When models include or exclude a paper, they must adhere to user provided inclusion/exclusion reasons.
Models also provide "reasoning" for this decision
However, it is hard to validate these reasons without reading the full paper.
To make this easier, we could "ground" each inclusion/exclusion reason in not only reasoning but supportive quotes, and build a user friendly UX to browse and validate these reasons in example studies.
When models include or exclude a paper, they must adhere to user provided inclusion/exclusion reasons.
Models also provide "reasoning" for this decision
However, it is hard to validate these reasons without reading the full paper.
To make this easier, we could "ground" each inclusion/exclusion reason in not only reasoning but supportive quotes, and build a user friendly UX to browse and validate these reasons in example studies.