Skip to content

EarthMaterial descriptions are not getting implemented #11

@smrgeoinfo

Description

@smrgeoinfo

Because the UML does not explicitly link EarthMaterial, CompoundMaterial, and RockMaterial to the relevant extension classes for description details, they are not getting implemented in the JSON. Here is a diagram showing the relationships that need to be implemented:

Image

I drew it with 'uses' associations because I don't want the code to try implementing the associations until we figure this out, but I'm think each description association would have a role labeled with the target description DataType. I'm out of time to work on this now, just putting a reminder here.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions