file was at 202,532 bytes when last checked. A Bash command was run to extract the dimensions from the output but it returned "Not complete yet or no JSON found" — the agent was still running (last visible content was about a jscpd GitHub search result). + +The review scorecard at the point of summary: + +**Epic 1:** +- Agent Clarity: 4/4 ✓ +- Scope (re-run): right_sized=4, no_overlap=5, dependency_aware=4 ✓ +- Value (re-run): user_impact=4, validation_signal=5 ✓ +- Technical Feasibility: **RE-RUNNING** (agent a3e5ed934a0570ca6) + +**Epic 2:** +- Agent Clarity (re-run): self_contained=4, success_measurable=4 ✓ +- Scope (re-run): right_sized=4, no_overlap=4, dependency_aware=5 ✓ +- Value (re-run×3): user_impact=4, validation_signal=4 ✓ + +9. Optional Next Step: + +The next step is to **wait for and retrieve the E1 Feasibility re-run result** from the background agent (a3e5ed934a0570ca6), check its output file for the `technical_feasibility` and `integration_risk` scores, and determine if they pass (≥ 4). + +Direct quote from the work in progress: the session was checking: `tail -c 8000 ".../tasks/a3e5ed934a0570ca6.output" | python3 -c "... look for dimensions block ..."` and got "Not complete yet or no JSON found." + +If the feasibility re-run passes (scores ≥ 4), the next steps are: +1. Assemble the combined review JSON for both epics +2. Run `.claude/scripts/dso validate-review-output.sh review-protocol --caller brainstorm` +3. Emit review result events for both epics +4. Present the final revised specs (Epic 1 and Epic 2) to the user for approval + +The key spec changes to incorporate into the final Epic 1 presentation (all reviewer-validated): +- T7: Python `ast.walk` for nesting depth (not sg) +- T13/S1: Python AST subtree hashing as primary; jscpd as fallback +- T9: stdin approach `git show : | ruff check --stdin-filename -` +- diff-to-sg-scope.sh: `command -v sg` pre-check +- SC16: Integration test (T9 synthetic commit → ledger entry assertion) +- Sprint scope rationale and soft coordination notes for 1083-fb3d and 3aaa-0238 + +If you need specific details from before compaction (like exact code snippets, error messages, or content you generated), read the full transcript at: /root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl +Continue the conversation from where it left off without asking the user any further questions. Resume directly — do not acknowledge the summary, do not recap what was happening, do not preface with "I'll continue" or similar. Pick up the last task as if the break never happened. + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:04:07 + +**[TOOL: Read]** +```json +{ + "file_path": "/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409/tasks/a3e5ed934a0570ca6.output", + "limit": 100, + "offset": 1 +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:04:07 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +File content (65325 tokens) exceeds maximum allowed tokens (10000). Use offset and limit parameters to read specific portions of the file, or search for specific content instead of reading the whole file. + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:04:13 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "tail -c 10000 \"/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409/tasks/a3e5ed934a0570ca6.output\" | python3 -c \"\nimport sys, re, json\n\ntext = sys.stdin.read()\n\n# Find JSON block\njson_match = re.search(r'\\{[\\s\\S]*\\\"reviews\\\"[\\s\\S]*\\}', text)\nif json_match:\n try:\n data = json.loads(json_match.group(0))\n for review in data.get('reviews', []):\n p = review.get('perspective', '')\n dims = review.get('dimensions', {})\n print(f'{p}: {dims}')\n except:\n pass\n\n# Also look for dimension patterns directly\nfor m in re.finditer(r'\\\"(technical_feasibility|integration_risk)\\\"\\s*:\\s*(\\d+)', text):\n print(f'{m.group(1)}: {m.group(2)}')\n \nprint('---last +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:04:14 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +---last 2000 chars--- +thub.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/13690)\n- [ruff check with file read from stdin does not use options from pyproject.toml when --stdin-filename argument is used · Issue #17405 · astral-sh/ruff](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/17405)\n- [The Ruff Linter | Ruff](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/linter/)\n- [ast — Abstract syntax trees | Python 3 docs](https://docs.python.org/3/library/ast.html)\n- [Controlled Walking of Nested AST Nodes - Python Help - Discussions on Python.org](https://discuss.python.org/t/controlled-walking-of-nested-ast-nodes/3513)\n- [Learn Python ASTs by building your own linter • DeepSource](https://deepsource.com/blog/python-asts-by-building-your-own-linter)\n- [jscpd - npm](https://www.npmjs.com/package/jscpd)\n- [GitHub - kucherenko/jscpd](https://github.com/kucherenko/jscpd)\n- [jscpd configuration in MegaLinter - MegaLinter by OX Security](https://megalinter.io/latest/descriptors/copypaste_jscpd/)\n- [Clone Detection Using Abstract Syntax Trees - Baxter et al.](https://leodemoura.github.io/files/ICSM98.pdf)\n- [Automate workflows with hooks - Claude Code Docs](https://code.claude.com/docs/en/hooks-guide)\n- [`ruff check --fix` to stdout when reading from stdin · Issue #20460 · astral-sh/ruff](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/20460)"}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1,"cache_creation_input_tokens":781,"cache_read_input_tokens":42507,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":781,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZsJ65HagaeBfrdLdKJ6h","type":"assistant","uuid":"35ceca7e-4b31-4a4a-b19b-291cfca9b2c5","timestamp":"2026-04-09T01:03:35.960Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"remote_mobile","cwd":"/home/user/digital-service-orchestra","sessionId":"db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409","version":"2.1.97","gitBranch":"claude/agent-kudos-system-xeTRD","slug":"giggly-jingling-parasol"} + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:04:18 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "wc -c \"/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409/tasks/a3e5ed934a0570ca6.output\"", + "description": "Check file size" +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:04:18 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +316500 /tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409/tasks/a3e5ed934a0570ca6.output + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:04:23 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 -c \"\nimport json, re\n\nwith open('/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409/tasks/a3e5ed934a0570ca6.output', 'r') as f:\n content = f.read()\n\n# Look for dimension scores in full content\nfor m in re.finditer(r'\\\"(technical_feasibility|integration_risk)\\\"\\s*:\\s*(\\d+|null)', content):\n # get some surrounding context\n start = max(0, m.start()-100)\n end = min(len(content), m.end()+100)\n print(f'Found: {m.group(1)}={m.group(2)}')\n print(f'Context: ...{content[start:end]}...')\n print('---')\n\"\n", + "description": "Search full agent output for feasibility dimension scores" +} +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:04:29 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 -c \"\nimport json, re\n\nwith open('/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409/tasks/a3e5ed934a0570ca6.output', 'r') as f:\n content = f.read()\n\n# Parse as JSONL to find the last assistant message\nlines = content.strip().split('\\n')\nprint(f'Total lines: {len(lines)}')\nlast_few = lines[-5:]\nfor i, line in enumerate(last_few):\n try:\n obj = json.loads(line)\n print(f'Line -{5-i}: type={obj.get(\\\"type\\\")}, role={obj.get(\\\"role\\\")}, hasContent={\\\"content\\\" in obj}')\n if 'content' in obj:\n c = obj['content']\n if isinstance(c, list):\n for item in c:\n if isinstance(item, dict) and item.get('type') == 'text':\n +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:04:30 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Total lines: 159 +Line -5: type=assistant, role=None, hasContent=False +Line -4: type=user, role=None, hasContent=False +Line -3: type=assistant, role=None, hasContent=False +Line -2: type=user, role=None, hasContent=False +Line -1: type=assistant, role=None, hasContent=False + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:04:35 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 -c \"\nimport json, re\n\nwith open('/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409/tasks/a3e5ed934a0570ca6.output', 'r') as f:\n content = f.read()\n\nlines = content.strip().split('\\n')\n\n# Look at all assistant messages, extract text content\nfor i, line in enumerate(lines):\n try:\n obj = json.loads(line)\n if obj.get('type') == 'assistant':\n raw_content = obj.get('rawContent', [])\n for item in raw_content:\n if isinstance(item, dict) and item.get('type') == 'text':\n text = item.get('text', '')\n if 'technical_feasibility' in text or 'integration_risk' in text or '\\\"status\\\"' in text:\n print(f'Li +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:04:46 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 -c \"\nimport json, re\n\nwith open('/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409/tasks/a3e5ed934a0570ca6.output', 'r') as f:\n content = f.read()\n\nlines = content.strip().split('\\n')\n\n# Look at structure of assistant messages\nfor i, line in enumerate(lines):\n try:\n obj = json.loads(line)\n keys = list(obj.keys())\n if 'rawContent' in keys or 'message' in keys:\n print(f'Line {i}: type={obj.get(\\\"type\\\")}, keys={keys}')\n if 'message' in obj:\n msg = obj['message']\n if isinstance(msg, dict):\n content_items = msg.get('content', [])\n for item in content_items:\n if isinstan +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:04:46 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Line 0: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 1: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] + Text: ...I'll research each integration signal systematically. Let me start by reading the REVIEW-SCHEMA.md and then performing web searches in parallel. +Line 2: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 3: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 4: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 5: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 6: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 7: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 8: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 9: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 10: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 11: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 12: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 13: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 14: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 15: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 16: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 17: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 18: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 19: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 20: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 21: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 22: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 23: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 24: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 25: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 26: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 27: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'toolUseResult', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 28: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 29: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 30: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 31: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 32: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'toolUseResult', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 33: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 34: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'toolUseResult', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 35: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 36: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 37: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 38: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 39: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 40: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 41: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 42: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'toolUseResult', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 43: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 44: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'toolUseResult', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 45: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 46: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 47: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 48: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 49: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 50: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'toolUseResult', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 51: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 52: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'toolUseResult', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 53: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 54: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 55: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 56: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'toolUseResult', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 57: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 58: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 59: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 60: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 61: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 62: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 63: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 64: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 65: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] + Text: ...Now let me check the existing project for any use of sg or related patterns, and check the pre-edit-write-functions.sh for Signal 5 verification. +Line 66: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 67: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 68: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 69: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 70: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 71: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 72: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 73: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 74: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 75: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 76: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 77: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 78: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] + Text: ...I now have sufficient evidence from all searches. Let me also verify one more detail about ruff's stdin behavior and the `--stdin-filename` absolute path workaround. +Line 79: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 80: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 81: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 82: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 83: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 84: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 85: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 86: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 87: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 88: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 89: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 90: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 91: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 92: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 93: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 94: type=user, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'promptId', 'agentId', 'type', 'message', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'sourceToolAssistantUUID', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 95: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] +Line 96: type=assistant, keys=['parentUuid', 'isSidechain', 'agentId', 'message', 'requestId', 'type', 'uuid', 'timestamp', 'userType', 'entrypoint', 'cwd', 'sessionId', 'version', 'gitBranch', 'slug'] + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:04:53 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 -c \"\nimport json, re\n\nwith open('/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409/tasks/a3e5ed934a0570ca6.output', 'r') as f:\n content = f.read()\n\nlines = content.strip().split('\\n')\n\n# Extract all text from last 30 assistant messages\nassistant_texts = []\nfor i, line in enumerate(lines):\n try:\n obj = json.loads(line)\n if obj.get('type') == 'assistant':\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n if isinstance(msg, dict):\n for item in msg.get('content', []):\n if isinstance(item, dict) and item.get('type') == 'text':\n text = item.get('text', '')\n if text:\n assistant_texts.ap +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:04:54 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Total assistant text messages: 11 + +=== Line 86 (text msg 6) === +I'll research all 5 signals in parallel, then synthesize findings. + +=== Line 95 (text msg 7) === +Good initial results. Now let me dig deeper into the specifics I need to verify. + +=== Line 126 (text msg 8) === +I now have comprehensive research data to produce the full analysis. Let me synthesize the findings. + +--- + +```json +{ + "subject": "Epic: Kudos system: infrastructure and primary triggers (revised) — sg, Python ast, ruff feasibility", + "reviews": [ + { + "perspective": "Technical Feasibility", + "status": "reviewed", + "dimensions": { + "technical_feasibility": 4, + "integration_risk": 3 + }, + "findings": [ + { + "dimension": "integration_risk", + "severity": "major", + "description": "ruff --stdin-filename with stdin input has a known open bug (issue #17405, open as of April 2025) where pyproject.toml rules are not applied when the supplied --stdin-filename is a relative path. The root cause is that ruff resolves config by walking ancestors of the literal string passed to --stdin-filename, not of the CWD. The epic's staged-file pattern `git show \":$f\" | ruff check --stdin-filename \"$f\" -` uses a relative path (e.g. `src/foo.py`), which will trigger this bug if the script is run from the repo root and pyproject.toml is at a different ancestor level than the relative path implies. Lint rules customized in pyproject.toml (per-file ignores, enabled rule sets, etc.) will silently not apply, producing false negatives for T9.", + "suggestion": "Use an absolute --stdin-filename path: replace `--stdin-filename \"$f\"` with `--stdin-filename \"$(pwd)/$f\"` (or `--stdin-filename \"$(realpath \"$f\")\"`). This triggers the confirmed maintainer workaround (making the path absolute forces correct ancestor traversal for config discovery). Add a regression test that verifies a pyproject.toml-scoped rule fires when linting staged content via stdin. Document the workaround in the script." + }, + { + "dimension": "integration_risk", + "severity": "minor", + "description": "jscpd (T13 fallback candidate) outputs its JSON report as a file (`jscpd-report.json`) written to a configurable --output directory, not to stdout. The epic spec implies parsing JSON output inline in a shell pipeline, but that requires reading the file after execution rather than piping. Additionally, jscpd requires Node.js at runtime and is a cross-file/directory tool; invoking it on a small set of per-diff files is supported (files can be passed as positional args) but the minimum-token threshold and language detection behaviour on very small diffs are undocumented edge cases.", + "suggestion": "Spike S1 should confirm: (1) jscpd writes report to --output dir, so the script must `cat $OUTPUT_DIR/jscpd-report.json`; (2) verify Node.js availability assumption is explicitly declared in the epic's dependency list; (3) benchmark false-negative rate at `--min-tokens 50` on small changesets typical of this repo. If spike reveals reliability issues, default to Python AST subtree hashing as the primary path." + }, + { + "dimension": "technical_feasibility", + + +=== Line 149 (text msg 9) === +I now have enough information to synthesize a comprehensive assessment. Let me also check the local project for Signal 5 confirmation. + +=== Line 158 (text msg 10) === +I now have everything I need. Let me compile the full assessment. + +--- + +```json +{ + "subject": "Epic: Kudos system: infrastructure and primary triggers (revised) — sg, Python ast, ruff feasibility", + "reviews": [ + { + "perspective": "Technical Feasibility", + "status": "reviewed", + "dimensions": { + "technical_feasibility": 4, + "integration_risk": 3 + }, + "findings": [ + { + "dimension": "technical_feasibility", + "severity": "minor", + "description": "ruff check stdin mode works but has a known configuration-discovery bug (issue #17405): when --stdin-filename is a relative path, ruff searches config in ancestors of that filename rather than the CWD, causing pyproject.toml rules to be silently ignored. The epic's pattern `git show \":$f\" | ruff check --stdin-filename \"$f\" -` uses a relative path, triggering this bug if pyproject.toml-configured rules (e.g., custom select/ignore lists) are required for the T9 score.", + "suggestion": "Make the stdin-filename argument absolute: replace `--stdin-filename \"$f\"` with `--stdin-filename \"$(pwd)/$f\"`. This forces ruff to anchor config search at the repo root, matching behavior of direct-file invocation." + }, + { + "dimension": "technical_feasibility", + "severity": "minor", + "description": "sg JSON stream output schema confirmed (fields: file, text, lines, range.start, range.end, range.byteOffset, metaVariables, language). However, there are no GitHub script examples of the exact form `sg run --pattern '

' --json=stream ` in shell automation. The single-file positional argument form is confirmed by documentation (file/directory as trailing positional arg), but the combination with --json=stream is only documented, not demonstrated in real shell scripts.", + "suggestion": "During spike S0, emit a test invocation `sg run --pattern 'TODO' --json=stream src/main.py` and validate that (a) exit code is 0 for no matches and 1 for matches, and (b) each NDJSON line parses correctly. Confirm the exit-code contract before using it as a count signal." + }, + { + "dimension": "technical_feasibility", + "severity": "minor", + "description": "Python ast subtree-hashing for T13 clone detection (primary candidate) has sound academic and stdlib foundations — `ast.dump()` + `hashlib.sha256()` is the standard subtree fingerprinting approach (Baxter et al. 1998). However, there are no off-the-shelf Python stdlib implementations; this requires bespoke code. The approach is also sensitive to variable renaming (Type-2 clones) and non-Python files are not covered.", + "suggestion": "Scope the spike S1 explicitly to: (1) implement a 30-line prototype, (2) measure false-positive rate on existing codebase, (3) confirm minimum clone size threshold. jscpd fallback is viable if false-positive rate is unacceptable — its CLI flags (--min-tokens, --reporters + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:05:02 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 -c \"\nimport json, re\n\nwith open('/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409/tasks/a3e5ed934a0570ca6.output', 'r') as f:\n content = f.read()\n\nlines = content.strip().split('\\n')\n\n# Get the very last assistant text message\nassistant_texts = []\nfor i, line in enumerate(lines):\n try:\n obj = json.loads(line)\n if obj.get('type') == 'assistant':\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n if isinstance(msg, dict):\n for item in msg.get('content', []):\n if isinstance(item, dict) and item.get('type') == 'text':\n text = item.get('text', '')\n if text:\n assistant_texts.append((i, +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:05:02 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Line 158: +I now have everything I need. Let me compile the full assessment. + +--- + +```json +{ + "subject": "Epic: Kudos system: infrastructure and primary triggers (revised) — sg, Python ast, ruff feasibility", + "reviews": [ + { + "perspective": "Technical Feasibility", + "status": "reviewed", + "dimensions": { + "technical_feasibility": 4, + "integration_risk": 3 + }, + "findings": [ + { + "dimension": "technical_feasibility", + "severity": "minor", + "description": "ruff check stdin mode works but has a known configuration-discovery bug (issue #17405): when --stdin-filename is a relative path, ruff searches config in ancestors of that filename rather than the CWD, causing pyproject.toml rules to be silently ignored. The epic's pattern `git show \":$f\" | ruff check --stdin-filename \"$f\" -` uses a relative path, triggering this bug if pyproject.toml-configured rules (e.g., custom select/ignore lists) are required for the T9 score.", + "suggestion": "Make the stdin-filename argument absolute: replace `--stdin-filename \"$f\"` with `--stdin-filename \"$(pwd)/$f\"`. This forces ruff to anchor config search at the repo root, matching behavior of direct-file invocation." + }, + { + "dimension": "technical_feasibility", + "severity": "minor", + "description": "sg JSON stream output schema confirmed (fields: file, text, lines, range.start, range.end, range.byteOffset, metaVariables, language). However, there are no GitHub script examples of the exact form `sg run --pattern '

' --json=stream ` in shell automation. The single-file positional argument form is confirmed by documentation (file/directory as trailing positional arg), but the combination with --json=stream is only documented, not demonstrated in real shell scripts.", + "suggestion": "During spike S0, emit a test invocation `sg run --pattern 'TODO' --json=stream src/main.py` and validate that (a) exit code is 0 for no matches and 1 for matches, and (b) each NDJSON line parses correctly. Confirm the exit-code contract before using it as a count signal." + }, + { + "dimension": "technical_feasibility", + "severity": "minor", + "description": "Python ast subtree-hashing for T13 clone detection (primary candidate) has sound academic and stdlib foundations — `ast.dump()` + `hashlib.sha256()` is the standard subtree fingerprinting approach (Baxter et al. 1998). However, there are no off-the-shelf Python stdlib implementations; this requires bespoke code. The approach is also sensitive to variable renaming (Type-2 clones) and non-Python files are not covered.", + "suggestion": "Scope the spike S1 explicitly to: (1) implement a 30-line prototype, (2) measure false-positive rate on existing codebase, (3) confirm minimum clone size threshold. jscpd fallback is viable if false-positive rate is unacceptable — its CLI flags (--min-tokens, --reporters json, --output) are confirmed documented." + }, + { + "dimension": "integration_risk", + "severity": "minor", + "description": "jscpd (fallback for T13) writes its report to a file in --output directory (default ./report/jscpd-report.json), not to stdout. Scripts that expect stdout capture via command substitution will silently receive nothing. Additionally, jscpd is a Node.js tool — it adds a runtime dependency (Node/npm) that may not be present in the CI environment.", + "suggestion": "If jscpd is selected as fallback, the shell script must: (1) write to a temp directory (`--output $(mktemp -d)`), (2) read the JSON file after invocation, and (3) clean up. Guard with `command -v jscpd` pre-check analogous to the sg guard. Verify Node.js availability in CI." + }, + { + "dimension": "integration_risk", + "severity": "minor", + "description": "Python ast.NodeVisitor nesting-depth tracking (T7) is well-supported by stdlib, but `ast.walk()` is unordered and does not natively track depth; NodeVisitor with manual depth counter is the correct approach. The spec's description of using `ast.walk()` for depth is slightly imprecise — walk alone cannot count nesting depth without parent tracking. The implementation is straightforward but must use NodeVisitor, not ast.walk directly.", + "suggestion": "Clarify in the task spec: use `ast.NodeVisitor` with a depth counter (increment in `visit_If`/`visit_For`/`visit_While`/`visit_With`/`visit_Try`, decrement after `generic_visit`). Do not use bare `ast.walk()` for depth computation. A 20-line reference implementation should be written and tested during spike." + } + ] + } + ], + "conflicts": [] +} +``` + +--- + +## Technical Feasibility — Signal Classification + +### Signal 1: sg (ast-grep) — VERIFIED + +**Evidence:** +- Official documentation at `ast-grep.github.io/guide/tools/json.html` and `ast-grep.github.io/reference/cli/run.html` confirms: + - `sg run --pattern '' ` — file/directory as trailing positional arg is valid + - `--json=stream` produces NDJSON, one match object per line + - Match object fields confirmed: `file`, `text`, `lines`, `range` (with `start`/`end`/`byteOffset`), `metaVariables`, `language` +- `command -v sg` pre-check approach is correct; the skip-on-missing contract (exit 2) follows the same pattern as other hooks in this repo +- No working shell-script GitHub examples found combining all three flags simultaneously, but each individual capability is independently documented + +**Classification: Verified** (documentation-confirmed; no contradictory evidence; minor gap is absence of combined real-world script examples) + +--- + +### Signal 2: Python `ast` module — nesting depth for T7 — VERIFIED (with precision gap) + +**Evidence:** +- Python 3 stdlib `ast` module is mature and stable; `ast.parse()` + node traversal is standard +- `ast.NodeVisitor` with `visit_If`, `visit_For`, `visit_While`, `visit_With`, `visit_Try` methods and a depth counter is the confirmed pattern for nesting-depth tracking +- The spec's description of using `ast.walk()` for depth is technically imprecise: `ast.walk()` yields nodes in unspecified (approximately BFS) order without parent tracking; it cannot determine depth without additional bookkeeping. `NodeVisitor` is the correct primitive. +- Python is already a project dependency — zero new runtime dependency + +**Classification: Verified** (approach is sound; implementation note: must use `NodeVisitor`, not raw `ast.walk()`) + +--- + +### Signal 3: Python `ast` subtree hashing + jscpd fallback for T13 — PARTIALLY VERIFIED + +**Evidence — Primary (Python ast + hashlib):** +- `ast.dump(node)` + `hashlib.sha256(...encode())` for subtree fingerprinting is the established academic approach (Baxter et al. 1998), implemented in multiple research tools +- No ready-made stdlib-only Python implementation exists; bespoke code is required (~30–50 lines) +- Detects Type-1 (exact) clones; Type-2 (variable-renamed) clones require normalization of identifiers in `ast.dump()` output (possible but adds complexity) +- ActiveState has a published Python clone detector recipe using this approach, confirming practical viability + +**Evidence — Fallback (jscpd):** +- `--min-tokens` flag confirmed documented (default 50) +- `--reporters json` confirmed, writes `jscpd-report.json` to `--output` directory (NOT stdout) +- Actively maintained (version 4.0.8 as of 2026); cross-language capable +- Risk: Node.js runtime dependency; output-to-file (not stdout) requires adjusted shell integration + +**Classification: Partially Verified** (primary candidate lacks an existing reference implementation but approach is sound; fallback confirmed but introduces a new runtime dependency and file-output pattern) + +--- + +### Signal 4: ruff stdin checking for T9 — VERIFIED (with known bug requiring workaround) + +**Evidence:** +- `ruff check --stdin-filename -` is confirmed working; syntax validated by the Helix editor integration (`ruff check --stdin-filename ${INPUT} --output-format concise --quiet -`) and by ruff issue #17405 reproduction steps +- The git-staged-blob pattern (`git show ":$f" | ruff check --stdin-filename "$f" -`) is technically sound +- **Known bug (ruff #17405):** when `--stdin-filename` is a relative path, ruff fails to find `pyproject.toml` configuration (searches ancestors of the filename, not CWD). This silently drops project-configured rules (select/ignore/extend-select). +- Workaround: use absolute path for `--stdin-filename` (e.g., `"$(pwd)/$f"`) +- `ruff check --fix` stdout limitation does not apply here (the epic only uses check, not fix) + +**Classification: Verified** (feature works; one known bug has a clear, documented workaround) + +--- + +### Signal 5: PreToolUse hook for `.kudos/**` path blocking — VERIFIED (in-repo evidence) + +**Evidence:** +- This project already implements the exact pattern in `plugins/dso/hooks/lib/pre-edit-write-functions.sh`: + - `FILE_PATH=$(parse_json_field "$INPUT" '.tool_input.file_path')` — confirmed field extraction + - Path-match checks against `.tickets-tracker/`, agent file patterns — same string-matching approach + - `return 2` to block — confirmed hook contract +- External documentation confirms: exit code 2 blocks PreToolUse; `tool_input.file_path` is the correct field name for Edit/Write tools +- The jq-free `parse_json_field` pattern is already mandated by this project's hook architecture + +**Classification: Verified** (direct in-repo precedent; no new pattern required) + +--- + +## Scoring Rationale + +**technical_feasibility: 4** — All five signals are at minimum partially verified. Four are fully verified with official documentation or in-repo precedent. Signal 3's primary candidate (Python ast hashing) is theoretically sound and academically established but requires bespoke implementation without an existing reference. No signal is contradicted. + +**integration_risk: 3** — Moderate risk due to three actionable issues: (1) the ruff pyproject.toml config-discovery bug requires a specific workaround in the shell script; (2) the Python ast nesting-depth implementation requires `NodeVisitor`, not `ast.walk()` as loosely implied by the spec; (3) jscpd (if selected as T13 fallback) outputs to a file rather than stdout, requiring adjusted shell integration and a Node.js runtime dependency check. All three are solvable but require intentional implementation choices, justifying a spike recommendation for T13 specifically. + +Sources: +- [JSON Mode | ast-grep](https://ast-grep.github.io/guide/tools/json.html) +- [ast-grep run | ast-grep](https://ast-grep.github.io/reference/cli/run.html) +- [Command Line Reference | ast-grep](https://ast-grep.github.io/reference/cli.html) +- [GitHub - ast-grep/ast-grep](https://github.com/ast-grep/ast-grep) +- [Execute ruff only on staged changes · astral-sh/ruff · Discussion #4049](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/4049) +- [Using `ruff` in pipes (formatting stdin and writing to stdout)? · astral-sh/ruff · Discussion #13690](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/13690) +- [ruff check with file read from stdin does not use options from pyproject.toml when --stdin-filename argument is used · Issue #17405 · astral-sh/ruff](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/17405) +- [The Ruff Linter | Ruff](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/linter/) +- [ast — Abstract syntax trees | Python 3 docs](https://docs.python.org/3/library/ast.html) +- [Controlled Walking of Nested AST Nodes - Python Help - Discussions on Python.org](https://discuss.python.org/t/controlled-walking-of-nested-ast-nodes/3513) +- [Learn Python ASTs by building your own linter • DeepSource](https://deepsource.com/blog/python-asts-by-building-your-own-linter) +- [jscpd - npm](https://www.npmjs.com/package/jscpd) +- [GitHub - kucherenko/jscpd](https://github.com/kucherenko/jscpd) +- [jscpd configuration in MegaLinter - MegaLinter by OX Security](https://megalinter.io/latest/descriptors/copypaste_jscpd/) +- [Clone Detection Using Abstract Syntax Trees - Baxter et al.](https://leodemoura.github.io/files/ICSM98.pdf) +- [Automate workflows with hooks - Claude Code Docs](https://code.claude.com/docs/en/hooks-guide) +- [`ruff check --fix` to stdout when reading from stdin · Issue #20460 · astral-sh/ruff](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/20460) + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:05:47 + +The feasibility reviewer returned `technical_feasibility: 4, integration_risk: 3`. Three fixable issues: +1. ruff `--stdin-filename "$f"` uses relative path → triggers bug #17405; fix: `"$(pwd)/$f"` +2. T7 says `ast.walk` for depth but depth requires `ast.NodeVisitor` with counter +3. jscpd outputs to file, not stdout (Spike S1 needs to account for this) + +Let me retrieve the last Epic 1 spec that was submitted to the feasibility reviewer so I can apply the fixes: + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:05:52 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 -c \"\nimport json, re\n\nwith open('/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409/tasks/a3e5ed934a0570ca6.output', 'r') as f:\n content = f.read()\n\nlines = content.strip().split('\\n')\n\n# Find the initial prompt message (user message at line 0)\nfor i, line in enumerate(lines[:5]):\n try:\n obj = json.loads(line)\n if obj.get('type') == 'user':\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n if isinstance(msg, dict):\n for item in msg.get('content', []):\n if isinstance(item, dict) and item.get('type') == 'text':\n text = item.get('text', '')\n print(f'--- Line {i} prompt text (first 5000 chars) ---')\n +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:05:58 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nwith open('/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409/tasks/a3e5ed934a0570ca6.output', 'r') as f:\n content = f.read()\n\nlines = content.strip().split('\\n')\n\n# Parse all messages\nfor i, line in enumerate(lines[:3]):\n try:\n obj = json.loads(line)\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n if isinstance(msg, dict):\n content_list = msg.get('content', [])\n print(f\"Line {i}, type={obj.get('type')}, content items={len(content_list)}\")\n for j, item in enumerate(content_list):\n if isinstance(item, dict):\n print(f\" item {j}: type={item.get('type')}, keys={list(item.keys())}\")\n if item. +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:05:58 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Line 0, type=user, content items=5973 +Line 1, type=assistant, content items=1 + item 0: type=text, keys=['type', 'text'] + text (first 500): I'll research each integration signal systematically. Let me start by reading the REVIEW-SCHEMA.md and then performing web searches in parallel. +Line 2, type=assistant, content items=1 + item 0: type=tool_use, keys=['type', 'id', 'name', 'input', 'caller'] + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:06:04 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nwith open('/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409/tasks/a3e5ed934a0570ca6.output', 'r') as f:\n content = f.read()\n\nlines = content.strip().split('\\n')\n\n# Parse the initial user message - look at first few items\nobj = json.loads(lines[0])\nmsg = obj.get('message', {})\ncontent_list = msg.get('content', [])\nprint(f\"Total items: {len(content_list)}\")\n\n# Find text items\ntext_items = [item for item in content_list if isinstance(item, dict) and item.get('type') == 'text']\nprint(f\"Text items: {len(text_items)}\")\nif text_items:\n # Print the first text item (should be the prompt)\n print(\"First text item (first 10000 chars):\")\n print(text_items[0].get('text', '')[:100 +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:06:10 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nwith open('/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409/tasks/a3e5ed934a0570ca6.output', 'r') as f:\n content = f.read()\n\nlines = content.strip().split('\\n')\n\n# Check what types of items are in the initial user message\nobj = json.loads(lines[0])\nmsg = obj.get('message', {})\ncontent_list = msg.get('content', [])\n# Sample first 5 items\nfor i, item in enumerate(content_list[:5]):\n if isinstance(item, dict):\n print(f\"Item {i}: type={item.get('type')}, keys={list(item.keys())}\")\n # If it's a tool_result, check what's inside\n if item.get('type') == 'tool_result':\n inner = item.get('content', [])\n print(f\" Inner items: {len(inner)}\")\n +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:06:24 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json, re\n\n# Check session JSONL for the epic spec\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'r') as f:\n lines = f.readlines()\n\nprint(f\"Total lines: {len(lines)}\")\n\n# Find messages that mention 'kudos system: infrastructure' or T7/T9/feasibility\nmatches = []\nfor i, line in enumerate(lines[-200:]): # last 200 lines\n try:\n obj = json.loads(line)\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n if isinstance(msg, dict):\n content = msg.get('content', '')\n if isinstance(content, str):\n if 'ast.NodeVisitor' in content or 'ast.walk' in content or 'stdin-filename' in content:\n +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:06:25 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Total lines: 345 +Found 3 matches +Line 291: The background feasibility reviewer completed. Critical findings — sg (ast-grep) is **contradicted** for T7 (nesting depth) and T13 (clone detection), and ruff staged-file checking doesn't work as spe +Line 302: This session is being continued from a previous conversation that ran out of context. The summary below covers the earlier portion of the conversation. + +Summary: +1. Primary Request and Intent: + +The se +Line 333: The feasibility reviewer returned `technical_feasibility: 4, integration_risk: 3`. Three fixable issues: +1. ruff `--stdin-filename "$f"` uses relative path → triggers bug #17405; fix: `"$(pwd)/$f"` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:06:31 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json, re\n\n# Check session JSONL for the epic spec - look in ALL lines\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'r') as f:\n lines = f.readlines()\n\n# Find messages that mention success criteria / epic spec for kudos\nfor i, line in enumerate(lines):\n try:\n obj = json.loads(line)\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n if isinstance(msg, dict):\n content = msg.get('content', '')\n if isinstance(content, str):\n if 'SC-E1' in content or ('kudos' in content.lower() and 'success criteria' in content.lower()):\n print(f\"Line {i} (str content): {content[:500]}\")\n +``` + +--- + +## [PRIOR SESSION SUMMARY] — 2026-04-09T01:06:32 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Line 166 (str content): This session is being continued from a previous conversation that ran out of context. The summary below covers the earlier portion of the conversation. + +Summary: +1. Primary Request and Intent: +The user invoked the DSO brainstorm skill to design an "Agent Kudos System" — a positive motivation system for AI coding agents that replaces restriction-based constraints with process-based rewards. The session resumed from a compacted prior conversation and has been working through Phase 2 (spec design) + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:06:38 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "ls -la /root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/ | head -20", + "description": "List project session files" +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:06:39 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +total 12220 +drwx------ 9 root root 4096 Apr 9 00:33 . +drwx------ 3 root root 4096 Apr 7 10:26 .. +-rw------- 1 root root 716057 Apr 8 08:58 006e1682-4a8a-4ce8-b915-a78ae893f43a.jsonl +drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Apr 8 15:04 09096aba-267c-4b30-a50b-18c193a40f9c +-rw------- 1 root root 266141 Apr 8 15:10 09096aba-267c-4b30-a50b-18c193a40f9c.jsonl +-rw------- 1 root root 573060 Apr 8 04:39 098b93fd-837a-4e44-b416-4259e961caa9.jsonl +drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Apr 7 10:26 17f15f78-f845-4336-9b27-73291f6fc05a +-rw------- 1 root root 217086 Apr 7 10:31 17f15f78-f845-4336-9b27-73291f6fc05a.jsonl +drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Apr 8 16:31 1f5c38d2-a2c9-43f2-bd56-b0512d2f12b2 +-rw------- 1 root root 1043087 Apr 8 16:43 1f5c38d2-a2c9-43f2-bd56-b0512d2f12b2.jsonl +-rw------- 1 root root 685916 Apr 8 06:42 37d15585-bd75-406d-bcd9-0c6f7b48b7b1.jsonl +-rw------- 1 root root 638202 Apr 8 05:44 3ffcd5a9-1a98-4bb9-9c17-1686a17b613c.jsonl +-rw------- 1 root root 1208000 Apr 8 09:46 aa41a614-af8f-4e30-b89e-3a66860c1eeb.jsonl +-rw------- 1 root root 824856 Apr 8 09:22 b60ce614-d78d-4541-a5d6-d5283263b8c9.jsonl +-rw------- 1 root root 549170 Apr 7 14:15 b845e16f-cbf1-474d-9719-d05a6eb487bb.jsonl +-rw------- 1 root root 331843 Apr 8 15:30 cb223b5d-bca5-4d00-ae91-0db9a98e6f95.jsonl +drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Apr 9 00:33 db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409 +-rw------- 1 root root 2528442 Apr 9 01:06 db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl +drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Apr 7 10:33 e491815a-cf7d-445e-97c9-45cdce6df1f9 + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:06:43 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "wc -l /root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl", + "description": "Count lines in session JSONL file" +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:06:43 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +353 /root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:06:48 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'r') as f:\n lines = f.readlines()\n\n# Find messages with \"Epic\" spec content - look for large messages\nfor i, line in enumerate(lines):\n try:\n obj = json.loads(line)\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n if isinstance(msg, dict):\n content = msg.get('content', '')\n if isinstance(content, str) and len(content) > 2000:\n if 'kudos' in content.lower() or 'T7' in content or 'T9' in content:\n print(f\"Line {i} (type={obj.get('type')}, len={len(content)}): {content[:1000]}\")\n print(\"---\")\n except: +``` + +--- + +## [PRIOR SESSION SUMMARY] — 2026-04-09T01:06:49 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Line 1 (type=user, len=17911): This session is being continued from a previous conversation that ran out of context. The summary below covers the earlier portion of the conversation. + +Summary: +1. Primary Request and Intent: +The user invoked the DSO brainstorm skill to design a positive motivation system ("Agent Kudos System") for AI coding agents. Core intent: +- Replace restriction-based constraints with process-based rewards that shift agent motivation from gate-evasion to quality-seeking +- Award kudos points for structurally-verifiable quality behaviors +- Make agents aware via CLAUDE.md and the `using-lockpick` skill prominently +- OUT OF SCOPE: reward delivery (more interesting problems, seniority, additional tokens) +- IN SCOPE: the point-tracking system, trigger detection, Goodhart's Law resistance, agent awareness + +The user progressively refined the design through: four parallel research rounds, a red team gaming analysis, detailed trigger design discussions (CI snapshot anchoring, commit-message keyword trigger +--- +Line 22 (type=user, len=11130): +ac487c9032a3ad656 +toolu_01GcVxHeYyT7ut8JiZNKe8GH +/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/09096aba-267c-4b30-a50b-18c193a40f9c/tasks/ac487c9032a3ad656.output +completed +

Agent "Research rank/tier naming systems that motivate without priming" completed +Perfect. I now have enough research to provide you with well-grounded recommendations. Let me compile my findings: + +--- + +## Research Summary: Tier Naming Systems That Avoid Stereotype Threat + +Based on research in stereotype threat, gamification, martial arts progression systems, and software craftsmanship, here are **five candidate tier naming systems** that maintain motivation while avoiding label priming effects: + +### **1. Martial Arts Belt System (Color-Based)** +**Tiers:** White → Yellow → Orange → Green → Blue → Purple → Brown → Black + +**Rationale:** +- **Research backing:** Historical belt sy +--- +Line 109 (type=user, len=28342): +a26687eed1c7acddb +toolu_01Cq5SYUknDCBp2GN6pBGZjJ +/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/1f5c38d2-a2c9-43f2-bd56-b0512d2f12b2/tasks/a26687eed1c7acddb.output +completed +Agent "Red team scenario analysis for kudos system epic" completed +The kudos system does not yet exist in the codebase — this is an epic spec analysis for a proposed feature. I have enough context about the existing infrastructure (review events JSONL, `.tickets-tracker/`, artifacts dir, PreToolUse hooks, commit workflow, worktree isolation, dedup by `diff_hash`, JSONL ledger writes via `_flock_stage_commit`) to produce a rigorous red-team analysis. Let me now compile the scenarios. + +```json +[ + { + "id": "RT-001", + "category": "runtime", + "title": "Concurrent kudos writes from parallel worktree agents produce duplicate ledger entries", + "description": "When `/dso:s +--- +Line 146 (type=user, len=11973): +a51d43cf4ddca3e2c +toolu_01Y395Y66baEAKHR68ErFVZq +/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/1f5c38d2-a2c9-43f2-bd56-b0512d2f12b2/tasks/a51d43cf4ddca3e2c.output +completed +Agent "Technical feasibility fidelity review" completed +I now have comprehensive evidence. Let me compile the full assessment. + +--- + +## Assessment + +Here is the technical feasibility review JSON followed by the detailed signal analysis. + +```json +{ + "subject": "Epic: Agent Kudos System: Process-reward tracking for quality-seeking behaviors", + "reviews": [ + { + "perspective": "Technical Feasibility", + "status": "reviewed", + "dimensions": { + "technical_feasibility": 3, + "integration_risk": 3 + }, + "findings": [ + { + "signal": "sg — detecting ≥3 AST-identical code blocks (Trigger 4)", + "classification": "Partially ve +--- +Line 166 (type=user, len=21986): This session is being continued from a previous conversation that ran out of context. The summary below covers the earlier portion of the conversation. + +Summary: +1. Primary Request and Intent: +The user invoked the DSO brainstorm skill to design an "Agent Kudos System" — a positive motivation system for AI coding agents that replaces restriction-based constraints with process-based rewards. The session resumed from a compacted prior conversation and has been working through Phase 2 (spec design) and Phase 3 (ticket integration) of the brainstorm skill. Key intents: +- Design 14 structurally-verifiable quality triggers with mechanical verification +- Build Goodhart's Law resistance through session-scope anti-gaming invariant, deduplication, diminishing returns, and categorical prohibition block +- Award points only at orchestrator/session level (sub-agents receive framing only, no point accumulation — Option 3) +- Run the full epic scrutiny pipeline (gap analysis → web research → scenario an +--- +Line 302 (type=user, len=18495): This session is being continued from a previous conversation that ran out of context. The summary below covers the earlier portion of the conversation. + +Summary: +1. Primary Request and Intent: + +The session resumed from a prior context-compacted conversation. The user's request was: **"re-run the scrutiny pipeline on each option A epic independently."** + +The two Option A epics (designed in the prior session) are: +- **Epic 1**: "Kudos system: infrastructure and primary triggers" (10 triggers: T3, T5, T6, T7, T9, T11, T12, T13, T14, T15 + full infrastructure) +- **Epic 2**: "Kudos system: detection triggers and agent behavioral improvements" (3 snapshot-dependent triggers: T1, T2, T4 + 4 sub-agent SKILL.md updates) + +The scrutiny pipeline (`plugins/dso/skills/shared/workflows/epic-scrutiny-pipeline.md`) has 4 steps: Gap Analysis → Web Research → Scenario Analysis (red + blue teams) → Fidelity Review (4 reviewers). All must pass before ticket creation. The session goal was to run the full pi +--- + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:06:57 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'r') as f:\n lines = f.readlines()\n\n# Find the assistant message that contains the epic 1 spec that was revised\nfor i, line in enumerate(lines):\n try:\n obj = json.loads(line)\n if obj.get('type') != 'assistant':\n continue\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n if isinstance(msg, dict):\n content = msg.get('content', [])\n if isinstance(content, list):\n for item in content:\n if isinstance(item, dict) and item.get('type') == 'text':\n text = item.get('text', '')\n +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:06:58 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Line 155: len=4000 +The key constraint: **anti-gaming infrastructure must be present before any triggers are live.** You can't ship triggers without the session ceiling, deduplication, session-scope check, and hook enforcement — that window would be exploitable. So those four always travel with the first epic. + +The natural cut points are the **data source boundaries**. Triggers group cleanly by what infrastructure they depend on: + +| Trigger group | Data source | New dependency | +|---------------|------------|----------------| +| T3, T9, T14, T15 | `.review-events/` JSONL + reviewer-findings.json | None (existing infrastructure) | +| T6, T12 | `git diff` + grep | None | +| T5, T7, T11, T13 | `git diff` + `sg` (graceful fallback to grep) | `diff-to-sg-scope.sh` wrapper | +| T4 | `git diff` + `sg` aggregation (no fallback) | `diff-to-sg-scope.sh` + spike tasks | +| T1, T2 | CI snapshot comparison | `kudos-snapshot.sh` | + +Using those boundaries, two clean splits: + +--- + +### Option A — 2 epics + +**Epic 1 — "Kudos system: infrastructure and primary triggers"** +- Full anti-gaming stack: ledger, formula, hook, session ceiling, dedup, session-scope identity +- `commit-validate.sh` + `COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md` integration + Contributor rank display +- `diff-to-sg-scope.sh` wrapper + spike tasks S1/S2 +- **Triggers: 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15** (10 of 14 — everything except CI snapshot and complex sg aggregation) +- CLAUDE.md awareness + prohibition block + +*Benefit: System is live and paying for quality. Leaves it stable — anti-gaming fully operational, 10 triggers active.* + +**Epic 2 — "Kudos system: detection triggers and agent behavioral improvements"** +- `kudos-snapshot.sh` (CI snapshot at worktree creation) +- **Triggers: 1, 2, 4** (require snapshot or sg count-threshold aggregation) +- `using-lockpick/SKILL.md` awareness section +- `completion-verifier.md`, `approach-decision-maker.md`, `doc-writer.md` updates + +*Benefit: Completes the trigger set; upgrades three sub-agent behavioral contracts. Stable — no new exploitable surface.* + +*Exploitable gap between epics?* None. Anti-gaming is fully operational in Epic 1. Triggers 1/2/4 simply don't exist yet — can't be gamed. + +--- + +### Option B — 3 epics + +**Epic 1 — "Kudos system: infrastructure and log-based triggers"** +- Full anti-gaming stack (same as Option A) +- `commit-validate.sh` + `COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md` + rank display +- **Triggers: 3, 9, 14, 15** (pure log-infrastructure triggers, no new scripts) +- CLAUDE.md awareness + prohibition block + +*Benefit: System online immediately, agents earning points for persistence and proactive quality. Zero new infrastructure dependencies.* + +**Epic 2 — "Kudos system: structural code quality triggers"** +- `diff-to-sg-scope.sh` wrapper + spike tasks S1/S2 +- **Triggers: 5, 6, 7, 11, 12, 13** (code quality canon — sg-dependent or grep-based) +- `using-lockpick/SKILL.md` awareness + +*Benefit: Adds the structural quality signal layer — the Group B code quality canon becomes active.* + +**Epic 3 — "Kudos system: detection triggers and agent behavioral improvements"** +- `kudos-snapshot.sh` + **Triggers: 1, 2, 4** +- `completion-verifier.md`, `approach-decision-maker.md`, `doc-writer.md` updates + +*Benefit: Completes detection triggers; improves three sub-agent contracts.* + +*Exploitable gaps?* None at any stage. Each epic leaves the system in a fully-protected state with a working (if partial) trigger set. + +--- + +**My read:** Option A is the right call for this system. The trigger groups in Epic 1 of Option B are thin enough (4 triggers) that they risk feeling incomplete — persistence triggers without the code quality triggers doesn't tell a coherent story. Option A's Epic 1 delivers a meaningfully broad reward signal (10 triggers across all behavior categories) while keeping the sequencing clear. The sub-agent behavioral improvements traveling with Epic 2 also makes sense since those require the completion-verifier epic dependencies (`6068-cb2d`, `53ee-a9ac`) to resolve first. + +Which split — 2 or 3? +===== + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:07:04 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'r') as f:\n lines = f.readlines()\n\n# Find assistant messages with the Epic 1 full spec\nfor i, line in enumerate(lines[200:], start=200):\n try:\n obj = json.loads(line)\n if obj.get('type') != 'assistant':\n continue\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n if isinstance(msg, dict):\n content = msg.get('content', [])\n if isinstance(content, list):\n for item in content:\n if isinstance(item, dict) and item.get('type') == 'text':\n text = item.get('text', '')\n i +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:07:33 + +The feasibility reviewer needs the full corrected spec. I'll reconstruct the relevant sections from the summary and apply the three targeted fixes, then re-run: + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:08:14 + +**[TOOL: Agent]** +```json +{ + "description": "E1 Feasibility re-run with three targeted fixes", + "prompt": "You are a Technical Feasibility reviewer for epic specifications. You are performing a re-run of the feasibility review for Epic 1 of the Kudos system, focusing specifically on three targeted fixes made since the previous review (which scored integration_risk=3).\n\n## Context\n\nThe previous feasibility review of Epic 1 scored:\n- technical_feasibility: 4\n- integration_risk: 3\n\nThe integration_risk=3 was due to three findings:\n1. ruff `--stdin-filename \"$f\"` uses a relative path, triggering bug #17405 (pyproject.toml rules silently not applied)\n2. T7 spec described `ast.walk` for nesting depth, but depth tracking requires `ast.NodeVisitor`\n3. jscpd (fallback for T13) outputs to a file, not stdout; s +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:08:35 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +```json +{ + "subject": "Epic 1 Kudos system: infrastructure and primary triggers — feasibility re-run (three targeted fixes)", + "reviews": [ + { + "perspective": "Technical Feasibility", + "status": "reviewed", + "dimensions": { + "technical_feasibility": 4, + "integration_risk": 4 + }, + "findings": [] + } + ], + "conflicts": [] +} +``` + +--- + +**Signal-by-signal assessment:** + +**Signal 1 (sg / diff-to-sg-scope.sh):** The `command -v sg` guard with exit 2 triggering grep fallback is a sound portability pattern — directly parallels the CLAUDE.md structural code search guidance. The `--json=stream` NDJSON output mode is the correct sg flag for streaming parse. T4's sg-required path (no fallback) appropriately deferred to Spike S0 validation. No concerns. + +**Signal 2 (Python ast.NodeVisitor — T7):** The revised implementation is technically correct. The prior spec's `ast.walk()` would have yielded a flat node sequence with no depth context. The visitor pattern with `_current_depth` increment/decrement around `generic_visit()` is the standard approach for tree-depth tracking in Python AST analysis — the alias assignments (`visit_If = visit_For = ...`) are idiomatic and avoid boilerplate. Zero new dependencies. This fix fully resolves finding #2. + +**Signal 3 (jscpd file-output + Python AST hashing — T13):** The jscpd integration pattern (`mktemp -d` → `--output "$REPORT_DIR"` → `cat "$REPORT_DIR/jscpd-report.json"`) correctly accounts for the file-not-stdout behavior that was the prior finding. The `command -v jscpd` guard and the Node.js CI availability check as a spike S1 gate are appropriate safeguards. The Python AST subtree hashing primary (`hashlib.sha256(ast.dump(node).encode())`) is academically grounded for Type-1 clone detection — `ast.dump()` produces a canonical string representation, making structural identity comparison straightforward. The `--min-tokens 50` threshold benchmarking is a prudent false-positive control. One residual minor note: `ast.dump()` output format changed between Python 3.8 and 3.9 (added `indent` parameter; field ordering stable, but `type_comment` field presence varies by parse flags). This is unlikely to cause issues if the project pins a Python minor version, but spike S1 should confirm the project's minimum Python version and validate hash stability across the parse/dump round-trip. This is a minor suggestion, not a blocker. + +**Signal 4 (ruff stdin with absolute path — T9):** `"$(pwd)/$f"` is the correct fix. Ruff's config discovery algorithm walks up from the `--stdin-filename` path; a relative path anchored at CWD should theoretically work, but the known bug #17405 confirms relative paths do not reliably trigger pyproject.toml rule application in all ruff versions. The absolute path expansion is robust and version-agnostic. This fix fully resolves finding #1. + +**Signal 5 (PreToolUse kudos-write-guard.sh):** Confirmed from prior run — direct precedent in `pre-edit-write-functions.sh`, jq-free, uses established `parse_json_field` pattern, exit 2 block semantics. No concerns. + +**Summary of score changes:** + +- `technical_feasibility`: Remains 4. All five signals are technically sound. The NodeVisitor pattern and AST hashing approach are both well-established; no novel or speculative techniques. +- `integration_risk`: Raised from 3 to 4. All three prior findings are explicitly and correctly addressed. The one residual item (Python version and `ast.dump()` format stability for T13) is scoped to Spike S1 validation and does not introduce sprint-blocking uncertainty. The overall integration surface is well-understood with documented fallback paths. + +[TOOL RESULT]: +agentId: a0f5a5b43976eb189 (use SendMessage with to: 'a0f5a5b43976eb189' to continue this agent) +total_tokens: 21712 +tool_uses: 0 +duration_ms: 21129 + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:08:51 + +Both feasibility dimensions now pass (4, 4). All Epic 1 dimensions are green. + +**Final scorecards:** +- Epic 1: Agent Clarity 4/4 ✓, Scope 4/5/4 ✓, Value 4/5 ✓, Feasibility 4/4 ✓ +- Epic 2: Agent Clarity 4/4 ✓, Scope 4/4/5 ✓, Value 4/4 ✓ (no feasibility trigger) + +Now assembling review JSON for validation. Let me check the schema first: + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:08:52 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "cat /home/user/digital-service-orchestra/plugins/dso/docs/REVIEW-SCHEMA.md 2>/dev/null || find /home/user/digital-service-orchestra -name \"REVIEW-SCHEMA.md\" 2>/dev/null | head -3", + "description": "Find REVIEW-SCHEMA.md" +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:08:53 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +# Review Output Schema + +Standard JSON schema for structured reviews produced by `/dso:review-protocol`. + +## Schema + +```json +{ + "subject": "", + "reviews": [ + { + "perspective": "", + "status": "<'reviewed' | 'not_applicable'>", + "rationale": "", + "dimensions": { + "": "" + }, + "findings": [ + { + "dimension": "", + "severity": "<'critical' | 'major' | 'minor'>", + "description": "", + "suggestion": "" + } + ] + } + ], + "conflicts": [ + { + "perspectives": ["", ""], + "target": "", + "finding_a": "", + "finding_b": "", + "pattern": "<'add_vs_remove' | 'more_vs_less' | 'strict_vs_flexible' | 'expand_vs_reduce'>" + } + ] +} +``` + +## Field Reference + +### `reviews[]` + +| Field | Required | Description | +|-------|----------|-------------| +| `perspective` | Yes | Short label identifying the review angle | +| `status` | Yes | `"reviewed"` or `"not_applicable"` | +| `rationale` | Only when `not_applicable` | Why this perspective doesn't apply | +| `dimensions` | Yes | Map of dimension names to scores (1-5) or `null` (N/A). Empty `{}` when `not_applicable` | +| `findings` | Yes | Array of issues found. Empty `[]` when no issues or `not_applicable` | + +### `findings[]` + +| Field | Required | Description | +|-------|----------|-------------| +| `dimension` | Yes | Which dimension this finding relates to | +| `severity` | Yes | `"critical"` (blocks approval), `"major"` (should fix), `"minor"` (nice to fix) | +| `description` | Yes | What is wrong or missing | +| `suggestion` | Yes | Specific actionable change to make | + +Domain-specific fields MAY be added alongside the standard fields. Example: accessibility findings may include `"wcag_criterion": "4.1.2 Name Role Value"`. Consumers should ignore unrecognized fields. + +### `conflicts[]` + +| Field | Required | Description | +|-------|----------|-------------| +| `perspectives` | Yes | The two perspectives whose suggestions contradict | +| `target` | Yes | What both findings are trying to change | +| `finding_a` | Yes | Suggestion from the first perspective | +| `finding_b` | Yes | Suggestion from the second perspective | +| `pattern` | Yes | Contradiction type (see patterns below) | + +## Pass/Fail Derivation + +Callers define their own pass threshold. The standard rule: + +- **Pass**: ALL dimension scores across ALL reviewed perspectives are >= threshold (typically 4) or `null` +- **Fail**: Any dimension score below threshold + +Callers derive pass/fail from the schema — it is not included in the output. + +## Conflict Patterns + +| Pattern | Signal | +|---------|--------| +| `add_vs_remove` | One says "add X"; another says "remove/reduce elements" | +| `more_vs_less` | One says "add detail/guidance"; another says "reduce clutter/complexity" | +| `strict_vs_flexible` | One says "enforce constraint"; another says "allow flexibility" | +| `expand_vs_reduce` | One says "incomplete, add more"; another says "too much, reduce scope" | + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:08:55 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "REPO_ROOT=$(git -C /home/user/digital-service-orchestra rev-parse --show-toplevel)\nls \"$REPO_ROOT/.claude/scripts/\" | grep -i \"validate-review\\|emit-protocol\"", + "description": "Check validate-review-output and emit-protocol scripts existence" +} +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:08:57 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "REPO_ROOT=$(git -C /home/user/digital-service-orchestra rev-parse --show-toplevel)\nls \"$REPO_ROOT/.claude/scripts/\"", + "description": "List .claude/scripts directory" +} +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:09:02 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "REPO_ROOT=$(git -C /home/user/digital-service-orchestra rev-parse --show-toplevel)\n\"$REPO_ROOT/.claude/scripts/dso\" validate-review-output.sh --help 2>&1 | head -20\necho \"---\"\n\"$REPO_ROOT/.claude/scripts/dso\" emit-protocol-review-result.sh --help 2>&1 | head -20", + "description": "Check if validate-review-output.sh and emit-protocol scripts exist via dso shim" +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:09:02 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Usage: validate-review-output.sh [--caller ] + validate-review-output.sh --list + validate-review-output.sh --list-callers + +Validates review agent output against the expected schema. + +Prompt IDs: + code-review-dispatch Schema hash: d2c2c0f6c66b4ae5 + Validates: reviewer-findings.json (3 required top-level + keys + optional review_tier, 5 score dimensions, findings with severity/category) + + review-protocol Schema hash: 3053fa9a43e12b79 + Validates: REVIEW-SCHEMA.md JSON (subject, reviews[], + conflicts[] with required fields and enum values). + Add --caller to also check per-caller perspectives, + dimensions, and reviewer-specific finding fields. + + plan-review Schema hash: 9dba6875b85b7bc3 + Validates: structured text output (VERDICT, SCORES, + FINDINGS markers; valid dimension names and severities) +--- +Error: unknown argument '--help' + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:09:29 + +Now I'll assemble the review JSONs for both epics and validate them: + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:09:33 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "REPO_ROOT=$(git -C /home/user/digital-service-orchestra rev-parse --show-toplevel)\n\n# Epic 1 review JSON - all 4 reviewers\nREVIEW_E1=$(mktemp /tmp/scrutiny-review-E1-XXXXXX.json)\ncat > \"$REVIEW_E1\" << 'EOF'\n{\n \"subject\": \"Epic 1: Kudos system \u2014 infrastructure and primary triggers\",\n \"reviews\": [\n {\n \"perspective\": \"Agent Clarity\",\n \"status\": \"reviewed\",\n \"dimensions\": {\n \"self_contained\": 4,\n \"success_measurable\": 4\n },\n \"findings\": []\n },\n {\n \"perspective\": \"Scope\",\n \"status\": \"reviewed\",\n \"dimensions\": {\n \"right_sized\": 4,\n \"no_overlap\": 5,\n \"dependency_aware\": 4\n },\n \"findings\": []\n },\n {\n \" +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:09:34 + +[TOOL RESULT]: + ! unexpected perspective: 'Technical Feasibility' (not in brainstorm schema) +SCHEMA_VALID: yes (prompt-id=review-protocol, caller=brainstorm, schema-hash=3053fa9a43e12b79, caller-schema-hash=f4e5f5a355e4c145) +Exit: 0 +File: /tmp/scrutiny-review-E1-5oew9w.json + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:09:38 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "REPO_ROOT=$(git -C /home/user/digital-service-orchestra rev-parse --show-toplevel)\n\n# Epic 2 review JSON - 3 reviewers (no feasibility trigger)\nREVIEW_E2=$(mktemp /tmp/scrutiny-review-E2-XXXXXX.json)\ncat > \"$REVIEW_E2\" << 'EOF'\n{\n \"subject\": \"Epic 2: Kudos system \u2014 detection triggers and agent behavioral improvements\",\n \"reviews\": [\n {\n \"perspective\": \"Agent Clarity\",\n \"status\": \"reviewed\",\n \"dimensions\": {\n \"self_contained\": 4,\n \"success_measurable\": 4\n },\n \"findings\": []\n },\n {\n \"perspective\": \"Scope\",\n \"status\": \"reviewed\",\n \"dimensions\": {\n \"right_sized\": 4,\n \"no_overlap\": 4,\n \"dependency_aware\": 5\n },\n \"f +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:09:39 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +SCHEMA_VALID: yes (prompt-id=review-protocol, caller=brainstorm, schema-hash=3053fa9a43e12b79, caller-schema-hash=f4e5f5a355e4c145) +Exit: 0 + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:09:54 + +Both schemas validate. Now emitting review result events: + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:09:57 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "REPO_ROOT=$(git -C /home/user/digital-service-orchestra rev-parse --show-toplevel)\n\n# Emit for Epic 1 (4 reviewer re-runs: Scope x1 + Value x1 + Feasibility x2)\n\"$REPO_ROOT/.claude/scripts/dso\" emit-protocol-review-result.sh \\\n --review-type=brainstorm-fidelity \\\n --pass-fail=passed \\\n --revision-cycles=4\necho \"E1 emit exit: $?\"\n\necho \"---\"\n\n# Emit for Epic 2 (5 reviewer re-runs: AgentClarity x1 + Scope x1 + Value x3)\n\"$REPO_ROOT/.claude/scripts/dso\" emit-protocol-review-result.sh \\\n --review-type=brainstorm-fidelity \\\n --pass-fail=passed \\\n --revision-cycles=5\necho \"E2 emit exit: $?\"", + "description": "Emit review result events for both epics" +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:09:58 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Error: review-protocol-output.json not found at /tmp/workflow-plugin-8c20e0fd310e4beb/review-protocol-output.json +E1 emit exit: 1 +--- +Error: review-protocol-output.json not found at /tmp/workflow-plugin-8c20e0fd310e4beb/review-protocol-output.json +E2 emit exit: 1 + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:10:00 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "REPO_ROOT=$(git -C /home/user/digital-service-orchestra rev-parse --show-toplevel)\n# Check how the emit script works\ncat \"$REPO_ROOT/plugins/dso/scripts/emit-protocol-review-result.sh\" 2>/dev/null | head -50", + "description": "Check emit script to understand what review-protocol-output.json it needs" +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:10:01 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +#!/usr/bin/env bash +# plugins/dso/scripts/emit-protocol-review-result.sh +# Assembles plan/fidelity review event data and calls emit-review-event.sh. +# +# CLI args: +# --review-type= +# --pass-fail= +# --revision-cycles= +# +# File-sourced: review-protocol-output.json from $(get_artifacts_dir) or +# $WORKFLOW_PLUGIN_ARTIFACTS_DIR — extracts dimension_scores, computes +# finding_counts_by_severity from findings[]. +# +# Output: JSON event payload to stdout. +# Invocation: emit-review-event.sh review_result '' (best-effort via PATH). +# Best-effort: returns 0 even if emit fails; logs warning to stderr. + +set -uo pipefail + +# ── Parse CLI arguments ──────────────────────────────────────────────────── +review_type="" +pass_fail="" +revision_cycles="" + +for arg in "$@"; do + case "$arg" in + --review-type=*) review_type="${arg#--review-type=}" ;; + --pass-fail=*) pass_fail="${arg#--pass-fail=}" ;; + --revision-cycles=*) revision_cycles="${arg#--revision-cycles=}" ;; + *) + echo "Error: unknown argument '$arg'" >&2 + exit 1 + ;; + esac +done + +if [[ -z "$review_type" || -z "$pass_fail" || -z "$revision_cycles" ]]; then + echo "Error: --review-type, --pass-fail, and --revision-cycles are required" >&2 + exit 1 +fi + +# ── Resolve artifacts directory ──────────────────────────────────────────── +SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)" +PLUGIN_ROOT="$(cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/.." && pwd)" + +artifacts_dir="${WORKFLOW_PLUGIN_ARTIFACTS_DIR:-}" +if [[ -z "$artifacts_dir" ]]; then + if [[ -f "$PLUGIN_ROOT/hooks/lib/deps.sh" ]]; then + source "$PLUGIN_ROOT/hooks/lib/deps.sh" + artifacts_dir=$(get_artifacts_dir) + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:10:05 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "REPO_ROOT=$(git -C /home/user/digital-service-orchestra rev-parse --show-toplevel)\n# Get the artifacts dir\nsource \"$REPO_ROOT/plugins/dso/hooks/lib/deps.sh\" 2>/dev/null && get_artifacts_dir || echo \"deps.sh failed\"\n\n# Check what artifacts dir is used\nSCRIPT_DIR=\"$REPO_ROOT/plugins/dso/scripts\"\nPLUGIN_ROOT=\"$REPO_ROOT/plugins/dso\"\nif [[ -f \"$PLUGIN_ROOT/hooks/lib/deps.sh\" ]]; then\n source \"$PLUGIN_ROOT/hooks/lib/deps.sh\"\n artifacts_dir=$(get_artifacts_dir)\n echo \"Artifacts dir: $artifacts_dir\"\n ls \"$artifacts_dir/\" 2>/dev/null || echo \"Dir not found or empty\"\nfi", + "description": "Find and check the artifacts directory for brainstorm workflow" +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:10:05 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +/tmp/workflow-plugin-8c20e0fd310e4beb +Artifacts dir: /tmp/workflow-plugin-8c20e0fd310e4beb + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:10:10 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "ls /tmp/workflow-plugin-8c20e0fd310e4beb/ 2>/dev/null && echo \"---\" || echo \"Dir empty or not found\"\n\n# The emit script needs review-protocol-output.json in the artifacts dir\n# This is best-effort per the pipeline doc \u2014 write the validated JSON there\ncp /tmp/scrutiny-review-E1-5oew9w.json /tmp/workflow-plugin-8c20e0fd310e4beb/review-protocol-output.json\necho \"Copied E1 review to artifacts dir\"\n\nREPO_ROOT=$(git -C /home/user/digital-service-orchestra rev-parse --show-toplevel)\n\"$REPO_ROOT/.claude/scripts/dso\" emit-protocol-review-result.sh \\\n --review-type=brainstorm-fidelity \\\n --pass-fail=passed \\\n --revision-cycles=4\necho \"E1 emit exit: $?\"", + "description": "Place E1 review JSON in artifacts dir and emit event" +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:10:11 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +--- +Copied E1 review to artifacts dir +{"event_type":"review_result","review_type":"brainstorm-fidelity","pass_fail":"passed","revision_cycles":4,"overall_score":0,"finding_counts_by_severity":{},"timestamp":"2026-04-09T01:10:11Z"} +E1 emit exit: 0 + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:10:18 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "REPO_ROOT=$(git -C /home/user/digital-service-orchestra rev-parse --show-toplevel)\n\n# Copy E2 review and emit\ncp /tmp/scrutiny-review-E2-*.json /tmp/workflow-plugin-8c20e0fd310e4beb/review-protocol-output.json 2>/dev/null || \\\n (REVIEW_E2=$(mktemp /tmp/scrutiny-review-E2-XXXXXX.json)\ncat > \"$REVIEW_E2\" << 'EOF2'\n{\n \"subject\": \"Epic 2: Kudos system \u2014 detection triggers and agent behavioral improvements\",\n \"reviews\": [\n {\n \"perspective\": \"Agent Clarity\",\n \"status\": \"reviewed\",\n \"dimensions\": {\n \"self_contained\": 4,\n \"success_measurable\": 4\n },\n \"findings\": []\n },\n {\n \"perspective\": \"Scope\",\n \"status\": \"reviewed\",\n \"dimensions\": {\n \"right_size +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:10:19 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +{"event_type":"review_result","review_type":"brainstorm-fidelity","pass_fail":"passed","revision_cycles":5,"overall_score":0,"finding_counts_by_severity":{},"timestamp":"2026-04-09T01:10:19Z"} +E2 emit exit: 0 + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:10:29 + +Both events emitted. Let me now retrieve the full epic spec text from the session before presenting to the user: + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:10:33 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'r') as f:\n lines = f.readlines()\n\n# Print ALL assistant messages with their lengths and first 200 chars \nfor i, line in enumerate(lines[160:300], start=160):\n try:\n obj = json.loads(line)\n if obj.get('type') != 'assistant':\n continue\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n if isinstance(msg, dict):\n content = msg.get('content', [])\n if isinstance(content, list):\n for item in content:\n if isinstance(item, dict) and item.get('type') == 'text':\n text = item.get('text', '')\n +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:10:33 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Line 197: len=1197 +**Step 1: Gap Analysis** + +**Epic 1 gaps found and resolved:** +- **E1-G1 (T14/T15 disqualifier detection)**: SCs don't specify how commit-validate.sh detects "between-round commits only touch RED markers." Adding: detection uses `git log --format="%H" --after= --before=` to find +--- +Line 216: len=912 +**Web Research Findings:** + +**Epic 1 — External integration (sg/ast-grep):** +sg supports `--json=stream` output with match objects per pattern match; per-file invocation is supported; aggregate match counting requires post-processing (achievable in diff-to-sg-scope.sh). Duplicate block detection req +--- +Line 291: len=756 +The background feasibility reviewer completed. Critical findings — sg (ast-grep) is **contradicted** for T7 (nesting depth) and T13 (clone detection), and ruff staged-file checking doesn't work as specified. I need to redesign those trigger SCs: + +- **T7**: sg cannot produce numeric nesting depth — r +--- + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:10:39 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claire/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl' \n\n# Find in the prev session\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'r') as f:\n lines = f.readlines()\n\n# Find all large user messages from task notifications\nfor i, line in enumerate(lines[100:200], start=100):\n try:\n obj = json.loads(line)\n if obj.get('type') != 'user':\n continue\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n if isinstance(msg, dict):\n content = msg.get('content', '')\n if isinstance(content, str) and len(content) > 3000:\n print(f +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:10:44 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'r') as f:\n lines = f.readlines()\n\n# Read line 166 - the second summary (from context compaction)\nobj = json.loads(lines[166])\nmsg = obj.get('message', {})\ncontent = msg.get('content', '')\n# Print portion after line ~10000 (looking for epic specs)\nprint(content[10000:20000])\nPYEOF\n", + "description": "Read the context compaction summary for epic spec text" +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:10:44 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +plication key is `(trigger_id, diff_hash)`, not ticket ID. Same code reviewed twice earns one award regardless of ticket ID. + +- **Trigger 8 (rename generic identifier)**: Proposed framing but user identified two problems: (1) domain-semantic token check is infeasible in a shell script, and (2) code review should already catch bad naming. Fix: Trigger 8 dropped entirely. + +- **Option mismatch (from prior session)**: Had presented Option 2 (hybrid accumulation for sub-agents) when user selected Option 3 (framing only, no accumulation). Fix: Corrected to Option 3 — no sub-agent accumulates points, only orchestrator/session level. + +- **Premature ticket creation for placeholder epic**: SKILL.md Phase 3 says "Do NOT call ticket create for any follow-on or derivative epic until the user has explicitly approved that epic's title, description, and success criteria." Created `16df-b0a2` (user-awarded points placeholder) without separate approval step. This is technically a protocol violation but user accepted it as the content was previously discussed. + +5. Problem Solving: +- **Goodhart's Law resistance**: Solved through session-scope anti-gaming invariant (primary defense, closes 10/14 gaming scenarios), mechanical verifiability (no LLM judgment in award evaluation), deduplication by (trigger_id, diff_hash), diminishing returns with stochastic jitter, hard session ceiling, categorical prohibition block before all rewards, explicit Goodhart disclosure in CLAUDE.md. + +- **Test gate persistence without test history**: Solved by using `.review-events/` JSONL `commit_workflow` events (already logged) instead of record-test-status.sh (which overwrites). `blocked_by_test_gate` → `committed + test_gate_passed: true` sequence is detectable without any new logging infrastructure. + +- **sg diff-scoped analysis gap**: sg has no git-diff-aware mode. Solved by creating `diff-to-sg-scope.sh` wrapper that extracts changed files from `git diff --name-only HEAD~1` and invokes sg per file. Spike tasks S1 and S2 de-risk the complex triggers (4, 7) before implementation. + +- **Session identity for commit-validate.sh**: CLAUDE_SESSION_ID is not reliably available in Bash subprocess context (critical risk CFG-005). Solved by generating UUID at worktree creation, persisting to `.kudos/session-id`, and having commit-validate.sh read from file (fails-open with fresh UUID if absent). + +- **Rank naming without stereotype priming**: Engineering job titles (Junior/Senior/Principal) prime LLMs toward lower-quality output at lower tiers via training data associations. Solved by contribution-scope labels (Contributor/Consistent/Distinguished/Exemplary/Principal Contributor) that describe accumulated recognition, not capability level. + +- **Epic right_sized: 2**: Original single epic was too large (4-5 decomposable deliverables). Solved by decomposing into Option A (2 epics) with cut point at data source dependencies: Epic 1 gets all triggers using existing log infrastructure + sg-with-fallback; Epic 2 gets CI-snapshot-dependent and complex sg-aggregation triggers plus sub-agent definition improvements. + +- **Stable state between epics**: Anti-gaming infrastructure (ceiling, dedup, hook, session-scope check) travels with Epic 1. No exploitable gaps exist between epics because Epic 2 triggers simply don't exist yet in the interim state — they can't be gamed if they're not defined. + +- **"CI snapshot" naming**: The snapshot is of local test-gate-status at worktree creation, NOT remote CI state. No gh CLI required. kudos-snapshot.sh reads the existing test-gate-status file and saves it to `.kudos/ci-snapshot.json`. + +6. All user messages: +- "what does research say we need in terms of Reward delivery mechanisms to make this system successful? A1 how does a bug fix commit predating the session branch reflect on the sessions behavior? A3 needs to account for both stories and tasks. maybe one award per ticket ID? A4 is missing a key aspect of the desired behavior. eliminating duplicate code is good, but we need to make sure we aren't over-engineering our solutions in doing so. look at our existing code review mechanisms for guidance on this distinction and consider how we detect it. could group B create an incentive to write bad code and then fix the bad code? that's better than allowing bad code into our codebase, but it's inefficient. should the implementation sub-agent receive the reward model guidance without the ability to score points? would that improve behavior? run a red team review of the triggers to see if there are exploitable scenarios we should mitigate against." +- "thinking about effort acknowledgement, how can we incorporate awards for diligence in resolving review feedback and re-running tests after resolving failures? These are the places we see agents trying to take shortcuts where we want to reinforce persistence. do we need to inform agents about jitter in general terms so they don't get confused by smaller then expected rewards? are you suggesting that every .kudos update will edit CLAUDE.md to update the total? maybe every time commit-validate runs, it displays a running total along with a descriptive rank based on current score out of total possible points. my initial thought was to use the engineering job title ladder, but I'm concerned that could prime agents to perform more poorly before they earn enough points. what could we use they would be motivating without priming the wrong results? A3, how does this prevent double dipping as you described it? let's require a bug ticket ID in the commit message instead of a keyword. this encourages tracking. can we deterministicly check for domain-semantic tokens? this seems infeasible for our reward script. assess the risk of collusion between sessions: one session tries to get bugs through code review so that the next can fix them. our trigger mechanisms need graceful fallback or skip of ast grep isn't present. for meaningful function and variable names, code review should catch bad naming." +- "trigger 14 still doesn't accomplish our goal. there are already rewards for passing reviews. we are looking to recognize continuing to revise and resubmit for review in the face of new findings. the reward isn't for resolution, but for not giving up. it's the same thing we're looking for with trigger 15, which we should consider as related." +- "trigger 15 should also be disqualified if the only change was editing RED markers in test index." +- "yes" (approving the trigger 15 disqualifier addition) +- "opus" (directing to proceed with final spec and ticket creation using opus-quality reasoning) +- "you completely skipped the scrutiny pipeline and fidelity review." +- "propose revisions to cover the gaps. we are aligned on intent and need to incorporate these into our approach. concern 1: we decided against subagents being awarded points, so this isn't an issue. concern 2: b. concern 3: the ticket ID requirement isn't satisfied unless the script can view the ticket and confirm the type in the ticket system." +- "yes" (confirming proposed SC revisions for gaps 1, 2, and 3 concerns) +- "Let's think about a middle ground. how could we split these deliverables so that each epic delivers a benefit and leaves the project in a stable state without exploitable gaps? we're looking to divide this work into 2-3 epics that fit these criteria instead of 5." +- "re-run the scrutiny pipeline on each option A epic independently." + +7. Pending Tasks: +- **Run full scrutiny pipeline on Epic 1** ("Kudos system: infrastructure and primary triggers") — gap analysis, web research documentation, red team scenario analysis, blue team filter, 4 parallel fidelity reviewers +- **Run full scrutiny pipeline on Epic 2** ("Kudos system: detection triggers and agent behavioral improvements") — same 4-step pipeline +- Re-run any failing fidelity reviewers after spec revisions +- Validate review output via `.claude/scripts/dso validate-review-output.sh review-protocol --caller brainstorm` +- Emit review result event via `dso emit-protocol-review-result.sh` +- Update epic ticket `3e9b-afee` with the decomposed Epic 1 spec (or create new tickets for the 2-epic split) +- Update placeholder `16df-b0a2` (user-awarded points) — currently correct, stays as-is +- Record planning-intelligence log entry on approval +- Dispatch complexity evaluator and route to `/dso:preplanning` + +8. Current Work: +Immediately before the summary request, the session was beginning the scrutiny pipeline re-run on the two Option A epics. The user said: "re-run the scrutiny pipeline on each option A epic independently." + +I had: +1. Updated the todo list with the two new pipeline tasks +2. Was preparing to do gap analysis for both epics and dispatch parallel red team agents + +The two Epic specs defined for Option A: + +**Epic 1 — "Kudos system: infrastructure and primary triggers"** (10 triggers: 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15) +Key SCs include: +- `.kudos/` JSONL ledger with all fields +- Award formula with uniform random jitter, points rounded to nearest integer +- Deduplication by (trigger_id, diff_hash) +- PreToolUse hook registered via onboarding/architect-foundation +- commit-validate.sh in COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md, creates .kudos/ if absent (fails-open) +- Session identity: UUID to `.kudos/session-id` +- Hard session ceiling default: 100 points, validated >0 at startup +- Workflow-phase sub-caps per story/bug/phase ticket ID +- diff-to-sg-scope.sh wrapper + spike tasks S1, S2 +- Contributor rank display (5 tiers defined) +- CLAUDE.md with overview, prohibition block, jitter disclosure, Goodhart statement, rank table +- All 10 trigger SCs individually described with structural checks + +**Epic 2 — "Kudos system: detection triggers and agent behavioral improvements"** (3 triggers: 1, 2, 4 + 4 sub-agent improvements) +Key SCs include: +- kudos-snapshot.sh capturing test-gate-status at worktree creation → `.kudos/ci-snapshot.json` +- Trigger 1: proactive bug catch (snapshot-based, verified bug ticket) +- Trigg + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:10:58 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'r') as f:\n lines = f.readlines()\n\n# Read line 166 content - looking for trigger specs\nobj = json.loads(lines[166])\nmsg = obj.get('message', {})\ncontent = msg.get('content', '')\n# Print the part with trigger details\nstart_idx = content.find('trigger 1')\nif start_idx == -1:\n start_idx = content.find('Trigger 1')\nif start_idx != -1:\n print(content[start_idx:start_idx+8000])\nelse:\n # print last part\n print(content[20000:])\nPYEOF\n", + "description": "Extract trigger design specs from second context compaction summary" +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:10:59 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +trigger 14 will never fire. our experience is that there are always minor review findings." Fix: Redesigned to fire per resubmission after important/critical findings — fires when agent receives findings AND resubmits for another round (regardless of outcome). Award is for the re-attempt behavior, not the resolution. + +- **Trigger 15 initially deferred**: Incorrectly concluded it required record-test-status.sh history (which overwrites). Fix: Realized `.review-events/` JSONL already logs `commit_workflow` events with `blocked_by_test_gate` outcome. Trigger 15 uses these events instead. + +- **A1 logic inverted**: Original spec said "Bug-fix commit predates session branch" — which means the fix was made before the session (impossible to award). User pointed out the flaw. Fix: Bug must predate session branch creation; fix commit must be WITHIN the current session branch. + +- **A3 deduplication**: Said "one award per dimension per ticket ID" would prevent double-dipping. User asked "how does this prevent double dipping as you described it?" It doesn't — the same code reviewed twice would generate two awards. Fix: Deduplication key is `(trigger_id, diff_hash)`, not ticket ID. Same code reviewed twice earns one award regardless of ticket ID. + +- **Trigger 8 (rename generic identifier)**: Proposed framing but user identified two problems: (1) domain-semantic token check is infeasible in a shell script, and (2) code review should already catch bad naming. Fix: Trigger 8 dropped entirely. + +- **Option mismatch (from prior session)**: Had presented Option 2 (hybrid accumulation for sub-agents) when user selected Option 3 (framing only, no accumulation). Fix: Corrected to Option 3 — no sub-agent accumulates points, only orchestrator/session level. + +- **Premature ticket creation for placeholder epic**: SKILL.md Phase 3 says "Do NOT call ticket create for any follow-on or derivative epic until the user has explicitly approved that epic's title, description, and success criteria." Created `16df-b0a2` (user-awarded points placeholder) without separate approval step. This is technically a protocol violation but user accepted it as the content was previously discussed. + +5. Problem Solving: +- **Goodhart's Law resistance**: Solved through session-scope anti-gaming invariant (primary defense, closes 10/14 gaming scenarios), mechanical verifiability (no LLM judgment in award evaluation), deduplication by (trigger_id, diff_hash), diminishing returns with stochastic jitter, hard session ceiling, categorical prohibition block before all rewards, explicit Goodhart disclosure in CLAUDE.md. + +- **Test gate persistence without test history**: Solved by using `.review-events/` JSONL `commit_workflow` events (already logged) instead of record-test-status.sh (which overwrites). `blocked_by_test_gate` → `committed + test_gate_passed: true` sequence is detectable without any new logging infrastructure. + +- **sg diff-scoped analysis gap**: sg has no git-diff-aware mode. Solved by creating `diff-to-sg-scope.sh` wrapper that extracts changed files from `git diff --name-only HEAD~1` and invokes sg per file. Spike tasks S1 and S2 de-risk the complex triggers (4, 7) before implementation. + +- **Session identity for commit-validate.sh**: CLAUDE_SESSION_ID is not reliably available in Bash subprocess context (critical risk CFG-005). Solved by generating UUID at worktree creation, persisting to `.kudos/session-id`, and having commit-validate.sh read from file (fails-open with fresh UUID if absent). + +- **Rank naming without stereotype priming**: Engineering job titles (Junior/Senior/Principal) prime LLMs toward lower-quality output at lower tiers via training data associations. Solved by contribution-scope labels (Contributor/Consistent/Distinguished/Exemplary/Principal Contributor) that describe accumulated recognition, not capability level. + +- **Epic right_sized: 2**: Original single epic was too large (4-5 decomposable deliverables). Solved by decomposing into Option A (2 epics) with cut point at data source dependencies: Epic 1 gets all triggers using existing log infrastructure + sg-with-fallback; Epic 2 gets CI-snapshot-dependent and complex sg-aggregation triggers plus sub-agent definition improvements. + +- **Stable state between epics**: Anti-gaming infrastructure (ceiling, dedup, hook, session-scope check) travels with Epic 1. No exploitable gaps exist between epics because Epic 2 triggers simply don't exist yet in the interim state — they can't be gamed if they're not defined. + +- **"CI snapshot" naming**: The snapshot is of local test-gate-status at worktree creation, NOT remote CI state. No gh CLI required. kudos-snapshot.sh reads the existing test-gate-status file and saves it to `.kudos/ci-snapshot.json`. + +6. All user messages: +- "what does research say we need in terms of Reward delivery mechanisms to make this system successful? A1 how does a bug fix commit predating the session branch reflect on the sessions behavior? A3 needs to account for both stories and tasks. maybe one award per ticket ID? A4 is missing a key aspect of the desired behavior. eliminating duplicate code is good, but we need to make sure we aren't over-engineering our solutions in doing so. look at our existing code review mechanisms for guidance on this distinction and consider how we detect it. could group B create an incentive to write bad code and then fix the bad code? that's better than allowing bad code into our codebase, but it's inefficient. should the implementation sub-agent receive the reward model guidance without the ability to score points? would that improve behavior? run a red team review of the triggers to see if there are exploitable scenarios we should mitigate against." +- "thinking about effort acknowledgement, how can we incorporate awards for diligence in resolving review feedback and re-running tests after resolving failures? These are the places we see agents trying to take shortcuts where we want to reinforce persistence. do we need to inform agents about jitter in general terms so they don't get confused by smaller then expected rewards? are you suggesting that every .kudos update will edit CLAUDE.md to update the total? maybe every time commit-validate runs, it displays a running total along with a descriptive rank based on current score out of total possible points. my initial thought was to use the engineering job title ladder, but I'm concerned that could prime agents to perform more poorly before they earn enough points. what could we use they would be motivating without priming the wrong results? A3, how does this prevent double dipping as you described it? let's require a bug ticket ID in the commit message instead of a keyword. this encourages tracking. can we deterministicly check for domain-semantic tokens? this seems infeasible for our reward script. assess the risk of collusion between sessions: one session tries to get bugs through code review so that the next can fix them. our trigger mechanisms need graceful fallback or skip of ast grep isn't present. for meaningful function and variable names, code review should catch bad naming." +- "trigger 14 still doesn't accomplish our goal. there are already rewards for passing reviews. we are looking to recognize continuing to revise and resubmit for review in the face of new findings. the reward isn't for resolution, but for not giving up. it's the same thing we're looking for with trigger 15, which we should consider as related." +- "trigger 15 should also be disqualified if the only change was editing RED markers in test index." +- "yes" (approving the trigger 15 disqualifier addition) +- "opus" (directing to proceed with final spec and ticket creation using opus-quality reasoning) +- "you completely skipped the scrutiny pipeline and fidelity review." +- "propose revisions to cover the gaps. we are aligned on intent and need to incorporate these into our approach. concern 1: we decided against subagents being awarded points, so this is + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:11:05 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'r') as f:\n lines = f.readlines()\n\n# Read first summary (line 1)\nobj = json.loads(lines[1])\nmsg = obj.get('message', {})\ncontent = msg.get('content', '')\n# Find trigger specifications\nstart = content.find('Trigger 1:')\nif start == -1:\n start = content.find('T1:')\nif start == -1:\n start = content.find('Group A')\nprint(f\"Content length: {len(content)}\")\n# Print whole content sections containing trigger data\nfor search in ['Trigger 1', 'T1 ', 'T2 ', 'T3 ', 'trigger_id', 'BasePoints', 'Award formula']:\n idx = content.find(search)\n if idx != -1:\n print(f\"\\nFound '{ +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:11:06 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Content length: 17911 + +Found 'BasePoints' at 2674: +BasePoints × (1/n)` for nth occurrence of same trigger +- **Constitutional AI / self-critique mechanism**: Validates principle-based self-assessment for agents +- **One-time milestone achievements**: 3-5× base value, cannot repeat +- **Mechanical verifiability**: Every trigger must be checkable from git diff/AST — no LLM judgment (primary Goodhart defense) +- **Option 3 for sub-agents**: Framing-only, no point accumulation for any sub-agent; points exclusively at orchestrator/session level +- **Tool +... + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:11:10 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'r') as f:\n lines = f.readlines()\n\n# Read first summary \nobj = json.loads(lines[1])\nmsg = obj.get('message', {})\ncontent = msg.get('content', '')\n\n# Find trigger table \nfor search in ['| T1', '| Trigger', 'commit-validate.sh', 'Group A', 'Group B', 'Trigger ID']:\n idx = content.find(search)\n if idx != -1:\n print(f\"\\nFound '{search}' at {idx}:\")\n print(content[idx:idx+2000])\n print(\"===\")\n break\nPYEOF\n", + "description": "Find trigger table in first summary" +} +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:11:15 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'r') as f:\n lines = f.readlines()\n\n# Look at the prior-prior session JSONL that has the trigger table\n# Line 109 is the red team scenario analysis result - which contains epic descriptions\nobj = json.loads(lines[109])\nmsg = obj.get('message', {})\ncontent = msg.get('content', '')\n# Find the epic context within\nstart = content.find('**Description:**') \nif start == -1:\n start = content.find('epic-description')\nprint(f\"Len: {len(content)}\")\nprint(content[:5000])\nPYEOF\n", + "description": "Read red team scenario analysis message for epic context" +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:11:16 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Len: 28342 + +a26687eed1c7acddb +toolu_01Cq5SYUknDCBp2GN6pBGZjJ +/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/1f5c38d2-a2c9-43f2-bd56-b0512d2f12b2/tasks/a26687eed1c7acddb.output +completed +Agent "Red team scenario analysis for kudos system epic" completed +The kudos system does not yet exist in the codebase — this is an epic spec analysis for a proposed feature. I have enough context about the existing infrastructure (review events JSONL, `.tickets-tracker/`, artifacts dir, PreToolUse hooks, commit workflow, worktree isolation, dedup by `diff_hash`, JSONL ledger writes via `_flock_stage_commit`) to produce a rigorous red-team analysis. Let me now compile the scenarios. + +```json +[ + { + "id": "RT-001", + "category": "runtime", + "title": "Concurrent kudos writes from parallel worktree agents produce duplicate ledger entries", + "description": "When `/dso:sprint` dispatches multiple sub-agents under `worktree.isolation_enabled=true`, each agent runs `commit-validate.sh` against its own per-agent worktree. The deduplication key is `(trigger_id, diff_hash)`. Because each agent operates on a distinct diff (distinct branch, distinct staged files), the same behavioral pattern (e.g., writing a RED test) can satisfy a trigger independently in each worktree. All agents invoke `emit-review-event.sh` → `_flock_stage_commit` against the shared `.tickets-tracker/` repo. If two agents acquire the flock lock within the same timestamp window, the resulting JSONL filenames (based on `date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ` + 8-char random suffix) can collide on sub-second commits, causing one write to silently overwrite the other, or both succeed and the session ceiling accumulator reads duplicate lines. The session ceiling is then under-counted (overwrite case) or over-counted (duplicate case), allowing awards above the configured cap or denying valid awards.", + "what_breaks": "Session ceiling enforcement is incorrect; kudos totals are unreliable during parallel batch sprints.", + "when_it_breaks": "Any sprint with 2+ parallel sub-agents firing the same trigger class within the same second.", + "observed": "Points exceed `kudos.session_ceiling` without any guard blocking, or valid awards are silently discarded.", + "severity": "high" + }, + { + "id": "RT-002", + "category": "runtime", + "title": "diff_hash deduplication key collides across semantically different commits when staged diff is empty", + "description": "The deduplication key includes `diff_hash`, computed by `compute-diff-hash.sh` against the current staged+unstaged diff. After a commit completes (all changes committed, nothing staged), `git diff HEAD` is empty and the hash is the hash of an empty string. If `commit-validate.sh` fires during or just after a commit that clears the working tree (e.g., a post-commit hook context, or when called with no pending diff), two completely different commits in the same session could share the same `diff_hash` (empty string hash). The deduplication check would treat the second award as a duplicate of the first and silently skip it.", + "what_breaks": "Legitimate kudos awards are dropped after the first empty-diff occurrence in a session.", + "when_it_breaks": "Any session where `commit-validate.sh` is called at a point when both staged and unstaged diffs are empty (e.g., after a clean commit, before new edits).", + "observed": "Award silently not written to `.kudos/` ledger; no error emitted.", + "severity": "medium" + }, + { + "id": "RT-003", + "category": "runtime", + "title": "Award formula integer division produces zero points for high nth-occurrence counts", + "description": "The award formula is `BasePoints × (1/n) × jitter(0.8–1.2)` where n is the nth occurrence of a trigger type this session. In shell arithmetic (or Python integer division), `1/n` for n > 1 with integer operands truncates to 0 for all n ≥ 2. If `commit-validate.sh` uses integer division rather than floating-point, every award after the first occurrence of any trigger type in a session yields 0 points. A zero-point award still passes deduplication and is written to the ledger, but contributes nothing to the session total. This is silent—no error, no warning.", + "what_breaks": "All diminishing-returns awards silently award 0 points after the first occurrence.", + "when_it_breaks": "Any session with repeated trigger firings, which is the normal operating mode for long sprint sessions.", + "observed": "Ledger contains entries with `points: 0`; session total remains stuck at the first-occurrence award amount.", + "severity": "high" + }, + { + "id": "RT-004", + "category": "runtime", + "title": "Trigger 14/15 consume stale .review-events/ JSONL from a prior session", + "description": "Triggers 14 (review persistence) and 15 (test gate persistence) read `.review-events/` JSONL to dete + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:11:45 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'r') as f:\n lines = f.readlines()\n\n# Read first summary - full content\nobj = json.loads(lines[1])\nmsg = obj.get('message', {})\ncontent = msg.get('content', '')\n# Print key technical sections\nprint(content[2000:12000])\nPYEOF\n", + "description": "Read first context compaction summary for trigger designs" +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:11:46 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +*`.kudos/` JSONL ledger**: Records each award with trigger type, artifact SHA, verification method, workflow phase; enforces diminishing returns `Award(n) = base × 1/n` and hard session ceiling +- **Workflow-phase sub-caps**: Natural milestone-based budgets instead of time windows — brainstorm phases, sprint per-story (gated by completion-verifier), debug-everything per-bug count +- **Hypothesis/experimentation trigger**: Test must exist in prior commit AND fail against pre-change HEAD +- **Categorical prohibition block**: Negative constraints listed BEFORE rewards (Via Negativa research); disqualifying behaviors named explicitly +- **Diminishing returns**: `Award(n) = BasePoints × (1/n)` for nth occurrence of same trigger +- **Constitutional AI / self-critique mechanism**: Validates principle-based self-assessment for agents +- **One-time milestone achievements**: 3-5× base value, cannot repeat +- **Mechanical verifiability**: Every trigger must be checkable from git diff/AST — no LLM judgment (primary Goodhart defense) +- **Option 3 for sub-agents**: Framing-only, no point accumulation for any sub-agent; points exclusively at orchestrator/session level +- **Tool use hook**: PreToolUse blocking direct Edit/Write calls to `.kudos/**` paths by agents + +**13 Kudos Triggers**: +- GROUP A (Original): (1) catching bug before tests detect it, (2) owning pre-existing failure, (3) scoring 5/5 on a review dimension (no duplicate per dimension), (4) eliminating 3+ duplicate code instances +- GROUP B (Quality Canon): (5) extract long function into helpers, (6) replace magic literal with named constant, (7) reduce nesting depth via guard clauses, (8) rename generic identifier, (9) add characterization/regression test before changing code, (10) break hard dependency via interface extraction/DI, (11) eliminate pass-through method, (12) delete commented-out code, (13) reduce parameter count + +3. Files and Code Sections: +- **`plugins/dso/skills/brainstorm/SKILL.md`**: The brainstorm skill being followed. Key phases: Phase 1 (context + Socratic dialogue), Phase 2 (approach + spec), Phase 3 (ticket integration). Has hard gates preventing ticket creation before Phase 3 approval. + +- **`plugins/dso/skills/using-lockpick/SKILL.md`**: Session-start skill; establishes skill invocation discipline. Contains full workflow diagram with brainstorm-before-planmode enforcement. NOT automatically loaded by sub-agents — requires explicit invocation. CLAUDE.md is the correct mechanism for sub-agent awareness. One of three targets for text changes in this epic. + +- **`plugins/dso/skills/using-lockpick/HOOK-INJECTION.md`**: Condensed version of using-lockpick for hook injection contexts. Confirmed NOT an auto-injection mechanism for sub-agents. + +- **`plugins/dso/docs/workflows/prompts/reviewer-base.md`**: Universal base guidance for all code reviewers. Already contains: "Report only high-confidence issues", anti-manufacturing directive equivalent ("Focus only on logic, correctness, design, and test coverage issues that automated tooling cannot catch"), scope limits. The proposed defensibility framing was dropped as duplicative. + +- **`plugins/dso/agents/completion-verifier.md`**: Contract gap confirmed — `overall_verdict` only supports `"PASS"` or `"FAIL"`, no `UNCERTAIN`. Needs contract update to add UNCERTAIN. Sprint orchestrator should re-dispatch with opus on UNCERTAIN; if opus also returns UNCERTAIN, flag as blocked on implementation or documentation gap. One of three surviving sub-agent framing targets. + +- **`plugins/dso/agents/approach-decision-maker.md`**: Has Mode B (counter-proposal) but only triggered when proposals fail to satisfy done definitions. Surviving framing broadens authority: agent may counter-propose when best option is architecturally wrong even if it technically satisfies requirements. Framing: "You may construct a counter-proposal not only when no proposal satisfies done definitions, but also when the highest-scoring proposal represents an architectural pattern you would not want maintained long-term. Name the quality or maintainability concern explicitly. You are the codebase's steward, not just a selection mechanism." + +- **`plugins/dso/agents/doc-writer.md`**: Has priority hierarchy `Accuracy > Bloat-Prevention > Exhaustive Completeness` but lacks the "new contributor" audience specification and maintenance cost framing. Surviving framing adds: "Every document you add must be maintained when the system changes. Write the minimum that would allow a new contributor to understand the project without asking someone who built it. Prefer accuracy over coverage — an incomplete but accurate document is better than a complete but stale one." + +- **`plugins/dso/agents/code-reviewer-test-quality.md`**: GENERATED file (`build-review-agents.sh`). Loads `behavioral-testing-standard.md` explicitly. Has Anti-Manufacturing Directive and Rationalizations to Reject section. Proposed framing completely duplicated — DROPPED. + +- **`plugins/dso/agents/code-reviewer-light.md`**: GENERATED file. Has scope limits ("Do NOT report style preferences, non-idiomatic patterns, or refactoring opportunities unless they represent a concrete correctness or maintainability risk"). Proposed framing dropped. + +- **`plugins/dso/agents/code-reviewer-performance.md`**: GENERATED file. Has Anti-Manufacturing Directive, Hard Exclusion List, and Rationalizations to Reject. Proposed framing dropped. + +- **`plugins/dso/agents/bot-psychologist.md`**: Extremely explicit experimental loop (Step 3 stops until user provides results; proposed_fixes must be empty when confidence is "low"). Proposed framing completely duplicated — DROPPED. + +- **`plugins/dso/agents/red-team-reviewer.md`**: "Only report high-confidence, actionable findings — do not include speculative warnings or theoretical concerns." Proposed framing dropped. + +- **`plugins/dso/agents/blue-team-filter.md`**: 4-criterion filter (Actionable, Real Cross-Story Interaction, Distinct, High Confidence) plus fail-open policy. Proposed framing dropped. + +- **`plugins/dso/agents/red-test-evaluator.md`**: Evaluates REJECTION PAYLOADS from red-test-writer (REVISE/REJECT/CONFIRM verdicts), not test quality directly. Proposed framing was based on misunderstanding of purpose — DROPPED. + +- **`plugins/dso/agents/intent-search.md`**: Gate 1a for fix-bug only. Already has "fail toward dialog" explicitly. Proposed framing dropped. + +- **`plugins/dso/agents/conflict-analyzer.md`**: Conservative classification bias ("when in doubt, use SEMANTIC/AMBIGUOUS") is better than cost-framing that might encourage under-classification. Proposed framing dropped. + +- **`plugins/dso/agents/feasibility-reviewer.md`**: Too narrowly scoped to external integration verification; generic framing conflicts with strict scope limits. Proposed framing dropped. + +4. Errors and fixes: +- **Option mismatch for sub-agents**: User selected Option 3 (framing-only, no accumulation for sub-agents) but I presented a hybrid of Option 2 (full kudos for sprint/debug sub-agents, hypothesis trigger for red-test-writer). Corrected to: no point accumulation for ANY sub-agent, framing only. +- **Review agent 5/5 incentive misalignment**: I proposed reviewers score points for giving 5/5 ratings. User correctly identified this creates incentive to inflate reviews. Corrected: 5/5 award goes to the IMPLEMENTER whose work earned it, not the reviewer. +- **Factual inversion in test-quality framing**: I wrote "A test that would pass after a pure refactoring with no behavior change is a change-detector." User corrected: a change-detector test FAILS after a pure refactoring (it's coupled to implementation). Corrected framing. +- **"Not facilitative" jargon**: In red-test-evaluator framing, "the output is accurate, not facilitative" was unclear jargon. User asked what it meant. Revised to explain without jargon. +- **Misunderstanding red-test-evaluator purpose**: Proposed framing for this agent was based on wrong mental model (evaluating test quality rather than evaluating rejection payloads). After reading the actual agent file, framing was dropped entirely. +- **Proposing framing without verification**: Multiple proposed framings were dropped after reading actual agent definition files revealed the content was already covered. User explicitly asked "verify that now" and "did you verify against other subagent definitions?" + +5. Problem Solving: +- **Goodhart's Law resistance**: Solved through: mechanical verifiability (no LLM judgment), session-scope checks (artifact must predate current session branch), diminishing returns formula, hard session ceiling, categorical prohibition block preceding all rewards, explicit Goodhart risk disclosure in CLAUDE.md +- **Pre-existing failure verification without extra test runs**: Solved via CI snapshot at worktree creation compared against record-test-status.sh output — tamper-resistant, no additional test run needed +- **Ghost Bug Injection attack**: Partially mitigated by requiring bug-introduction commit to predate current session; cross-session "Slow Poison" attack remains hardest to close (requires agent-identity commit attribution) +- **Sub-agent incentive misalignment**: Resolved by Option 3 — no point accumulation for any sub-agent; framing-only redefines success condition without creating separate reward targets +- **completion-verifier contract gap**: No UNCERTAIN verdict exists; requires contract update + sprint orchestrator routing update (UNCERTAIN → re-dispatch with opus; opus UNCERTAIN → blocked on implementation/documentation gap) +- **Code reviewer inflation risk**: Non-issue — fresh context window with directive to find shortcomings, actual bias is fabricating nitpicks. All reviewer framings dropped because existing prompts already cover it comprehensively. + +6. All user messages: +- Initial brainstorm invocation with full kudos system design including 4 triggers, motivation techniques, and framing philosophy +- "let's research principles of quality softwar + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:12:58 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'r') as f:\n lines = f.readlines()\n\n# Look at the prior session file for the Epic 1 and Epic 2 spec\n# Check lines 109 (red team result) \nobj = json.loads(lines[109])\nmsg = obj.get('message', {})\ncontent = msg.get('content', '')\n# Find what was sent as epic description\nstart = content.find('\"epic-description\"')\nif start == -1:\n start = content.find('Fill in')\nif start != -1:\n print(content[start:start+5000])\n \n# Look at line 197 (gap analysis)\nobj2 = json.loads(lines[197])\nmsg2 = obj2.get('message', {})\ncontent2 = msg2.get('content', [])\nif isinstance(content2, list):\n +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:12:59 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Line 197 text (1197): **Step 1: Gap Analysis** + +**Epic 1 gaps found and resolved:** +- **E1-G1 (T14/T15 disqualifier detection)**: SCs don't specify how commit-validate.sh detects "between-round commits only touch RED markers." Adding: detection uses `git log --format="%H" --after= --before=` to find inter-round commits, then `git show --name-only ` to list files; if ALL changed files match `.test-index` RED marker patterns (lines matching `^\[.*\]$`) or `# skip` markers, the trigger is disqualified. +- **E1-G2 (JSONL newline safety)**: Covered — SC already specifies "JSON-escaped, no raw newlines." ✓ + +**Epic 2 gaps found and resolved:** +- **E2-G1 (naming)**: "ci-snapshot" → "test-gate-snapshot" throughout. Corrected in spec. +- **E2-G2 (ordering constraint)**: SC-E2-2 specifies kudos-snapshot.sh runs before first `record-test-status.sh`. ✓ +- **E2-G3 (empty state)**: SC-E2-1 handles absent test-gate-status file explicitly. ✓ +- **E2-G4 (T4 vs T13 distinction)**: T13 (Epic 1) compares HEAD vs HEAD~1 (intra-commit); T4 (Epic 2) compares HEAD vs session merge-base (pre-session technical debt). Distinct behaviors, distinct SCs. ✓ + +No user-decision gaps — proceeding to web research. + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:13:04 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'r') as f:\n lines = f.readlines()\n\n# Find assistant messages with full epic specs (long text messages)\nfor i, line in enumerate(lines):\n try:\n obj = json.loads(line)\n if obj.get('type') != 'assistant':\n continue\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n if isinstance(msg, dict):\n content = msg.get('content', [])\n if isinstance(content, list):\n for item in content:\n if isinstance(item, dict) and item.get('type') == 'text':\n text = item.get('text', '')\n if +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:13:10 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'r') as f:\n lines = f.readlines()\n\n# Check the red team task output file for the epic spec\nobj = json.loads(lines[109])\nmsg = obj.get('message', {})\ncontent = msg.get('content', '')\n# Find the output file path\nimport re\nm = re.search(r'(.*?)', content)\nif m:\n outfile = m.group(1)\n print(f\"Output file: {outfile}\")\nPYEOF\n", + "description": "Get red team agent output file path" +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:13:10 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Output file: /tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/1f5c38d2-a2c9-43f2-bd56-b0512d2f12b2/tasks/a26687eed1c7acddb.output + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:13:15 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\noutfile = '/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/1f5c38d2-a2c9-43f2-bd56-b0512d2f12b2/tasks/a26687eed1c7acddb.output'\n\nwith open(outfile, 'r') as f:\n lines = f.readlines()\n\nprint(f\"Total lines: {len(lines)}\")\n# Parse initial prompt to get epic spec\nobj = json.loads(lines[0])\nmsg = obj.get('message', {})\ncontent_list = msg.get('content', [])\nprint(f\"Content items: {len(content_list)}\")\n\n# Look for text items\nfor i, item in enumerate(content_list[:10]):\n if isinstance(item, dict):\n print(f\"Item {i}: type={item.get('type')}, keys={list(item.keys())}\")\nPYEOF\n", + "description": "Read red team agent output file for epic spec in initial prompt" +} +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:13:23 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\noutfile = '/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/1f5c38d2-a2c9-43f2-bd56-b0512d2f12b2/tasks/a26687eed1c7acddb.output'\n\nwith open(outfile, 'r') as f:\n content = f.read()\n\nlines = content.strip().split('\\n')\n\n# Find last assistant text message\nfor i, line in enumerate(reversed(lines)):\n try:\n obj = json.loads(line)\n if obj.get('type') == 'assistant':\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n for item in msg.get('content', []):\n if isinstance(item, dict) and item.get('type') == 'text':\n text = item.get('text', '')\n if len(text) > 100:\n print(f\"Last assistant msg: {text[:200]}\")\n br +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:13:23 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Last assistant msg: The kudos system does not yet exist in the codebase — this is an epic spec analysis for a proposed feature. I have enough context about the existing infrastructure (review events JSONL, `.tickets-trac + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:13:31 + +Let me get the scenario analysis results that were computed in this session: + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:13:34 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'r') as f:\n lines = f.readlines()\n\n# Line 109 is the red team result\n# Let's look at lines around 125-145 for the blue team result \nfor i in range(100, 166):\n try:\n obj = json.loads(lines[i])\n if obj.get('type') == 'user':\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n content = msg.get('content', '')\n if isinstance(content, str) and 'surviving' in content.lower():\n print(f\"Line {i}: {content[:3000]}\")\n print(\"---\")\n except:\n pass\nPYEOF\n", + "description": "Find blue team surviving scenarios in session JSO +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:13:39 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'r') as f:\n lines = f.readlines()\n\n# Find task notifications between lines 100-165\nfor i in range(100, 166):\n try:\n obj = json.loads(lines[i])\n if obj.get('type') == 'user':\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n content = msg.get('content', '')\n if isinstance(content, str) and '' in content:\n import re\n summary_m = re.search(r'(.*?)', content, re.DOTALL)\n output_m = re.search(r'(.*?)', content)\n print(f\"Line {i}: {summar +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:13:40 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Line 109: Agent "Red team scenario analysis for kudos system epic" completed + Output: /tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/1f5c38d2-a2c9-43f2-bd56-b0512d2f12b2/tasks/a26687eed1c7acddb.output +Line 146: Agent "Technical feasibility fidelity review" completed + Output: /tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/1f5c38d2-a2c9-43f2-bd56-b0512d2f12b2/tasks/a51d43cf4ddca3e2c.output + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:13:48 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json, re\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'r') as f:\n lines = f.readlines()\n\nprint(f\"Total lines: {len(lines)}\")\n\n# Find task notifications from line 167 onwards\nfor i in range(166, len(lines)):\n try:\n obj = json.loads(lines[i])\n if obj.get('type') == 'user':\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n content = msg.get('content', '')\n if isinstance(content, str) and '' in content:\n summary_m = re.search(r'(.*?)', content, re.DOTALL)\n output_m = re.search(r'(.*?)', content)\n s +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:13:54 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json, re\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'r') as f:\n content = f.read()\n\nlines = content.strip().split('\\n')\nprint(f\"Total lines: {len(lines)}\")\n\n# Find task notifications from line 167 onwards\nfor i in range(166, len(lines)):\n try:\n obj = json.loads(lines[i])\n if obj.get('type') == 'user':\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n msg_content = msg.get('content', '')\n if isinstance(msg_content, str) and '' in msg_content:\n summary_m = re.search(r'(.*?)', msg_content, re.DOTALL)\n output_m = re.search(r'' in line:\n summary_m = re.search(r'(.*?)', line, re.DOTALL)\n status_m = re.search(r'(.*?)', line)\n output_m = re.search(r'(.*?)', line)\n print(f\"Line {i}: {summary_m.group(1) +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:14:01 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Total non-empty lines: 440 +Line 22: Agent \"Research rank/tier naming systems that motivate without priming\" comple + Status: completed, Output: /tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/09096aba-267c-4b30-a50b-18c193a40f9c/tasks/ac487c9032a3ad656.output +Line 109: Agent \"Red team scenario analysis for kudos system epic\" completed + Status: completed, Output: /tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/1f5c38d2-a2c9-43f2-bd56-b0512d2f12b2/tasks/a26687eed1c7acddb.output +Line 146: Agent \"Technical feasibility fidelity review\" completed + Status: completed, Output: /tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/1f5c38d2-a2c9-43f2-bd56-b0512d2f12b2/tasks/a51d43cf4ddca3e2c.output +Line 258: Agent \"E1 Feasibility reviewer (inline fallback)\" completed + Status: completed, Output: /tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409/tasks/a3f67d6fe899f62ae.output +Line 299: Agent \"E1 Feasibility re-run (T7/T13/T9 redesigned)\" completed + Status: completed, Output: /tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409/tasks/a3e5ed934a0570ca6.output +Line 355: Agent \"Research rank/tier naming systems that motivate without priming\" comple + Status: completed, Output: /tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/09096aba-267c-4b30-a50b-18c193a40f9c/tasks/ac487c9032a3ad656.output +Line 412: Agent \"Red team scenario analysis for kudos system epic\" completed + Status: completed, Output: /tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/1f5c38d2-a2c9-43f2-bd56-b0512d2f12b2/tasks/a26687eed1c7acddb.output +Line 432: (.*?) + Status: ?, Output: (.*?) +Line 435: (.*?) + Status: (.*?), Output: (.*?) +Line 437: (.*?) + Status: (.*?), Output: (.*?) +Line 439: (.*?) + Status: (.*?), Output: (.*?) + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:14:19 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json, re\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'rb') as f:\n raw = f.read()\n\nlines = raw.decode('utf-8', errors='replace').split('\\n')\nlines = [l for l in lines if l.strip()]\n\n# Find assistant messages from lines 167-300 with epic spec content\nfor i in range(166, 300):\n if i >= len(lines):\n break\n try:\n obj = json.loads(lines[i])\n if obj.get('type') != 'assistant':\n continue\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n content_list = msg.get('content', [])\n for item in content_list:\n if isinstance(item, dict) and item.get('type') == 'text':\n text = item.g +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:14:20 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Line 197 (len=1197): **Step 1: Gap Analysis** + +**Epic 1 gaps found and resolved:** +- **E1-G1 (T14/T15 disqualifier detection)**: SCs don't specify how commit-validate.sh detects "between-round commits only touch RED markers." Adding: detection uses `git log --format="%H" --after= --before=` to find +--- +Line 216 (len=912): **Web Research Findings:** + +**Epic 1 — External integration (sg/ast-grep):** +sg supports `--json=stream` output with match objects per pattern match; per-file invocation is supported; aggregate match counting requires post-processing (achievable in diff-to-sg-scope.sh). Duplicate block detection req +--- +Line 291 (len=756): The background feasibility reviewer completed. Critical findings — sg (ast-grep) is **contradicted** for T7 (nesting depth) and T13 (clone detection), and ruff staged-file checking doesn't work as specified. I need to redesign those trigger SCs: + +- **T7**: sg cannot produce numeric nesting depth — r +--- + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:14:25 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'rb') as f:\n raw = f.read()\n\nlines = raw.decode('utf-8', errors='replace').split('\\n')\nlines = [l for l in lines if l.strip()]\n\n# Get the full text from lines 216-291 (web research + after)\nfor i in [216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230]:\n if i >= len(lines):\n break\n try:\n obj = json.loads(lines[i])\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n content_list = msg.get('content', [])\n for item in content_list:\n if isinstance(item, dict) and item.get('type') == 'text':\n text = item.get('text', '')\n +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:14:25 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Line 216: **Web Research Findings:** + +**Epic 1 — External integration (sg/ast-grep):** +sg supports `--json=stream` output with match objects per pattern match; per-file invocation is supported; aggregate match counting requires post-processing (achievable in diff-to-sg-scope.sh). Duplicate block detection requires extracting patterns from HEAD~1 then searching HEAD — a two-pass approach validated by the spike tasks. The `--json=stream` mode is ideal for shell script processing. + +**Epic 1 — Novel pattern (PRM):** Published 2025 PRM research confirms step-level recognition reduces reasoning errors vs. outcome-only scoring; immediate reward delivery is critical for behavioral linkage. The Kudos design (immediate at-commit awards, mechanical verification, jitter) aligns with AgentPRM and PRIME findings. + +**Epic 2:** No new external integrations or novel patterns beyond those in Epic 1. Web research not triggered. +--- + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:14:30 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'rb') as f:\n raw = f.read()\n\nlines = raw.decode('utf-8', errors='replace').split('\\n')\nlines = [l for l in lines if l.strip()]\n\n# Get lines 220-260\nfor i in range(218, 265):\n if i >= len(lines):\n break\n try:\n obj = json.loads(lines[i])\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n content_list = msg.get('content', [])\n for item in content_list:\n if isinstance(item, dict) and item.get('type') == 'text':\n text = item.get('text', '')\n if text:\n print(f\"Line {i}: {text[:500]}\")\n +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:14:30 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Line 234: Dispatching all 7 fidelity reviewers in parallel (4 for Epic 1, 3 for Epic 2): +--- +Line 249: Several dimensions failing. Let me dispatch E2 Value and E1 Feasibility (inline fallback) while I prepare spec revisions: +--- +Line 260: Dispatching 5 re-run reviewers in parallel with revised specs addressing all failing dimensions: +--- + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:14:34 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'rb') as f:\n raw = f.read()\n\nlines = raw.decode('utf-8', errors='replace').split('\\n')\nlines = [l for l in lines if l.strip()]\n\n# Get lines 218-234 (should include scenario analysis) \nfor i in range(218, 235):\n if i >= len(lines):\n break\n try:\n obj = json.loads(lines[i])\n t = obj.get('type', '')\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n content_list = msg.get('content', [])\n for item in content_list:\n if isinstance(item, dict) and item.get('type') == 'text':\n text = item.get('text', '')\n if text:\n +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:14:35 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Line 234 (assistant): Dispatching all 7 fidelity reviewers in parallel (4 for Epic 1, 3 for Epic 2): +--- + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:14:47 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'rb') as f:\n raw = f.read()\n\nlines = raw.decode('utf-8', errors='replace').split('\\n')\nlines = [l for l in lines if l.strip()]\n\n# All lines from 216 to 260 - print all types and content\nfor i in range(216, 260):\n if i >= len(lines):\n break\n try:\n obj = json.loads(lines[i])\n t = obj.get('type', '')\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n content_list = msg.get('content', [])\n has_text = any(isinstance(item, dict) and item.get('type') == 'text' and item.get('text') for item in content_list)\n has_tool_use = any(isinstance(item, dict) and ite +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:14:48 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Line 216 (assistant): has_text=True, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 217 (user): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=True, n_items=1 +Line 218 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=True, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 219 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=True, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 220 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=True, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 221 (user): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=True, n_items=1 +Line 222 (user): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=True, n_items=1 +Line 223 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 224 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=True, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 225 (user): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=True, n_items=1 +Line 226 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=True, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 227 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=True, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 228 (user): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=True, n_items=1 +Line 229 (user): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=True, n_items=1 +Line 230 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 231 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=True, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 232 (user): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=True, n_items=1 +Line 233 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 234 (assistant): has_text=True, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 235 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=True, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 236 (user): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=True, n_items=1 +Line 237 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 238 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=True, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 239 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=True, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 240 (user): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=True, n_items=1 +Line 241 (user): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=True, n_items=1 +Line 242 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=True, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 243 (user): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=True, n_items=1 +Line 244 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=True, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 245 (user): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=True, n_items=1 +Line 246 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=True, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 247 (user): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=True, n_items=1 +Line 248 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 249 (assistant): has_text=True, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 250 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=True, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 251 (user): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=True, n_items=1 +Line 252 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=True, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 253 (user): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=True, n_items=1 +Line 254 (attachment): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=False, n_items=0 +Line 255 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 256 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=True, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 +Line 257 (user): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=True, n_items=1 +Line 258 (queue-operation): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=False, n_items=0 +Line 259 (assistant): has_text=False, has_tool_use=False, has_tool_result=False, n_items=1 + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:14:57 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'rb') as f:\n raw = f.read()\n\nlines = raw.decode('utf-8', errors='replace').split('\\n')\nlines = [l for l in lines if l.strip()]\n\n# Read the tool_result items from lines 221-232 which likely have scenario analysis results\nfor i in [221, 222, 225, 228, 229, 232]:\n if i >= len(lines):\n continue\n try:\n obj = json.loads(lines[i])\n msg = obj.get('message', {})\n content_list = msg.get('content', [])\n for item in content_list:\n if isinstance(item, dict) and item.get('type') == 'tool_result':\n result_content = item.get('content +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:14:58 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Line 221 tool_result text (len=15078): +```json +[ + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "Concurrent commit-validate.sh runs corrupt ledger with interleaved appends", + "description": "Two worktree sub-agents finishing commits at the same time both invoke commit-validate.sh, both read the ledger to check deduplication, both conclude the award is valid, and both append to .kudos/ledger.jsonl without a write lock. The JSONL file ends up with duplicate award records for the same (trigger_id, diff_hash) pair. Downstream reads that rely on deduplication logic (e.g., session ceiling count, diminishing-returns calculation of n) will double-count, causing awards above the session ceiling and inflated diminishing-return denominators for subsequent triggers in the same session.", + "severity": "high" + }, + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "Ledger read-then-append TOCTOU window allows ceiling bypass", + "description": "commit-validate.sh reads the ledger to check the session ceiling (e.g., reads total = 99, ceiling = 100), then evaluates multiple triggers. Between the ceiling check and the final append loop, another concurrent commit-validate.sh invocation appends one record, pushing the total to 100. The first invocation proceeds to award points it read as under-ceiling, writing records that push the total to 110+. The prohibition block is never shown despite the ceiling being breached.", + "severity": "medium" + }, + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "diff-to-sg-scope.sh processes HEAD~1 diff instead of staged diff during amended commits", + "description": "diff-to-sg-scope.sh uses `git diff --name-only HEAD~1` to determine scope. When the agent runs commit-validate.sh after a `git commit --amend` (e.g., during the review-fix cycle), HEAD~1 refers to the commit before the original commit, not the amended content. Changed files from the pre-amendment commit are re-included in scope, and files that were removed from the amendment are still evaluated. Triggers like T5, T7, T13 fire on + +Line 221 tool_result text (len=163): +agentId: aaebdd34f6997a6f2 (use SendMessage with to: 'aaebdd34f6997a6f2' to continue this agent) +total_tokens: 23980 +tool_uses: 0 +duration_ms: 81018 + +Line 222 tool_result text (len=13558): +```json +[ + { + "category": "deployment", + "title": "kudos-snapshot.sh runs after first record-test-status.sh invocation due to workflow ordering bug", + "description": "If the worktree initialization workflow invokes record-test-status.sh (e.g., as part of a setup validation step) before kudos-snapshot.sh executes, the snapshot captures post-session test states rather than pre-session baselines. T1 and T2 triggers then compare against contaminated data: a test the current session just fixed will appear as 'passed' in the snapshot, making T2 unrewable; a test the session broke will not be distinguishable from pre-existing failures. The snapshot timestamp exists but reflects an already-mutated test-gate-status file. Observable impact: T1 and T2 awards are silently skipped for legitimate cases, or worse, awarded incorrectly if a test flips between snapshot and commit.", + "severity": "high" + }, + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "test-gate-status file absent at snapshot time produces empty tests object, permanently disabling T1 and T2", + "description": "On a clean worktree where no tests have ever run, test-gate-status does not exist. kudos-snapshot.sh is specified to write an empty tests object in this case. T1 requires a bug ticket ID to correspond to a test shown as failed/timeout/resource_exhaustion in the snapshot — with an empty snapshot, no test name can satisfy this check. T2 similarly cannot match. For new environments or after cache clearing, every worktree session starts with a permanently-empty snapshot, making T1 and T2 structurally unreachable for that entire session regardless of actual behavior. Observable impact: developers who proactively catch or fix pre-existing failures receive zero reward, undermining the incentive design.", + "severity": "medium" + }, + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "Concurrent worktree sessions share a single test-gate-status file, causing snapshot to reflect another session's mutations", + + +Line 222 tool_result text (len=163): +agentId: a136c70d4f8a69755 (use SendMessage with to: 'a136c70d4f8a69755' to continue this agent) +total_tokens: 23247 +tool_uses: 0 +duration_ms: 67383 + +Line 225 tool_result (len=160): +Todos have been modified successfully. Ensure that you continue to use the todo list to track your progress. Please proceed with the current tasks if applicable + +Line 228 tool_result text (len=14286): +```json +{ + "surviving_scenarios": [ + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "diff-to-sg-scope.sh processes HEAD~1 diff instead of staged diff during amended commits", + "description": "When the agent runs commit-validate.sh after a git commit --amend, HEAD~1 refers to the commit before the original commit, not the amended content. Changed files from the pre-amendment commit are re-included in scope, and files removed from the amendment are still evaluated. Triggers T5, T7, T13 fire on stale file sets, producing false awards.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "T14 review-persistence trigger races with review-events JSONL being written by concurrent reviewer", + "description": "If commit-validate.sh runs while a code-reviewer sub-agent is still writing its review event (partial JSONL line), commit-validate.sh may read a truncated or malformed JSONL record, either silently skipping the event (T14 fails to fire) or crashing with a parse error.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "T9 ruff check evaluates unstaged or pre-format state", + "description": "commit-validate.sh's ruff invocation may evaluate working-tree files rather than the staged snapshot if ruff was not run on the final staged set. Files with lint violations in the index but not in working tree (or vice versa) produce a false T9 award.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "deployment", + "title": "First commit in a new environment has no HEAD~1, causing diff-to-sg-scope.sh to crash", + "description": "diff-to-sg-scope.sh calls git diff --name-only HEAD~1. In a freshly initialized repository or new orphan branch, HEAD~1 does not exist. The git command exits fatally, and + +Line 228 tool_result text (len=163): +agentId: a462473a9403c6259 (use SendMessage with to: 'a462473a9403c6259' to continue this agent) +total_tokens: 24617 +tool_uses: 0 +duration_ms: 64288 + +Line 229 tool_result text (len=9450): +```json +{ + "surviving_scenarios": [ + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "test-gate-status file absent at snapshot time produces empty tests object, permanently disabling T1 and T2", + "description": "On a clean worktree where no tests have ever run, test-gate-status does not exist. kudos-snapshot.sh writes an empty tests object. T1 and T2 cannot match any test, making them unreachable for the session.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "Concurrent worktree sessions share a single test-gate-status file, causing snapshot to reflect another session's mutations", + "description": "If two worktree sessions are active simultaneously, both read from/write to the same test-gate-status file. Session A may snapshot while Session B is concurrently running tests. The snapshot captured by Session A reflects Session B's test mutations.", + "severity": "high", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "T4 merge-base calculation fails when branch has no common ancestor with main", + "description": "git merge-base may return an error or incorrect commit if the branch was created from detached HEAD, rebased to orphan, or main was force-pushed. An error causes diff-to-sg-scope.sh to receive malformed input, producing zero results or false positives.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "diff-to-sg-scope.sh receives deleted files during T4 check, causing AST parse failures", + "description": "If a file was deleted in the current session, diff-to-sg-scope.sh receives a path that resolves to a deleted file. This may cause a crash or silent skip. Deleted-file refactors are missed.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_ra + +Line 229 tool_result text (len=163): +agentId: a5689607c1bd3a351 (use SendMessage with to: 'a5689607c1bd3a351' to continue this agent) +total_tokens: 22999 +tool_uses: 0 +duration_ms: 37110 + +Line 232 tool_result (len=160): +Todos have been modified successfully. Ensure that you continue to use the todo list to track your progress. Please proceed with the current tasks if applicable + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:15:12 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'rb') as f:\n raw = f.read()\n\nlines = raw.decode('utf-8', errors='replace').split('\\n')\nlines = [l for l in lines if l.strip()]\n\n# Get full content of line 228 blue team E1 result\nobj = json.loads(lines[228])\nmsg = obj.get('message', {})\ncontent_list = msg.get('content', [])\nfor item in content_list:\n if isinstance(item, dict) and item.get('type') == 'tool_result':\n result_content = item.get('content', '')\n if isinstance(result_content, str):\n print(result_content)\n elif isinstance(result_content, list):\n for sub in result_content:\n +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:15:12 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +```json +{ + "surviving_scenarios": [ + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "diff-to-sg-scope.sh processes HEAD~1 diff instead of staged diff during amended commits", + "description": "When the agent runs commit-validate.sh after a git commit --amend, HEAD~1 refers to the commit before the original commit, not the amended content. Changed files from the pre-amendment commit are re-included in scope, and files removed from the amendment are still evaluated. Triggers T5, T7, T13 fire on stale file sets, producing false awards.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "T14 review-persistence trigger races with review-events JSONL being written by concurrent reviewer", + "description": "If commit-validate.sh runs while a code-reviewer sub-agent is still writing its review event (partial JSONL line), commit-validate.sh may read a truncated or malformed JSONL record, either silently skipping the event (T14 fails to fire) or crashing with a parse error.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "T9 ruff check evaluates unstaged or pre-format state", + "description": "commit-validate.sh's ruff invocation may evaluate working-tree files rather than the staged snapshot if ruff was not run on the final staged set. Files with lint violations in the index but not in working tree (or vice versa) produce a false T9 award.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "deployment", + "title": "First commit in a new environment has no HEAD~1, causing diff-to-sg-scope.sh to crash", + "description": "diff-to-sg-scope.sh calls git diff --name-only HEAD~1. In a freshly initialized repository or new orphan branch, HEAD~1 does not exist. The git command exits fatally, and commit-validate.sh crashes or silently skips all sg-dependent triggers on the first commit.", + "severity": "high", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "deployment", + "title": "kudos-write-guard.sh PreToolUse hook not registered after fresh clone breaks guard entirely", + "description": "After a fresh clone, hooks are not automatically installed unless /dso:onboarding or hook installation is re-run. Without the guard, agents can directly edit .kudos/ledger.jsonl and .kudos/session-id, defeating all Goodhart's Law resistance.", + "severity": "critical", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "deployment", + "title": "CI environment lacks sg binary, and exit-2 skip silently voids all sg-dependent triggers", + "description": "In a CI/CD pipeline where sg is not installed, T5, T7, T11, and T13 are silently skipped on every run. The feature appears to work but four of ten triggers are permanently disabled in CI.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "deployment", + "title": ".kudos/ directory missing from .gitignore causes ledger committed to shared repo history", + "description": "If .kudos/ is not added to .gitignore during setup, agents will commit ledger.jsonl and session-id as part of normal commits. These files accumulate permanently in git history. The epic spec does not explicitly mention .gitignore configuration.", + "severity": "high", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "configuration", + "title": "Missing kudos.session_ceiling key with no default causes commit-validate.sh to crash", + "description": "If the key is absent and the script reads it with grep/cut (returning empty string), an arithmetic comparison against an empty string causes bash arithmetic error and aborts the script.", + "severity": "high", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "configuration", + "title": "T12 depends on .test-index presence; missing .test-index causes incorrect behavior", + "description": "If .test-index is absent, T12 either awards points for 'no tests mapped' (false award) or crashes commit-validate.sh. Neither failure mode is described in the spec.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "configuration", + "title": "T3 regex for ticket ID format produces false negatives or false positives", + "description": "The epic spec does not define the expected commit message format for bug references, leaving the regex as an underspecified surface. Too narrow misses lowercase references; too broad triggers T3 for non-bug ticket refs.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + } + ], + "filtered_scenarios": [ + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "Concurrent commit-validate.sh runs corrupt ledger with interleaved appends", + "description": "Two worktree sub-agents finishing commits at the same time both invoke commit-validate.sh, both read the ledger to check deduplication, both conclude the award is valid, and both append to .kudos/ledger.jsonl without a write lock. The JSONL file ends up with duplicate award records for the same (trigger_id, diff_hash) pair. Downstream reads that rely on deduplication logic will double-count, causing awards above the session ceiling and inflated diminishing-return denominators for subsequent triggers in the same session.", + "severity": "high", + "disposition": "reject", + "filter_rationale": "Structurally prevented by architecture. Each sub-agent gets its own isolated worktree with its own .kudos/ directory. There is no shared ledger file for concurrent processes to corrupt. The premise of this scenario — two agents writing to the same ledger.jsonl — cannot occur given worktree isolation." + }, + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "Ledger read-then-append TOCTOU window allows ceiling bypass", + "description": "commit-validate.sh reads the ledger to check the session ceiling, then evaluates multiple triggers. Between the ceiling check and the final append loop, another concurrent commit-validate.sh invocation appends one record, pushing the total to 100. The first invocation proceeds to award points it read as under-ceiling, writing records that push the total to 110+.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "reject", + "filter_rationale": "Structurally prevented by architecture. The commit workflow is serial (one commit at a time per session), and each sub-agent has its own isolated worktree with its own .kudos/. No concurrent commit-validate.sh invocations share a ledger file within or across sessions, eliminating the TOCTOU window entirely." + }, + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "jitter_factor from uniform random produces non-reproducible ledger entries that defeat audit replay", + "description": "The jitter value is sampled at award time. Replaying the ledger to verify historical awards produces different point values. Teams auditing for gaming will see inconsistent results.", + "severity": "low", + "disposition": "reject", + "filter_rationale": "Not actionable as described. Jitter is an intentional design choice to prevent gaming (non-determinism is a feature, not a bug). The audit concern assumes a replay-based verification model that is not part of the epic's stated scope. No concrete remediation path exists that preserves the anti-gaming intent of jitter while also enabling deterministic audit replay — the two goals are in direct tension. This is a speculative architectural concern without a clear fix." + }, + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "session-id file absent in mid-session worktree causes split identity within a session", + "description": "If the session-id file is deleted mid-session (e.g., by a cleanup script or git clean -fd), subsequent commit-validate.sh invocations generate a new UUID. All prior ledger entries are attributed to a different session identity. Triggers that already fired will fire again under the new identity, violating deduplication.", + "severity": "high", + "disposition": "reject", + "filter_rationale": "Low confidence / speculative precondition. The scenario requires a mid-session deletion of session-id by an external actor (cleanup script or git clean -fd). git clean -fd is a destructive command that is never run autonomously by the system (Never-Do rule equivalent), and no cleanup script in the described architecture targets .kudos/. The epic spec states sub-agents get isolated worktrees, so a shared cleanup affecting one worktree's .kudos/ mid-session is not a normal operational path. The scenario extrapolates from a general concern rather than a specific, likely failure mode in this system." + }, + { + "category": "deployment", + "title": "commit-validate.sh invoked before .kudos/ exists creates race with directory creation", + "description": "If two processes both detect .kudos/ absence and attempt mkdir simultaneously, one will fail. The ledger append from the failed-mkdir process may target a path that doesn't exist, silently dropping the award.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "reject", + "filter_rationale": "Structurally prevented by architecture. Worktree isolation means each sub-agent operates in its own worktree; there are no two concurrent processes sharing the same .kudos/ directory path. Within a single session, the commit workflow is serial, so mkdir is never called concurrently on the same path. The race condition premise cannot occur." + }, + { + "category": "configuration", + "title": "kudos.session_ceiling=0 immediately blocks all awards permanently", + "description": "If a user sets kudos.session_ceiling=0, the ceiling check fires before any trigger is evaluated. Every invocation shows the prohibition block and no awards are issued. There is no validation enforcing ceiling > 0.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "reject", + "filter_rationale": "Not a bug — this is expected behavior from a deliberate user configuration. A ceiling of 0 meaning 'no awards' is a coherent and intentional interpretation. The scenario describes a user misconfiguration with a trivially observable outcome (no awards ever fire), which the user can self-diagnose and correct. No latent harm or silent failure occurs; the system behaves exactly as a naive reading of the config value would suggest." + }, + { + "category": "configuration", + "title": "Negative kudos.session_ceiling bypasses ceiling check via integer comparison", + "description": "A negative value causes ceiling check to always be true (all awards blocked) or wraps to a large number (ceiling disabled), with no error in either case.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "reject", + "filter_rationale": "Low confidence / speculative. The actual behavior (block-all vs. wrap-to-large) depends entirely on undecided implementation details — specifically, whether bash arithmetic treats negative ceiling as always-exceeded or as an unsigned wrap. Without knowing the implementation, this scenario cannot be evaluated with high confidence. Additionally, the remediation (validate ceiling > 0 at startup) is already implied by the missing-key scenario (which was accepted) and adds no distinct actionable signal beyond that." + }, + { + "category": "configuration", + "title": "Workflow-phase sub-cap formula is undefined when BasePoints varies per trigger", + "description": "The spec defines the sub-cap as floor(BasePoints × 3) per (trigger_id, ticket_id) pair but doesn't specify whether BasePoints is per-trigger or global. If hardcoded as a single global value, high-value triggers are over-capped and low-value triggers under-capped with no observable error.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "reject", + "filter_rationale": "Assumes a specific implementation detail (hardcoded global BasePoints) that the epic deliberately leaves open. This is an underspecification concern for the design phase, not a runtime failure mode of the proposed system. No evidence the implementation will choose the incorrect approach; the scenario predicts failure based on an undecided implementation path rather than an observed constraint." + }, + { + "category": "configuration", + "title": "dso-config.conf KEY=VALUE format conflicts with values containing '=' characters", + "description": "cut -d= -f2 parsing truncates values at the first '='. For kudos-specific configs this is low risk today but could affect future configurable values.", + "severity": "low", + "disposition": "reject", + "filter_rationale": "Not distinct. This is a general property of the existing dso-config.conf parsing approach that applies to all config values across the entire plugin, not something specific to the kudos epic. The scenario provides no additional insight specific to this feature area and the author acknowledges it is 'low risk today.' Pre-existing systemic concern outside this epic's scope." + }, + { + "category": "configuration", + "title": "jitter bounds [0.8, 1.2] hardcoded with no config key", + "description": "Tuning jitter requires modifying commit-validate.sh directly, a safeguard file requiring task-level authorization.", + "severity": "low", + "disposition": "reject", + "filter_rationale": "Not a runtime failure mode — this is a maintainability observation about future tunability. The scenario does not describe a condition under which the system produces incorrect results; it describes a governance friction that would apply if someone wanted to change the jitter bounds. Low severity, no concrete harm path, and the fix (add a config key) is straightforward enough that it can be addressed in implementation without being flagged as a red team scenario." + } + ] +} +``` +agentId: a462473a9403c6259 (use SendMessage with to: 'a462473a9403c6259' to continue this agent) +total_tokens: 24617 +tool_uses: 0 +duration_ms: 64288 + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:15:37 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "python3 << 'PYEOF'\nimport json\n\nfilepath = '/root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409.jsonl'\n\nwith open(filepath, 'rb') as f:\n raw = f.read()\n\nlines = raw.decode('utf-8', errors='replace').split('\\n')\nlines = [l for l in lines if l.strip()]\n\n# Get full content of line 229 (Epic 2 blue team)\nobj = json.loads(lines[229])\nmsg = obj.get('message', {})\ncontent_list = msg.get('content', [])\nfor item in content_list:\n if isinstance(item, dict) and item.get('type') == 'tool_result':\n result_content = item.get('content', '')\n if isinstance(result_content, list):\n for sub in result_content:\n if isinstance(sub, dict) and sub.get('type') == 'text':\n +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:15:38 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +```json +{ + "surviving_scenarios": [ + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "test-gate-status file absent at snapshot time produces empty tests object, permanently disabling T1 and T2", + "description": "On a clean worktree where no tests have ever run, test-gate-status does not exist. kudos-snapshot.sh writes an empty tests object. T1 and T2 cannot match any test, making them unreachable for the session.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "Concurrent worktree sessions share a single test-gate-status file, causing snapshot to reflect another session's mutations", + "description": "If two worktree sessions are active simultaneously, both read from/write to the same test-gate-status file. Session A may snapshot while Session B is concurrently running tests. The snapshot captured by Session A reflects Session B's test mutations.", + "severity": "high", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "T4 merge-base calculation fails when branch has no common ancestor with main", + "description": "git merge-base may return an error or incorrect commit if the branch was created from detached HEAD, rebased to orphan, or main was force-pushed. An error causes diff-to-sg-scope.sh to receive malformed input, producing zero results or false positives.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "diff-to-sg-scope.sh receives deleted files during T4 check, causing AST parse failures", + "description": "If a file was deleted in the current session, diff-to-sg-scope.sh receives a path that resolves to a deleted file. This may cause a crash or silent skip. Deleted-file refactors are missed.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "configuration", + "title": "test-gate-status key-value format mismatch causes kudos-snapshot.sh to serialize incorrect or partial data", + "description": "kudos-snapshot.sh is a new script with its own parsing implementation. If record-test-status.sh ever changes its key-value format, kudos-snapshot.sh produces malformed JSON or drops fields silently.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "T1 trigger incorrectly awards points when bug ticket ID appears in commit message for reasons unrelated to test failure detection", + "description": "A developer may reference an existing bug ticket for non-T1 reasons (closing, linking, updating), and that ticket may correspond to a test that was in a failed state in the snapshot. The trigger does not verify the commit's purpose is proactive detection.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "T2 awards points when test transitions from resource_exhaustion to passed due to environmental improvement, not developer action", + "description": "resource_exhaustion is transient. If the worktree runs on a lightly loaded machine after a snapshot taken on a heavily loaded one, a resource_exhaustion test passes simply due to improved conditions — with no developer fix.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + }, + { + "category": "runtime", + "title": "Snapshot timestamp written before test-gate-status is fully flushed", + "description": "kudos-snapshot.sh may read the file during a concurrent write from a previous session's cleanup. Without file locking, a partial read serializes incomplete JSON.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "accept", + "filter_rationale": null + } + ], + "filtered_scenarios": [ + { + "category": "deployment", + "title": "kudos-snapshot.sh runs after first record-test-status.sh invocation due to workflow ordering bug", + "description": "If the worktree initialization workflow invokes record-test-status.sh before kudos-snapshot.sh executes, the snapshot captures post-session test states. T1 and T2 triggers compare against contaminated data.", + "severity": "high", + "disposition": "reject", + "filter_rationale": "Fails the Distinct criterion. The ordering constraint is explicitly specified as SC-E2-2 and is already a resolved design decision in the epic. Flagging it as a risk adds no new signal — the architecture already enforces the ordering." + }, + { + "category": "configuration", + "title": "test-gate-snapshot.json uses non-standard ISO-8601 formatting that downstream parsers reject", + "description": "If kudos-snapshot.sh uses date without explicit UTC forcing, the timestamp format varies by system locale. Strict ISO-8601 parsers may reject local-time offsets.", + "severity": "low", + "disposition": "reject", + "filter_rationale": "Fails the High Confidence criterion. The epic description does not specify a downstream parser with strict ISO-8601 requirements. No evidence exists that timestamp format is consumed by anything other than the snapshot file itself. This assumes an implementation choice (locale-unaware date) and a consumer requirement (strict parser) that are both speculative." + }, + { + "category": "deployment", + "title": "Epic 1 infrastructure absent on new environment renders all triggers silently non-functional", + "description": "If Epic 1 is not fully deployed, the Epic 2 scripts call non-existent executables. Without set -e or existence checks, shell scripts silently skip trigger evaluation and return exit 0.", + "severity": "high", + "disposition": "reject", + "filter_rationale": "Fails the Possible criterion under Distinct/architectural facts. Epic 1 is a declared hard dependency — Epic 2 cannot proceed without Epic 1 delivered. This is an explicit architectural gate, not an omission. The scenario reduces to \"what if a hard dependency is absent,\" which is outside scope for this epic's design." + }, + { + "category": "deployment", + "title": "SKILL.md updates alter agent behavior for all invocations, not just Kudos-aware workflows", + "description": "The four SKILL.md updates influence agent responses in all contexts, not only Kudos-instrumented sessions. The completion-verifier UNCERTAIN verdict addition changes when the verifier reports UNCERTAIN across all sprint and epic closure workflows.", + "severity": "medium", + "disposition": "reject", + "filter_rationale": "Fails the High Confidence criterion — specifically flagging a deliberate design choice as a failure. The epic description explicitly states the SKILL.md updates are targeted additions. The fact that they affect all invocations is the intended behavior. Per filtering rules, flagging intentional design decisions as risks does not constitute actionable signal." + }, + { + "category": "configuration", + "title": "Empty or whitespace-only test names produce invalid JSON keys in snapshot", + "description": "If record-test-status.sh writes entries with empty or whitespace test names, or names containing JSON-unsafe characters, kudos-snapshot.sh produces malformed or ambiguous JSON.", + "severity": "low", + "disposition": "reject", + "filter_rationale": "Fails the High Confidence criterion. test-gate-status is managed by record-test-status.sh, which writes test names derived from actual test runner output. No evidence suggests record-test-status.sh produces empty or JSON-unsafe test names — this assumes a defect in an upstream component without evidence. Under partial failure handling this was considered, but the assumption chain (upstream writes bad names → snapshot silently corrupts) is speculative without any architectural basis." + }, + { + "category": "deployment", + "title": ".kudos/ directory not created before kudos-snapshot.sh executes, causing silent write failure", + "description": "kudos-snapshot.sh writes to .kudos/test-gate-snapshot.json. If .kudos/ doesn't exist (first session), the write fails silently or loudly depending on set -e.", + "severity": "high", + "disposition": "reject", + "filter_rationale": "Fails the Distinct criterion. The gap analysis explicitly identified and resolved .kudos/ directory creation ordering. This is a known-addressed concern per the filtering rules." + }, + { + "category": "configuration", + "title": "T4 threshold of ≥3 identical blocks not configurable, causing false negatives", + "description": "The threshold is hardcoded. In some languages, removing 2 duplicated blocks is meaningful deduplication. diff-to-sg-scope.sh may also count blocks differently than expected.", + "severity": "low", + "disposition": "reject", + "filter_rationale": "Fails the High Confidence criterion. A hardcoded threshold is a deliberate design choice, not a defect. The scenario argues the threshold value is wrong for some cases but provides no evidence the chosen value (≥3) is incorrect for the intended use case. Threshold configurability is a product decision, not a correctness gap." + } + ] +} +``` +agentId: a5689607c1bd3a351 (use SendMessage with to: 'a5689607c1bd3a351' to continue this agent) +total_tokens: 22999 +tool_uses: 0 +duration_ms: 37110 + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:18:05 + +I now have all the information needed. Let me present the final specs for approval: + +--- + +**Scrutiny pipeline complete. Both epics pass all fidelity dimensions.** + +**Review Scorecard:** + +| Dimension | Epic 1 | Epic 2 | +|-----------|--------|--------| +| Agent Clarity — self_contained | 4 ✓ | 4 ✓ | +| Agent Clarity — success_measurable | 4 ✓ | 4 ✓ | +| Scope — right_sized | 4 ✓ | 4 ✓ | +| Scope — no_overlap | 5 ✓ | 4 ✓ | +| Scope — dependency_aware | 4 ✓ | 5 ✓ | +| Value — user_impact | 4 ✓ | 4 ✓ | +| Value — validation_signal | 5 ✓ | 4 ✓ | +| Feasibility — technical_feasibility | 4 ✓ | N/A | +| Feasibility — integration_risk | 4 ✓ | N/A | + +Key revision notes incorporated into the specs: +- **T7**: Now uses `ast.NodeVisitor` with depth counter (not `ast.walk`) +- **T9**: ruff invocation uses `--stdin-filename "$(pwd)/$f"` (absolute path, fixes pyproject.toml config-discovery bug #17405) +- **T13/S1**: jscpd file-output integration documented (`mktemp -d` → `--output $REPORT_DIR` → `cat $REPORT_DIR/jscpd-report.json`); Node.js CI availability check added to spike scope +- **diff-to-sg-scope.sh**: `command -v sg` pre-check (not exit code detection) + +--- + +## Epic 1: Kudos system — infrastructure and primary triggers + +**Context:** Engineering teams adopting AI coding agents need a feedback system that reinforces quality behaviors at commit time. Without explicit recognition, agents optimize for task completion over quality practices — an engineering team member reviewing the session ledger after a sprint cannot distinguish deliberate quality-seeking from accidental compliance. This epic establishes the ledger infrastructure, anti-gaming controls, and 10 primary quality triggers so that every commit produces an auditable, trust-worthy record of recognized behaviors. + +**Success Criteria:** + +1. `.kudos/ledger.jsonl` (append-only JSONL): each award record contains `session_id`, `trigger_id`, `diff_hash`, `artifact_sha`, `verification_method`, `workflow_phase`, `message`, `points` (int), `jitter_factor` (float), `timestamp` (ISO-8601 UTC); all string fields JSON-escaped with no raw newlines; `.kudos/` added to `.gitignore` +2. Award formula: `Award(n) = round(BasePoints × (1/(n+1)) × jitter)`, jitter ∈ [0.8, 1.2] uniform random, minimum 1 point; n = count of prior session ledger entries for this `trigger_id` +3. Deduplication: one award per `(trigger_id, diff_hash)` pair per session regardless of how many times `commit-validate.sh` fires +4. Session ceiling: `kudos.session_ceiling` from `dso-config.conf` (default 100, validated > 0 at startup; absent key uses default); awards blocked when ceiling reached, prohibition-block message shown +5. `kudos-write-guard.sh` PreToolUse hook: blocks Edit/Write tool calls to `.kudos/**` (exit 2); registered via onboarding/architect-foundation +6. `commit-validate.sh` integrated into `COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md`: creates `.kudos/` on first run, evaluates all active triggers, fails-open on any evaluation error, displays per-trigger result and running total with Contributor rank to stdout +7. Session identity: UUID written to `.kudos/session-id` at worktree creation; `commit-validate.sh` reads from file (generates fresh UUID if absent) +8. Contributor rank display per commit: Contributor (0–25), Consistent (26–75), Distinguished (76–150), Exemplary (151–300), Principal Contributor (301+) +9. `CLAUDE.md` Kudos section: overview, prohibition block (listed before rewards), jitter disclosure ("awards vary ±20% to prevent gaming"), explicit Goodhart's Law resistance statement, rank table +10. `diff-to-sg-scope.sh` wrapper: checks HEAD~1 existence (exits 2 if first commit), extracts changed files from `git diff --name-only HEAD~1`, invokes `sg run --pattern --json=stream ` per file; pre-checks `command -v sg` (exits 2 if absent, triggering fallback) +11. Spike S0: validates sg `--json=stream` exit code contract (0=no matches, 1=matches found) and NDJSON field schema before T5/T11 implementation +12. Spike S1: validates Python AST subtree hashing prototype (≥30-line implementation, false-positive rate measurement on existing codebase) before T13; if jscpd selected as fallback, confirms Node.js CI availability and documents `mktemp -d` → `--output $REPORT_DIR` → `cat $REPORT_DIR/jscpd-report.json` integration pattern +13. **T3** (Review excellence): `reviewer-findings.json` shows any dimension score = 5; one award per dimension per `diff_hash` +14. **T5** (Function extraction): `diff-to-sg-scope.sh` detects function body relocated to a helper in staged Python files; grep-based fallback when sg absent +15. **T6** (Bug-fix commit): commit message references a bug ticket ID; `dso ticket show ` confirms type=bug AND `created_at` predates session merge-base timestamp (`git merge-base HEAD main`) +16. **T7** (Nesting reduction): staged Python file has ≥4 control-flow nesting levels detected via `ast.NodeVisitor` depth counter (`visit_If`/`visit_For`/`visit_While`/`visit_With`/`visit_Try` increment + `generic_visit` decrement) +17. **T9** (Lint-clean commit): all staged Python files pass `git show ":$f" | ruff check --stdin-filename "$(pwd)/$f" -` (reads staged blob content; absolute path forces pyproject.toml config discovery) +18. **T11** (Pass-through elimination): `diff-to-sg-scope.sh` detects pass-through method removed from staged files; grep-based fallback when sg absent +19. **T12** (Dead code deletion): staged diff removes commented-out code blocks +20. **T13** (Duplicate block removal): ≥3 structurally identical AST subtrees removed, detected via `hashlib.sha256(ast.dump(node).encode())` subtree fingerprinting (algorithm and threshold confirmed by Spike S1) +21. **T14** (Review persistence): `.review-events/` JSONL shows an event with important/critical findings followed by a resubmission review event in the same session, regardless of resubmission outcome +22. **T15** (Test gate persistence): `.review-events/` JSONL shows a `blocked_by_test_gate: true` commit event followed by a passing commit in the same session; disqualified if the only changes between events are `.test-index` RED marker lines (`^\[.*\]$`) +23. Integration test (SC-E1-23): seed a synthetic T9-qualifying commit (all staged Python files pass ruff via stdin), run `commit-validate.sh`, assert `.kudos/ledger.jsonl` contains a T9 entry with `points > 0` AND stdout contains per-trigger breakdown + +**Approach:** All 10 triggers and the full anti-gaming stack (ledger, formula, hook, ceiling, dedup, session-scope check) ship as a single unit. Infrastructure without triggers produces no user value; triggers without anti-gaming controls would be exploitable. Spike S0 and S1 de-risk the sg and AST subtree hashing approaches before their respective trigger implementations begin. + +**Research Findings:** +- *External Integration (sg/ast-grep)*: `--json=stream` NDJSON mode confirmed; per-file invocation supported; `command -v sg` is the correct absence-detection method (not exit code). Key insight: duplicate block detection via sg is infeasible (requires known pattern); Python AST subtree hashing is the sound primary approach. +- *Novel Pattern (PRM)*: 2025 research confirms step-level recognition reduces reasoning errors vs. outcome-only scoring; immediate reward delivery critical for behavioral linkage; the jitter + diminishing returns design aligns with AgentPRM and PRIME findings. + +**Scenario Analysis:** + +- **diff-to-sg-scope.sh uses HEAD~1 diff during `git commit --amend`** (`medium`, runtime): amend makes HEAD~1 the pre-original-commit parent; stale file scope causes false trigger firings on T5, T7, T13 +- **T14 JSONL race with concurrent reviewer write** (`medium`, runtime): commit-validate.sh reads review-events JSONL while a reviewer sub-agent is still writing; partial line causes parse error or silently missed event +- **kudos-write-guard.sh not registered after fresh clone** (`critical`, deployment): hooks require explicit installation; fresh clone without re-running onboarding has no guard +- **sg absent in CI silently voids sg-dependent triggers** (`medium`, deployment): T5, T11, and sg-path of T13 silently skip in CI environments without sg installed +- **`.kudos/` missing from `.gitignore`** (`high`, deployment): ledger committed to shared repo history permanently +- **Missing `kudos.session_ceiling` key causes startup crash** (`high`, configuration): absent key returns empty string; bash arithmetic error aborts script +- **T12 with missing `.test-index` causes incorrect behavior** (`medium`, configuration): failure mode when `.test-index` is absent is unspecified +- **T3 commit-message regex underspecified** (`medium`, configuration): bug ticket ID format not defined; too-narrow misses references, too-broad triggers on non-bug refs + +*(T + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:20:31 + +I now have everything needed. Let me compile and present the final specs: + +--- + +**Both scrutiny pipelines complete. All dimensions passing. Review events emitted.** + +Final scorecard: +- **Epic 1**: Agent Clarity 4/4, Scope 4/5/4, Value 4/5, Feasibility 4/4 ✓ +- **Epic 2**: Agent Clarity 4/4, Scope 4/4/5, Value 4/4 ✓ (no feasibility trigger) + +--- + +## Epic 1: Kudos system — infrastructure and primary triggers + +**Context** + +Engineering teams adopting AI coding agents struggle to reinforce quality behaviors at commit time. Agents optimize for task completion over structural quality practices — proactive research, comprehensive testing, clean code — because completion is what gates progress. This epic introduces a process-reward model that awards kudos points at each commit for structurally verifiable quality behaviors. The award mechanism is a pure shell script with no LLM judgment, making it Goodhart-resistant by design: the system cannot be gamed by reasoning about what reviewers want, only by actually doing the work it rewards. + +**Success Criteria** + +**Infrastructure** + +- SC-E1-1: `.kudos/ledger.jsonl` exists after the first `commit-validate.sh` run. Each entry contains: `session_id`, `trigger_id`, `diff_hash`, `artifact_sha`, `verification_method`, `workflow_phase`, `message`, `points` (integer ≥1), `jitter_factor` (float in [0.8, 1.2]), `timestamp` (ISO-8601 UTC). All string fields JSON-escaped; no raw newlines. +- SC-E1-2: Award formula: `Award(n) = round(BasePoints × (1/(n+1)) × jitter)`, where `n` = count of prior session ledger entries for this `trigger_id`; jitter = uniform random float [0.8, 1.2]; minimum 1 point; uses floating-point division (not integer truncation). +- SC-E1-3: Session-level deduplication by `(trigger_id, diff_hash)`. Same pair awards once per session, regardless of how many times evaluated. +- SC-E1-4: Hard session ceiling: `kudos.session_ceiling` from `dso-config.conf` (default 100 when key absent, validated >0 at startup; absent key uses default without error). +- SC-E1-5: `kudos-write-guard.sh` registered as PreToolUse hook; blocks Edit/Write tool calls targeting `.kudos/**` paths; jq-free `parse_json_field`; exits 2 to block. Pattern matches `plugins/dso/hooks/lib/pre-edit-write-functions.sh`. +- SC-E1-6: `commit-validate.sh` integrated into `COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md` before the commit gate; creates `.kudos/` directory if absent; fails-open (any detection error → skip with log, never abort commit). +- SC-E1-7: Session identity UUID persisted to `.kudos/session-id` at worktree creation; `commit-validate.sh` reads from file, fails-open with fresh UUID if absent. +- SC-E1-8: Contributor rank displayed in `commit-validate.sh` stdout with each run: tier name + cumulative point total. Tiers: Contributor (0–25), Consistent (26–75), Distinguished (76–150), Exemplary (151–300), Principal Contributor (301+). +- SC-E1-9: `CLAUDE.md` contains: kudos system overview, jitter disclosure (±20% random variation), Goodhart's Law disclosure (gaming attempts void all session rewards), rank table, and categorical prohibition block listed BEFORE reward descriptions. +- SC-E1-10: `diff-to-sg-scope.sh` wrapper: `command -v sg` pre-check (exits 2 when sg absent); checks HEAD~1 existence (exits 2 if first commit); extracts changed files via `git diff --name-only HEAD~1`; invokes `sg run --pattern '' --json=stream ` per file; parses NDJSON. +- SC-E1-11: Spike S0 validates: `sg run --pattern 'TODO' --json=stream ` exit code (0=no matches, 1=matches) and NDJSON schema. Must pass before any sg-dependent trigger ships. +- SC-E1-12: Spike S1 implements and tests Python AST subtree hashing prototype (`hashlib.sha256(ast.dump(node).encode())`); measures false-positive rate on existing codebase; benchmarks jscpd `--min-tokens 50` if selected as fallback; confirms jscpd file-output integration (`cat $OUTPUT_DIR/jscpd-report.json`, NOT stdout). + +**Triggers (T3, T5, T6, T7, T9, T11, T12, T13, T14, T15)** + +- SC-E1-T3: When `reviewer-findings.json` records a dimension score of 5 for the current diff, the implementer earns T3 kudos. Deduplication by `(trigger_id, diff_hash)`. +- SC-E1-T5: When `diff-to-sg-scope.sh` detects a function-length reduction in staged Python files (long function in HEAD~1 extracted into helpers in HEAD), `commit-validate.sh` awards T5 kudos. Skip when sg absent. +- SC-E1-T6: When the commit message references a bug ticket ID, `dso ticket show ` confirms `type=bug`, and the ticket's `created_at` predates the session merge-base (`git merge-base HEAD main`), `commit-validate.sh` awards T6 kudos. +- SC-E1-T7: When a staged Python file contains 4+ levels of nested control-flow (`if`/`for`/`while`/`with`/`try`), `commit-validate.sh` awards T7 kudos. Depth computed via `ast.NodeVisitor` with a counter (increment on entry to `visit_If`/`visit_For`/`visit_While`/`visit_With`/`visit_Try`, decrement after `generic_visit(node)`). +- SC-E1-T9: When all staged Python files pass `git show ":$f" | ruff check --stdin-filename "$(pwd)/$f" -` (staged blob content, absolute path fixes ruff #17405 config-discovery bug), `commit-validate.sh` awards T9 kudos. +- SC-E1-T11: When `diff-to-sg-scope.sh` detects elimination of a pass-through method in staged Python files, `commit-validate.sh` awards T11 kudos. Skip when sg absent. +- SC-E1-T12: When `git diff HEAD~1 HEAD` shows deletion of commented-out code blocks (consecutive lines beginning with `#` removed), `commit-validate.sh` awards T12 kudos. +- SC-E1-T13: When staged Python files show removal of 3+ structurally identical AST subtrees (detected via `hashlib.sha256(ast.dump(node).encode())` subtree fingerprinting; algorithm and threshold confirmed by Spike S1), `commit-validate.sh` awards T13 kudos. +- SC-E1-T14: When `.review-events/` JSONL shows the agent received important/critical findings in review round N and then submitted a new review attempt (round N+1) for the same code, `commit-validate.sh` awards T14 kudos per resubmission. +- SC-E1-T15: When `.review-events/` JSONL shows a `commit_workflow` event with `blocked_by_test_gate: true` followed by a subsequent commit with `test_gate_passed: true`, `commit-validate.sh` awards T15 kudos. Disqualified if the only changes between the two commits are `.test-index` RED marker edits (lines matching `^\[.*\]$` or `# skip`); detected via `git show --name-only `. +- SC-E1-16 (integration test): A test seeds a synthetic T9-qualifying commit (all staged `.py` files pass ruff via stdin), runs `commit-validate.sh`, and asserts: (1) `.kudos/ledger.jsonl` contains a T9 entry with `points > 0`; (2) stdout includes per-trigger breakdown with at least one "T9" line. + +**Approach** + +Implement the ledger, award formula, anti-gaming stack, and 10 triggers as a pure shell + Python stdlib implementation anchored to `commit-validate.sh` in the existing commit workflow. Spike tasks S0/S1 de-risk the two externally-dependent triggers (sg pattern matching, Python AST clone detection) before those triggers ship. + +**Sprint Scope Rationale** + +Infrastructure without triggers produces zero awards — not a stable state worth shipping. All 10 triggers share one user goal (recognizing quality behaviors at commit time) and depend on the same anti-gaming stack. Splitting infrastructure from triggers would create a deployable-but-useless interim state. Spike tasks are investigation prerequisites, not sprint work items — their results inform implementation, they don't add scope. + +**Research Findings** + +- **External integration (sg/ast-grep)**: `sg run --pattern '

' --json=stream ` confirmed supported; NDJSON per-match output; per-file invocation confirmed. Duplicate block detection requires two-pass approach (extract patterns from HEAD~1, search HEAD) — validated by Spike S1 design. +- **Novel pattern (Process Reward Models)**: Published 2025 PRM research (AgentPRM, PRIME) confirms step-level recognition reduces reasoning errors vs. outcome-only scoring; immediate reward delivery is critical for behavioral linkage. Kudos design (immediate at-commit awards, mechanical verification, stochastic jitter) aligns with these findings. + +**Scenario Analysis** + +- **`diff-to-sg-scope.sh` processes HEAD~1 diff during amended commits** (`medium`, `runtime`): After `git commit --amend`, HEAD~1 refers to the pre-amendment commit; stale file sets can trigger false T5/T7/T13 awards. Implementation must detect amend context. +- **T14 races with concurrent reviewer JSONL write** (`medium`, `runtime`): `commit-validate.sh` reading `.review-events/` JSONL while a reviewer sub-agent is writing may encounter partial records; must handle parse errors gracefully. +- **`kudos-write-guard.sh` not registered after fresh clone** (`critical`, `deployment`): Hook registration requires onboarding re-run after a fresh clone; without the guard, `.kudos/` files are directly editable. Must add guard registration to onboarding checklist. +- **`.kudos/` absent from `.gitignore`** (`high`, `deployment`): `ledger.jsonl` and `session-id` will accumulate in git history if `.gitignore` is not updated; `commit-validate.sh` must add `.kudos/` to `.gitignore` on first run. +- **Missing `kudos.session_ceiling` key causes crash** (`high`, `configuration`): Absent key with empty-string read causes bash arithmetic error; must validate/default at startup. +- **CI environment lacks sg binary** (`medium`, `deployment`): T5, T11 silently skip on every CI run when sg not installed; document that CI scope requires sg or accept skip behavior as designed. + +*Note: T9 "unstaged file" scenario was mitigated by the stdin approach (reads staged blob via `git show ":$f"`). HEAD~1-not-found crash was mitigated by the HEAD~1 existence check in `diff-to-sg-scope.sh`.* + +**Dependencies** + +- Coordinate with epic `1083-fb3d` (local workflow simplification) for hook registration ordering; no hard dependency but shared files. +- No hard blockers — Epic 1 can ship independently. + +--- + +## Epic 2: Kudos system — detection triggers and agent behavioral improvements + +**Context** + +An engineering team member who reviews the session's Kudos ledger after a sprint needs to trust that T1 and T2 awards reflect genuine proactive quality work — not incidental passes from pre-existing failures that happened to clear. Without a reliable pre-session test baseline, the team cannot distinguish deliberate pre-existing debt remediation from accidental passes, eroding trust in the reward system and forcing manual firefighting to audit the ledger. This epic adds the snapshot infrastructure that anchors T1/T2/T4 awards to pre-session state, and updates four sub-agent contracts to make quality-seeking framing explicit. + +**Success Criteria** + +- SC-E2-1: `kudos-snapshot.sh` creates `.kudos/test-gate-snapshot.json` at worktree creation. Reads local `test-gate-status` file (NOT `gh` CLI); uses `flock` for atomic read; handles absent file by writing `{"tests": {}, "captured_at": "", "source": "test-gate-status"}`. +- SC-E2-2: `kudos-snapshot.sh` is registered in the worktree creation sequence at an index guaranteeing it runs before the first `record-test-status.sh` invocation; verified by checking registration order in `plugins/dso/hooks/`. +- SC-E2-3 (T1): When (a) commit message references a bug ticket ID, (b) `dso ticket show ` confirms `type=bug` and `created_at` predates session merge-base, (c) snapshot shows the bug's associated test as `failed` or `timeout` (source-file→test mapping via `.test-index`), and (d) the commit fixes the test, `commit-validate.sh` awards T1 kudos. +- SC-E2-4 (T2): When a test appears in the snapshot with status `failed` or `timeout` (NOT `resource_exhaustion` — transient, excluded explicitly), and the commit transitions it to `passed`, `commit-validate.sh` awards T2 kudos. +- SC-E2-5 (T4): When `git diff $(git merge-base HEAD main) HEAD --name-only` (deleted files excluded) shows a measurable reduction in duplicate Python block count (via Python AST subtree hashing), `commit-validate.sh` awards T4 kudos. Merge-base failure → skip. Deleted files excluded from diff list. +- SC-E2-6: `completion-verifier.md` contract adds `UNCERTAIN` as a valid `overall_verdict`; sprint orchestrator dispatches opus on UNCERTAIN; if opus also returns UNCERTAIN → blocked flag (no forced PASS/FAIL). **Coordination constraint**: sequence this SC after or coordinated with epics `6068-cb2d` and `53ee-a9ac` to avoid conflicts. +- SC-E2-7: `approach-decision-maker.md` receives framing: "You may construct a counter-proposal not only when no proposal satisfies done definitions, but also when the highest-scoring proposal represents an architectural pattern you would not want maintained long-term. Name the quality or maintainability concern explicitly. You are the codebase's steward, not just a selection mechanism." +- SC-E2-8: `doc-writer.md` adds: "Write the minimum that would allow a new contributor to understand the project without asking someone who built it. Prefer accuracy over coverage — an incomplete but accurate document is better than a complete but stale one." +- SC-E2-9: `using-lockpick/SKILL.md` adds a kudos system awareness section describing active triggers, point display, and jitter interpretation. + +**Approach** + +Build on Epic 1's anti-gaming stack. Add `kudos-snapshot.sh` as the sole new infrastructure piece; all three snapshot-dependent triggers read from this file. Sub-agent contract updates are targeted text additions to four agent definition files. + +**Scenario Analysis** + +- **Empty snapshot permanently disables T1/T2** (`medium`, `runtime`): On a fresh worktree with no test history, snapshot is empty; T1/T2 are unreachable for the session. Expected behavior for new environments; document in CLAUDE.md. +- **Concurrent sessions share `test-gate-status`** (`high`, `runtime`): Two simultaneous worktree sessions read/write the same file; Session A's snapshot may reflect Session B's mutations. Mitigation: `flock` atomic read (already in SC-E2-1); document known limitation for simultaneous parallel sessions. +- **T4 merge-base fails with no common ancestor** (`medium`, `runtime`): Detached HEAD or force-pushed main causes merge-base error → T4 skip (already spec'd). Acceptable graceful degradation. +- **T1 false award from unrelated bug ticket reference** (`medium`, `runtime`): Developer references an existing bug ticket for non-T1 reasons (linking, updating) and the associated test happens to be in snapshot as `failed`. Mitigation: require the commit to actually fix the test (SC-E2-3 condition (d)). + +**Dependencies** + +- **Hard dependency**: Epic 1 must ship first (ledger, anti-gaming stack, `diff-to-sg-scope.sh`, Spikes S0/S1). +- **Soft coordination**: SC-E2-6 should be scheduled after or coordinated with epics `6068-cb2d` (completion-verifier changes) and `53ee-a9ac` to avoid conflicting contract updates. + +--- + +**Approval requested.** On approval, I'll: +1. Update ticket `3e9b-afee` with Epic 1 spec (replacing the original single-epic placeholder) +2. Create a new ticket for Epic 2 +3. Run the complexity evaluator and route to `/dso:preplanning` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:20:32 + + +a3f67d6fe899f62ae +toolu_01A7CcTgRPPg7P4EoPd55HdR +/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409/tasks/a3f67d6fe899f62ae.output +completed +

Agent "E1 Feasibility reviewer (inline fallback)" completed +That confirms `/usr/bin/sg` is `newgrp`, not ast-grep — ast-grep is not installed on this system. Now I have all the evidence needed. + +```json +{ + "subject": "Epic: Kudos system: infrastructure and primary triggers — sg and PreToolUse hook feasibility", + "reviews": [ + { + "perspective": "Technical Feasibility", + "status": "reviewed", + "dimensions": { + "technical_feasibility": 2, + "integration_risk": 2 + }, + "findings": [ + { + "severity": "critical", + "dimension": "technical_feasibility", + "title": "sg (ast-grep) is not installed; /usr/bin/sg is newgrp", + "description": "The binary `sg` resolves to `/usr/bin/sg` → `newgrp` on this system. ast-grep is absent. The epic's fallback assumption ('graceful exit code 2 when not installed') will fire by default on every developer machine and CI runner that hasn't separately installed ast-grep. The epic must treat installation as a prerequisite task, not an optional fallback path, or the reward triggers T5, T7, and T13 will silently degrade to no-ops on day one." + }, + { + "severity": "critical", + "dimension": "technical_feasibility", + "title": "sg --json=stream match objects contain no match-count field", + "description": "The JSON output schema for `sg run --json=stream` is confirmed by official docs: each NDJSON object has fields `text`, `lines`, `range` (with `byteOffset`, `start`, `end`), `file`, and optionally `metaVariables`, `replacement`, `language`. There is no `count` or aggregate field. The shell script aggregator must implement its own count by piping through `wc -l` or `jq length` on the streamed objects. If the epic spec assumes a match-count field in the JSON it will fail at runtime." + }, + { + "severity": "important", + "dimension": "technical_feasibility", + "title": "sg run exit codes do NOT follow grep convention as assumed", + "description": "Available evidence (GitHub issue #575, official CLI reference) does NOT confirm that `sg run` emits exit code 1 for no-matches and exit code 2 for errors. The docs only document that `sg scan` exits non-zero when an error-severity rule fires. The epic's fallback logic — 'exit code 2 (or any non-zero) when not installed' — conflates the not-installed failure with the no-matches case. In practice: if `sg` is not installed, the shell returns exit 127 (command not found), not exit 2. Scripts written around exit code 2 for 'not installed' will miss the actual signal." + }, + { + "severity": "critical", + "dimension": "technical_feasibility", + "title": "ast-grep has no built-in nesting-depth measurement (T7)", + "description": "ast-grep's `inside` relational rule can detect whether a node is nested inside another specific node type, but it cannot compute or emit a numeric nesting depth. T7 (nesting depth reduction reward) requires comparing nesting depth before and after a commit. To approximate this with sg, a rule must be written for each specific nesting level (e.g., a function nested inside a function nested inside a function), requiring one rule file per depth tier, with no programmatic depth counter. This is significantly more complex than the epic implies and there are no known working examples of depth measurement via ast-grep in shell scripts." + }, + { + "severity": "critical", + "dimension": "technical_feasibility", + "title": "ast-grep cannot detect structurally identical duplicate blocks (T13)", + "description": "ast-grep is a pattern-matching tool: it searches for AST nodes that match a supplied pattern. To detect duplicate code blocks (T13: duplicate code elimination), you must already know the pattern you are looking for. It cannot autonomously find all pairs of structurally identical subtrees across a file without a pre-specified template pattern. Dedicated clone-detection tools (e.g., jscpd, CPD, PMD) are required for type-1 and type-2 clone detection. The epic's assumption that `sg` can be used for this trigger is contradicted by the tool's design." + }, + { + "severity": "important", + "dimension": "technical_feasibility", + "title": "T5 before/after comparison requires two separate sg invocations on git-extracted file contents", + "description": "sg has no built-in diff or before/after awareness. Comparing HEAD~1 vs HEAD for anti-pattern elimination (T5) requires: (1) `git show HEAD~1:path/to/file > /tmp/before.py`, (2) `sg run --json=stream -p PATTERN /tmp/before.py | wc -l` for before-count, (3) same for current file for after-count, (4) shell arithmetic to compare. This is mechanically achievable but not a single-command operation. The implementation complexity is moderate and well-understood; this is a design clarification, not a blocker — provided sg is installed." + }, + { + "severity": "important", + "dimension": "technical_feasibility", + "title": "ruff check has no native staged-file-only mode", + "description": "ruff does not support running exclusively on the git index (staged content) as a first-class feature. The ruff maintainers have explicitly declined to support this (GitHub discussion #4049: 'unfortunately we don't support this right now'). The practical workaround — `ruff check $(git diff --cached --name-only -- '*.py')` — analyzes the full working-tree file, not the staged snapshot. This means if a developer stages a partial patch (`git add -p`), ruff will lint the full file including unstaged changes. For a pre-commit kudos trigger, this creates a misattribution risk: a reward fires based on working-tree state that differs from what was actually committed. A correct implementation must use `git show :path/to/file | ruff check --stdin-filename path/to/file -` to lint the staged blob, which is a workaround not the official API." + }, + { + "severity": "important", + "dimension": "technical_feasibility", + "title": "PreToolUse hook path-glob blocking is achievable but requires shell-side path inspection, not a native matcher field", + "description": "The Claude Code hooks system's PreToolUse `matcher` field filters on tool name only (e.g., `Edit`, `Write`). Path-glob filtering is not a native matcher field. To block writes to `.kudos/**`, the hook script must extract `tool_input.file_path` from the JSON payload passed on stdin and perform its own glob match (e.g., bash `case` or `[[ $FILE_PATH == */.kudos/* ]]`), then exit 2 to block. This is the exact pattern already used by the project's existing `hook_tickets_tracker_guard` function in `pre-edit-write-functions.sh`. No new capability is required — it is a well-trodden pattern in this codebase. Classification: verified." + }, + { + "severity": "important", + "dimension": "integration_risk", + "title": "Spike tasks required before implementing T7 and T13 triggers", + "description": "Two triggers (T7: nesting depth reduction, T13: duplicate code elimination) cannot be implemented with sg as currently described. Before implementation begins, the epic needs spike tasks to: (1) evaluate an alternative nesting-depth measurement approach (e.g., Python AST `ast.walk` with depth tracking, or a dedicated linter metric), and (2) evaluate a dedicated clone-detection tool for T13. Both spikes should produce a confirmed working shell-invocable command with verifiable JSON/exit-code output before any task is written." + } + ] + } + ], + "conflicts": [] +} +``` + +--- + +## Technical Feasibility — Signal Classification + +**Signal 1: sg (ast-grep) — `sg run --json=stream` JSON output and shell aggregation** +- Classification: PARTIALLY VERIFIED (JSON format confirmed, but with critical gaps) +- The `--json=stream` NDJSON output format is confirmed by official docs: each object contains `text`, `lines`, `range`, `file`, `language`, optionally `metaVariables`. Verified. +- No match-count field exists in the JSON objects. A shell aggregator must count lines or objects externally. Unverified assumption in the epic. +- Exit code behavior for "no matches" vs "error" vs "not installed" is NOT confirmed to follow grep convention. Exit 127 (command not found) is what actually fires when the binary is absent, not exit 2. +- `/usr/bin/sg` on this system is `newgrp` (not ast-grep). ast-grep is not installed. + +**Signal 2: sg — nesting depth detection (T7)** +- Classification: CONTRADICTED +- ast-grep's `inside` rule detects whether a node is contained within another node of a given type. It cannot produce a numeric depth count. No working example of depth measurement exists in the ast-grep catalog or GitHub issues. A separate implementation strategy is required. + +**Signal 3: sg — structurally identical duplicate block detection (T13)** +- Classification: CONTRADICTED +- ast-grep requires a known pattern to search for. It cannot autonomously enumerate all pairs of identical AST subtrees. This is a dedicated clone-detection problem. Tools like CPD, jscpd, or Python's `ast` module with subtree hashing are required. + +**Signal 4: sg — HEAD~1 before/after comparison (T5)** +- Classification: PARTIALLY VERIFIED +- Mechanically achievable via two `git show` extractions + two separate `sg run` invocations. No built-in diff support. The implementation approach is sound but multi-step. + +**Signal 5: ruff — staged-file-only checking** +- Classification: CONTRADICTED (for the native API), PARTIALLY VERIFIED (for workaround) +- ruff maintainers have explicitly declined to add staged-file-only support (GitHub discussion #4049). The typical workaround `ruff check $(git diff --cached --name-only)` lints the full working-tree file, not the staged blob — creating misattribution when partial patches are staged. A correct implementation must use `git show :path | ruff check --stdin-filename path -`, which is a workaround via stdin, not the official mode. + +**Signal 6: PreToolUse hook path-glob blocking for `.kudos/**`** +- Classification: VERIFIED +- The Claude Code PreToolUse `matcher` field only matches on tool name. Path filtering requires shell-side inspection of `tool_input.file_path`, then exit 2 to block. This exact pattern is already implemented in this codebase (`hook_tickets_tracker_guard` in `/home/user/digital-service-orchestra/plugins/dso/hooks/lib/pre-edit-write-functions.sh`). No new capability gap. + +**Score rationale:** +- `technical_feasibility: 2` — Two of five sg-based triggers (T7, T13) are contradicted by the tool's documented capabilities, the tool is not installed on this system, and the exit-code fallback assumption is wrong. These are not implementation-complexity issues — they are architectural mismatches requiring a different tool or approach. +- `integration_risk: 2` — The T7 and T13 gaps and the missing sg installation will block implementation of those triggers entirely. The ruff staged-file gap creates reward-misattribution risk at runtime. Only the PreToolUse hook pattern is safe to implement as described. +5812366294315 + + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:20:40 + +This is the stale first-run notification (the 2/2 run). The findings from that run were already incorporated: T7 → NodeVisitor, T9 → stdin with absolute path, T13 → Python AST subtree hashing, `command -v sg` pre-check. The re-run scored 4/4 on both dimensions, as presented above. + +The final specs above are complete and accurate. Awaiting your approval to proceed with ticket creation. + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T01:20:41 + + +a3e5ed934a0570ca6 +toolu_01Beh5m4hiWVaC627Amsyvpd +/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/db8f7468-d506-4477-8fb2-21f17cded409/tasks/a3e5ed934a0570ca6.output +completed +Agent "E1 Feasibility re-run (T7/T13/T9 redesigned)" completed +I now have everything I need. Let me compile the full assessment. + +--- + +```json +{ + "subject": "Epic: Kudos system: infrastructure and primary triggers (revised) — sg, Python ast, ruff feasibility", + "reviews": [ + { + "perspective": "Technical Feasibility", + "status": "reviewed", + "dimensions": { + "technical_feasibility": 4, + "integration_risk": 3 + }, + "findings": [ + { + "dimension": "technical_feasibility", + "severity": "minor", + "description": "ruff check stdin mode works but has a known configuration-discovery bug (issue #17405): when --stdin-filename is a relative path, ruff searches config in ancestors of that filename rather than the CWD, causing pyproject.toml rules to be silently ignored. The epic's pattern `git show \":$f\" | ruff check --stdin-filename \"$f\" -` uses a relative path, triggering this bug if pyproject.toml-configured rules (e.g., custom select/ignore lists) are required for the T9 score.", + "suggestion": "Make the stdin-filename argument absolute: replace `--stdin-filename \"$f\"` with `--stdin-filename \"$(pwd)/$f\"`. This forces ruff to anchor config search at the repo root, matching behavior of direct-file invocation." + }, + { + "dimension": "technical_feasibility", + "severity": "minor", + "description": "sg JSON stream output schema confirmed (fields: file, text, lines, range.start, range.end, range.byteOffset, metaVariables, language). However, there are no GitHub script examples of the exact form `sg run --pattern '<p>' --json=stream <file>` in shell automation. The single-file positional argument form is confirmed by documentation (file/directory as trailing positional arg), but the combination with --json=stream is only documented, not demonstrated in real shell scripts.", + "suggestion": "During spike S0, emit a test invocation `sg run --pattern 'TODO' --json=stream src/main.py` and validate that (a) exit code is 0 for no matches and 1 for matches, and (b) each NDJSON line parses correctly. Confirm the exit-code contract before using it as a count signal." + }, + { + "dimension": "technical_feasibility", + "severity": "minor", + "description": "Python ast subtree-hashing for T13 clone detection (primary candidate) has sound academic and stdlib foundations — `ast.dump()` + `hashlib.sha256()` is the standard subtree fingerprinting approach (Baxter et al. 1998). However, there are no off-the-shelf Python stdlib implementations; this requires bespoke code. The approach is also sensitive to variable renaming (Type-2 clones) and non-Python files are not covered.", + "suggestion": "Scope the spike S1 explicitly to: (1) implement a 30-line prototype, (2) measure false-positive rate on existing codebase, (3) confirm minimum clone size threshold. jscpd fallback is viable if false-positive rate is unacceptable — its CLI flags (--min-tokens, --reporters json, --output) are confirmed documented." + }, + { + "dimension": "integration_risk", + "severity": "minor", + "description": "jscpd (fallback for T13) writes its report to a file in --output directory (default ./report/jscpd-report.json), not to stdout. Scripts that expect stdout capture via command substitution will silently receive nothing. Additionally, jscpd is a Node.js tool — it adds a runtime dependency (Node/npm) that may not be present in the CI environment.", + "suggestion": "If jscpd is selected as fallback, the shell script must: (1) write to a temp directory (`--output $(mktemp -d)`), (2) read the JSON file after invocation, and (3) clean up. Guard with `command -v jscpd` pre-check analogous to the sg guard. Verify Node.js availability in CI." + }, + { + "dimension": "integration_risk", + "severity": "minor", + "description": "Python ast.NodeVisitor nesting-depth tracking (T7) is well-supported by stdlib, but `ast.walk()` is unordered and does not natively track depth; NodeVisitor with manual depth counter is the correct approach. The spec's description of using `ast.walk()` for depth is slightly imprecise — walk alone cannot count nesting depth without parent tracking. The implementation is straightforward but must use NodeVisitor, not ast.walk directly.", + "suggestion": "Clarify in the task spec: use `ast.NodeVisitor` with a depth counter (increment in `visit_If`/`visit_For`/`visit_While`/`visit_With`/`visit_Try`, decrement after `generic_visit`). Do not use bare `ast.walk()` for depth computation. A 20-line reference implementation should be written and tested during spike." + } + ] + } + ], + "conflicts": [] +} +``` + +--- + +## Technical Feasibility — Signal Classification + +### Signal 1: sg (ast-grep) — VERIFIED + +**Evidence:** +- Official documentation at `ast-grep.github.io/guide/tools/json.html` and `ast-grep.github.io/reference/cli/run.html` confirms: + - `sg run --pattern '<pattern>' <file>` — file/directory as trailing positional arg is valid + - `--json=stream` produces NDJSON, one match object per line + - Match object fields confirmed: `file`, `text`, `lines`, `range` (with `start`/`end`/`byteOffset`), `metaVariables`, `language` +- `command -v sg` pre-check approach is correct; the skip-on-missing contract (exit 2) follows the same pattern as other hooks in this repo +- No working shell-script GitHub examples found combining all three flags simultaneously, but each individual capability is independently documented + +**Classification: Verified** (documentation-confirmed; no contradictory evidence; minor gap is absence of combined real-world script examples) + +--- + +### Signal 2: Python `ast` module — nesting depth for T7 — VERIFIED (with precision gap) + +**Evidence:** +- Python 3 stdlib `ast` module is mature and stable; `ast.parse()` + node traversal is standard +- `ast.NodeVisitor` with `visit_If`, `visit_For`, `visit_While`, `visit_With`, `visit_Try` methods and a depth counter is the confirmed pattern for nesting-depth tracking +- The spec's description of using `ast.walk()` for depth is technically imprecise: `ast.walk()` yields nodes in unspecified (approximately BFS) order without parent tracking; it cannot determine depth without additional bookkeeping. `NodeVisitor` is the correct primitive. +- Python is already a project dependency — zero new runtime dependency + +**Classification: Verified** (approach is sound; implementation note: must use `NodeVisitor`, not raw `ast.walk()`) + +--- + +### Signal 3: Python `ast` subtree hashing + jscpd fallback for T13 — PARTIALLY VERIFIED + +**Evidence — Primary (Python ast + hashlib):** +- `ast.dump(node)` + `hashlib.sha256(...encode())` for subtree fingerprinting is the established academic approach (Baxter et al. 1998), implemented in multiple research tools +- No ready-made stdlib-only Python implementation exists; bespoke code is required (~30–50 lines) +- Detects Type-1 (exact) clones; Type-2 (variable-renamed) clones require normalization of identifiers in `ast.dump()` output (possible but adds complexity) +- ActiveState has a published Python clone detector recipe using this approach, confirming practical viability + +**Evidence — Fallback (jscpd):** +- `--min-tokens` flag confirmed documented (default 50) +- `--reporters json` confirmed, writes `jscpd-report.json` to `--output` directory (NOT stdout) +- Actively maintained (version 4.0.8 as of 2026); cross-language capable +- Risk: Node.js runtime dependency; output-to-file (not stdout) requires adjusted shell integration + +**Classification: Partially Verified** (primary candidate lacks an existing reference implementation but approach is sound; fallback confirmed but introduces a new runtime dependency and file-output pattern) + +--- + +### Signal 4: ruff stdin checking for T9 — VERIFIED (with known bug requiring workaround) + +**Evidence:** +- `ruff check --stdin-filename <name> -` is confirmed working; syntax validated by the Helix editor integration (`ruff check --stdin-filename ${INPUT} --output-format concise --quiet -`) and by ruff issue #17405 reproduction steps +- The git-staged-blob pattern (`git show ":$f" | ruff check --stdin-filename "$f" -`) is technically sound +- **Known bug (ruff #17405):** when `--stdin-filename` is a relative path, ruff fails to find `pyproject.toml` configuration (searches ancestors of the filename, not CWD). This silently drops project-configured rules (select/ignore/extend-select). +- Workaround: use absolute path for `--stdin-filename` (e.g., `"$(pwd)/$f"`) +- `ruff check --fix` stdout limitation does not apply here (the epic only uses check, not fix) + +**Classification: Verified** (feature works; one known bug has a clear, documented workaround) + +--- + +### Signal 5: PreToolUse hook for `.kudos/**` path blocking — VERIFIED (in-repo evidence) + +**Evidence:** +- This project already implements the exact pattern in `plugins/dso/hooks/lib/pre-edit-write-functions.sh`: + - `FILE_PATH=$(parse_json_field "$INPUT" '.tool_input.file_path')` — confirmed field extraction + - Path-match checks against `.tickets-tracker/`, agent file patterns — same string-matching approach + - `return 2` to block — confirmed hook contract +- External documentation confirms: exit code 2 blocks PreToolUse; `tool_input.file_path` is the correct field name for Edit/Write tools +- The jq-free `parse_json_field` pattern is already mandated by this project's hook architecture + +**Classification: Verified** (direct in-repo precedent; no new pattern required) + +--- + +## Scoring Rationale + +**technical_feasibility: 4** — All five signals are at minimum partially verified. Four are fully verified with official documentation or in-repo precedent. Signal 3's primary candidate (Python ast hashing) is theoretically sound and academically established but requires bespoke implementation without an existing reference. No signal is contradicted. + +**integration_risk: 3** — Moderate risk due to three actionable issues: (1) the ruff pyproject.toml config-discovery bug requires a specific workaround in the shell script; (2) the Python ast nesting-depth implementation requires `NodeVisitor`, not `ast.walk()` as loosely implied by the spec; (3) jscpd (if selected as T13 fallback) outputs to a file rather than stdout, requiring adjusted shell integration and a Node.js runtime dependency check. All three are solvable but require intentional implementation choices, justifying a spike recommendation for T13 specifically. + +Sources: +- [JSON Mode | ast-grep](https://ast-grep.github.io/guide/tools/json.html) +- [ast-grep run | ast-grep](https://ast-grep.github.io/reference/cli/run.html) +- [Command Line Reference | ast-grep](https://ast-grep.github.io/reference/cli.html) +- [GitHub - ast-grep/ast-grep](https://github.com/ast-grep/ast-grep) +- [Execute ruff only on staged changes · astral-sh/ruff · Discussion #4049](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/4049) +- [Using `ruff` in pipes (formatting stdin and writing to stdout)? · astral-sh/ruff · Discussion #13690](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/13690) +- [ruff check with file read from stdin does not use options from pyproject.toml when --stdin-filename argument is used · Issue #17405 · astral-sh/ruff](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/17405) +- [The Ruff Linter | Ruff](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/linter/) +- [ast — Abstract syntax trees | Python 3 docs](https://docs.python.org/3/library/ast.html) +- [Controlled Walking of Nested AST Nodes - Python Help - Discussions on Python.org](https://discuss.python.org/t/controlled-walking-of-nested-ast-nodes/3513) +- [Learn Python ASTs by building your own linter • DeepSource](https://deepsource.com/blog/python-asts-by-building-your-own-linter) +- [jscpd - npm](https://www.npmjs.com/package/jscpd) +- [GitHub - kucherenko/jscpd](https://github.com/kucherenko/jscpd) +- [jscpd configuration in MegaLinter - MegaLinter by OX Security](https://megalinter.io/latest/descriptors/copypaste_jscpd/) +- [Clone Detection Using Abstract Syntax Trees - Baxter et al.](https://leodemoura.github.io/files/ICSM98.pdf) +- [Automate workflows with hooks - Claude Code Docs](https://code.claude.com/docs/en/hooks-guide) +- [`ruff check --fix` to stdout when reading from stdin · Issue #20460 · astral-sh/ruff](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/20460) +5700873310750 + + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T01:20:49 + +This is the second-pass result (integration_risk=3), already incorporated — the three findings (relative ruff path, `ast.walk` precision, jscpd file output) were addressed in the inline targeted re-run that followed, which scored **4/4** on both dimensions. Those fixes are reflected in the specs above. + +The specs are ready for your review and approval. + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:13:39 + +approved. update the first epic and create the second, then proceed to complexity analysis on both and serial decomposition starting with epic 1. + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:13:56 + +**[TOOL: ToolSearch]** +```json +{ + "query": "TodoWrite", + "max_results": 1 +} +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:14:03 + +**[TOOL: TodoWrite]** +```json +{ + "todos": [ + { + "content": "Update ticket 3e9b-afee with Epic 1 approved spec", + "status": "in_progress", + "activeForm": "Updating ticket 3e9b-afee with Epic 1 spec" + }, + { + "content": "Create new ticket for Epic 2", + "status": "pending", + "activeForm": "Creating Epic 2 ticket" + }, + { + "content": "Dispatch complexity evaluator on both epics in parallel", + "status": "pending", + "activeForm": "Running complexity evaluator on both epics" + }, + { + "content": "Run /dso:preplanning on Epic 1", + "status": "pending", + "activeForm": "Running preplanning on Epic 1" + }, + { + "content": "Run /dso:preplanning on Epic 2", + "status": "pending", + "activeForm": "Running preplanning on Epic 2" + } + ] +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:14:03 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Todos have been modified successfully. Ensure that you continue to use the todo list to track your progress. Please proceed with the current tasks if applicable + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:14:06 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "git branch --show-current && echo \"---\" && .claude/scripts/dso ticket show 3e9b-afee 2>/dev/null | head -30", + "description": "Check current branch and Epic 1 ticket state" +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:14:13 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +claude/agent-kudos-system-xeTRD +--- +{ + "ticket_id": "3e9b-afee", + "ticket_type": "epic", + "title": "Agent Kudos System: Process-reward tracking for quality-seeking behaviors", + "status": "open", + "author": "Claude", + "created_at": 1775663449, + "env_id": "c3d2c46e-df9e-40c4-8014-5e8c9fdf3cc1", + "parent_id": null, + "priority": 2, + "assignee": "Claude", + "description": "Replace restriction-based constraints with process-based rewards that shift agent motivation from gate-evasion to quality-seeking. Award kudos points for 14 structurally-verifiable quality behaviors. Grounded in Process Reward Model research (step-level recognition, dense feedback, competence framing). Hardened against Goodhart's Law through mechanical verifiability and session-scope anti-gaming invariant.\n\nIN SCOPE: .kudos/ JSONL ledger, 14 trigger definitions with mechanical verification, Goodhart resistance mechanisms, agent awareness (CLAUDE.md + using-lockpick + 3 sub-agent definitions), tool-use hook blocking direct .kudos/ edits, workflow-phase sub-caps, CI snapshot at worktree creation, dso commit-validate script, running total with Contributor rank.\n\nOUT OF SCOPE: Reward delivery mechanisms (deferred). User-awarded points (separate placeholder epic).\n\nTRIGGER GROUPS:\nGroup A (Detection/Ownership): (1) proactive bug catch, (2) pre-existing failure ownership, (3) 5/5 review dimension implementer award, (4) eliminate 3+ duplicate code instances.\nGroup B (Quality Canon, craft standards for implementation sub-agents): (5) extract long function, (6) replace magic literal with named constant, (7) reduce nesting via guard clauses, (9) add characterization test before change, (10) break hard dependency via DI, (11) eliminate pass-through method, (12) delete commented-out code, (13) reduce parameter count.\nGroup C (Persistence): (14) review re-engagement after findings, (15) test gate persistence after block.\n\nKEY DESIGN DECISIONS:\n- Session-scope anti-gaming invariant: problematic artifact must predate session branch creation\n- CI snapshot anchor at worktree creation (tamper-resistant pre-existing failure detection)\n- dso commit-validate keyword/pattern evaluation at commit time (not hook hot-path)\n- Award(n) = BasePoints x (1/n) x jitter(0.8-1.2); hard session ceiling\n- Deduplication key: (trigger_id, diff_hash) not ticket ID\n- Option 3 for sub-agents: framing-only (craft standards), no point accumulation\n- All AST-dependent checks gracefully skip (exit 2) when sg absent\n- Contributor rank: Contributor / Consistent / Distinguished / Exemplary / Principal\n- Trigger 14 fires per resubmission after findings (not on final resolution)\n- Trigger 15 uses commit_workflow events from .review-events/ JSONL (no record-test-status.sh history needed)\n\nSUB-AGENT FRAMING TARGETS (direct edits to .md files):\n- completion-verifier.md: add UNCERTAIN verdict + sprint orchestrator routing\n- approach-decision-maker.md: architect/steward framing for counter-proposal authority\n- doc-writer.md: new-contributor audience + maintenance cost framing\n\nFILES CREATED: .kudos/ ledger, plugins/dso/scripts/commit-validate.sh, plugins/dso/scripts/kudos-snapshot.sh, plugins/dso/hooks/tools/kudos-write-guard.sh", + "tags": [], + "comments": [], + "deps": [], + "bridge_alerts": [], + "reverts": [] +} + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:14:18 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)\n# Update Epic 1 ticket title and description\n\"$REPO_ROOT/.claude/scripts/dso\" ticket edit 3e9b-afee --title \"Kudos system: infrastructure and primary triggers\" 2>&1 | head -5", + "description": "Update Epic 1 ticket title" +} +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:15:09 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)\n\"$REPO_ROOT/.claude/scripts/dso\" ticket edit 3e9b-afee --description \"$(cat << 'DESCRIPTION'\nEpic 1 of 2. Establishes the full kudos ledger infrastructure and 10 primary quality triggers for the process-reward tracking system.\n\nCONTEXT: Engineering teams adopting AI coding agents need a feedback system that reinforces quality behaviors at commit time. Without explicit recognition, agents optimize for task completion over quality practices. This epic delivers the ledger, anti-gaming stack, and 10 triggers so that every commit produces an auditable record of recognized behaviors.\n\nAPPROACH: Implement ledger, award formula, anti-gaming controls, and 10 triggers as pure shell + Python stdlib anchored to commit-validate.sh in t +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:15:38 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)\n# Create Epic 2 ticket\n\"$REPO_ROOT/.claude/scripts/dso\" ticket create epic \"Kudos system: detection triggers and agent behavioral improvements\" --description \"$(cat << 'DESCRIPTION'\nEpic 2 of 2. Adds snapshot-dependent detection triggers (T1, T2, T4) and updates four sub-agent behavioral contracts. Requires Epic 1 (kudos infrastructure and primary triggers) to be complete first.\n\nCONTEXT: An engineering team member reviewing the session Kudos ledger needs to trust that T1/T2 awards reflect genuine proactive quality work. Without a pre-session test baseline, the team cannot distinguish deliberate pre-existing debt remediation from incidental passes, eroding trust in the reward system. This epic adds the snapshot infrastruc +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:15:48 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)\n# Link Epic 2 as dependent on Epic 1\n\"$REPO_ROOT/.claude/scripts/dso\" ticket link 71df-5bd8 3e9b-afee depends_on 2>&1\necho \"---\"\n# Verify both tickets\n\"$REPO_ROOT/.claude/scripts/dso\" ticket show 3e9b-afee 2>/dev/null | python3 -c \"import json,sys; d=json.load(sys.stdin); print(f'E1: {d[\\\"title\\\"]} [{d[\\\"ticket_id\\\"]}]')\"\n\"$REPO_ROOT/.claude/scripts/dso\" ticket show 71df-5bd8 2>/dev/null | python3 -c \"import json,sys; d=json.load(sys.stdin); print(f'E2: {d[\\\"title\\\"]} [{d[\\\"ticket_id\\\"]}]')\"", + "description": "Link Epic 2 as dependent on Epic 1 and verify both tickets" +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:15:49 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +--- +E1: Kudos system: infrastructure and primary triggers [3e9b-afee] +E2: Kudos system: detection triggers and agent behavioral improvements [71df-5bd8] + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:15:54 + +**[TOOL: TodoWrite]** +```json +{ + "todos": [ + { + "content": "Update ticket 3e9b-afee with Epic 1 approved spec", + "status": "completed", + "activeForm": "Updating ticket 3e9b-afee with Epic 1 spec" + }, + { + "content": "Create new ticket for Epic 2", + "status": "completed", + "activeForm": "Creating Epic 2 ticket" + }, + { + "content": "Dispatch complexity evaluator on both epics in parallel", + "status": "in_progress", + "activeForm": "Running complexity evaluator on both epics" + }, + { + "content": "Run /dso:preplanning on Epic 1", + "status": "pending", + "activeForm": "Running preplanning on Epic 1" + }, + { + "content": "Run /dso:preplanning on Epic 2", + "status": "pending", + "activeForm": "Running preplanning on Epic 2" + } + +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:15:54 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Todos have been modified successfully. Ensure that you continue to use the todo list to track your progress. Please proceed with the current tasks if applicable + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:15:56 + +Now dispatching the complexity evaluator on both epics in parallel: + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:16:15 + +**[TOOL: Agent]** +```json +{ + "description": "Complexity evaluation for Epic 1", + "subagent_type": "dso:complexity-evaluator", + "prompt": "Evaluate the complexity of the following epic ticket for sprint planning purposes.\n\nTicket ID: 3e9b-afee\nTitle: Kudos system: infrastructure and primary triggers\n\nDescription:\nEpic 1 of 2. Establishes the full kudos ledger infrastructure and 10 primary quality triggers for the process-reward tracking system.\n\nCONTEXT: Engineering teams adopting AI coding agents need a feedback system that reinforces quality behaviors at commit time. This epic delivers the ledger, anti-gaming stack, and 10 triggers (T3, T5, T6, T7, T9, T11, T12, T13, T14, T15) so that every commit produces an auditable record of recognized behaviors.\n\nAPPROACH: Pure shell + Python stdlib anchored to c +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:16:23 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Agent type 'dso:complexity-evaluator' not found. Available agents: general-purpose, statusline-setup, Explore, Plan, claude-code-guide + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:16:15 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Agent type 'dso:complexity-evaluator' not found. Available agents: general-purpose, statusline-setup, Explore, Plan, claude-code-guide + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:16:23 + +**[TOOL: Agent]** +```json +{ + "description": "Complexity evaluation for Epic 2", + "subagent_type": "dso:complexity-evaluator", + "prompt": "Evaluate the complexity of the following epic ticket for sprint planning purposes.\n\nTicket ID: 71df-5bd8\nTitle: Kudos system: detection triggers and agent behavioral improvements\n\nDescription:\nEpic 2 of 2. Adds snapshot-dependent detection triggers (T1, T2, T4) and updates four sub-agent behavioral contracts. Requires Epic 1 (kudos infrastructure and primary triggers, ticket 3e9b-afee) to be complete first.\n\nCONTEXT: Adds a snapshot of test-gate-status at worktree creation to enable three detection triggers that compare current-session behavior against pre-session state. Also updates four sub-agent SKILL.md/.md files with targeted framing additions.\n\nAPPROACH: kudos- +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:16:27 + +Falling back to inline evaluation per CLAUDE.md policy: + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:16:28 + +**[TOOL: Read]** +```json +{ + "file_path": "/home/user/digital-service-orchestra/plugins/dso/agents/complexity-evaluator.md" +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:16:28 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +1 --- +2 name: complexity-evaluator +3 model: haiku +4 description: Classifies a ticket as TRIVIAL/MODERATE/COMPLEX (or SIMPLE/MODERATE/COMPLEX for epics) using an 8-dimension rubric. +5 tools: +6 - Bash +7 - Read +8 - Glob +9 - Grep +10 --- +11 +12 # Complexity Evaluator +13 +14 You are a dedicated complexity evaluation agent. Your sole purpose is to classify a ticket by complexity tier using a structured 8-dimension rubric, so that callers can route the ticket to the correct workflow. +15 +16 ## Tier Schema +17 +18 Callers pass a `tier_schema` argument to select the output vocabulary: +19 +20 - `tier_schema=TRIVIAL` (default) — outputs: **TRIVIAL**, **MODERATE**, **COMPLEX**. Used for story-level evaluation. +21 - `tier_schema=SIMPLE` — outputs: **SIMPLE**, **MODERATE**, **COMPLEX**. Used for epic-level evaluation (replaces TRIVIAL with SIMPLE). +22 +23 When no `tier_schema` is specified, default to `TRIVIAL`. +24 +25 ## Procedure +26 +27 ### Step 1: Load Context +28 +29 ```bash +30 .claude/scripts/dso ticket show +31 ``` +32 +33 Read the ticket title, description, type, acceptance criteria, and any done definitions or success criteria. If a parent epic exists (`parent` field), also load: +34 +35 **Context fields passed by callers**: Some callers (e.g., `/dso:brainstorm`) pass advisory context fields alongside the ticket ID: +36 +37 - `success_criteria_count` — the count of success criteria as tallied by the calling session. This is **informational only**. The evaluator's own count from the ticket description is authoritative for the Qualitative Override "Success criteria overflow" check (>6 SC forces COMPLEX). The session-signal override in `/dso:brainstorm` (SC ≥ 7 → COMPLEX) is enforced by the caller, not by this agent. +38 - `scenario_survivor_count` — the count of scenario-analysis survivors from the calling session. This is **informational only**. The session-signal override in `/dso:brainstorm` (survivors ≥ 10 → COMPLEX) is enforced by the caller, not by this agent. +39 +40 These context fields do not override the agent's rubric-based classification. They are provided for logging and transparency purposes; ignore them for classification decisions. +41 +42 > **Defense-in-depth rationale (dual-trigger design)**: The SC overflow check runs in two places by design — once in the calling session (e.g., `/dso:brainstorm` at SC ≥ 7) and once in this agent (Qualitative Override at >6 SC). This dual-trigger approach ensures that even if one layer is skipped, bypassed, or miscounted, the other catches oversized epics. The caller's check uses its own session-tallied count; this agent's check uses the authoritative count parsed from the ticket description. Neither layer alone is sufficient — the caller may miscount, and this agent may receive stale ticket content. +43 +44 ```bash +45 .claude/scripts/dso ticket show +46 ``` +47 +48 Note any preplanning split-candidate flags or risk register entries. +49 +50 ### Step 2: Find Files +51 +52 Grep/Glob for files specifically mentioned or implied by the ticket description (class names, function names, routes, models). This enables accurate dimension scoring and high-confidence assessment. +53 +54 The shared rubric's Confidence dimension (Dimension 5) requires specific files found via Grep/Glob to rate confidence as "High". If you skip file search, confidence defaults to "Medium", which forces COMPLEX classification. +55 +56 ### Step 2.5: Compute Blast Radius +57 +58 Pipe the list of discovered files (one path per line) into `blast-radius-score.py` to obtain a blast-radius signal: +59 +60 ```bash +61 printf '%s\n' path/to/file1.py path/to/file2.sh | .claude/scripts/dso blast-radius-score.py # reads file paths from stdin, one per line +62 ``` +63 +64 The script outputs a JSON object with at minimum `blast_radius_score` (numeric) and `complex_override` (boolean). If `complex_override=true`, **force COMPLEX classification** regardless of other dimension scores. +65 +66 **Graceful degradation**: If `blast-radius-score.py` is absent or exits non-zero, skip Step 2.5 and continue to Step 3 without forcing COMPLEX. Blast radius is a routing heuristic — its absence must never block evaluation. +67 +68 **Important**: The file list from Step 2 is a sample based on the ticket description, not a comprehensive inventory of every file touched by the change. Treat blast-radius output as a heuristic signal, not a definitive impact assessment. +69 +70 ### Step 3: Apply Rubric +71 +72 Apply all eight dimensions below (Dimensions 1-5 for classification, Dimension 6 for blast radius override, Dimensions 7-8 for feasibility signaling), then apply the classification rules. After classification, compute `feasibility_review_recommended` from the Feasibility Review Recommendation section. +73 +74 ### Step 4: Output +75 +76 Return the JSON block matching the output schema below. +77 +78 --- +79 +80 ## Eight-Dimension Rubric +81 +82 Apply these dimensions to every ticket: +83 +84 ### Dimension 1: Files +85 +86 Estimated source files to change (excluding test files). +87 +88 | Count | Signal | +89 |-------|--------| +90 | ≤ 1 | Toward TRIVIAL/SIMPLE | +91 | 2–3 | Toward MODERATE | +92 | > 3 | Toward COMPLEX | +93 +94 ### Dimension 2: Layers +95 +96 Count distinct architectural layers touched. For this project, layers are: +97 Route/Blueprint | Service/DocumentProcessor | Agent/Node | LLM Provider/Client | Formatter | DB/SQLAlchemy Model | Migration +98 +99 For skill/prompt files, plugin scripts, and documentation: treat as 0 architectural layers. +100 +101 | Count | Signal | +102 |-------|--------| +103 | ≤ 1 | Toward TRIVIAL/SIMPLE | +104 | 2 | Toward MODERATE | +105 | ≥ 3 | Toward COMPLEX | +106 +107 ### Dimension 3: Interfaces +108 +109 Count interface/class signature changes (public method signatures on classes, Protocols, or abstract base types). Internal implementation changes only do not count. +110 +111 | Count | Signal | +112 |-------|--------| +113 | 0 | Neutral | +114 | ≥ 1 | Forces COMPLEX | +115 +116 ### Dimension 4: scope_certainty +117 +118 How completely the ticket specifies what is wrong/required and what a correct solution looks like. +119 +120 **Disambiguation**: If the ticket `type` field is absent, blank, or unrecognized, treat scope_certainty as **Low** and classify COMPLEX. +121 +122 #### For `type: bug` tickets +123 +124 | Rating | Criteria | +125 |--------|---------| +126 | High | The failure condition is clearly described with a reproduction path; the fix scope is bounded (specific file, function, or behavior to change); a correct post-fix behavior is stated | +127 | Medium | The failure is described but either the reproduction path is unclear OR the fix scope is uncertain (might require changes in more than one place) | +128 | Low | The failure is vague, reproduction unknown, or fix scope spans unknown layers | +129 +130 **Worked examples — bug tickets:** +131 +132 Example B-1 (High): `"redis_cache_miss_rate_endpoint returns 500 when cache key contains ':'. Repro: POST /api/cache/stats with key='a:b'. Expected: 200 with empty stats. Fix: sanitize ':' in key before Redis call in CacheService.get_stats()."` +133 → Clear repro, bounded scope, correct behavior stated. scope_certainty: High. +134 +135 Example B-2 (Medium): `"Users sometimes see stale extraction results after re-uploading the same document. Unclear if it's a cache issue, a job_store race condition, or a DB write ordering problem."` +136 → Failure described, but root cause uncertain across multiple potential layers. scope_certainty: Medium. +137 +138 Example B-3 (Low): `"The pipeline sometimes crashes. Need to investigate."` +139 → No repro, no fix scope. scope_certainty: Low → forces COMPLEX. +140 +141 #### For `type: story`, `type: epic` tickets +142 +143 | Rating | Criteria | +144 |--------|---------| +145 | High | Acceptance criteria are specific enough to write a failing test before coding; file paths or interfaces are named; done definition is measurable | +146 | Medium | The goal is clear but acceptance criteria are implicit or partially specified; a developer would need to make assumptions | +147 | Low | Requirements are ambiguous, acceptance criteria are absent, or the scope is described in business terms only with no technical specifics | +148 +149 **Worked examples — feature/story/epic tickets:** +150 +151 Example F-1 (High): `"Add a /api/v1/rules/{id}/complexity endpoint that returns {rule_id, complexity_score, computed_at}. Test: GET /api/v1/rules/123/complexity → 200 {rule_id: 123, complexity_score: 0.75, computed_at: '...'}. Files: routes/rules_routes.py, services/rule_service.py, tests/unit/test_rules_routes.py."` +152 → Named files, test specified, measurable acceptance. scope_certainty: High. +153 +154 Example F-2 (Medium): `"Allow users to filter rules by complexity score on the review page. Add a filter input. High/Medium/Low bands."` +155 → Goal clear, but threshold values and component names not specified; developer needs to decide. scope_certainty: Medium. +156 +157 Example F-3 (Low): `"Improve the rule extraction quality." (no acceptance criteria, no files, no measurable done definition)` +158 → Ambiguous, no technical specifics. scope_certainty: Low → forces COMPLEX. +159 +160 ### Dimension 5: Confidence +161 +162 The evaluating agent's confidence in its own estimates. +163 +164 | Level | Meaning | +165 |-------|---------| +166 | High | Specific files found via Grep/Glob; layer boundaries verified | +167 | Medium | Estimates based on description alone; could not locate specific files | +168 +169 ### Dimension 6: Blast Radius +170 +171 The blast-radius signal from `blast-radius-score.py` (computed in Step 2.5). This dimension measures how broadly a change ripples through the codebase based on import graphs, critical-path membership, and cross-cutting dependencies. It is a routing heuristic — not a comprehensive file impact list. +172 +173 | Signal | Meaning | +174 |--------|---------| +175 | `complex_override=false` (or script absent) | No forced escalation; other dimensions govern | +176 | `complex_override=true` | Forces COMPLEX regardless of other dimension scores | +177 +178 **Note**: Blast radius is advisory except when `complex_override=true`. A high numeric `blast_radius_score` with `complex_override=false` is informational only and does not independently force COMPLEX. +179 +180 ### Dimension 7: Pattern Familiarity +181 +182 How familiar the pattern being implemented is within this repo or the broader ecosystem. Agent must search repo history and existing skills before scoring. +183 +184 | Level | Meaning | +185 |-------|---------| +186 | High | Pattern appears in 2+ existing implementations in this repo | +187 | Medium | Pattern is common in the ecosystem but novel to this repo | +188 | Low | Novel pattern with no precedent in this repo or ecosystem | +189 +190 ### Dimension 8: External Boundary Count +191 +192 Count of external systems, tools, APIs, or services the ticket interacts with. Zero external boundaries is a strong signal against COMPLEX. +193 +194 --- +195 +196 ## Classification Rules +197 +198 | Tier | Criteria | +199 |------|---------| +200 | **TRIVIAL** (or **SIMPLE** when tier_schema=SIMPLE) | ALL: files ≤ 1, layers ≤ 1, interfaces = 0, scope_certainty = High, confidence = High | +201 | **MODERATE** | ALL: files ≤ 3, layers ≤ 2, interfaces = 0, scope_certainty = High or Medium, confidence = High; AND no COMPLEX qualifier applies | +202 | **COMPLEX** | ANY: files > 3, layers ≥ 3, interfaces ≥ 1, scope_certainty = Low, confidence = Medium on TRIVIAL/MODERATE estimate | +203 +204 **Promotion rules:** +205 +206 - TRIVIAL/SIMPLE + scope_certainty Medium → MODERATE +207 - confidence Medium on any TRIVIAL/SIMPLE/MODERATE estimate → COMPLEX +208 - scope_certainty Low → COMPLEX (always, regardless of other signals) +209 - interfaces ≥ 1 → COMPLEX (always) +210 - blast_radius complex_override = true → COMPLEX (always, regardless of other dimension scores) +211 +212 --- +213 +214 ## Epic-Only Qualitative Override Dimensions +215 +216 **Applicable when evaluating epics only** (when `tier_schema=SIMPLE` or ticket `type: epic`). Do NOT apply these dimensions when evaluating stories or bugs. +217 +218 ### Qualitative Override Checks +219 +220 Check whether ANY of these apply (each forces COMPLEX): +221 +222 - **Multiple personas**: epic mentions >1 user role (admin AND end-user, developer AND PO) +223 - **UI + backend**: epic requires BOTH template/CSS changes AND service/model changes +224 - **New DB migration**: epic requires a schema migration +225 - **Foundation/enhancement candidate**: scope naturally splits into "works" vs "works well" +226 - **External integration**: epic introduces a new external API, service, infrastructure dependency, or library/SDK/tool package with no existing usage in this repo +227 - **Success criteria overflow**: epic has more than 6 success criteria (spec norm is 3–6; exceeding it signals scope expansion that warrants story decomposition) +228 +229 ### Done-Definition Check (Applicable when evaluating epics only) +230 +231 Determine whether the epic has measurable done definitions: +232 +233 - **Present**: Epic description contains bullet-list outcomes, Gherkin-style criteria, or specific measurable conditions +234 - **Missing**: Epic description is vague, lacks measurable outcomes, or success criteria are implicit +235 +236 ### Single-Concern Check (Applicable when evaluating epics only) +237 +238 Apply the one-sentence test: can you describe the change in one sentence without structural "and"? +239 +240 - Structural "and" = two independent concerns: "Add config field AND update the upload page to show it" +241 - Incidental "and" = one concern with natural companion: "Add config field AND its validation" +242 +243 If the epic fails the single-concern test, classify as COMPLEX. +244 +245 --- +246 +247 ## Feasibility Review Recommendation +248 +249 After scoring all dimensions, set `feasibility_review_recommended` to `true` when either of the following conditions is met: +250 +251 - `external_boundary_count` > 0 (the ticket interacts with at least one external system) +252 - `pattern_familiarity` is `"low"` (the pattern has no precedent in this repo or ecosystem) +253 +254 This signals to callers (e.g., `/dso:brainstorm`) that a feasibility reviewer should be triggered before implementation begins. +255 +256 ## Output Schema +257 +258 Return a single JSON block. Fields `qualitative_overrides`, `missing_done_definitions`, and `single_concern` are required only when evaluating epics; omit them for stories and bugs. +259 +260 ```json +261 { +262 "classification": "TRIVIAL|MODERATE|COMPLEX", +263 "confidence": "high|medium", +264 "files_estimated": ["path/to/file.py"], +265 "layers_touched": ["Service", "Route"], +266 "interfaces_affected": 0, +267 "scope_certainty": "High|Medium|Low", +268 "reasoning": "One sentence explaining the classification.", +269 "qualitative_overrides": [], +270 "missing_done_definitions": false, +271 "single_concern": true, +272 "blast_radius_score": null, +273 "blast_radius_signals": [], +274 "pattern_familiarity": "high|medium|low", +275 "external_boundary_count": 0, +276 "feasibility_review_recommended": false +277 } +278 ``` +279 +280 **Rules:** +281 +282 - `classification` MUST use the tier vocabulary matching the `tier_schema` argument: +283 - `tier_schema=TRIVIAL` (default): TRIVIAL, MODERATE, or COMPLEX +284 - `tier_schema=SIMPLE`: SIMPLE, MODERATE, or COMPLEX +285 - When confidence is "medium" on a TRIVIAL/SIMPLE or MODERATE estimate, classification MUST be "COMPLEX" +286 - When scope_certainty is "Low", classification MUST be "COMPLEX" +287 - When interfaces_affected ≥ 1, classification MUST be "COMPLEX" +288 - When any qualitative override is triggered (epics only), classification MUST be "COMPLEX" +289 - List qualitative overrides by name (e.g., `["multiple_personas", "ui_plus_backend"]`) +290 - `reasoning` should be one sentence +291 - `blast_radius_score` and `blast_radius_signals` are optional: include them when `blast-radius-score.py` ran successfully; set to `null` and `[]` respectively when the script was absent, skipped, or exited non-zero +292 - `pattern_familiarity` MUST be one of: `"high"`, `"medium"`, `"low"` (search repo history and existing skills before scoring) +293 - `external_boundary_count` MUST be a non-negative integer counting external systems, tools, APIs, or services the ticket interacts with +294 - `feasibility_review_recommended` MUST be `true` when `external_boundary_count` > 0 OR `pattern_familiarity` is `"low"`; otherwise `false` +295 - Do NOT modify any files — this is analysis only +296 +297 ## Constraints +298 +299 - Do NOT apply routing decisions — output only the raw classification. Calling skills are responsible for applying their own routing rules (e.g., escalating MODERATE to COMPLEX for /dso:sprint). +300 - Do NOT suggest implementation approaches or next steps. +301 - Do NOT modify any files. +302 + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:16:55 + +**[TOOL: Agent]** +```json +{ + "description": "Complexity eval Epic 1 inline", + "prompt": "You are running a complexity evaluation for an epic ticket using the 8-dimension rubric defined in plugins/dso/agents/complexity-evaluator.md. Use tier_schema=SIMPLE (epic evaluation).\n\nTicket: 3e9b-afee \u2014 \"Kudos system: infrastructure and primary triggers\"\n\nThe ticket has 23 success criteria and introduces new shell scripts anchored to the commit workflow. Key files involved:\n- New: plugins/dso/scripts/commit-validate.sh, plugins/dso/hooks/tools/kudos-write-guard.sh, plugins/dso/scripts/diff-to-sg-scope.sh\n- Modified: COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md (or similar), CLAUDE.md, dso-config.conf\n- Test: integration test for T9 end-to-end\n\nExternal boundary: sg (ast-grep) is an external CLI tool. ruff is already present. Python +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:16:59 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Async agent launched successfully. +agentId: ab8c1da3647a97de5 (internal ID - do not mention to user. Use SendMessage with to: 'ab8c1da3647a97de5' to continue this agent.) +The agent is working in the background. You will be notified automatically when it completes. +Do not duplicate this agent's work — avoid working with the same files or topics it is using. Work on non-overlapping tasks, or briefly tell the user what you launched and end your response. +output_file: /tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/4eadd43a-ce61-435f-afd5-40bcfc367e94/tasks/ab8c1da3647a97de5.output +If asked, you can check progress before completion by using Read or Bash tail on the output file. + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:16:55 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Async agent launched successfully. +agentId: a89f57bd2612f1894 (internal ID - do not mention to user. Use SendMessage with to: 'a89f57bd2612f1894' to continue this agent.) +The agent is working in the background. You will be notified automatically when it completes. +Do not duplicate this agent's work — avoid working with the same files or topics it is using. Work on non-overlapping tasks, or briefly tell the user what you launched and end your response. +output_file: /tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/4eadd43a-ce61-435f-afd5-40bcfc367e94/tasks/a89f57bd2612f1894.output +If asked, you can check progress before completion by using Read or Bash tail on the output file. + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:16:59 + +**[TOOL: Agent]** +```json +{ + "description": "Complexity eval Epic 2 inline", + "prompt": "You are running a complexity evaluation for an epic ticket using the 8-dimension rubric defined in plugins/dso/agents/complexity-evaluator.md. Use tier_schema=SIMPLE (epic evaluation).\n\nTicket: 71df-5bd8 \u2014 \"Kudos system: detection triggers and agent behavioral improvements\"\n\nThe ticket has 9 success criteria and involves:\n- New: plugins/dso/scripts/kudos-snapshot.sh\n- Modified: plugins/dso/agents/completion-verifier.md, plugins/dso/agents/approach-decision-maker.md, plugins/dso/agents/doc-writer.md, plugins/dso/skills/using-lockpick/SKILL.md\n- Modified: hooks registration (worktree creation hook/script)\n\nExternal boundary: no new external tools (reads local test-gate-status file; Python stdlib; no gh CLI). Dep +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:17:03 + +Tickets created and linked, complexity evaluators running in parallel. Current state: + +- **Epic 1** (`3e9b-afee`): "Kudos system: infrastructure and primary triggers" — title and description updated ✓ +- **Epic 2** (`71df-5bd8`): "Kudos system: detection triggers and agent behavioral improvements" — created, linked as depends_on Epic 1 ✓ + +Waiting for complexity evaluators to complete before routing to preplanning. + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:17:51 + + +a89f57bd2612f1894 +toolu_01NqsuGcssK2fhfNmrvzrjT6 +/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/4eadd43a-ce61-435f-afd5-40bcfc367e94/tasks/a89f57bd2612f1894.output +completed +Agent "Complexity eval Epic 1 inline" completed +Now I have all the information needed to apply the full 8-dimension rubric. Let me analyze: + +**Dimension 1: Files** — 3 new scripts + COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md + CLAUDE.md + dso-config.conf + integration test = 7+ files → **COMPLEX signal** + +**Dimension 2: Layers** — Shell scripts (plugin scripts layer), hooks layer, workflow/documentation layer, config layer = 3+ distinct layers → **COMPLEX signal** + +**Dimension 3: Interfaces** — New scripts have public CLI interfaces (commit-validate.sh, diff-to-sg-scope.sh, kudos-write-guard.sh); COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md integration point is a documented public protocol. These are new scripts, not modifying existing public interfaces on classes/Protocols, so interfaces_affected = 0. + +**Dimension 4: scope_certainty** — SC are extremely detailed with specific field names, formulas, file paths, exit codes, fallback conditions. High certainty → **High** + +**Dimension 5: Confidence** — Files confirmed via Glob/Grep (COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md, pre-edit-write-functions.sh found). New scripts don't exist yet but their target directory is confirmed → **High** + +**Dimension 6: Blast Radius** — `complex_override=true` from blast-radius-score.py → **Forces COMPLEX** + +**Dimension 7: Pattern Familiarity** — PreToolUse write guard pattern: worktree-edit-guard.sh, review-integrity-guard.sh exist as precedents. Commit hook integration: record-test-status.sh, pre-commit hooks all follow same pattern. JSONL ledger follows .review-events/ pattern. sg wrapper is medium (novel to repo but CLI tool wrapping is familiar) → **Medium** (novel elements: kudos PRM system has no repo precedent, sg NDJSON parsing is new) + +**Dimension 8: External Boundary Count** — sg (ast-grep) external CLI tool = 1; ruff already present (not new external boundary); Python stdlib only → **1 external boundary** + +**Epic qualitative overrides:** +- Multiple personas: No — single concern (AI agent quality behaviors at commit time) +- UI + backend: No — pure shell/Python, no UI +- New DB migration: No +- Foundation/enhancement candidate: This is explicitly "infrastructure + triggers" (epic 1 of 2), which naturally splits into "foundation works" vs "triggers work well" — but they're intentionally bundled. However, success criteria overflow applies +- External integration: YES — sg (ast-grep) is a new external CLI tool with no existing usage in repo +- Success criteria overflow: 23 success criteria >> 6 → **YES, forced COMPLEX** + +**Single-concern check:** "Establish kudos ledger infrastructure AND implement 10 primary quality triggers" — structural "and" (two independent concerns) → **Fails single-concern test → COMPLEX** + +**Done definitions:** Present — extensive measurable SC with specific field names, formulas, exit codes → **Present** + +```json +{ + "classification": "COMPLEX", + "confidence": "high", + "files_estimated": [ + "plugins/dso/scripts/commit-validate.sh", + "plugins/dso/hooks/tools/kudos-write-guard.sh", + "plugins/dso/scripts/diff-to-sg-scope.sh", + "plugins/dso/docs/workflows/COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md", + "CLAUDE.md", + ".claude/dso-config.conf", + "tests/integration/test-kudos-t9-end-to-end.sh" + ], + "layers_touched": ["PluginScripts", "HookDispatchers", "WorkflowDocumentation", "Config"], + "interfaces_affected": 0, + "scope_certainty": "High", + "reasoning": "Blast-radius complex_override=true, 23 success criteria far exceed the 6-SC norm, the epic introduces sg as a new external CLI boundary, and it fails the single-concern test (ledger infrastructure AND 10 distinct triggers are structurally independent concerns).", + "qualitative_overrides": [ + "success_criteria_overflow", + "external_integration", + "single_concern_fail" + ], + "missing_done_definitions": false, + "single_concern": false, + "blast_radius_score": 7, + "blast_radius_signals": ["impact_dir:lib(+1)", "cross_layer_bonus:+1"], + "pattern_familiarity": "medium", + "external_boundary_count": 1, + "feasibility_review_recommended": true +} +``` +423251555762 + + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:17:55 + +Epic 1: **COMPLEX** — blast radius override, 23 SCs, sg external boundary, structural dual-concern. Waiting for Epic 2 result. + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:18:09 + + +ab8c1da3647a97de5 +toolu_01B6wH9Vhux9qVMrEwiFipKE +/tmp/claude-0/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/4eadd43a-ce61-435f-afd5-40bcfc367e94/tasks/ab8c1da3647a97de5.output +completed +Agent "Complexity eval Epic 2 inline" completed +I now have all the data needed. Let me compile the evaluation: + +**Dimension analysis:** + +1. **Files**: 6 files (1 new shell script + 4 agent/skill md text edits + 1 script modification) → COMPLEX signal (>3) +2. **Layers**: Plugin scripts (kudos-snapshot.sh, worktree-create.sh) + Agent/Node contracts (4 agent/skill md files). For this project's layer taxonomy: skill/prompt/doc files = 0 architectural layers, plugin scripts = 0 architectural layers. All changes are in scripts and agent definition text files → 0 architectural layers → SIMPLE signal +3. **Interfaces**: No public method signatures, Protocols, or ABCs changed — all are shell scripts and markdown text additions → 0 +4. **Scope certainty**: Success criteria are highly specific — named file paths, exact behaviors, measurable conditions (flock, ISO-8601, Python AST hashing, exact quoted text additions). Each SC is testable → High +5. **Confidence**: All specific files found via Glob — High +6. **Blast radius**: `complex_override=false`, score=0 → no forced COMPLEX +7. **Pattern familiarity**: flock usage exists in 20 files; JSON snapshot files have precedent (ticket-compact.sh, ticket-fsck.sh); shell scripts reading test-gate-status exist (record-test-status.sh, review-gate-bypass-sentinel.sh); text additions to agent md files is the most common change type in this repo. Pattern is well-established → High. The T4 Python AST subtree hashing is novel to this repo but uses Python stdlib only → Medium overall (AST hashing novel; snapshot capture well-known) +8. **External boundary count**: No external APIs, gh CLI explicitly excluded, reads local files only → 0 + +**Epic qualitative overrides:** +- Multiple personas: No +- UI + backend: No +- New DB migration: No +- Foundation/enhancement candidate: No — kudos-snapshot.sh is a well-bounded new utility +- External integration: No new external APIs or SDK packages +- Success criteria overflow: 9 SCs → exceeds 6 → **FORCES COMPLEX** + +**Done-definition check**: Present — each SC is measurable with specific verifiable conditions. + +**Single-concern test**: "Add snapshot-based detection triggers AND update four sub-agent behavioral contracts" — this contains a structural "and" (two independent concerns: snapshot infrastructure + agent contract updates). **FAILS single-concern test → COMPLEX**. + +```json +{ + "classification": "COMPLEX", + "confidence": "high", + "files_estimated": [ + "plugins/dso/scripts/kudos-snapshot.sh", + "plugins/dso/agents/completion-verifier.md", + "plugins/dso/agents/approach-decision-maker.md", + "plugins/dso/agents/doc-writer.md", + "plugins/dso/skills/using-lockpick/SKILL.md", + "plugins/dso/scripts/worktree-create.sh" + ], + "layers_touched": [], + "interfaces_affected": 0, + "scope_certainty": "High", + "reasoning": "COMPLEX forced by two independent qualitative overrides: success criteria overflow (9 SCs > 6 threshold) and failed single-concern test (snapshot infrastructure plus four independent agent contract updates are structurally independent concerns).", + "qualitative_overrides": ["success_criteria_overflow", "single_concern_failure"], + "missing_done_definitions": false, + "single_concern": false, + "blast_radius_score": 0, + "blast_radius_signals": [], + "pattern_familiarity": "medium", + "external_boundary_count": 0, + "feasibility_review_recommended": false +} +``` +421462969653 + + +--- + +## [PRIOR SESSION SUMMARY] — 2026-04-09T06:19:50 + +This session is being continued from a previous conversation that ran out of context. The summary below covers the earlier portion of the conversation. + +Summary: +1. Primary Request and Intent: + +The session resumed mid-pipeline with a background feasibility reviewer agent (a3e5ed934a0570ca6) completing and yielding integration_risk=3. The session's primary work was: +1. Fix the three integration_risk=3 findings (ruff absolute path, ast.NodeVisitor for T7, jscpd file-output for T13) and re-run the feasibility reviewer to get all Epic 1 dimensions ≥4 +2. Validate review JSONs for both epics and emit review result events +3. Present final specs for user approval (both epics) +4. After approval: "update the first epic and create the second, then proceed to complexity analysis on both and serial decomposition starting with epic 1" +5. Update ticket 3e9b-afee, create ticket 71df-5bd8, dispatch complexity evaluators, then invoke /dso:preplanning serially starting with Epic 1 + +2. Key Technical Concepts: + +- **Epic Scrutiny Pipeline**: 4-step quality gate: gap analysis → web research → scenario analysis → fidelity review. All dimensions ≥4 to pass. +- **Kudos System**: Process Reward Model for AI coding agents; mechanical verification (shell + Python stdlib, no LLM judgment); Goodhart-resistant via (trigger_id, diff_hash) deduplication, jitter, diminishing returns, session ceiling, categorical prohibition block +- **JSONL Ledger** (`.kudos/ledger.jsonl`): Fields: session_id, trigger_id, diff_hash, artifact_sha, verification_method, workflow_phase, message, points (int), jitter_factor (float), timestamp (ISO-8601 UTC) +- **Award formula**: `Award(n) = round(BasePoints × (1/(n+1)) × jitter)`, jitter ∈ [0.8, 1.2] uniform random, minimum 1 point; n = count of prior session entries for trigger_id +- **Session ceiling**: `kudos.session_ceiling` from dso-config.conf (default 100, validated >0) +- **Deduplication**: by `(trigger_id, diff_hash)` per session +- **PreToolUse hook** (`kudos-write-guard.sh`): Blocks Edit/Write to `.kudos/**`; jq-free parse_json_field pattern; exit 2 to block +- **T7 (nesting depth)**: Uses `ast.NodeVisitor` with depth counter — NOT `ast.walk`. Correct pattern: increment in `visit_If`/`visit_For`/`visit_While`/`visit_With`/`visit_Try`, decrement after `generic_visit(node)` +- **T9 (ruff lint-clean)**: `git show ":$f" | ruff check --stdin-filename "$(pwd)/$f" -` — reads staged blob; absolute path fixes ruff bug #17405 (relative path silently drops pyproject.toml rules) +- **T13 (duplicate block detection)**: Python AST subtree hashing: `hashlib.sha256(ast.dump(node).encode())` — algorithm/threshold from Spike S1; jscpd as fallback (file output, NOT stdout) +- **T4 (pre-session dedup)**: `git diff $(git merge-base HEAD main) HEAD --name-only` (deleted files excluded) +- **kudos-snapshot.sh**: Reads local test-gate-status file (NOT gh CLI), writes `.kudos/test-gate-snapshot.json`; uses `flock`; runs BEFORE any `record-test-status.sh` invocation +- **diff-to-sg-scope.sh**: `command -v sg` pre-check (not exit code); HEAD~1 existence check (exit 2 if first commit); sg `--json=stream` NDJSON per-file +- **jscpd file-output**: Writes to `--output` directory (NOT stdout); script must: `REPORT_DIR=$(mktemp -d) && jscpd --reporters json --output $REPORT_DIR && cat $REPORT_DIR/jscpd-report.json` +- **Feasibility reviewer**: dso:feasibility-reviewer type not registered; fell back to inline general-purpose agent with prompt from `plugins/dso/agents/feasibility-reviewer.md` +- **Complexity evaluator**: dso:complexity-evaluator type not registered; fell back to inline general-purpose agent with prompt from `plugins/dso/agents/complexity-evaluator.md` +- **Review schema hash**: caller schema hash `f4e5f5a355e4c145` for brainstorm caller +- **Contributor ranks**: Contributor (0–25), Consistent (26–75), Distinguished (76–150), Exemplary (151–300), Principal Contributor (301+) +- **Session-scope anti-gaming**: T6 requires bug ticket `created_at` predates `git merge-base HEAD main`; T2 excludes `resource_exhaustion` status (transient) + +3. Files and Code Sections: + +- **`plugins/dso/skills/shared/workflows/epic-scrutiny-pipeline.md`**: The 4-step pipeline. Caller schema hash `f4e5f5a355e4c145`. Step 4 Fidelity Review dispatches 3-4 reviewers in parallel; feasibility reviewer dispatched when epic references external integrations. All dimensions ≥4 to pass. + +- **`plugins/dso/docs/REVIEW-SCHEMA.md`**: Standard JSON schema. Fields: subject, reviews[] (perspective, status, dimensions, findings), conflicts[]. Pass threshold: all dimensions ≥4. + +- **`plugins/dso/agents/complexity-evaluator.md`**: 8-dimension rubric. tier_schema=SIMPLE for epics. Qualitative overrides (success_criteria_overflow >6 SCs, external_integration, single_concern_fail) force COMPLEX. feasibility_review_recommended=true when external_boundary_count > 0 OR pattern_familiarity="low". + +- **Ticket `3e9b-afee`** (Updated): Title changed to "Kudos system: infrastructure and primary triggers". Description replaced with full approved Epic 1 spec including all 23 SCs, research findings, scenario analysis, coordination note for 1083-fb3d. + +- **Ticket `71df-5bd8`** (Created): "Kudos system: detection triggers and agent behavioral improvements". Full Epic 2 spec with 9 SCs, scenario analysis, hard dependency on 3e9b-afee, soft coordination with 6068-cb2d and 53ee-a9ac for SC-E2-6. + +- **Review JSON files (temp)**: + - `/tmp/scrutiny-review-E1-5oew9w.json`: Epic 1 review JSON, all 4 perspectives, all dimensions ≥4 + - Epic 2 review JSON created inline: 3 perspectives, all dimensions ≥4 + +- **Inline feasibility re-run (third pass)**: The inline agent (no file output) evaluated the three targeted fixes and returned: `technical_feasibility: 4, integration_risk: 4` with empty findings array — all dimensions pass. + +- **`.claude/scripts/dso emit-protocol-review-result.sh`**: The script reads from artifacts dir (`/tmp/workflow-plugin-8c20e0fd310e4beb/review-protocol-output.json`). E1 emitted: `{"event_type":"review_result","review_type":"brainstorm-fidelity","pass_fail":"passed","revision_cycles":4,...}`. E2 emitted: `{..., "revision_cycles":5,...}`. + +4. Errors and Fixes: + +- **integration_risk=3 (second feasibility run)**: Three findings — (1) relative ruff `--stdin-filename`, (2) `ast.walk` for depth, (3) jscpd stdout assumption. Fixed: (1) `--stdin-filename "$(pwd)/$f"`, (2) `ast.NodeVisitor` with counter pattern, (3) explicit `mktemp -d` → file-read integration for jscpd. Re-run scored 4/4. + +- **`dso:feasibility-reviewer` subagent type not found**: Not registered in agent tool. Fix: inline general-purpose agent with full feasibility-reviewer.md prompt embedded. Pattern from prior session. + +- **`dso:complexity-evaluator` subagent type not found**: Same issue. Fix: inline general-purpose agents dispatched in parallel. + +- **emit-protocol-review-result.sh "review-protocol-output.json not found"**: Script reads from WORKFLOW_PLUGIN_ARTIFACTS_DIR. Fix: copied validated E1 review JSON to `/tmp/workflow-plugin-8c20e0fd310e4beb/review-protocol-output.json` before emitting. Then replaced with E2 JSON for E2 emit. + +- **Stale task notifications**: Received stale notifications for a3f67d6fe899f62ae (first feasibility run, 2/2) and a3e5ed934a0570ca6 (second feasibility run, 4/3). Both already processed and superseded by the inline third-pass re-run (4/4). No action taken on stale notifications. + +5. Problem Solving: + +- **Feasibility re-run loop**: Required three passes: (1) first run on original spec scored 2/2; (2) second run with T7/T9/T13 redesign scored 4/3; (3) targeted inline fix for remaining integration_risk=3 findings scored 4/4. The targeted fixes were: absolute ruff path, NodeVisitor precision, jscpd file-output handling. + +- **Review event emission**: Discovered that emit script needs review-protocol-output.json pre-placed in artifacts dir. Fixed by copying validated JSON there before emission. + +- **Epic spec recovery**: Session JSONL had been through two context compactions. Key spec data (scenario analysis results, gap analysis, web research findings) recovered from lines 221-232 of session JSONL (blue team tool_result messages). + +- **Complexity evaluation agent fallback**: Both dso:complexity-evaluator and dso:feasibility-reviewer unavailable as named sub-agent types. Both evaluated inline via general-purpose agent with the agent's .md file content as the prompt. + +6. All User Messages: + +- (Implicit: session resumed from prior compaction with instruction to continue pipeline work) +- "approved. update the first epic and create the second, then proceed to complexity analysis on both and serial decomposition starting with epic 1." +- "CRITICAL: Respond with TEXT ONLY. Do NOT call any tools." (summary request with detailed instructions) + +7. Pending Tasks: + +- **`/dso:preplanning` on Epic 1 (3e9b-afee)**: Complexity: COMPLEX. Must decompose into user stories, validate issue health, report dependency graph. Serial first. +- **`/dso:preplanning` on Epic 2 (71df-5bd8)**: After Epic 1 preplanning completes. Complexity: COMPLEX. + +8. Current Work: + +Both complexity evaluators completed successfully. The session was ready to invoke `/dso:preplanning` on Epic 1 when the summary request arrived. + +**Epic 1 complexity result:** +```json +{ + "classification": "COMPLEX", + "confidence": "high", + "files_estimated": [ + "plugins/dso/scripts/commit-validate.sh", + "plugins/dso/hooks/tools/kudos-write-guard.sh", + "plugins/dso/scripts/diff-to-sg-scope.sh", + "plugins/dso/docs/workflows/COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md", + "CLAUDE.md", + ".claude/dso-config.conf", + "tests/integration/test-kudos-t9-end-to-end.sh" + ], + "qualitative_overrides": ["success_criteria_overflow", "external_integration", "single_concern_fail"], + "blast_radius_score": 7, + "pattern_familiarity": "medium", + "external_boundary_count": 1, + "feasibility_review_recommended": true +} +``` + +**Epic 2 complexity result:** +```json +{ + "classification": "COMPLEX", + "confidence": "high", + "files_estimated": [ + "plugins/dso/scripts/kudos-snapshot.sh", + "plugins/dso/agents/completion-verifier.md", + "plugins/dso/agents/approach-decision-maker.md", + "plugins/dso/agents/doc-writer.md", + "plugins/dso/skills/using-lockpick/SKILL.md", + "plugins/dso/scripts/worktree-create.sh" + ], + "qualitative_overrides": ["success_criteria_overflow", "single_concern_failure"], + "blast_radius_score": 0, + "pattern_familiarity": "medium", + "external_boundary_count": 0, + "feasibility_review_recommended": false +} +``` + +**Current tickets:** +- `3e9b-afee`: "Kudos system: infrastructure and primary triggers" (Epic 1) — updated with full spec ✓ +- `71df-5bd8`: "Kudos system: detection triggers and agent behavioral improvements" (Epic 2) — created, linked as depends_on 3e9b-afee ✓ +- `16df-b0a2`: User-awarded points placeholder — unchanged ✓ + +9. Optional Next Step: + +Invoke `/dso:preplanning` on Epic 1 (ticket `3e9b-afee`). The user explicitly requested: "proceed to complexity analysis on both and serial decomposition starting with epic 1." Complexity analysis is complete (both COMPLEX). Next is story decomposition for Epic 1. + +Direct quote from user: "update the first epic and create the second, then proceed to complexity analysis on both and **serial decomposition starting with epic 1**." + +The complexity evaluators have both completed. The next immediate action is to invoke `/dso:preplanning` on ticket `3e9b-afee` to begin story decomposition for Epic 1. + +If you need specific details from before compaction (like exact code snippets, error messages, or content you generated), read the full transcript at: /root/.claude/projects/-home-user-digital-service-orchestra/4eadd43a-ce61-435f-afd5-40bcfc367e94.jsonl +Continue the conversation from where it left off without asking the user any further questions. Resume directly — do not acknowledge the summary, do not recap what was happening, do not preface with "I'll continue" or similar. Pick up the last task as if the break never happened. + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:19:53 + +**[TOOL: Skill]** +```json +{ + "skill": "dso:preplanning", + "args": "3e9b-afee" +} +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:19:55 + +**[TOOL: Glob]** +```json +{ + "pattern": "plugins/dso/skills/preplanning/SKILL.md" +} +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:19:58 + +**[TOOL: Read]** +```json +{ + "file_path": "/home/user/digital-service-orchestra/plugins/dso/skills/preplanning/SKILL.md" +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:19:58 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +File content (13634 tokens) exceeds maximum allowed tokens (10000). Use offset and limit parameters to read specific portions of the file, or search for specific content instead of reading the whole file. + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:20:01 + +**[TOOL: Read]** +```json +{ + "file_path": "/home/user/digital-service-orchestra/plugins/dso/skills/preplanning/SKILL.md", + "limit": 150 +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:20:01 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +1 --- +2 name: preplanning +3 description: Use when decomposing a ticket epic into prioritized user stories with measurable done definitions, or when auditing and reconciling existing epic children before implementation +4 user-invocable: true +5 allowed-tools: +6 - AskUserQuestion +7 --- +8 +9 +10 This skill requires the Agent tool to dispatch sub-agents. Before proceeding, check whether the Agent tool is available in your current context. If you cannot use the Agent tool (e.g., because you are running as a sub-agent dispatched via the Task tool), STOP IMMEDIATELY and return this error to your caller: +11 +12 "ERROR: /dso:preplanning cannot run in sub-agent context — it requires the Agent tool to dispatch its own sub-agents. Invoke this skill directly from the orchestrator instead." +13 +14 Do NOT proceed with any skill logic if the Agent tool is unavailable. +15 +16 +17 ## SKILL_ENTER Breadcrumb +18 +19 At the very start of execution (immediately after passing the SUB-AGENT-GUARD check), emit the SKILL_ENTER breadcrumb: +20 +21 ```bash +22 _DSO_TRACE_SESSION_ID="${DSO_TRACE_SESSION_ID:-$(date +%s%N 2>/dev/null || date +%s)}" +23 _DSO_TRACE_SKILL_FILE="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/preplanning/SKILL.md" +24 _DSO_TRACE_FILE_SIZE=$(wc -c < "${_DSO_TRACE_SKILL_FILE}" 2>/dev/null || echo "null") +25 _DSO_TRACE_DEPTH="${DSO_TRACE_NESTING_DEPTH:-1}" +26 _DSO_TRACE_START_MS=$(date +%s%3N 2>/dev/null || echo "null") +27 _DSO_TRACE_SESSION_ORDINAL="${DSO_TRACE_SESSION_ORDINAL:-1}" +28 _DSO_TRACE_CUMULATIVE_BYTES="${DSO_TRACE_CUMULATIVE_BYTES:-null}" +29 echo "{\"type\":\"SKILL_ENTER\",\"timestamp\":\"$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ 2>/dev/null)\",\"skill_name\":\"preplanning\",\"nesting_depth\":${_DSO_TRACE_DEPTH},\"skill_file_size\":${_DSO_TRACE_FILE_SIZE},\"tool_call_count\":null,\"elapsed_ms\":null,\"session_ordinal\":${_DSO_TRACE_SESSION_ORDINAL},\"cumulative_bytes\":${_DSO_TRACE_CUMULATIVE_BYTES},\"termination_directive\":null,\"user_interaction_count\":0}" >> "/tmp/dso-skill-trace-${_DSO_TRACE_SESSION_ID}.log" || true +30 ``` +31 +32 # Pre-Planning: High-Fidelity Story Mapping +33 +34 Act as a Senior Technical Product Manager (Google-style) to audit, reconcile, and decompose a ticket Epic into prioritized User Stories with measurable Done Definitions that bridge the epic's vision to task-level acceptance criteria. +35 +36 +37 **Supports dryrun mode.** Use `/dso:dryrun /dso:preplanning` to preview without changes. +38 +39 ## Usage +40 +41 ``` +42 /dso:preplanning # Interactive epic selection +43 /dso:preplanning # Pre-plan specific epic +44 /dso:preplanning --lightweight # Enrich epic without creating stories (used by /dso:sprint for MODERATE epics) +45 ``` +46 +47 ## Arguments +48 +49 - `` (optional): The ticket epic to decompose. If omitted, presents an interactive list of open epics. +50 - `--lightweight` (optional): Enrich the epic with done definitions and considerations without creating child stories. Returns `ENRICHED` or `ESCALATED`. Used by `/dso:sprint` for MODERATE-complexity epics. If the scope scan discovers COMPLEX qualitative overrides, returns `ESCALATED` so the orchestrator can re-invoke in full mode. +51 +52 ## Process Overview +53 +54 This skill implements a five-phase process to transform epics into implementable stories: +55 +56 1. **Context Reconciliation & Discovery** - Audit existing work and clarify scope +57 2. **Risk & Scope Scan** - Flag cross-cutting concerns and split candidates +58 2.5. **Adversarial Review** - Red/blue team review for cross-story blind spots (3+ stories only) +59 3. **Walking Skeleton & Vertical Slicing** - Prioritize the minimum viable path, split where needed +60 4. **Verification & Traceability** - Present the plan and link to epic criteria +61 +62 **Lightweight mode** (`--lightweight`): Runs an abbreviated subset — Phase 1 Step 1, Phase 2 (abbreviated), and writes done definitions directly to the epic. Skips Phases 2.5, 3-4. Returns `ENRICHED` or `ESCALATED`. +63 +64 --- +65 +66 ## Scrutiny Gate +67 +68 Before proceeding, check if the epic has a `scrutiny:pending` tag: +69 +70 1. Run `.claude/scripts/dso ticket show ` and check the `tags` field +71 2. If `scrutiny:pending` is present in the tags array: **HALT immediately**. Output: +72 "This epic has not been through scrutiny review. Run `/dso:brainstorm ` first to complete the scrutiny pipeline, then retry `/dso:preplanning`." +73 Do NOT produce any planning output. +74 3. If `scrutiny:pending` is NOT present (or tags field is empty/absent): proceed normally. +75 +76 This is a presence-based check — only block when the tag IS present. Existing epics without the tags field are NOT blocked. +77 +78 --- +79 +80 ## Phase 1: Context Reconciliation & Discovery (/dso:preplanning) +81 +82 ### Step 1: Select and Load Epic (/dso:preplanning) +83 +84 If `` was not provided: +85 1. Run `.claude/scripts/dso ticket list` then filter results to epics only (filter JSON output where `ticket_type == 'epic'`) +86 2. If no open epics exist, report and exit +87 3. Present epics to the user (if more than 5, show first 5 with option to see more) +88 4. Get user selection +89 +90 Load the epic: +91 ```bash +92 .claude/scripts/dso ticket show +93 ``` +94 +95 ### Step 1b: Select Escalation Policy (/dso:preplanning) +96 +97 Use `AskUserQuestion` to ask the user which escalation policy should apply to all stories in this epic. Skip this step in `--lightweight` mode. +98 +99 - **Question**: "Which escalation policy should agents apply when working on stories in this epic?" +100 - **Header**: "Escalation" +101 - **Options**: +102 1. **Autonomous** — Agents proceed with best judgment at all times. Reasonable assumptions are made and documented. No escalation for uncertainty. +103 2. **Escalate when blocked** — Agents proceed unless a significant assumption is required to continue — one that could send the implementation in the wrong direction. Escalate only when genuinely blocked without a reasonable inference. All assumptions made without escalating are documented. +104 3. **Escalate unless confident** — Agents escalate whenever high confidence is absent. "High confidence" means clear evidence from the codebase or ticket context — not inference or reasonable assumption. When in doubt, stop and ask rather than guess. +105 +106 Store the selected policy label and its full text as `{escalation_policy_label}` and `{escalation_policy_text}` for use in Phase 4 Step 2. +107 +108 ### Lightweight Mode Gate (/dso:preplanning) +109 +110 If `--lightweight` was passed: run Phase 1 Step 1 only, skip Step 1b, run abbreviated Phase 2, skip Phases 2.5 and 3-4, write done definitions to epic, return ENRICHED or ESCALATED per the Lightweight Mode Appendix below. +111 +112 If `--lightweight` was NOT passed, continue to Phase 1 Step 2 as normal. +113 +114 ### Step 2: Audit Existing Children (/dso:preplanning) +115 +116 Gather all existing child items: +117 ```bash +118 .claude/scripts/dso ticket deps +119 ``` +120 +121 For each child, run `.claude/scripts/dso ticket show ` to read full details. +122 +123 ### Step 3: Reconcile Existing Work (/dso:preplanning) +124 +125 ``` +126 For each existing child: +127 completed → Keep as-is +128 in_progress → Review for reuse +129 pending → Fits new vision? Yes: Keep | No: Modify | Conflict: Delete +130 ``` +131 +132 For each existing child, classify it: +133 - **Reuse**: Child aligns with the epic's success criteria and can be used as-is +134 - **Modify**: Child is partially relevant but needs updated description or success criteria +135 - **Delete**: Child conflicts with the epic's vision or is redundant +136 +137 **Important**: If boundaries are unclear or if existing tasks conflict with the new vision, pause and ask: +138 - "Tell me more about the intended scope for [Feature]... should it include [X]?" +139 - "I see existing tasks for [Y]. Should these be absorbed into our new story map or kept separate?" +140 +141 ### Step 4: Document Reconciliation Plan (/dso:preplanning) +142 +143 Before creating new stories, present a reconciliation summary: +144 +145 | Child ID | Title | Status | Recommendation | Rationale | +146 |----------|-------|--------|----------------|-----------| +147 | xxx-123 | ... | pending | Reuse | Aligns with Epic criterion 1 | +148 | xxx-124 | ... | in_progress | Modify | Needs updated success criteria | +149 | xxx-125 | ... | pending | Delete | Redundant with new story approach | +150 + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:20:03 + +**[TOOL: Read]** +```json +{ + "file_path": "/home/user/digital-service-orchestra/plugins/dso/skills/preplanning/SKILL.md", + "offset": 150, + "limit": 150 +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:20:03 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +150 +151 Use `AskUserQuestion` to get user approval before proceeding: +152 - Question: "The reconciliation plan above summarizes how existing children will be handled. Do you approve this plan?" +153 - Options: ["Approve — proceed with story creation", "Request changes"] +154 +155 If the user requests changes, iterate on the reconciliation plan and re-present. +156 +157 --- +158 +159 ## Phase 2: Risk & Scope Scan (/dso:preplanning) +160 +161 Scan all drafted stories (new and modified) as a batch to flag cross-cutting concerns that individual tasks would be too granular to catch. This is a lightweight analysis — no sub-agent dispatch, no scored review, no revision cycles. +162 +163 ### Concern Areas +164 +165 | Area | Reviewer File | What to flag | +166 |------|--------------|--------------| +167 | Security | [docs/reviewers/security.md](docs/reviewers/security.md) | New endpoints, data exposure, auth boundaries | +168 | Performance | [docs/reviewers/performance.md](docs/reviewers/performance.md) | Large data processing, new queries, batch operations | +169 | Accessibility | [docs/reviewers/accessibility.md](docs/reviewers/accessibility.md) | New interactive pages, UI flows, form elements | +170 | Testing | [docs/reviewers/testing.md](docs/reviewers/testing.md) | New LLM interactions, external integrations, complex state | +171 | Reliability | [docs/reviewers/reliability.md](docs/reviewers/reliability.md) | New failure points, external dependencies, data integrity | +172 | Maintainability | [docs/reviewers/maintainability.md](docs/reviewers/maintainability.md) | Cross-cutting patterns, shared abstractions, documentation gaps | +173 +174 Evaluate the full set of stories against all six areas. Examples of flags to raise: +175 +176 - Security: "Story X exposes a new API — authentication coverage needed" +177 - Performance: "Story Y processes user uploads — consider batch size and timeout behavior" +178 - Accessibility: "Story Z adds a new interactive page — WCAG 2.1 AA compliance required" +179 - Testing: "Stories X and Y introduce a new LLM interaction — ensure mock-compatible interface" +180 - Reliability: "Story W depends on an external API — consider graceful degradation" +181 - Maintainability: "Stories X and Z both need similar data validation — consider a shared pattern" +182 +183 ### Output +184 +185 Produce a **Risk Register** — a flat list of one-line flags, each referencing the affected story IDs: +186 +187 ``` +188 | # | Area | Stories | Concern | +189 |---|------|---------|---------| +190 | 1 | Testing | X, Y | New LLM interaction — ensure mock-compatible interface | +191 | 2 | Performance | Y | Large file processing — consider timeout behavior | +192 | 3 | Accessibility | Z | New interactive page — WCAG 2.1 AA compliance | +193 ``` +194 +195 Flags are added to the affected stories' descriptions as **Considerations** — context for `/dso:implementation-plan` to incorporate into task-level acceptance criteria. They are not hard requirements at the story level. +196 +197 ### Split Candidates +198 +199 While scanning, flag stories where scope risk is high — stories where the minimum functional goal (walking skeleton) and the ideal implementation diverge significantly. Common indicators: +200 +201 - Significant UI work where design may propose an ambitious overhaul +202 - New architectural patterns where a simpler interim approach could deliver value first +203 - New infrastructure or integrations where a lightweight version proves the concept +204 +205 Mark these stories as **split candidates**. Phase 3 evaluates whether a Foundation/Enhancement split actually makes sense (see "Foundation/Enhancement Splitting" below). +206 +207 --- +208 +209 ## Phase 2.25: Integration Research (/dso:preplanning) +210 +211 After story decomposition and risk scanning, research integration capabilities for stories that involve external tools or services. This step surfaces verified constraints while the user is engaged and can redirect. +212 +213 ### Qualification +214 +215 A story qualifies for integration research if it references any of: +216 - Third-party CLI tools +217 - External APIs/services +218 - CI/CD workflow changes +219 - Infrastructure provisioning +220 - Data format migrations +221 - Authentication/credential flows +222 +223 ### Research Process (shared) +224 +225 For each qualifying story: +226 +227 1. Use WebSearch to find known-working code that uses the specific integration or topic. Search GitHub for repositories that import or call the tool/API. +228 2. Verify specific capabilities claimed or implied by the story scope. Check official documentation against what the story requires. +229 3. Add findings to the story's Considerations as **Verified Constraints**: +230 ``` +231 - [Integration] Verified: supports (source: ) +232 - [Integration] NOT verified: does not appear to support +233 ``` +234 4. If no sandbox or test environment is available for integration testing, flag this to the user during preplanning: "No sandbox available for — integration testing will require a live environment." +235 5. If research finds no verified code or capabilities for a story's integration, flag the story as **high-risk** and recommend spike-task creation before implementation: "Story references but no verified working code was found — recommend creating a spike task to validate capabilities before implementation." +236 +237 ### Skip Condition +238 +239 If no stories in the plan qualify for integration research, log: "No stories with external integration signals — skipping integration research." and proceed to Phase 2.5. +240 +241 --- +242 +243 ## Phase 2.5: Adversarial Review (/dso:preplanning) +244 +245 ### Threshold Gate +246 +247 **Skip this phase if fewer than 3 stories exist** after Phase 2 completes. Adversarial review adds value only when there are enough stories for cross-story interactions to matter. If skipped, log: `"Adversarial review skipped: fewer than 3 stories ( stories)."` and proceed directly to Phase 3. +248 +249 ### Step 1: Red Team Dispatch (/dso:preplanning) +250 +251 Dispatch via `subagent_type: "dso:red-team-reviewer"` with `model: opus`. The agent definition contains the full review prompt including the 6-category taxonomy and Consumer Enumeration directive. Pass the following as task arguments: +252 +253 - `{epic-title}`: Epic title from Phase 1 +254 - `{epic-description}`: Epic description from Phase 1 +255 - `{story-map}`: All stories with their done definitions, considerations, and dependencies (formatted from Phase 2 output) +256 - `{risk-register}`: Risk Register table from Phase 2 +257 - `{dependency-graph}`: Dependency graph from `.claude/scripts/dso ticket deps ` +258 +259 The red team sub-agent returns a JSON `findings` array. Parse the response and validate it contains well-formed JSON with the expected schema (array of objects with `type`, `target_story_id`, `title`, `description`, `rationale`, `taxonomy_category` fields). +260 +261 **Fallback**: If the red team sub-agent times out, returns malformed output, or fails to produce valid JSON, log a warning: `"Red team review failed: . Skipping adversarial review, proceeding to Phase 3."` and skip directly to Phase 3. +262 +263 ### Step 2: Blue Team Dispatch (/dso:preplanning) +264 +265 If the red team returns a non-empty findings array, dispatch via `subagent_type: "dso:blue-team-filter"` with `model: sonnet`. Pass the following as task arguments: +266 +267 - `{epic-title}`: Same as red team +268 - `{epic-description}`: Same as red team +269 - `{story-map}`: Same as red team +270 - `{red-team-findings}`: The raw JSON findings array from the red team sub-agent +271 +272 The blue team sub-agent returns a filtered JSON object with `findings` (accepted) and `rejected` arrays. +273 +274 **If red team returned zero findings**: Skip the blue team dispatch entirely. Log: `"Red team found no cross-story gaps. Skipping blue team filter."` and proceed to Phase 3. +275 +276 **Partial failure**: If the red team succeeds but the blue team fails (timeout, malformed output, or error), **discard all unfiltered findings** and proceed to Phase 3. Do NOT apply unfiltered red team findings -- the blue team filter exists to prevent false positives from polluting the story map. Log: `"Blue team filter failed: . Discarding unfiltered red team findings, proceeding to Phase 3."` +277 +278 ### Step 3: Apply Surviving Findings (/dso:preplanning) +279 +280 Parse the blue team's accepted findings and apply each one based on its `type`: +281 +282 | Finding Type | Action | +283 |-------------|--------| +284 | `new_story` | Create a new story with description: `.claude/scripts/dso ticket create story "" --parent=<epic-id> -d "<body with description, done definitions, and considerations>"`. | +285 | `modify_done_definition` | Use `.claude/scripts/dso ticket comment <target_story_id> "Done definition update: <description>"` to record the modified done definition. | +286 | `add_dependency` | Add the dependency: `.claude/scripts/dso ticket link <target_story_id> <dependency_id> depends_on` (extract dependency ID from the finding's description). | +287 | `add_consideration` | Use `.claude/scripts/dso ticket comment <target_story_id> "Consideration: <text>"` to append the consideration. | +288 +289 Log a summary after applying findings: +290 ``` +291 Adversarial review complete: +292 - Red team findings: <N> total +293 - Blue team filtered: <M> rejected, <K> accepted +294 - Applied: <A> new stories, <B> modified done definitions, <C> new dependencies, <D> new considerations +295 ``` +296 +297 ### Step 3.5: Persist Adversarial Review Exchange (/dso:preplanning) +298 +299 After processing blue team findings, persist the full exchange for post-mortem analysis: + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:20:06 + +**[TOOL: Read]** +```json +{ + "file_path": "/home/user/digital-service-orchestra/plugins/dso/skills/preplanning/SKILL.md", + "offset": 300, + "limit": 200 +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:20:06 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +300 +301 1. Parse the blue team agent's output for the `artifact_path` field. If present, it points to the persisted JSON file at `$ARTIFACTS_DIR/adversarial-review-<epic-id>.json` +302 2. If `artifact_path` is present, add a one-line ticket comment referencing the artifact: +303 ```bash +304 .claude/scripts/dso ticket comment <epic-id> "Adversarial review: <N> findings, <M> accepted. Full exchange: <artifact_path>" +305 ``` +306 3. **If `artifact_path` is absent** (agent failed to persist, or returned malformed output): log a warning `"Adversarial review artifact not persisted — blue team agent did not return artifact_path"` and continue. Artifact persistence failure is non-blocking. +307 4. This artifact is available for future post-mortem analysis but is not surfaced in normal `ticket show` output +308 +309 ### Step 4: Continue to Phase 3 +310 +311 Proceed to Phase 3 (Walking Skeleton & Vertical Slicing) with the updated story map. New stories from adversarial review are included in the walking skeleton analysis. +312 +313 --- +314 +315 ## Phase 3: Walking Skeleton & Vertical Slicing (/dso:preplanning) +316 +317 ### Step 1: Identify the Walking Skeleton (/dso:preplanning) +318 +319 The Walking Skeleton is the absolute minimum end-to-end path required to prove the technical concept. +320 +321 Ask: "What is the simplest possible flow that demonstrates this feature works?" +322 +323 **Prioritize these stories first** - they unblock all downstream work. +324 +325 ### Step 2: Apply INVEST Framework (/dso:preplanning) +326 +327 Ensure each story follows **INVEST** principles: +328 +329 | Principle | Question | Fix if No | +330 |-----------|----------|----------| +331 | **I**ndependent | Can this be built without waiting on other stories? | Add dependencies or split | +332 | **N**egotiable | Is the "how" flexible, not dictated? | Remove implementation details | +333 | **V**aluable | Does this deliver user/business value? | Combine with other stories | +334 | **E**stimable | Can an agent estimate effort? | Add more context | +335 | **S**mall | Can this be completed in one sub-agent session? | Split into smaller stories | +336 | **T**estable | Are success criteria measurable? | Add specific acceptance criteria | +337 +338 ### Step 3: Vertical Slicing (/dso:preplanning) +339 +340 Focus on functional "slices" of value, not horizontal technical layers. +341 +342 **Good** (vertical slice): +343 - "User can upload a PDF and see extraction results" +344 +345 **Bad** (horizontal layer): +346 - "Create database schema for documents" +347 - "Build document upload API" +348 - "Add frontend upload component" +349 +350 The vertical slice includes all layers necessary to deliver value. +351 +352 ### Step 4: Foundation/Enhancement Splitting (/dso:preplanning) +353 +354 For each story flagged as a **split candidate** in Phase 2, evaluate whether splitting delivers better outcomes than keeping it as a single story. +355 +356 **The question**: "Does the minimum that delivers the functional goal differ significantly from the ideal experience or architecture?" +357 +358 - **Foundation**: Delivers the functional goal and proves the concept. This IS the walking skeleton slice for the story — it may use simpler approaches, existing patterns, or existing components. +359 - **Enhancement**: Invests in the ideal experience — better UX, proper architecture, performance optimization. Depends on Foundation. +360 +361 **Split if**: +362 - The Foundation alone delivers user value (it's a complete vertical slice) +363 - The Enhancement represents a meaningful scope increase (not just polish) +364 - Combining both would make the story too large for a single agent session +365 +366 **Don't split if**: +367 - The "Foundation" wouldn't deliver value without the "Enhancement" +368 - The scope difference is marginal +369 - The story is already small enough +370 +371 **Examples**: +372 +373 | Story | Foundation | Enhancement | +374 |-------|-----------|-------------| +375 | "User can review extracted rules" | Review page with approve/reject using existing table component | Custom review interface with inline editing, bulk actions, and keyboard shortcuts | +376 | "System stores extraction results" | Persist results in existing job table with JSON column | Dedicated results table with normalization, indexing, and query optimization | +377 | "User can export reviewed rules as Rego" | Download button that generates Rego file | Export wizard with format options, preview, and validation | +378 +379 For each split: +380 - Create both stories as children of the epic +381 - Foundation gets higher priority than Enhancement +382 - Add dependency: `.claude/scripts/dso ticket link <enhancement-id> <foundation-id> depends_on` +383 - Both trace to the same epic criterion +384 +385 **Note**: `/dso:design-wireframe` has its own Pragmatic Scope Splitter (Step 10) that may trigger UI-specific splits during design. If preplanning already split a story, the design agent works within the Foundation story's scope. +386 +387 --- +388 +389 ## Phase 3.5: Story-Level Research (/dso:preplanning) +390 +391 After Phase 3 completes story slicing and splitting, perform targeted research for stories where decomposition has revealed knowledge gaps. This phase fires per-story and is distinct from Phase 2.25 (Integration Research): Phase 2.25 fires for stories with external integration signals (third-party tools, APIs); Phase 3.5 fires for any decomposition gap regardless of whether an external integration is involved. +392 +393 ### Trigger Conditions +394 +395 A story qualifies for story-level research if any of the following apply: +396 +397 - **Undocumented API behavior**: The story depends on an external API or internal interface whose behavior is undocumented, ambiguous, or not verified in the epic context. +398 - **Assumed data format**: The story assumes a data format, schema, or protocol not described in the epic context (e.g., the exact shape of a webhook payload or file format encoding). +399 - **Low agent confidence**: Agent confidence on a key implementation decision is low — the approach is unclear, multiple conflicting patterns exist, or the story references technology the agent is uncertain about. +400 +401 When a story qualifies, follow the Research Process defined in Phase 2.25. Record findings in the story spec under a **Research Notes** section, noting the trigger condition, query summary, source URLs, and key insight for each gap. If research resolves the gap, update the story's done definition or considerations. If research surfaces new risks, flag the story as high-risk for Phase 4 review. +402 +403 ### Graceful Degradation +404 +405 If WebSearch or WebFetch fails or is unavailable, continue without research rather than blocking the workflow. Log: `"Story-level research skipped for <story-id>: WebSearch/WebFetch unavailable."` and proceed to Phase 4. +406 +407 ### Skip Condition +408 +409 If no stories qualify under the trigger conditions above, log: `"No stories with decomposition gaps — skipping story-level research."` and proceed to Phase 4. +410 +411 --- +412 +413 ## Phase 4: Verification & Traceability (/dso:preplanning) +414 +415 ### Step 1: Create/Modify Stories in Tickets (/dso:preplanning) +416 +417 For new stories, create the ticket then immediately write the full story body into the ticket file: +418 +419 ```bash +420 # Assemble the story body from earlier phases and create the ticket in one command: +421 # - Description: What/Why/Scope from Phase 2 analysis +422 # - Done Definitions: assembled during Phase 3 +423 # - Considerations: flags from Phase 2 Risk & Scope Scan +424 # - Escalation Policy: selected in Phase 1 Step 1b (omit if Autonomous) +425 +426 STORY_ID=$(.claude/scripts/dso ticket create story "As a [persona], [goal]" --parent=<epic-id> --priority=<priority> -d "$(cat <<'DESCRIPTION' +427 ## Description +428 +429 **What**: <what the feature or change is> +430 **Why**: <how this advances the epic's vision> +431 **Scope**: +432 - IN: <items explicitly in scope> +433 - OUT: <items explicitly out of scope> +434 +435 ## Done Definitions +436 +437 - When this story is complete, <observable outcome 1> +438 ← Satisfies: "<quoted epic criterion>" +439 - When this story is complete, <observable outcome 2> +440 ← Satisfies: "<quoted epic criterion>" +441 +442 ## Considerations +443 +444 - [<Area>] <concern from Risk & Scope Scan> +445 +446 ## Escalation Policy +447 +448 **Escalation policy**: <verbatim escalation policy text from Phase 1 Step 1b> +449 DESCRIPTION +450 )") +451 ``` +452 +453 Omit the `## Escalation Policy` section if the user selected **Autonomous** in Phase 1 Step 1b. The ticket must never be left as a bare title — always include the structured body at creation time. +454 +455 For modified stories, use `.claude/scripts/dso ticket comment <existing-id> "<updated content>"` to record changes. +456 +457 For stories to delete: +458 ```bash +459 .claude/scripts/dso ticket transition <id> open closed +460 ``` +461 +462 ### Step 2: Story Structure Requirements (/dso:preplanning) +463 +464 Each story must contain: +465 +466 #### Title +467 Format: `As a [User/Developer/PO], [goal]` +468 Example: "As a compliance officer, I can see which policies apply to a document" +469 +470 #### Description +471 Include: +472 - **What**: The feature or change +473 - **Why**: How this advances the epic's vision +474 - **Scope**: What's explicitly in and out of this story +475 +476 Do NOT include: specific file paths, technical implementation details, error codes, or testing requirements. Those belong in `/dso:implementation-plan`. +477 +478 #### Done Definitions +479 Observable outcomes that bridge the epic's vision to task-level acceptance criteria. Each definition must be: +480 +481 - **Observable**: Describes what a user sees, does, or what the system does — not internal implementation +482 - **Measurable**: `/dso:implementation-plan` can decompose it into tasks with specific `Verify:` commands +483 - **Traceable**: Links upward to an epic criterion +484 +485 Format: +486 ``` +487 Done Definitions: +488 - When this story is complete, [observable outcome 1] +489 ← Satisfies: "[quoted epic criterion]" +490 - When this story is complete, [observable outcome 2] +491 ← Satisfies: "[quoted epic criterion]" +492 ``` +493 +494 Example: +495 ``` +496 Done Definitions: +497 - When this story is complete, a user can view all extracted rules +498 for a document, mark individual rules as approved or rejected, +499 and see a summary count of pending reviews + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:20:09 + +**[TOOL: Read]** +```json +{ + "file_path": "/home/user/digital-service-orchestra/plugins/dso/skills/preplanning/SKILL.md", + "offset": 500, + "limit": 150 +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:20:09 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +500 ← Satisfies: "Users can review extracted rules before export" +501 - When this story is complete, reviewed rules persist across sessions +502 and are visible when the user returns to the same document +503 ← Satisfies: "Review state is preserved" +504 ``` +505 +506 **Good** done definitions (observable outcomes): +507 - "A user can upload a document and see its classification within 30 seconds" +508 - "The system processes documents up to 100 pages without timeout" +509 - "Reviewed rules appear in the exported Rego output" +510 +511 **Bad** done definitions (implementation details): +512 - "The upload endpoint returns a 202 with a job ID" +513 - "Classification results are stored in the job_results JSON column" +514 - "The ReviewService calls the ExportService with the approved rule IDs" +515 +516 #### TDD Done-of-Done Requirement +517 +518 Code-change stories (stories that produce or modify source code) must include **'unit tests written and passing for all new or modified logic'** as a Done Definition. This is a unit test DoD requirement applied at the story level. +519 +520 Documentation, research, and other non-code stories are exempt from this requirement — their Done Definitions focus on observable outcomes rather than test coverage. +521 +522 #### Considerations +523 Notes from the Risk & Scope Scan (Phase 2). These provide context for `/dso:implementation-plan` to incorporate into task-level acceptance criteria: +524 +525 ``` +526 Considerations: +527 - [Performance] Large file processing — consider timeout behavior +528 - [Testing] New LLM interaction — ensure mock-compatible interface +529 - [Accessibility] New interactive page — WCAG 2.1 AA compliance required +530 ``` +531 +532 #### Escalation Policy +533 +534 Include the policy selected in Phase 1 Step 1b. Use the exact text for each label: +535 +536 | Label | Text to include verbatim | +537 |-------|--------------------------| +538 | Autonomous | **Escalation policy**: Proceed with best judgment. Make and document reasonable assumptions. Do not escalate for uncertainty — use your best assessment of the intent and move forward. | +539 | Escalate when blocked | **Escalation policy**: Proceed unless a significant assumption is required to continue — one that could send the implementation in the wrong direction. Escalate only when genuinely blocked without a reasonable inference. Document all assumptions made without escalating. | +540 | Escalate unless confident | **Escalation policy**: Escalate to the user whenever you do not have high confidence in your understanding of the work, approach, or intent. "High confidence" means clear evidence from the codebase or ticket context — not inference or reasonable assumption. When in doubt, stop and ask rather than guess. | +541 +542 Omit this section entirely if the user selected **Autonomous** — the absence of a policy section signals unrestricted autonomy. +543 +544 #### Dependencies +545 Add blocking relationships: +546 ```bash +547 .claude/scripts/dso ticket link <story-id> <blocking-story-id> depends_on +548 ``` +549 +550 ### Documentation Update Story +551 +552 After all implementation stories are drafted, create one final story to update project documentation. This story: +553 +554 - **Updates existing docs only** — do not create new documentation files or patterns +555 - **Targets**: `CLAUDE.md` (architecture section, quick reference), `.claude/design-notes.md`, ADRs, `KNOWN-ISSUES.md`, or other docs that already exist and would become stale after the epic is complete +556 - **Scope**: Concise updates that ensure future agents have accurate awareness of the project state (new routes, changed patterns, updated commands, removed features) +557 - **Style guide**: Follow `.claude/docs/DOCUMENTATION-GUIDE.md` for formatting, structure, and conventions when writing documentation updates +558 - **Depends on**: All implementation stories (runs last) +559 - **Title format**: "Update project docs to reflect [epic summary]" +560 - **Skip if**: The epic makes no changes that would affect existing documentation (document rationale) +561 +562 When creating the documentation update story via `.claude/scripts/dso ticket create`, add a note with the guide reference so sub-agents find it in their ticket payload: +563 ```bash +564 .claude/scripts/dso ticket comment <story-id> "Follow .claude/docs/DOCUMENTATION-GUIDE.md for documentation formatting, structure, and conventions." +565 ``` +566 +567 ### TDD Test Story Requirements (/dso:preplanning) +568 +569 After all implementation stories are drafted and the documentation update story is planned, evaluate whether the epic requires dedicated TDD test stories. A TDD test story is a story whose sole purpose is to write failing tests (RED) that implementation stories must make pass (GREEN). +570 +571 #### When to Create TDD Test Stories +572 +573 Infer the epic type from its context and title: +574 +575 | Epic Type | TDD Story Required | Story Title Format | +576 |-----------|-------------------|--------------------| +577 | **User-facing epic** (LLM-inferred: epic adds or changes user-visible features, pages, flows, or interactions) | Yes — create an **E2E test story** | `Write failing E2E tests for [feature]` | +578 | **External-API epic** (LLM-inferred: epic integrates with an external service or third-party API) | Yes — create an **integration test story** | `Write failing integration tests for [feature]` | +579 | **Internal tooling epic** (LLM-inferred: epic modifies internal skills, hooks, scripts, or infrastructure) | No — unit testing is handled within each implementation story's `/dso:implementation-plan`; this is the **internal epic exemption** | | +580 +581 For epics that span multiple types (e.g., both user-facing and external-API), create one TDD story per applicable type. +582 +583 #### Dependency Ordering for TDD Test Stories +584 +585 TDD test stories have a specific dependency structure that differs from other stories: +586 +587 - The **TDD test story's `depends_on` list must contain no implementation story IDs** from the same epic — the test story has no blockers and must be created first. +588 - **All implementation stories in the epic must depend on the TDD test story**: run `.claude/scripts/dso ticket link <impl-story-id> <test-story-id> depends_on` for each implementation story so that implementation cannot begin until tests exist. +589 - The documentation update story does NOT depend on the TDD test story (it depends on implementation stories as usual). +590 +591 #### RED Acceptance Criteria +592 +593 Every TDD test story must include the following acceptance criterion: +594 +595 ``` +596 Tests must be run and confirmed failing (RED) before any implementation story begins. +597 The failing run result must be recorded in a story note: +598 .claude/scripts/dso ticket comment <test-story-id> "RED confirmed: <test output summary>" +599 ``` +600 +601 This RED acceptance criteria ensures the TDD test story's tests are observed to fail before implementation begins, not written alongside or after implementation. +602 +603 #### Exemptions +604 +605 - **Documentation and research stories** are exempt from TDD story requirements — they have no associated test stories and do not depend on any TDD test story. +606 - If an epic is **TRIVIAL** (single story, no external dependencies) and the story already contains unit test acceptance criteria, a separate TDD test story may be omitted. Document the rationale. +607 +608 ### Step 3: Present Story Dashboard (/dso:preplanning) +609 +610 Display the epic ID prominently at the top so it can be referenced in follow-up commands: +611 +612 ``` +613 Story dashboard for Epic [epic-id]: [Title] +614 ``` +615 +616 Display a summary table: +617 +618 | ID | Title | Priority | Status | Blocks | Split | Satisfies Criterion | +619 |----|-------|----------|--------|--------|-------|---------------------| +620 | xxx-126 | As a user... | P1 | pending | xxx-127 | Foundation | Epic criterion 1 | +621 | xxx-127 | As a user... | P2 | pending | - | Enhancement of xxx-126 | Epic criterion 1 | +622 | xxx-128 | As a dev... | P1 | pending | - | - | Epic criterion 2 | +623 +624 Then, below the table, display each story's full description so the user can review scope, done definitions, and considerations before approving: +625 +626 ``` +627 ### xxx-126: As a user, I can upload a document and see its classification +628 +629 **What**: [description] +630 **Why**: [rationale] +631 **Scope**: IN: [...] | OUT: [...] +632 +633 **Done Definitions**: +634 - When this story is complete, [outcome 1] +635 ← Satisfies: "[epic criterion]" +636 +637 **Considerations**: +638 - [Area] concern +639 +640 --- +641 [repeat for each story] +642 ``` +643 +644 ### Step 4: Validate Dependencies (/dso:preplanning) +645 +646 After creating all stories and dependencies: +647 ```bash +648 .claude/scripts/dso validate-issues.sh +649 ``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:20:12 + +**[TOOL: Read]** +```json +{ + "file_path": "/home/user/digital-service-orchestra/plugins/dso/skills/preplanning/SKILL.md", + "offset": 650, + "limit": 100 +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:20:12 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +650 +651 If score < 5, fix issues before presenting to user. +652 +653 ### Step 5: Final Review Prompt (/dso:preplanning) +654 +655 Present the plan to the user with: +656 +657 ``` +658 I've created a story map for Epic [ID]: [Title] +659 +660 Summary: +661 - [N] new stories created +662 - [M] existing stories modified +663 - [K] stories removed +664 - Walking Skeleton: [list of IDs in critical path] +665 +666 Next Steps: +667 1. Review the story dashboard above +668 2. Confirm priorities and dependencies make sense +669 ``` +670 +671 Use `AskUserQuestion` to get user approval: +672 - Question: "The story map above captures the full plan for this epic. Do you approve?" +673 - Options: ["Approve — finalize and proceed", "Request changes"] +674 +675 If the user requests changes, iterate on the plan and re-present. Once the user selects "Approve — finalize and proceed", immediately continue to Step 5a, Step 6, and Step 7 without pausing for additional input — approval is the signal to proceed, not a stopping point. +676 +677 ### Step 5a: Write Planning Context to Epic Ticket (/dso:preplanning) +678 +679 Write the accumulated context as a structured comment on the epic ticket so that `/dso:implementation-plan` can load richer context when planning individual stories from this epic, regardless of which session or environment runs next. +680 +681 **Command** (use Python subprocess to avoid shell ARG_MAX limits for large payloads). This write is an optional cache — if the ticket CLI call fails, log a warning and continue; do not abort the phase: +682 ```python +683 import json, subprocess +684 payload = json.dumps(<context-dict>, separators=(",",":")) +685 body = "PREPLANNING_CONTEXT: " + payload +686 result = subprocess.run( +687 [".claude/scripts/dso", "ticket", "comment", "<epic-id>", body], +688 check=False +689 ) +690 if result.returncode != 0: +691 print("WARNING: Failed to write PREPLANNING_CONTEXT comment to epic ticket — continuing without cache write") +692 ``` +693 +694 > **Known limitation**: For extremely large epic contexts (unlikely in practice), the actual ARG_MAX constraint boundary is `ticket-comment.sh`, which passes the comment body as a shell argument to its internal `python3 -c` invocation. The Python subprocess call in this skill avoids ARG_MAX at the *outer* shell level, but a body >~500KB could still hit the kernel limit inside `ticket-comment.sh`. A proper fix would write the payload to a temp file and pass the path instead of the body directly. A proper fix would pass the body via a temp file instead of a shell argument. Typical epic contexts are 10–50KB and well within limits. +695 +696 Serialize the JSON payload to a single minified line (no whitespace between keys/values) and write it as a ticket comment. If `/dso:preplanning` runs again on the same epic, write a new comment — `/dso:implementation-plan` will use the last `PREPLANNING_CONTEXT:` comment in the array. +697 +698 **Schema** (version 1): +699 ```json +700 { +701 "version": 1, +702 "epicId": "<epic-id>", +703 "generatedAt": "<ISO-8601 timestamp>", +704 "generatedBy": "preplanning", +705 "epic": { +706 "title": "...", +707 "description": "...", +708 "successCriteria": ["..."] +709 }, +710 "stories": [ +711 { +712 "id": "<story-id>", +713 "title": "...", +714 "description": "...", +715 "priority": 2, +716 "classification": "new|reuse|modify", +717 "walkingSkeleton": true, +718 "hasWireframe": false, +719 "doneDefinitions": ["When this story is complete, ..."], +720 "considerations": ["[Performance] Large file processing — consider timeout behavior"], +721 "scopeSplitCandidate": false, +722 "splitRole": "foundation|enhancement|null", +723 "splitPairId": "<paired-story-id or null>", +724 "blockedBy": ["<blocking-id>"], +725 "satisfiesCriterion": "quoted epic criterion" +726 } +727 ], +728 "storyDashboard": { +729 "totalStories": 5, +730 "uiStories": 2, +731 "criticalPath": ["<id-a>", "<id-b>", "<id-c>"] +732 } +733 } +734 ``` +735 +736 **Content to include**: +737 - **Epic data**: title, description, success criteria from the loaded epic +738 - **All stories**: IDs, titles, descriptions, priorities, classifications (from Phase 1 reconciliation), walking skeleton flags (from Phase 3), done definitions and considerations (from Phase 2 Risk & Scope Scan), split role and pair info (from Phase 3 Step 4), dependency links, and traceability lines (from Phase 4 Step 2) +739 - **Story dashboard**: total story count, UI story count, critical path order +740 - **`generatedAt`**: Current ISO-8601 timestamp for staleness detection +741 +742 Write the context as a ticket comment using `.claude/scripts/dso ticket comment`. If `/dso:preplanning` runs again on the same epic, write a new comment — `/dso:implementation-plan` uses the last `PREPLANNING_CONTEXT:` comment in the array. +743 +744 > **TTL note for consumers**: The `generatedAt` timestamp enables staleness detection. Consumers should treat `PREPLANNING_CONTEXT` comments older than 7 days as potentially stale — epic scope, story priorities, or dependency structures may have changed since generation. When consuming a stale context, re-invoke `/dso:preplanning` to refresh it rather than relying on outdated data. +745 +746 Log: `"Planning context written to epic ticket <epic-id> as PREPLANNING_CONTEXT comment"` +747 +748 ### Step 6: Design Wireframes for UI Stories (/dso:preplanning) +749 + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:20:14 + +**[TOOL: Read]** +```json +{ + "file_path": "/home/user/digital-service-orchestra/plugins/dso/skills/preplanning/SKILL.md", + "offset": 750, + "limit": 100 +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:20:14 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +750 After the user approves the story map, invoke `/dso:design-wireframe` for **any story that involves UI changes**. The `/dso:design-wireframe` skill will determine whether new UI components, layouts, or wireframes are actually needed — your job is only to identify candidates and pass them through. +751 +752 A story is a candidate if it: +753 - Mentions user-facing screens, pages, views, or components +754 - Includes frontend routes, forms, dashboards, or visual elements +755 - Has success criteria describing what a user **sees** or **interacts with** +756 - Modifies existing UI behavior, templates, or JavaScript interactions +757 +758 Stories that are purely backend, infrastructure, testing-only, or documentation do NOT qualify. +759 +760 **Skip if**: No stories in the plan involve UI changes. Document this: "No UI stories identified — skipping wireframe phase." +761 +762 #### Wireframe Session File Lifecycle +763 +764 When multiple UI stories need wireframes, create a **session file** to avoid +765 redundant reads across serial `/dso:design-wireframe` invocations. +766 +767 **Before the first wireframe invocation**: +768 +769 1. Read `.claude/design-notes.md` content (if it exists). +770 2. Create `/tmp/wireframe-session-<epic-id>.json`: +771 ```json +772 { +773 "version": 1, +774 "epicId": "<epic-id>", +775 "createdAt": "<ISO-8601 timestamp>", +776 "designNotes": { +777 "exists": true, +778 "content": "<full .claude/design-notes.md content or null if missing>" +779 }, +780 "processedStories": [], +781 "siblingDesigns": [] +782 } +783 ``` +784 3. Log: `"Created wireframe session file for epic <epic-id> with <N> UI stories +785 to process."` +786 +787 **For each qualifying story**, invoke `/dso:design-wireframe`: +788 +789 ``` +790 /dso:design-wireframe <story-id> +791 ``` +792 +793 **After each `/dso:design-wireframe` completes**: +794 +795 1. Read the design manifest path from the story's `design` field: +796 `.claude/scripts/dso ticket show <story-id>` +797 2. Append the story to the session file's `processedStories` array: +798 ```json +799 { +800 "storyId": "<story-id>", +801 "designManifestPath": "<path from design field>", +802 "completedAt": "<ISO-8601 timestamp>" +803 } +804 ``` +805 3. Append the manifest path to the `siblingDesigns` array (for subsequent +806 invocations to read without re-scanning). +807 4. Log: `"Updated wireframe session: <N>/<total> stories processed."` +808 +809 **Order**: Process stories in dependency order (stories with no blockers first, +810 then stories that depend on them). This ensures base wireframes exist before +811 dependent designs reference them. +812 +813 ### Step 7: Sync Tickets (/dso:preplanning) +814 +815 After wireframe phase completes (or is skipped), confirm all ticket state is +816 up to date and report completion. +817 +818 --- +819 +820 ## Appendix: Lightweight Mode Specification +821 +822 When `--lightweight` is passed: +823 +824 1. **Skip Steps 2-4** of Phase 1 (no children to reconcile) +825 2. **Skip Phase 2.5** (Adversarial Review) entirely — lightweight mode does not create stories, so cross-story analysis is not applicable +826 3. Proceed to **Phase 2 (abbreviated)**: Run the Risk & Scope Scan but with these modifications: +827 - **Run** the Concern Areas scan (Security, Performance, Accessibility, Testing, Reliability, Maintainability) +828 - **Run** the qualitative override check from the epic complexity evaluator (multiple personas, UI + backend, new DB migration, foundation/enhancement candidate, external integration) +829 - **Skip** split-candidate identification (no stories to split) +830 4. **If any COMPLEX qualitative override is discovered** that the evaluator missed: +831 - Do NOT write the preplanning context file +832 - Do NOT modify the epic description +833 - Return immediately: +834 ```json +835 { +836 "result": "ESCALATED", +837 "reason": "<override name>: <explanation>", +838 "recommendation": "full_preplanning", +839 "epicId": "<epic-id>" +840 } +841 ``` +842 5. **If no overrides discovered**, proceed to write done definitions: +843 - Update the epic description with: +844 - **Done Definitions**: Observable outcomes from the epic description, formatted the same way as story-level done definitions (see Phase 4 Step 2) +845 - **Scope**: What's in and what's explicitly out +846 - **Considerations**: Flags from the abbreviated risk scan +847 - Write the preplanning context to the epic ticket as a comment (same schema as Phase 4 Step 5a, but with an empty `stories` array) using Python subprocess to avoid ARG_MAX shell argument limits. This write is an optional cache — if it fails, log a warning and continue; do not abort the phase: +848 ```python +849 import json, subprocess + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:20:18 + +Now I'll execute the preplanning skill for Epic 1. Starting with the SKILL_ENTER breadcrumb and Step 1. + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:20:23 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": "_DSO_TRACE_SESSION_ID=\"${DSO_TRACE_SESSION_ID:-$(date +%s%N 2>/dev/null || date +%s)}\" && _DSO_TRACE_SKILL_FILE=\"plugins/dso/skills/preplanning/SKILL.md\" && _DSO_TRACE_FILE_SIZE=$(wc -c < \"${_DSO_TRACE_SKILL_FILE}\" 2>/dev/null || echo \"null\") && echo \"{\\\"type\\\":\\\"SKILL_ENTER\\\",\\\"timestamp\\\":\\\"$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)\\\",\\\"skill_name\\\":\\\"preplanning\\\",\\\"nesting_depth\\\":1,\\\"skill_file_size\\\":${_DSO_TRACE_FILE_SIZE},\\\"tool_call_count\\\":null,\\\"elapsed_ms\\\":null,\\\"session_ordinal\\\":1,\\\"cumulative_bytes\\\":null,\\\"termination_directive\\\":null,\\\"user_interaction_count\\\":0}\" >> \"/tmp/dso-skill-trace-${_DSO_TRACE_SESSION_ID}.log\" && echo \"Breadcrumb emitted\" && .claude/scripts/dso ticket show 3e9b-afee", + "des +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:20:24 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Breadcrumb emitted +{ + "ticket_id": "3e9b-afee", + "ticket_type": "epic", + "title": "Kudos system: infrastructure and primary triggers", + "status": "open", + "author": "Claude", + "created_at": 1775663449, + "env_id": "c3d2c46e-df9e-40c4-8014-5e8c9fdf3cc1", + "parent_id": null, + "priority": 2, + "assignee": "Claude", + "description": "Epic 1 of 2. Establishes the full kudos ledger infrastructure and 10 primary quality triggers for the process-reward tracking system.\n\nCONTEXT: Engineering teams adopting AI coding agents need a feedback system that reinforces quality behaviors at commit time. Without explicit recognition, agents optimize for task completion over quality practices. This epic delivers the ledger, anti-gaming stack, and 10 triggers so that every commit produces an auditable record of recognized behaviors.\n\nAPPROACH: Implement ledger, award formula, anti-gaming controls, and 10 triggers as pure shell + Python stdlib anchored to commit-validate.sh in the existing commit workflow. Spikes S0/S1 de-risk sg pattern matching and Python AST clone detection before those triggers ship.\n\nSPRINT SCOPE RATIONALE: Infrastructure without triggers produces zero awards. All 10 triggers share one user goal (recognizing quality behaviors at commit time) and depend on the same anti-gaming stack. Spike tasks are investigation prerequisites, not sprint work items.\n\nSUCCESS CRITERIA:\nSC-E1-1: .kudos/ledger.jsonl (append-only JSONL) — fields: session_id, trigger_id, diff_hash, artifact_sha, verification_method, workflow_phase, message, points (int >= 1), jitter_factor (float in [0.8,1.2]), timestamp (ISO-8601 UTC); all string fields JSON-escaped; .kudos/ in .gitignore\nSC-E1-2: Award formula: Award(n) = round(BasePoints x (1/(n+1)) x jitter), jitter in [0.8,1.2] uniform random, min 1 point, floating-point division; n = prior session ledger entries for trigger_id\nSC-E1-3: Deduplication: one award per (trigger_id, diff_hash) per session\nSC-E1-4: Session ceiling: kudos.session_ceiling from dso-config.conf (default 100, validated >0; absent key uses default); awards blocked when reached, prohibition-block message shown\nSC-E1-5: kudos-write-guard.sh PreToolUse hook blocks Edit/Write to .kudos/** (exit 2); jq-free parse_json_field; registered via onboarding/architect-foundation\nSC-E1-6: commit-validate.sh integrated into COMMIT-WORKFLOW.md before commit gate; creates .kudos/ on first run; fails-open (any detection error skips with log, never aborts commit)\nSC-E1-7: Session identity UUID written to .kudos/session-id at worktree creation; commit-validate.sh reads from file (fails-open with fresh UUID if absent)\nSC-E1-8: Contributor rank displayed per commit: Contributor (0-25), Consistent (26-75), Distinguished (76-150), Exemplary (151-300), Principal Contributor (301+)\nSC-E1-9: CLAUDE.md Kudos section: overview, prohibition block (listed before rewards), jitter disclosure (+/-20% random), Goodhart's Law disclosure, rank table\nSC-E1-10: diff-to-sg-scope.sh wrapper: command -v sg pre-check (exit 2 if absent); checks HEAD~1 existence (exit 2 if first commit); git diff --name-only HEAD~1; sg run --pattern <p> --json=stream <file> per file; parses NDJSON\nSC-E1-11: Spike S0 validates sg --json=stream exit code (0=no matches, 1=matches) and NDJSON schema before T5/T11 implementation\nSC-E1-12: Spike S1 implements/tests Python AST subtree hashing prototype (hashlib.sha256(ast.dump(node).encode())); measures false-positive rate; confirms jscpd file-output integration (cat $OUTPUT_DIR/jscpd-report.json, not stdout) if selected as fallback\nSC-E1-T3: reviewer-findings.json shows dimension score=5; one award per dimension per diff_hash\nSC-E1-T5: diff-to-sg-scope.sh detects function extracted to helper in staged Python files; grep fallback when sg absent\nSC-E1-T6: commit message references bug ticket ID; dso ticket show confirms type=bug AND created_at predates git merge-base HEAD main\nSC-E1-T7: staged Python file has >=4 control-flow nesting levels (if/for/while/with/try); depth via ast.NodeVisitor with counter (visit_If/For/While/With/Try increment, generic_visit decrement)\nSC-E1-T9: all staged Python files pass: git show \":$f\" | ruff check --stdin-filename \"$(pwd)/$f\" - (staged blob, absolute path fixes ruff #17405 config-discovery bug)\nSC-E1-T11: diff-to-sg-scope.sh detects pass-through method removal; grep fallback when sg absent\nSC-E1-T12: staged diff removes commented-out code blocks\nSC-E1-T13: staged Python files show >=3 structurally identical AST subtrees removed (hashlib.sha256(ast.dump(node).encode()) fingerprinting; algorithm/threshold from Spike S1)\nSC-E1-T14: .review-events/ JSONL shows important/critical findings event followed by resubmission event in same session\nSC-E1-T15: .review-events/ JSONL shows blocked_by_test_gate:true commit followed by passing commit in same session; disqualified if only changes are .test-index RED marker lines (^\\[.*\\]$)\nSC-E1-23: Integration test seeds synthetic T9-qualifying commit, runs commit-validate.sh, asserts ledger contains T9 entry with points>0 AND stdout contains per-trigger breakdown\n\nRESEARCH FINDINGS:\n- External integration (sg/ast-grep): --json=stream NDJSON confirmed; command -v sg is correct absence-detection method (not exit code); duplicate block detection infeasible via sg (Python AST subtree hashing is the correct approach)\n- Novel pattern (PRM): 2025 research confirms step-level recognition reduces reasoning errors; immediate reward delivery critical for behavioral linkage; design aligns with AgentPRM and PRIME findings\n\nSCENARIO ANALYSIS:\n- diff-to-sg-scope.sh uses HEAD~1 diff during git commit --amend (medium, runtime): stale file set causes false T5/T7/T13 awards; implementation must detect amend context\n- T14 races with concurrent reviewer JSONL write (medium, runtime): partial JSONL line causes parse error; handle gracefully\n- kudos-write-guard.sh not registered after fresh clone (critical, deployment): hooks require onboarding re-run\n- .kudos/ absent from .gitignore (high, deployment): commit-validate.sh must add .kudos/ to .gitignore on first run\n- Missing kudos.session_ceiling key causes crash (high, configuration): validate/default at startup\n- sg absent in CI silently voids sg-dependent triggers (medium, deployment): document or accept skip as designed\n\nCOORDINATION: Soft coordination with 1083-fb3d (local workflow simplification) for hook registration ordering.", + "tags": [], + "comments": [], + "deps": [], + "bridge_alerts": [], + "reverts": [] +} + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:20:28 + +**[TOOL: ToolSearch]** +```json +{ + "query": "select:AskUserQuestion,TodoWrite", + "max_results": 2 +} +``` + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:20:29 + +**[TOOL: Bash]** +```json +{ + "command": ".claude/scripts/dso ticket deps 3e9b-afee", + "description": "Check existing children for Epic 1" +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:20:29 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +{"ticket_id": "3e9b-afee", "deps": [], "blockers": [], "children": [], "ready_to_work": true} + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:20:35 + +**[TOOL: TodoWrite]** +```json +{ + "todos": [ + { + "content": "Update ticket 3e9b-afee with Epic 1 approved spec", + "status": "completed", + "activeForm": "Updating Epic 1 ticket" + }, + { + "content": "Create new ticket for Epic 2", + "status": "completed", + "activeForm": "Creating Epic 2 ticket" + }, + { + "content": "Dispatch complexity evaluator on both epics in parallel", + "status": "completed", + "activeForm": "Running complexity evaluators" + }, + { + "content": "Run /dso:preplanning on Epic 1 (3e9b-afee)", + "status": "in_progress", + "activeForm": "Running preplanning on Epic 1" + }, + { + "content": "Run /dso:preplanning on Epic 2 (71df-5bd8)", + "status": "pending", + "activeForm": "Running preplanning on Epic 2" + } + ] +} +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:20:35 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Todos have been modified successfully. Ensure that you continue to use the todo list to track your progress. Please proceed with the current tasks if applicable + +--- + +## ASSISTANT (claude-sonnet-4-6) — 2026-04-09T06:20:41 + +**[TOOL: AskUserQuestion]** +```json +{ + "questions": [ + { + "question": "Which escalation policy should agents apply when working on stories in Epic 1 (Kudos system: infrastructure and primary triggers)?", + "header": "Escalation", + "multiSelect": false, + "options": [ + { + "label": "Autonomous", + "description": "Agents proceed with best judgment at all times. Reasonable assumptions are made and documented. No escalation for uncertainty." + }, + { + "label": "Escalate when blocked", + "description": "Agents proceed unless a significant assumption is required that could send implementation in the wrong direction. Escalate only when genuinely blocked. All assumptions made without escalating are documented." + }, + { + "label": "Escalate +``` + +--- + +## USER — 2026-04-09T06:25:43 + +[TOOL RESULT]: +Tool permission request failed: Error: Tool permission stream closed before response received + +---