-
|
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Describe alternatives you've considered Additional context |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
An option to completely disable background parsing is You can also try to disable just the
Note that it is not really related with query execution. It does some analysis and loads metadata information about the database schema while analyzing and validating query, i breifly described the whole procedure here. It would be nice if you can repeat your test using following scenario with both mentioned options enabled:
Then repeat it with Also it might be that your other configuration options discourage "separate connection for metadata read", which effectively prevents parallelization of metadata reading and queries execution, because forces DBeaver to use one and the same database connection for all the operations. This i cannot guess. "Background analysis" called "background" for a reason after all. You can use PS I should explicitly say, that the issue is apparently not about the background analysis performance but about the exagreggated timing of the query execution. And the issue description completely lack the scenario in which it is being observed. So at the moment no meaningful details really presented to allow its solution or explaination of actual reasons for. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
epic. worked. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.

An option to completely disable background parsing is
Enable semantic analysis.You can also try to disable just the
Read database table/column for semantic analysisoption. This way background analysis will be providing some advanced highlighting but won't use any information about the database structure, and so it won't be accessing database connection at all.Note that it is not really related with query execution. It does some analysis and loads metadata information about the database schema while analyzing and validating query, i breifly described the whole procedure here.
So the only reason for the query execution to conflict with background analysis i may think of is during editor…