|
| 1 | +# Node.js Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Meeting 2025-07-16 |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## Links |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +* **Recording**: <https://youtube.com/live/FOQLs8_HWrs> |
| 6 | +* **GitHub Issue**: <https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/1766> |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +## Present |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +* Antoine du Hamel @aduh95 (voting member) |
| 11 | +* Gireesh Punathil @gireeshpunathil (voting member) |
| 12 | +* James Snell @jasnell (voting member) |
| 13 | +* Chengzhong Wu @legendecas (voting member) |
| 14 | +* Marco Ippolito @marco-ippolito (voting member) |
| 15 | +* Matteo Collina @mcollina (voting member) |
| 16 | +* Michael Dawson @mhdawson (voting member) |
| 17 | +* Filip Skokan @panva (voting member) |
| 18 | +* Rafael Gonzaga @RafaelGSS (voting member) |
| 19 | +* Darshan Sen @RaisinTen (voting member) |
| 20 | +* Richard Lau @richardlau (voting member) |
| 21 | +* Ruy Adorno @ruyadorno (voting member) |
| 22 | +* Michaël Zasso @targos (voting member) |
| 23 | +* Robin Ginn @rginn (OpenJS Executive director) |
| 24 | +* Claudio Wunder @ovflowd (Website team member) |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +## Agenda |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +### Announcements |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +* Robin - would love for people to take a look at JSConf, discount for core maintainers and collab summit the day after |
| 31 | +* Michael - recent releases |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +### Reminders |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +* Remember to nominate people for the [contributor spotlight](https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/doc/contributing/reconizing-contributors.md#bi-monthly-contributor-spotlight) |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +### CPC and Board Meeting Updates |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +*Extracted from **tsc-agenda** labeled issues and pull requests from the **nodejs org** prior to the meeting. |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +* No updates this week |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +### nodejs/nodejs.org |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +* Dedicated Partners/Sponsors Page + Updates on the Home Page [#7909](https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/issues/7909) |
| 46 | + * Claudio outlined the proposal to highlight our partners/supporters |
| 47 | + * Would co-ordinate with the Foundation marketing team |
| 48 | + * Robin, as part of the sovereign tech fund, we formalized agreements with |
| 49 | + supporting companies. Whenever we bring on a new partner we have a process that is |
| 50 | + documented in the CPC repo and we also sign legal contracts with these partners so that |
| 51 | + we can ensure that the free services they generously provide are there in the future |
| 52 | + despite any turnover these companies may have internally and we also provide guaranteed |
| 53 | + co-marketing with them, in the form of case-study, couple of blogs, discounts in our events, |
| 54 | + training, social media and a guarantee of a prominent brand positioning in our website for |
| 55 | + example. |
| 56 | + * Michael - please cross check against <https://github.com/nodejs/build> |
| 57 | + * Michael, any concerns from the TSC members who are here. |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +* Dedicated EOL page [#7906](https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/issues/7906) |
| 60 | + * Claudio - good to have a dedicated static page, and then links to ESP partners |
| 61 | + * Michael - I think we agreed to work towards to this as a step after changing the link on the |
| 62 | + main page to Matteo’s blog post. Vue has a similar page. |
| 63 | + * Claudio - at this point just asking to see if there are any concerns |
| 64 | + * Matteo - something that might be interesting to include are the vulnerabilities which are not |
| 65 | + patch in the EOL versions. |
| 66 | + * Filip - like idea, however, not certain about displaying all of the details, but maybe just list the |
| 67 | + CVEs and severity. Could possibly have a link. |
| 68 | + * Claudio would need to have list |
| 69 | + * Filip - it can use same dataset that [is-my-node-vulnerable](https://github.com/nodejs/is-my-node-vulnerable) uses |
| 70 | + * James, make it clear they are already known vulnerabilities |
| 71 | + * No objections/concerns from those in the meeting |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +* Move the homepage security link to the banner [#7899](https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/issues/7899) |
| 74 | + * Matteo, this was part of the discussions around the ESP link |
| 75 | + * Previous discussions have superseded this so remove from the agenda |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +### nodejs/TSC |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +* Interim TSC Election [#1763](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/1763) |
| 80 | + * On agenda as an FYI |
| 81 | + * Have a number of nominations, past the proposed day for nominations |
| 82 | + * One question is whether we should have two vice-chairs or vote for one |
| 83 | + * Matteo will send out email to make sure we have consensus |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +* Update charter with communication responsibilities [#1754](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/pull/1754) |
| 86 | + * Lets skip since we don’t have Darshan |
| 87 | + * There are two different PRs for slightly different proposals. May need to schedule |
| 88 | + a discussion specifically for it. |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +* Let's talk about the CI situation [#1614](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/1614) |
| 91 | + * <https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/59004> |
| 92 | + * Was discussed last week, |
| 93 | + * Gireesh, looked for champion in TSC, but no champion |
| 94 | + * As agreed Darshan opened an issue to look interest in the wider community. |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +### nodejs/admin |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +* Create a directory for funding individual contributors [#981](https://github.com/nodejs/admin/pull/981) |
| 99 | + * Lets skip since we don’t have Darshan |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +## Strategic Initiatives |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +* Skipped for this week. |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +## Upcoming Meetings |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +* **Node.js Project Calendar**: <https://nodejs.org/calendar> |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +Click `+GoogleCalendar` at the bottom right to add to your own Google calendar. |
0 commit comments