Strengthen testVisualization test case

[aymanhab]

testVisualization should be more extensive and cover the case where multiple non-trivial transforms are specified to transform meshes, as was done in version 3.3 and earlier.

[aseth1]

In 3.3 and earlier, the VisibleObject had a transform associated with it and so did the individual Mesh geometry contained by the VisibleObject. The current solution (in #1299) assumes (and is likely correct) that the Mesh transform is expressed in the VisibleObject frame of reference and that the VisibleObject transform is expressed in the Body reference frame (prior to Frames), so the when we update to replace with a new Geometry its transform is now composed from the two transforms to express the Mesh in the Body frame.

There are currently no tests to verify that the composition rule is correct and the test with translational offsets alone is insufficient since the order of transforms as no effect on the translation and only the rotational offset. We should verify that a 3.3. or earlier model with the two transforms defined are indeed composed as expected otherwise user define geometry will not visualize as expected.