Format of "available" apis (ip-ranges/int:pk/available-ips/)

[arthanson]

ip-ranges, prefixes and vlan-groups have sub-api's that are currently not modeled in netbox-python, opening a discussion of what format should be used. Here are the different formats that I could think of:

1. nb.ipam.ip_range.available_ips.list(1)
2. nb.ipam.ip_ranges(1).available_ips.list()
3. IPRange.get_available_ips()
4. nb.ipam.available_ips(ip_range=1).list()

Option 1 is the most in-line with the way the classes are currently, but option 2 seems more in-line with pynetbox.

These would be for the following endpoints:
'ip-ranges/int:pk/available-ips/',
'prefixes/int:pk/available-prefixes/',
'prefixes/int:pk/available-ips/',
'vlan-groups/int:pk/available-vlans/',

[markkuleinio]

I only now realized this repo, nice! I guess it's no use submitting PRs anymore to pynetbox 😁

[pobradovic08]

Option 2 is maybe slightly more intuitive as the ID is related to ip_range and not available_ips, but I voted for Option 1 as it could be easily implemented. I don't know how much work is needed to implement Option 2 and if that would be bring huge benefits compared to Option 1.