Skip to content

[Idea]: Investigate and standardize placeholder format for sensitive values in examples across NGINX documentation #1710

@FaithKovi

Description

@FaithKovi

What is your idea for improving documentation?

While discussing Replace examples of sensitive values with explicit placeholders
#1363, it became clear that there may not be a documented or consistently applied placeholder format across the NGINX documentation sets.

The goal is to improve clarity for users, reduce confusion when copying examples, and avoid false positives from security scanning tools caused by plausible sensitive values.

Which product or products does this idea relate to?

Other

Does this idea relate to other issues?

Yes, it relates to #1363

Are there alternative ideas for improving the same topic?

No response

Any additional information

Description

The contributing guide instructs contributors to replace personal and sensitive information in documentation examples with generic placeholders. However, no specific placeholder format is defined, which leads to inconsistent usage across the documentation.

This issue proposes a short investigation to:

  • Identify the placeholder patterns that are already in use in parts of the documentation
  • Propose and define a single, clear placeholder convention in the style guide that can be reused across all documentation, with provided examples

Acceptance criteria

  • A placeholder format is clearly documented and easy to follow
  • Placeholder values are distinct and cannot be mistaken for real data
  • The guidance supports both user clarity and security scanning tools

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

P4 - Low (TTR: 90 days)Minor cleanup or content updates (stylistic, cosmetic, or low-impact gaps). Fix when convenient.communityIssues or pull requests started by community memberscontent-strategyenhancementNew feature or requestprocess documentationDocumentation related to how the repository or documention itself is managed.

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions