txn-ctx modification

[PieterKas]

WGLC Feedback from Joe Salowey Section 7.5.1 Shouldn't the txn-ctx value also be unmodified in a replacement token?

[tulshi]

Did you mean tctx? That can be modified, I think because a replacement might be needed to in fact specify some additional values or specify existing values in a way that is understood by downstream services.

[tulshi]

@PieterKas could you please clarify?

[PieterKas]

This was an issue raised by @jsalowey as part of the WGLC feedback - I just opened the issue. @jsalowey - can you clarify?

[tulshi]

I'm deferring this because we have removed the replacement flow from the normative sections of the draft.