Issues remaining for Final Draft

[cloudhead]

• Introduce oscoin as another name for "open source coin"
• Reference TrustRank
• Remove mentions of pledging/stake
• Explain the intuition on why the structure of os projects is different than the web, and why that leads us to add contributors to the graph.
• Mention vesting on reward tokens
• Clear up confusion around term "bidirectional" in 3.4
• Talk about checkpointing incentive? (Receive more Osrank from contributors)
• Talk in more detail about why we're using a blockchain. (Governance, minting)
• Mention concerns about PoW at scale
• Acknowledge and address issue with false dependencies and omissions in Future Work section
• Improve background section's language around OSS
• Mention the primary focus on libraries and "upstream" dependencies
• Talk about "Free Software"
• Write conclusion

[hxrts]

• Reference Cathedral & Bazaar Eric S. Raymond. The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. 1999.
• False Ecosystems section doesn't sufficiently address scenario where an important package creates fraudulent dependencies or splits packages to increase their payout

[cloudhead]

@hxrts where would you reference Cathedral & Bazaar? (I think it's a good idea)

[hxrts]

I think you may have found a place after our discussion, but if not I can make a suggestion when I see the most recent version tomorrow.

[hxrts]

May want to add writing a conclusion to this list as well.