Smart Contract Named Actions - AEIP16 #47
samuelmanzanera
announced in
AEIP
Replies: 2 comments 6 replies
|
I suggest an improvement on the function arguments that I believe would make them friendlier: We could explicitly write the arguments names, ex: |
3 replies
|
Looks good !
But we don't know what is the field you're talking about. Also, I think it's not very clear that in transaction V2 the |
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This is a discussion for the AEIP16 located at: https://github.com/archethic-foundation/aeip/blob/main/AEIP-16.md
All reactions