Submitting author: @carlybauer (Carly E. Bauer)
Repository: https://github.com/carlybauer/WQDashboard
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @bleds22e
Reviewers: @paulgovan, @an-bui
Archive: Pending
Paper kind: learning module
Status
Status badge code:
HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/89806425e92356d59fc0f966f4d9b057"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/89806425e92356d59fc0f966f4d9b057/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/89806425e92356d59fc0f966f4d9b057)
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@paulgovan & @an-bui, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review.
First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
@editorialbot generate my checklist
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://openjournals.readthedocs.io/en/jose/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @bleds22e know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
@paulgovan, please create your checklist typing: @editorialbot generate my checklist
@an-bui, please create your checklist typing: @editorialbot generate my checklist
Submitting author: @carlybauer (Carly E. Bauer)
Repository: https://github.com/carlybauer/WQDashboard
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @bleds22e
Reviewers: @paulgovan, @an-bui
Archive: Pending
Paper kind: learning module
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@paulgovan & @an-bui, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review.
First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://openjournals.readthedocs.io/en/jose/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @bleds22e know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
@paulgovan, please create your checklist typing:
@editorialbot generate my checklist@an-bui, please create your checklist typing:
@editorialbot generate my checklist