Replies: 1 comment
|
Hey @jmscott! Yes, we would. However, it takes a lot of time for us to benchmark the Postgres FTS functionalities since they're quite slow. I can add it to the list of additional benchmarks here: #279 and we will eventually get to it. Or, if you'd like to run the benchmarks yourself, we'd love your contribution :) |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
we index documents internally using the rum index extension from ~postgrespro on github, with excellent results in the small terabyte range. the rum index seems considerably quicker than the pg core ts. would paradedb consider adding rum to the benchmark?
All reactions