taxonomy: correction vol-au vent

[moon-rabbitOFF]

There was a huge confusion with different products with vol-au-vent in their names grouped in the category "Vol-au-vent" which was in "puff pastry meals". I separated those products in four categories:

• Puff pastry molds for vol-au-vent (e.g. https://world.openfoodfacts.org/product/8436026539651/vol-au-vent-musfi-s)
• Vol-au-vent in puff pastries, which is the equivalent of the old category under puff pastry meals. Those products are called bouchées à la reine in France (e.g. https://world.openfoodfacts.org/product/3250392486167/bouchees-a-la-reine-netto)
• Vol-au-vent in sauce, which is sold in Belgium mostly and not eaten in puff-pastry there (e.g. https://world.openfoodfacts.org/product/5400101004061/simpl-vol-au-vent or https://world.openfoodfacts.org/product/5400101077546/carrefour-the-market-traiteur-gourmet-vol-au-vent).
• fr: Garnitures pour bouchées à reine, which is similar to the Belgian vol-au-vent, but with poultry quenelles (which is a dumpling made of ground poultry, flour and eggs) instead of poultry meat. This is the filling that is put in the puff pastries.
  I also merged "Puff pastries with ham and cheese" and "Ham and cheese in puffed pastry".

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 51.78%. Comparing base (ae3357c) to head (b98d292).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #12718      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   46.45%   51.78%   +5.33%     
==========================================
  Files          95       96       +1     
  Lines       24799    24857      +58     
  Branches     5949     5958       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits        11520    12872    +1352     
+ Misses      11711    10254    -1457     
- Partials     1568     1731     +163     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration-test-group-1	31.30% <ø> (?)
integration-test-group-2	27.16% <ø> (?)
integration-test-group-3	8.78% <ø> (?)
integration-test-group-4	10.74% <ø> (?)
integration-test-group-5	20.07% <ø> (?)
integration-test-group-6	24.94% <ø> (?)
integration-test-group-7	10.30% <ø> (?)
integration-test-group-8	8.79% <ø> (?)
integration-test-group-9	8.99% <ø> (?)
unit-test-group-1	26.41% <ø> (ø)
unit-test-group-2	21.79% <ø> (ø)
unit-test-group-3	20.64% <ø> (ø)
unit-test-group-4	31.25% <ø> (ø)
unit-test-group-5	20.05% <ø> (ø)
unit-test-group-6	29.46% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud