Skip to content

Can we move _map output out of the main Zarr tree? #142

Description

@j08lue

It is currently hard-coded that with each Zarr array of an indicator, the code writes a _map version of the same data, which has been reprojected to Web Mercator.

First of all, I think the creation of this copy should be optional - many will not need it, e.g. when using the indicators as input to Physrisk.

Secondly, the _map folders inside the Zarr tree can confuse clients to think that they are arrays in the same group. I think they should be separated at a higher level, perhaps a completely separate Zarr store, since they have a different projection than the main data and will in many ways not be compatible.

What do the maintainers think?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions