"Cloning" notes is misleading, why not call it linking?

[tredondo]

Initially I thought cloning notes meant copying them, but then I saw in the wiki what actually happens.

So why not call this operation linking? Since it's just like symlinks on Unix.

Even that wiki pages admits repeatedly that "cloning" is a misleading term.

[eliandoran]

I agree with the term cloning being confusing since it can be confused with duplicating.

I'm not personally a fan of (hard) linking terminology since it's quite technical and mostly on the Unix/Linux side.

We plan to change it as per in #4099, but we haven't reached consensus yet.