Skip to content

Improve how to contribute and review expectations #369

@mariajgrimaldi

Description

@mariajgrimaldi

Description

Some comments I've gathered from the community survey on the challenges/suggestions section:

The most confusing part for me was figuring out WHO should be reviewing requests? Or if there was a process for requesting a review. Otherwise, I found documentation to be very helpful. My biggest complaint, last time I was working in these repos the documentation was still in PRs and a WIP, but it contained a lot of useful and important info. Hopefully those PRs made their way into being merged at this point to help discoverability.

The events and filter definitions are in a separate repo and that always creates some friction with PRs since you have a multi-step process of merging and bumping versions based on another pr.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    documentationRelates to documentation improvements

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions