Simplification of the AEIP9 #46
samuelmanzanera
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
|
Could be a good idea, but the type_mime would still be needed for aeweb / https / ipfs link.
As it the type_mime field could be completely removed |
0 replies
|
I like this simplification.
I don't get why you'd need mime for aeweb/https/ipfs. Only the data require it. |
2 replies
|
I'm not against to keep it, if we want to keep the mime_type, we can:
WIth this latest option, the application wishing the be dataURI compliant to render the image, it would have to inject the mime-type before the ';' |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Since the AEIP9 we introduced a structure to reference assets in token with base64, AEWeb, IPFS or HTTP links.
However this structure is a bit cumbersome and could be lifted a bit.
By using specific URI scheme we could reduce the footprint of the token def reducing fees reduce its cumbersomeness
What do you think of URI scheme like those:
The latter follow the Data URI scheme which well known in the web industry and could support different kind of format, hence removing the need of the type_mime field for this embedded resource.
All reactions