Upgrade to Duende 7.1.0 causes HTTP 431 errors #19
Unanswered
rabberbock
asked this question in
IdentityServer
Replies: 6 comments
|
Can you please provide some more information?
|
0 replies
|
@RolandGuijt The request endpoint is |
0 replies
|
How is the Blazor WASM app configured? Is it using a BFF or is there some other setup? |
0 replies
|
@RolandGuijt I am not using BFF. We are using jwt tokens to authenticate to our API. @page "/authentication/{action}"
<RemoteAuthenticatorView Action="@Action" OnLogOutSucceeded="LogOutSucceededCallback">
<LoggingIn>
<AppSkeletonLoader Text="Logging In..."/>
</LoggingIn>
etc ...
</RemoteAuthenticatorView>
@code{
[Parameter]
public string Action { get; set; }
etc ...
}services.AddOidcAuthentication(options =>
{
options.ProviderOptions.ClientId = "clientId";
options.ProviderOptions.Authority = identityServerUrl;
options.ProviderOptions.ResponseType = "code";
options.ProviderOptions.DefaultScopes.Add("role");
options.ProviderOptions.DefaultScopes.Add("ourAPI");
options.ProviderOptions.DefaultScopes.Add("openid");
options.ProviderOptions.DefaultScopes.Add("profile");
options.ProviderOptions.DefaultScopes.Add("email");
options.AuthenticationPaths.LogInPath = "login";
}); |
0 replies
|
(note: we're moving this issue to our new community discussions) |
0 replies
|
That looks correct. Is it possible for you to see what the header looks like when the request is send to the authorize endpoint? Maybe using the F12 tools in the browser? |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Which version of Duende IdentityServer are you using?
7.1.0
Which version of .NET are you using?
.NET 9
Describe the bug
We just upgraded to .NET 9 and upgraded Duende packages as well and many of our clients are seeing 431 errors. This only started once we made the .NET 9 version live. It was really only package upgrades across our app, so wondering if you know of anything offhand that would cause this. We have since reverted our deployment and the amount of 431 is consistently decreasing.
To Reproduce
I will try to reproduce this when I get a chance.
Expected behavior
No 431 errors.
Log output/exception with stacktrace
Additional context
All reactions