Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Honestly, I’d focus more on what the framework enables and why teams pick it, rather than trying to find a long list of public “big names”. Most systems built with it are the kind of stuff that lives in private networks/closed environments (internal platforms, infra services, distributed backends), so people usually don’t publish architecture details. That said, it has been used in production in a few real systems -e.g. Samsung’s Smart TV backend (ad platform). You can also see usage in the wild via Platform Engineering Labs (https://github.com/platform-engineering-labs). And as far as I know, projects like dYdX (https://github.com/dydxprotocol/) and 3Commas (https://3commas.io/) are currently evaluating or moving toward it. Teams usually choose it for pretty practical reasons: it keeps the concurrency/supervision model straightforward, plays nicely with Erlang/OTP, and helps structure highly concurrent systems without extra “framework weight”. Also worth mentioning: it has zero external dependencies, which is a big plus for companies that care about stability, upgrades, or minimizing supply-chain risk. And it’s a pretty natural option if you’re coming from older Erlang-based solutions and want a more modern stack/tooling, while still keeping the OTP ideas instead of rewriting everything from scratch. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi, @halturin I would like to use your project in our production environment, but my boss has asked me to provide evidence of its adoption by major companies or projects. I know it might sound a bit silly, but if you could share the names of some big companies you know that are using it, I would really appreciate it.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions