Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Moving this issue to a new discussion! As it's a lot of work to maintain a CLI, I would prefer only have a single Maybe having an # the former `ralph runserver` command would become:
ralph lrs run
# the former `ralph auth` command would become:
ralph lrs authWDYT? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Continuing the conversation on clarity of the documentation.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
When I first discovered Ralph, it took me some digging into the code and discussions with team members to fully understand the multiple facets of Ralph. In particular, the data processing/validating tool AND the LRS server. I believe we would benefit from improving the doc and code structure to make clearer these different aspects.
Below is a first suggestion. Perhaps we could discuss here of other ways to make Ralph more accessible to first time users ?
Separate data processing and LRS management in cli ?
Currently, the
ralphcommand is used both to:auth.json)This seems like very different tasks. I am wondering if it would make things clearer for new users to separate these functions by having two commands. For example
ralphandralph-LRS-admin?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions