[PRE REVIEW]: py_neuromodulation: Signal processing and decoding for neural electrophysiological recordings

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @timonmerk (Timon Merk)
Repository: https://github.com/neuromodulation/py_neuromodulation
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper
Version: v0.1.2
Editor: @jromanowska
Reviewers: @finsberg, @danielmk
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1f6e7a77e799d0f94195b5cadc64085a"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1f6e7a77e799d0f94195b5cadc64085a/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1f6e7a77e799d0f94195b5cadc64085a/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1f6e7a77e799d0f94195b5cadc64085a)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @timonmerk. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@timonmerk if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.06.007 is OK
- 10.1038/s41593-020-00744-x is OK
- 10.1016/j.tics.2016.12.008 is OK
- 10.1155/2011/879716 is OK
- 10.7551/mitpress/9609.001.0001 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2013.00267 is OK
- 10.1155/2011/156869 is OK
- 10.1016/j.expneurol.2022.113993 is OK
- 10.7554/eLife.75126 is OK
- 10.1093/brain/awae219 is OK
- 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3212709/v1 is OK
- 10.1016/j.brs.2024.12.917 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2402.10251 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2502.17213 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7979740 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: ELGarulli/neurokin

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98  T=1.49 s (156.9 files/s, 241507.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript                      31            288          18792         306151
Python                          97           3350           3303          11481
HTML                             3           1322              2           7063
JSX                             31            427            182           3795
reStructuredText                44            351            577            430
YAML                             5             43             32            357
TeX                              1             17              0            267
CSS                              5             39             15            230
Jupyter Notebook                 2              0            893            162
Text                             2             38              0            132
JSON                             6              0              0            125
TOML                             1             10              7             96
Markdown                         1             17              2             82
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
MATLAB                           1             13              1             20
SVG                              2              0              1             19
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           234           5927          23815         330445
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   736	timonmerk
   104	Laura
    78	Toni M. Brotons
    70	Richard Koehler
    45	Antonio Martinez Brotons
    18	toni-neurosc
    17	Samed Rouven Vossberg
     7	timon.merk
     6	Jonathan Vanhoecke
     5	elizametno
     4	mousa-saeed
     2	Elizaveta Terekhova
     2	Jojo Vanhoecke
     2	Thomas S. Binns
     1	Richard M. Köhler
     1	ahmedtarek-
     1	alessiaca
     1	jlbusch

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

⚠️ Wordcount for paper.md is 1436

🔴 Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

NeuroDSP: A package for neural digital signal processing
Submitting author: @voytek
Handling editor: @arokem (Retired)
Reviewers: @TomDLT
Similarity score: 0.7290

mhealthtools: A Modular R Package for Extracting Features from Mobile and Wearable Sensor Data
Submitting author: @philerooski
Handling editor: @trallard (Retired)
Reviewers: @Ebedthan, @AKuederle
Similarity score: 0.7277

pyomeca: An Open-Source Framework for Biomechanical Analysis
Submitting author: @romainmartinez
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @BKillen05, @mitkof6
Similarity score: 0.7217

Openseize: A digital signal processing package for large EEG datasets in Python
Submitting author: @mscaudill
Handling editor: @samhforbes (Active)
Reviewers: @szorowi1, @AJQuinn
Similarity score: 0.7217

ReSurfEMG: A Python library for preprocessing and analysis of respiratory EMG.
Submitting author: @drcandacemakedamoore
Handling editor: @AJQuinn (Retired)
Reviewers: @ixjlyons, @ajbaird
Similarity score: 0.7124

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[timonmerk]

suggested reviewers:

• Julie-Fabre
• sappelhoff
• finsberg
• danielmk
• ntolley
• ixjlyons
• cudmore

[timonmerk]

Can we help in the editing process?

[timonmerk]

@sappelhoff and @britta-wstnr I am very sorry to tag you here directly. But I just wondered about the usual turn-around time of the editors? It would be very helpful to know if the paper was considered for this journal? Many thanks!