'Splat_235 long-range projecting sst GABAergic cortical interneuron (Mmus) (Hsap)' (PCL:0051236) is explicitly classified as in_taxon some Homo sapiens.
But it is also a child of 'long-range projecting sst GABAergic cortical interneuron (Mmus)' (CL:4023025), which is in_taxon some Mus musculus.
The two classifications are obviously incompatible and would cause a failure if CL (which merges PCL in to create its “CL-plus” product) were to try enforcing taxon constraints (which it currently does not, but it should do.)
Assuming PCL:0051236 is indeed human-specific (or even only present_in_taxon some Homo sapiens), it should not be a subclass of a mouse-specific cell type.
'Splat_235 long-range projecting sst GABAergic cortical interneuron (Mmus) (Hsap)' (PCL:0051236) is explicitly classified as in_taxon some Homo sapiens.
But it is also a child of 'long-range projecting sst GABAergic cortical interneuron (Mmus)' (CL:4023025), which is in_taxon some Mus musculus.
The two classifications are obviously incompatible and would cause a failure if CL (which merges PCL in to create its “CL-plus” product) were to try enforcing taxon constraints (which it currently does not, but it should do.)
Assuming PCL:0051236 is indeed human-specific (or even only
present_in_taxonsome Homo sapiens), it should not be a subclass of a mouse-specific cell type.