Inconsistent termiologies

[nus-pe-bot]

Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.

---

INDEX is not used as an argument anywhere in command but shown to be a possible arguement

---

_{[original: nus-cs2113-AY2324S2/pe-interim#2219] [original labels: severity.Medium type.DocumentationBug]}

[cyhjason29]

Team's Response

Thanks for pointing this out. Yes, [INDEX] has been improperly used when it should be [ATTEMPT_NUM] instead.

Duplicate as the essence of the reported bug is the inconsistent terminology.

Duplicate status (if any):

Duplicate of #1428