PrivateBin
Is there a reason to keep Bootstrap 3.4.1 as JS library even 5.0.1 is used in latest release? #1766
-
Describe the problem/questionIs there a reason to keep Bootstracp 3.4.1 as JS library even though 5.0.1 is used in latest release? Also by being defined in serial fashion, doesn't this create conflicts and override 5.0.1 definitions? Did you use the FAQ section?
What you did?
What happensNo response What should happenNo response Additional informationNo response Server addressNo response Server OSNo response WebserverNo response PrivateBin versionNo response Browser and versionNo response Local operating system and versionNo response Issue reproducibilityYes, reproducible on https://privatebin.net. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
Yes, the bootstrap (3) template and it's variants still use it. It depends on your instances configuration if you keep the default bootstrap5 template, use a custom one or the prior bootstrap one or one of it's variants. We will remove the old library from the project when we remove the old templates (I've got no urgent plans to do so), but you can choose to remove the files
It should not, as only one or the other is used. The privatebin.net site is a bit special in that it enables switching templates, so if you monitor the requests and you switch templates, first one, then the other library is loaded. But they are not executed in your tabs context at the same time. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Yes, the bootstrap (3) template and it's variants still use it. It depends on your instances configuration if you keep the default bootstrap5 template, use a custom one or the prior bootstrap one or one of it's variants.
We will remove the old library from the project when we remove the old templates (I've got no urgent plans to do so), but you can choose to remove the files
css/bootstrap,js/bootstrap-3.4.1.jsandtpl/bootstrap.phpfrom your installation if you don't use them.It sh…