Skip to content

chore(custom-agents): improve docs#2678

Open
paologallinaharbur wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/docsCustomAgent
Open

chore(custom-agents): improve docs#2678
paologallinaharbur wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/docsCustomAgent

Conversation

@paologallinaharbur

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR aims to document how to leverage custom agent types while developing.

I am changing the location of the readme of the agentTypes so that all docs are in a unique place

Related to newrelic/helm-charts#2333

Comment thread docs/agent_type.md
Comment on lines +392 to +395
Agent Control ships a set of embedded agent types (see
[`agent-control/agent-type-registry/newrelic/`](../agent-control/agent-type-registry/newrelic)). You can add your own —
or override an embedded one — by placing the definition YAML in the *dynamic agent types* directory. Custom definitions
take precedence over embedded ones with the same id.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Agent Control ships a set of embedded agent types (see
[`agent-control/agent-type-registry/newrelic/`](../agent-control/agent-type-registry/newrelic)). You can add your own —
or override an embedded one — by placing the definition YAML in the *dynamic agent types* directory. Custom definitions
take precedence over embedded ones with the same id.
Agent Control ships a set of embedded agent types (see
[`agent-control/agent-type-registry/newrelic/`](../agent-control/agent-type-registry/newrelic)). You can add your own —
or override an embedded one — by placing the definition YAML in the *dynamic agent types* directory. Custom definitions
take precedence over any other definition with the same id (namespace + name + version).

Should we already consider that this would also override the remote ones?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants