Idea from @michellew21 - what if we add a check mark of similar next to dpi system info that has been verified by the public entity that is responsible for it.
Prior art
Similar to check marks on social media e.g. bluesky users: https://bsky.app/profile/jay.bsky.team/post/3luq4rt744s2u
Why might we do this
- To demonstrate that we appreciate it when folks come to us with data, and to encourage others to do the same.
Why might we not do this
- it could create the impression that data that hasn't been confirmed is less reliable.
Other options
- We could have a variety of flags to denote what the source of the data was: public website, interview, etc
Open Questions
- Who or what qualifies as being able to verify data for a given DPI
Implementation sketch
For the simple case of true/false boolean flag of "has been verified/no verified" we could add a column to that data with true|false as the values. The website template would be updated to show the verification status as a symbol on the DPI info card.
Work estimate: 1 day to design, build, test, deploy.
Idea from @michellew21 - what if we add a check mark of similar next to dpi system info that has been verified by the public entity that is responsible for it.
Prior art
Similar to check marks on social media e.g. bluesky users: https://bsky.app/profile/jay.bsky.team/post/3luq4rt744s2u
Why might we do this
Why might we not do this
Other options
Open Questions
Implementation sketch
For the simple case of true/false boolean flag of "has been verified/no verified" we could add a column to that data with
true|falseas the values. The website template would be updated to show the verification status as a symbol on the DPI info card.Work estimate: 1 day to design, build, test, deploy.