Skip to content

Commit 46343cb

Browse files
0xrinegade0xrinegade
authored
Merge pull request #87 from openSVM/copilot/fix-86
Fix osvm audit panic and add external template support with built-in fallback
2 parents fd3460d + fc305fe commit 46343cb

13 files changed

+906
-45
lines changed

‎audit_reports/osvm_audit_report_20250801_204051.typ‎

Lines changed: 307 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,307 @@
1+
#set document(title: "OSVM Security Audit Report")
2+
#set page(numbering: "1")
3+
#set text(size: 11pt)
4+
#set heading(numbering: "1.")
5+
6+
#align(center)[
7+
#text(size: 24pt, weight: "bold")[OSVM Security Audit Report]
8+
9+
#v(1em)
10+
11+
#text(size: 14pt)[Comprehensive Security Assessment]
12+
13+
#v(2em)
14+
15+
#text(size: 12pt)[
16+
Generated: 2025-08-01 20:40:51 UTC
17+
18+
Version: 0.4.3
19+
20+
Security Score: 75/100
21+
22+
Compliance Level: Moderate
23+
]
24+
]
25+
26+
#pagebreak()
27+
28+
= Executive Summary
29+
30+
This report presents the results of a comprehensive security audit conducted on the OSVM (Open SVM) CLI application. The audit identified 6 findings across various security domains.
31+
32+
#table(
33+
columns: (auto, auto),
34+
stroke: none,
35+
[*Metric*], [*Value*],
36+
[Total Findings], [6],
37+
[Critical], [1],
38+
[High], [2],
39+
[Medium], [3],
40+
[Low], [0],
41+
[Info], [0],
42+
[Security Score], [75/100],
43+
[Compliance Level], [Moderate],
44+
)
45+
46+
47+
#text(fill: red, weight: "bold")[
48+
⚠️ This audit identified 3 critical or high severity findings that require immediate attention.
49+
]
50+
51+
52+
= System Information
53+
54+
#table(
55+
columns: (auto, auto),
56+
stroke: none,
57+
[*Component*], [*Version*],
58+
[Rust], [rustc 1.87.0 (example)],
59+
[Solana], [solana-cli 2.2.7 (example)],
60+
[OS], [Linux x86_64],
61+
[Architecture], [x86_64],
62+
)
63+
64+
= Security Findings
65+
66+
67+
== Security (1 findings)
68+
69+
70+
=== OSVM-001 - Example security finding
71+
72+
*Severity:* Medium
73+
*Category:* Security
74+
*CWE ID:* CWE-200
75+
*CVSS Score:* 5
76+
77+
*Description:*
78+
This is an example security finding for demonstration purposes
79+
80+
*Impact:*
81+
Potential information disclosure
82+
83+
*Recommendation:*
84+
Review and implement proper access controls
85+
86+
*Code Location:* src/example.rs
87+
88+
89+
*References:*
90+
91+
- https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/200.html
92+
93+
94+
95+
96+
97+
== Solana Security (5 findings)
98+
99+
100+
=== OSVM-SOL-001 - Missing signer validation in Solana program
101+
102+
*Severity:* Critical
103+
*Category:* Solana Security
104+
*CWE ID:* CWE-862
105+
*CVSS Score:* 9
106+
107+
*Description:*
108+
Detected potential missing signer validation in program instruction handling
109+
110+
*Impact:*
111+
Unauthorized users could execute privileged operations
112+
113+
*Recommendation:*
114+
Always validate that required accounts are signers using is_signer checks
115+
116+
*Code Location:* src/solana/program.rs
117+
118+
119+
*References:*
120+
121+
- https://book.anchor-lang.com/anchor_bts/security.html
122+
123+
- https://solana.com/developers/guides/getstarted/intro-to-anchor
124+
125+
126+
127+
128+
=== OSVM-SOL-002 - Potential PDA verification bypass
129+
130+
*Severity:* High
131+
*Category:* Solana Security
132+
*CWE ID:* CWE-345
133+
*CVSS Score:* 8
134+
135+
*Description:*
136+
Program uses PDA operations without proper verification of derived addresses
137+
138+
*Impact:*
139+
Attackers could provide arbitrary accounts instead of valid PDAs
140+
141+
*Recommendation:*
142+
Always verify PDA derivation matches expected seeds and program ID
143+
144+
*Code Location:* src/solana/pda.rs
145+
146+
147+
*References:*
148+
149+
- https://solanacookbook.com/references/programs.html#how-to-create-a-pda
150+
151+
152+
153+
154+
=== OSVM-SOL-003 - SPL token operations without authority checks
155+
156+
*Severity:* High
157+
*Category:* Solana Security
158+
*CWE ID:* CWE-862
159+
*CVSS Score:* 8
160+
161+
*Description:*
162+
Token operations performed without proper authority validation
163+
164+
*Impact:*
165+
Unauthorized token operations could lead to fund theft
166+
167+
*Recommendation:*
168+
Always verify token authorities before performing operations
169+
170+
*Code Location:* src/solana/token.rs
171+
172+
173+
*References:*
174+
175+
- https://spl.solana.com/token
176+
177+
178+
179+
180+
=== OSVM-SOL-004 - Missing MEV protection in trading operations
181+
182+
*Severity:* Medium
183+
*Category:* Solana Security
184+
*CWE ID:* CWE-841
185+
*CVSS Score:* 4.5
186+
187+
*Description:*
188+
Trading operations lack protection against MEV attacks
189+
190+
*Impact:*
191+
Transactions vulnerable to front-running and sandwich attacks
192+
193+
*Recommendation:*
194+
Implement slippage protection and transaction deadlines
195+
196+
*Code Location:* src/solana/dex.rs
197+
198+
199+
*References:*
200+
201+
- https://docs.solana.com/developing/programming-model/transactions
202+
203+
204+
205+
206+
=== OSVM-SOL-005 - Insecure Solana RPC endpoint usage
207+
208+
*Severity:* Medium
209+
*Category:* Solana Security
210+
*CWE ID:* CWE-319
211+
*CVSS Score:* 5
212+
213+
*Description:*
214+
Application uses public or insecure RPC endpoints
215+
216+
*Impact:*
217+
Rate limiting, censorship, or man-in-the-middle attacks on RPC calls
218+
219+
*Recommendation:*
220+
Use HTTPS RPC endpoints and consider private/dedicated RPC providers
221+
222+
*Code Location:* src/config/rpc.rs
223+
224+
225+
*References:*
226+
227+
- https://docs.solana.com/cluster/rpc-endpoints
228+
229+
230+
231+
232+
233+
234+
= Security Recommendations
235+
236+
237+
1. Implement regular security audits
238+
239+
240+
2. Keep dependencies up to date
241+
242+
243+
3. Follow security best practices
244+
245+
246+
4. Implement proper Solana account validation
247+
248+
249+
5. Use secure RPC endpoints and MEV protection
250+
251+
252+
6. Follow Solana security guidelines and best practices
253+
254+
255+
256+
= Compliance Notes
257+
258+
259+
- This audit follows industry security standards
260+
261+
- Findings are categorized using CWE framework
262+
263+
- Solana-specific security checks included
264+
265+
- Critical Solana vulnerabilities require immediate attention
266+
267+
268+
= Statistics
269+
270+
#table(
271+
columns: (auto, auto),
272+
stroke: none,
273+
[*Metric*], [*Value*],
274+
[Total Findings], [6],
275+
[Findings with CWE], [6],
276+
[Findings with CVSS], [6],
277+
[Findings with Location], [6],
278+
[Unique Categories], [2],
279+
[Average CVSS Score], [6.6],
280+
[Coverage Percentage], [100%],
281+
)
282+
283+
= Conclusion
284+
285+
This security audit provides a comprehensive assessment of the OSVM CLI application's security posture. All identified findings should be addressed according to their severity level, with critical and high-severity issues taking priority.
286+
287+
288+
#text(fill: red, weight: "bold")[
289+
⚠️ CRITICAL: 1 critical findings require immediate remediation.
290+
]
291+
292+
293+
294+
#text(fill: orange, weight: "bold")[
295+
⚠️ HIGH: 2 high-severity findings should be addressed promptly.
296+
]
297+
298+
299+
Regular security assessments and continuous monitoring are recommended to maintain a strong security stance.
300+
301+
#align(center)[
302+
#text(size: 10pt, style: "italic")[
303+
Generated by OSVM Security Audit System
304+
305+
End of Report
306+
]
307+
]

‎audit_reports/osvm_audit_report_20250801_204107.typ‎

Lines changed: 31 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
1+
#set document(title: "Custom OSVM Security Audit Report")
2+
#set page(numbering: "1")
3+
#set text(size: 11pt)
4+
5+
#align(center)[
6+
#text(size: 20pt, weight: "bold")[🔒 Custom Security Audit Report]
7+
8+
#v(1em)
9+
10+
#text(size: 12pt)[
11+
Generated: 2025-08-01 20:41:07 UTC
12+
13+
Version: 0.4.3
14+
15+
Security Score: 75/100
16+
17+
Custom Template Used ✅
18+
]
19+
]
20+
21+
= Custom Audit Summary
22+
23+
This is a custom template showing external template functionality works!
24+
25+
Total findings: 6
26+
Critical: 1
27+
High: 2
28+
Medium: 3
29+
Low: 0
30+
31+
System: Linux x86_64 x86_64

‎audit_reports/osvm_audit_report_20250801_204247.json‎

Lines changed: 24 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
1+
{
2+
"custom_audit_report": {
3+
"metadata": {
4+
"generated_at": "2025-08-01 20:42:47 UTC",
5+
"version": "0.4.3",
6+
"tool": "Custom OSVM Security Audit System",
7+
"template_type": "external"
8+
},
9+
"summary": {
10+
"total_findings": 6,
11+
"critical_findings": 1,
12+
"high_findings": 2,
13+
"medium_findings": 3,
14+
"low_findings": 0,
15+
"security_score": 75,
16+
"compliance_level": "Moderate",
17+
"custom_template_used": true
18+
},
19+
"system_info": {
20+
"os": "Linux x86_64",
21+
"architecture": "x86_64"
22+
}
23+
}
24+
}

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)