Every public class, function, class method, and class attribute has a doc string following pydocstyle

[christian-oreilly]

The use of "ruff check" in .github/workflows/ci.yml and the flag "D" in the select attributed of [tool.ruff.lint] in pyproject.toml should take care of this. However, most of the code is currently in "private" modules (i.e., .py file starting with ). It is unclear to me why these modules were chosen as private. I propose to rename these modules without using the "". This would actually solve this issue... The corresponding PR would not pass the tests until everything that should be documented is.

[christian-oreilly]

@everyone I was not in the loop when modules (.py files) like "widget.py" were named with a "" to make them private. Is anyone aware of the rational behind this choice and does anyone have an argument why these should not be made public? This would include _constats.py, _options_mixin.py, _utils.py, and _widget.py.

[bcalford]

I've set up #113 that switches these private modules over to public, then adding all of the necessary docstrings.

Before we merge the PR or close the issue, it would be good to get confirmation that the modules can be made public. Once given the go ahead, though, it will be ready to go.