Migrating from deprecated Overrides fields

[Enzodtz]

Hi,

I noticed most fields from the Overrides class are marked as deprecated.

novu-py/src/novu_py/models/triggereventrequestdto.py

Lines 33 to 81 in 33e5855

	class Overrides(BaseModel):
	r"""This could be used to override provider specific configurations"""
	steps: Optional[Dict[str, StepsOverrides]] = None
	r"""This could be used to override provider specific configurations"""
	providers: Optional[Dict[str, Dict[str, Any]]] = None
	r"""Overrides the provider configuration for the entire workflow and all steps"""
	email: Annotated[
	Optional[Dict[str, Any]],
	pydantic.Field(
	deprecated="warning: ** DEPRECATED ** - This will be removed in a future release, please migrate away from it as soon as possible."
	),
	] = None
	r"""Override the email provider specific configurations for the entire workflow"""
	push: Annotated[
	Optional[Dict[str, Any]],
	pydantic.Field(
	deprecated="warning: ** DEPRECATED ** - This will be removed in a future release, please migrate away from it as soon as possible."
	),
	] = None
	r"""Override the push provider specific configurations for the entire workflow"""
	sms: Annotated[
	Optional[Dict[str, Any]],
	pydantic.Field(
	deprecated="warning: ** DEPRECATED ** - This will be removed in a future release, please migrate away from it as soon as possible."
	),
	] = None
	r"""Override the sms provider specific configurations for the entire workflow"""
	chat: Annotated[
	Optional[Dict[str, Any]],
	pydantic.Field(
	deprecated="warning: ** DEPRECATED ** - This will be removed in a future release, please migrate away from it as soon as possible."
	),
	] = None
	r"""Override the chat provider specific configurations for the entire workflow"""
	layout_identifier: Annotated[
	Optional[str],
	pydantic.Field(
	deprecated="warning: ** DEPRECATED ** - This will be removed in a future release, please migrate away from it as soon as possible.",
	alias="layoutIdentifier",
	),
	] = None
	r"""Override the layout identifier for the entire workflow"""

However I was not able to find the alternative to those. Even the official docs recommend it.

I'm looking for guidance on the best practices for overrides.

Thanks in advance.

[RizwaanShaik273]

Hi team and @Enzodtz 👋

I’d like to take the initiative on this.
As a first step, I plan to add clear documentation/comments in the SDK code explaining that providers and steps are the recommended replacements for the deprecated channel-specific override fields (email, sms, push, chat, layout_identifier), without changing behavior.

Once that’s reviewed and accepted, we can iterate further if needed.

Please let me know if this approach works. Thanks!