Proposal: API‑Driven Validation & Approval Workflow for XDR / SOAR Platforms #20515
jacob-kraniak
started this conversation in
Password Manager
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
✨ Thank you for your code contribution proposal! While the Bitwarden team reviews your submission, we encourage you to check out our contribution guidelines. Please ensure that your code contribution includes a detailed description of what you would like to contribute, along with any relevant screenshots and links to existing feature requests. This information helps us gather feedback from the community and Bitwarden team members before you start writing code. To keep discussions focused, posts that do not include a proposal for a code contribution will be removed.
Thank you for contributing to Bitwarden! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Select Topic Area
✅ Code Contribution Proposal
Code Contribution Proposal
Proposal: API-Driven Bitwarden Approval Automation for XDR / SOAR Platforms
Summary
In enterprise environments, Bitwarden’s “Please Confirm User” and “Admin Approve Device” requests generate a high volume of repetitive, manual approval tasks. These events are security-relevant but low-signal, and they frequently require administrator action despite the user or device having already been validated upstream.
This proposal suggests a standardized, API-based integration pattern that allows XDR / SOAR platforms to:
This proposal is API-first and explicitly does not rely on the Bitwarden CLI.
Problem Statement
In many enterprises:
These requests are:
From a security operations perspective, these approvals are ideal candidates for policy-driven SOAR automation, yet no supported, standardized API workflow exists today.
Proposal Overview
Introduce a documented API workflow enabling first-class integration with XDR / SOAR platforms.
Key Capabilities
1. Inbound Approval Events
Bitwarden emits structured events such as:
user_approval_requesteddevice_approval_requestedDelivery mechanisms could include:
2. Outbound Approval Actions
An authenticated enterprise API endpoint allowing trusted automation platforms to:
Conceptual Example
Each action should be logged and attributable for audit and compliance.
Identity-Based User Validation
Approval decisions should rely on authoritative identity signals, not standalone Bitwarden context.
Before approving a request, a SOAR workflow may validate that the requesting user or device:
(e.g., Entra ID / Azure AD, Okta, Ping)
This aligns with Zero Trust principles and prevents approval of stale or orphaned identities.
Optional Human-in-the-Loop Approval
Where required by policy or risk tolerance, an optional admin confirmation step may be inserted.
Approval prompts could be surfaced via:
This enables:
Once approved, the SOAR platform completes the action via the Bitwarden API and logs the decision.
Compliance, Security, and Auditability
This design supports regulated enterprise environments:
Example XDR / SOAR Context (Vendor-Neutral)
Many modern XDR platforms already support:
For example, SentinelOne documents community automation workflows here:
https://github.com/Sentinel-One/ai-siem/
This proposal is intentionally vendor-agnostic.
Design Principles
Any implementation of this proposal should be:
Mermaid Workflow Diagram
flowchart TD A[Bitwarden Approval Requested] --> B[XDR / SOAR Receives Event] B --> C{Validate Identity} C -->|Active in IdP| D{Licensed & Policy Compliant} C -->|Invalid / Disabled| X[Deny or Escalate] D -->|Yes| E{Human Approval Required?} D -->|No| X E -->|No| F[Approve via Bitwarden API] E -->|Yes| G["Admin Quick Approval<br/>Teams Card / UI Prompt"] G -->|Approved| F G -->|Denied| X F --> H[Log Action for Audit] X --> HRequest for Feedback & Collaboration
I’m seeking feedback from Bitwarden maintainers and the community on:
Happy to collaborate on API schemas, workflow documentation, or reference implementations if this aligns with Bitwarden’s roadmap.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions