Skip to content

Clarify that server implementations may accept shortened RFC 3339 time stamps (e.g., yyyy-mm or yyyy-mm-dd) #202

@jerstlouis

Description

@jerstlouis

From #185

7.2.4 - How should the Content-Datetime: value be encoded in case of an interval? How can I encode temporal information that are not valid according to RFC3339? (e.g. 2020-01 until 2021-01)?

Thanks for spotting that, I guess I did not realize that RFC 3339 does not seem to cover time period at all. The intent was to follow the same syntax as the datetime parameter in Features (and Common) which cites RFC 3339 section 5.6. The intent is to use the / separator. For your particular example, couldn't you encode that as 2020-01-01 / 2020-12-31 ?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type
No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

Status

In Review

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions