Exploration: Lightweight Container Execution for Automotive ECUs (Eclipse SSAM) #2934
jeff-kim-mobis
started this conversation in
Architecture Community
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
Container execution is in scope with https://eclipse-score.github.io/score/main/features/lifecycle/requirements/index.html#feat_req__lifecycle__oci_compliant |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
@NicolasFussberger , @S-MOHAMD, @ramceb please review and check if we could integrate it into lifecycle, have to modify the feature request or if we reject tis approach @anmittag => TLC: 2026-06-11 recheck |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Context
Eclipse SSAM is currently under review as a new Eclipse top-level project:
https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/eclipse-ssam
It is a lightweight container execution framework purpose-built for resource-constrained automotive ECUs — not a general-purpose OCI runtime.
Initial contributor: Hyundai Mobis. License: Apache 2.0. Code is already public.
Why S-CORE
S-CORE today has no module covering container/package execution — how applications are deployed, started, and isolated as runnable packages on the ECU. SSAM targets exactly that gap:
Functional safety compliance up to ASIL-B is a stated future goal of the project, not a current claim.
Platform
Currently runs on Linux-based hosts. A QNX port is planned once QNX introduces container execution capabilities — relevant for S-CORE's multi-OS target deployments.
What I'm asking
We understand container execution is not a v1.0 target for S-CORE.
However, for S-CORE to serve real SDV use cases beyond v1.0 — dynamic deployment, app isolation, secure update — a container/package runtime seems hard to avoid.
This post is to gauge whether the Architecture Community shares that view:
For deeper technical detail, the Eclipse proposal page is the most complete reference. We'd especially value early reactions on concerns or adjacent work the community thinks we should be aware of.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions