Skip to content

Remove PERUSE in favour of upcoming MPI_T pvar implementation #189

Open
@ompiteam

Description

@ompiteam

Hello,

I suggest to remove the PERUSE functionality from the Open MPI trunk in favour of the upcoming MPI_T pvar implementation with the attached patch.
The PERUSE functionality is already broken as reported in https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4204.

Best regards
Christoph Niethammer

Activity

self-assigned this
on Oct 1, 2014
added this to the Open MPI 1.9 milestone on Oct 1, 2014
ompiteam

ompiteam commented on Oct 1, 2014

@ompiteam
ContributorAuthor

Imported from trac issue 4285. Created by hpcchris on 2014-02-18T05:09:25, last modified: 2014-02-18T06:45:10

ompiteam

ompiteam commented on Oct 1, 2014

@ompiteam
ContributorAuthor

Trac comment by bosilca on 2014-02-18 06:34:42:

The PERSUE interface is providing a level of finesse and accuracy for retrieving the network status that is unmatched by the MPI_T, a functionality I need in some of our projects. I have no idea what the ticket https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4204 is about, but the PERUSE interface is working right now and it was working for quite some time.

For what is worth, I think this is way too early. Commits without careful validation break a functionality and instead of asking people to fix it, we remove it in favor of some upcoming functionality. Hardly a way to incite people to get involved.

ompiteam

ompiteam commented on Oct 1, 2014

@ompiteam
ContributorAuthor

Trac comment by bosilca on 2014-02-18 06:45:10:

The issue was with the test itself. a patch has been pushed into the testing.

added a commit that references this issue on Mar 5, 2015

Merge pull request open-mpi#189 from jsquyres/pr/pkg-config-fix

modified the milestones: Future, Open MPI v2.0.0 on Jun 25, 2015
jsquyres

jsquyres commented on Jun 25, 2015

@jsquyres
Member

PERUSE won't be removed until MPI_T can exhibit the same functionality. @hjelmn is working on a proposal for the MPI Forum Tools Working Group to add PERUSE-like capabilities to MPI_T.

added a commit that references this issue on Jan 29, 2019

Merge pull request open-mpi#189 from rhc54/topic/remote

e0484f4
linked a pull request that will close this issue on Apr 8, 2022
jsquyres

jsquyres commented on Apr 8, 2022

@jsquyres
Member

This issue can be closed when #8057 merges.

linked a pull request that will close this issueMPI_T Events #8057on Apr 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Relationships

None yet

    Participants

    @jsquyres@ompiteam

    Issue actions

      Remove PERUSE in favour of upcoming MPI_T pvar implementation · Issue #189 · open-mpi/ompi