Suggestion: Document comparison to Tika

[nickchomey]

Kreuzberg seems extremely impressive. Thanks for sharing your hard work!

However, Tika is the gold standard in this area and vastly more mature. So, it seems to me that it would be helpful to compare Kreuzberg to Tika in the readme and/or docs. Which file types they work with, potential concerns with edge cases, performance, features etc...

Likewise, Extractous embeds/wraps Tika in rust to make it more accessible, but it is seemingly abandonned (and has much less functionality. Despite that, a mention of how Kreuzberg differs would be great.

(I expect Kreuzberg to compare very favourably).

[Goldziher]

Ok, I'll adopt your proposal and replace extraction with apache Tika