Update rubrics.md

Author: saisha-r

rubrics.md

@@ -86,4 +86,83 @@ Some examples of how this works:
 |**3**  | Adequate delivery; some issues with clarity or engagement.  |
 |**2**  | Poor delivery; difficult to follow and/or lacking visuals.  |
 |**1**  | Little effort in presentation and/or is often unclear.  |
-|**0**  | No effort in presentation and/or completely unclear.  |
+|**0**  | No effort in presentation and/or completely unclear.  |
+
+## Project 1 Presentation
+
+### Introduction
+
+| Score | Criteria |
+|:---:  |---    |
+|**5**  | Clearly introduces the experiment, research question, and hypotheses with strong context and relevance.  |
+|**4**  | Introduces the experiment and research question; hypotheses are present but may lack clarity or depth.  |
+|**3**  | Basic introduction with minimal explanation of research question or hypotheses.  |
+|**2**  | Introduction is unclear or missing key components.  |
+|**1**  | Introduction is missing most of the key components (e.g., research question and hypotheses)  |
+|**0**  | Introduction is missing or contains irrelevant content.  |
+
+### Analysis
+
+| Score | Criteria |
+|:---:  |---    |
+|**5**  | Thorough explanation of data cleaning and organization process; demonstrates strong understanding and rationale.  |
+|**4**  | Good explanation of data cleaning and organization; some rationale provided.  |
+|**3**  | Basic description of process; lacks depth or clarity. |
+|**2**  | Minimal or unclear explanation of data handling. |
+|**1**  | Disorganized explanation of the data cleaning and analysis, does not describe their process.  |
+|**0**  | No explanation of data cleaning or analysis.  |
+
+### Discussion of Results
+
+| Score | Criteria |
+|:---:  |---    |
+|**5**  | Insightful interpretation of results; connects findings to research question and hypotheses effectively.  |
+|**4**  | Clear discussion of results; some connection to research question and hypotheses.  |
+|**3**  | Basic discussion; limited interpretation or connection to research question.  |
+|**2**  | Results are presented without meaningful discussion or interpretation.  |
+|**1**  | Results are unclear and missing the interpretation of the findings. |
+|**0**  | No discussion of the results. |
+
+### Coding Reflection
+
+| Score | Criteria |
+|:---:  |---    |
+|**5**  | Deep reflection on coding experience; thoughtful insights on Copilot-generated code, challenges, and lessons learned.   |
+|**4**  | Good reflection; mentions Copilot and challenges with some insights.  |
+|**3**  | Basic reflection; limited discussion of Copilot or challenges.  |
+|**2**  | Reflection is superficial or missing examples.  |
+|**1**  | Minimal reflection is made and/or is unclear. |
+|**0**  | No reflection provided. |
+
+### Conclusion
+
+| Score | Criteria |
+|:---:  |---    |
+|**5**  | Strong summary that ties together all sections; reinforces key takeaways and implications.  |
+|**4**  | Clear summary; touches on main points.  |
+|**3**  | Basic conclusion; may miss some key takeways (e.g., the findings).  |
+|**2**  | Conclusion is unclear and does not summarize the key takeways.  |
+|**1**  | A conclusion is barely made with little attempt to summarize the project.  |
+|**0**  | No conclusion is provided.  |
+
+### Presentation Skills
+
+| Score | Criteria |
+|:---:  |---    |
+|**5**  | Clear, engaging delivery; excellent pacing, and visuals.  |
+|**4**  | Good delivery; mostly clear and engaging with appropriate visuals.  |
+|**3**  | Adequate delivery; some issues with clarity or engagement.  |
+|**2**  | Poor delivery; difficult to follow and/or lacking visuals.  |
+|**1**  | Little effort in presentation and/or is often unclear.  |
+|**0**  | No effort in presentation and/or completely unclear.  |
+
+### Questions
+
+| Score | Criteria |
+|:---:  |---    |
+|**5**  | Answers are clear, accurate, and insightful; demonstrate deep understanding of the code and analysis; explanations are well-structured and confident.  |
+|**4**  | Answers are mostly clear and accurate; show good understanding; explanations are organized and generally confident.  |
+|**3**  | Answers are adequate but somewhat vague or incomplete; demonstrate basic understanding; may lack detail or clarity in reasoning.  |
+|**2**  | Answers are unclear or partially incorrect; show limited understanding; explanations are disorganized or hesitant.  |
+|**1**  | Answers show minimal effort or major inaccuracies; lack understanding of key concepts; responses are confusing or off-topic.  |
+|**0**  | No attempt to answer questions or responses are completely irrelevant.  |