Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 14, 2022. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 14, 2022. It is now read-only.

Static sec-group ranges for "all internet" access use-case #30

Description

@gberche-orange

In addition to supporting dynamic ASG derived from filtered credentials, there are use-cases for creating static ASG definitions regardless of the returned credentials.

One use-case, is a static-cred-broker that will provide an "all internet" service, possibly returning empty credentials.

Scenario 1:

Given a sec-group-filter deployed with the following specific configuration:

cf set-env always-apply-sec-group-definitions ' [ { "protocol": "tcp", "destination": "10.0.11.0-10.0.11.255", "ports": "80,443", "description": "Allow http and https traffic from ZoneA" },  { "protocol": "tcp", "destination": "10.0.12.0/24", "ports": "80,443", "description": "Allow http and https traffic from ZoneB" } ] '

When a filtered broker returns the following binding response (e.g. a static-cred configured to return an empty binding response)

{ }

Then the following ASG is created and bound to the corresponding application:

[
 { "protocol": "tcp", "destination": "10.0.11.0/24", "ports": "80,443" } ,  
 { "protocol": "tcp", "destination": "10.0.12.0/24", "ports": "80,443" }
]

Optional scenario 2:

When a filtered broker returns the following binding response (e.g.

{"uri":"https://developer-tripadvisor.com/content-api/"}.

with developer-tripadvisor.com resolving to 23.21.145.5

Then the following ASG is created and bound to the corresponding application:

[
 { "protocol": "tcp", "destination": "23.21.145.5/32", "ports": "443" } ,  
 { "protocol": "tcp", "destination": "10.0.11.0/24", "ports": "80,443"  } ,  
 { "protocol": "tcp", "destination": "10.0.12.0/24", "ports": "80,443"  }
]

Rationale for scenario 2 is to simplify the implementation (previous behavior and existing specs are not affected). CF supports redundant security groups declarations.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions