Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
|
First of all, I love people throwing ideas out! No idea is a bad idea. I think everything you mentioned is a valuable addition and something that people would use, but also everything can and should be made via third party extensions as it's all doable 👀 The goal is and will always be to keep the degoog base instance as small/neat/light as possible. All these major functionalities should be done via extensions Do you want to play with it yourself or collaborate on it? Are you on the discord server? |
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hey @fccview,
how's it going? I'm using degoog a lot lately (I love it!) and would love to contribute a little bit more time to the project.
I hope it's okay when I throw out some ideas. 🌝
I love the integrated LLM api but I feel a bit "friction" when using it.
The integration could be presented in a different way, right now it sits at the top and can easily be overseen (maybe a stronger highlight background color?).
Also there's a lot of space on the right side of the search results, it could be used for LLM purposes.
Hey! Imagine you could click a button right next to the search results, a small chat window pops up and you could ask specific things about the website before visiting it, using some playwright automation to fetch the website content.
Another thing I thought about was that the search query get's filtered and if the query starts with a "!" or ends with a "?", it will directly go into a chat view to interact with the LLM.
The reason why I say this is because most people still use at least one search engine and a LLM frontend, why not combine it in a harmonic way so that each feature (LLM & Search) is still separated but you can combine it with a click? Per request.
=> This is what most platforms miss.
Q
All reactions