More sophisticated use of {module} parameter

[pwinkeler]

Sometimes adding modules to a chassis results in the device extending its interface numbering scheme rather than explicitly referring to the module. For example; module 1 has interfaces 1-24; module 2 then gets interfaces 25-48, etc. To model this easily I'd like to a module whose interface names are computed using th {module} parameter rather than just substituting. For example I could have an interface name inside a module written as: "{module}*2+[1-24]" or something like that.

[rconkor]

that's a really interesting idea. Maybe submit this as a FR.