AI generated WAMP outline using STORM (Stanford)

[oberstet]

Hi all,

fwiw, I've recently became aware of a new LLM driven tool to generate overview articles for topics called STORM:

https://github.com/stanford-oval/storm/
https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14207

here is the result:

https://storm.genie.stanford.edu/article/the-web-application-messaging-protocol-313773

---

this was a "non interactive" test, however, I might find time to check out the interactive mode as well, since what I am missing in the generated text is:

---

There are two areas which would deserve more attention and text:

1. "Routed RPCs" are quite unique to WAMP, and the fact that WAMP has both PubSub and RPC in one protocol is also unique, and a huge advantage.

2. Rgd future directions, 3 areas WAMP will add features and already has alpha implementation for are:

2a. **Distributed** WAMP, with WAMP router nodes interconnected, and transparently forwarding calls and events between nodes, and the WAMP clients connected to these.

2b. **Decentralized WAMP**, where WAMP router nodes are interconnected, but owned and operated by different parties (thus, decentralized), and with respective/required cross-party information shared on a public blockchain - specifically, Ethereum, and Ethereum L1 or L2 (eg Optimism or Arbitrum).

2c. "End-to-end encryption" for all application traffic, which protects calls and events routed in network of WAMP router nodes from the operators of these nodes, establishing security for the WAMP endpoints (clients) regardless of any intermediate nodes.

-----

PS:
- The "Answer saved" popup on every save of my feedback is super annoying and pointless.
- The fact that my feedback (this text) is NOT included in the generated HTML or PDF report (which I would like to share among collegues) sucks. I have to copy pasta that manually.

---

any feedback comments welcome.

I would be very interested in implementors and users feedback of course, or from anyone.

regarding the generated text, regarding the areas I am missing (1 + 2a - 2c), as well as general LLM/AI critique!

have a good day,
cheers,

/Tobias