Use Case
Users of ORT for GitLab would like to use their own local configuration but also combine it with oss-review-toolkit/ort-config. For example, a user wants to keep curations and package configurations for his/her organization's proprietary packages in a private local configuration repository but for all open source package use and contribute to oss-review-toolkit/ort-config.
Currently setting up such a workflow in ORT for GitLab would require repository mirroring of oss-review-toolkit/ort-config in GitLab and adding a 'private' branch which is requires some effort and might result in Git merge conflicts. We would prefer an easier out of the box solution by expanding on the mechanism introduced in #5269.
Note: useOrtCurations introduced in #5269 only works via the CLI and can not be set via .conf file. Regardless which solution we end up implement we should make this configurable via .conf (which is how we configure ORT in ORT for GitLab)
Use Case
Users of ORT for GitLab would like to use their own local configuration but also combine it with oss-review-toolkit/ort-config. For example, a user wants to keep curations and package configurations for his/her organization's proprietary packages in a private local configuration repository but for all open source package use and contribute to oss-review-toolkit/ort-config.
Currently setting up such a workflow in ORT for GitLab would require repository mirroring of oss-review-toolkit/ort-config in GitLab and adding a 'private' branch which is requires some effort and might result in Git merge conflicts. We would prefer an easier out of the box solution by expanding on the mechanism introduced in #5269.
Note:
useOrtCurationsintroduced in #5269 only works via the CLI and can not be set via .conf file. Regardless which solution we end up implement we should make this configurable via .conf (which is how we configure ORT in ORT for GitLab)