✨ implement ListContributors for Azure DevOps

[JamieMagee]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Feature

• PR title follows the guidelines defined in our pull request documentation

What is the current behavior?

LisContributors throws an unsupported error on Azure DevOps

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?**

LisContributors is implemented for Azure DevOps

• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features)

Which issue(s) this PR fixes

Next step of #4177

Special notes for your reviewer

I am a little unsure what to put for Companies or Organizations. For now, I've defaulted to the current Azure DevOps organization.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

For user-facing changes, please add a concise, human-readable release note to
the release-note

(In particular, describe what changes users might need to make in their
application as a result of this pull request.)

implement `ListContributors` for Azure DevOps

[JamieMagee]

The Contributors check now passes. Albeit with unexpected results, as I'm not sure what to choose for Companies or Organizations.

Details

$ env SCORECARD_EXPERIMENTAL=1 go run . --repo dev.azure.com/jamiemagee/jamiemagee/_git/scorecard --checks Contributors
Starting [Contributors]
Finished [Contributors]

RESULTS
-------
Aggregate score: 3.0 / 10

Check scores:
|--------|--------------|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| SCORE  |     NAME     |             REASON             |                        DOCUMENTATION/REMEDIATION                        |
|--------|--------------|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 3 / 10 | Contributors | project has 1 contributing     | https://github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#contributors |
|        |              | companies or organizations --  |                                                                         |
|        |              | score normalized to 3          |                                                                         |
|--------|--------------|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

[spencerschrock]

The Contributors check now passes. Albeit with unexpected results, as I'm not sure what to choose for Companies or Organizations.

It may be difficult to get meaningful data for this check since everything is inherently contained in a single organization?

[JamieMagee]

It may be difficult to get meaningful data for this check since everything is inherently contained in a single organization?

Exactly. It also returns nonsensical results for imported repositories. A better check might be using email domain to determine organization association. What do you think?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 61.40351% with 22 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.52%. Comparing base (353ed60) to head (d94ab0f).
Report is 72 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4437      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   66.80%   68.52%   +1.71%     
==========================================
  Files         230      241      +11     
  Lines       16602    17938    +1336     
==========================================
+ Hits        11091    12292    +1201     
- Misses       4808     4843      +35     
- Partials      703      803     +100     

[spencerschrock]

A better check might be using email domain to determine organization association. What do you think?

This was also suggested in #4415 for GitLab, let's talk about this tomorrow Thursday at the community meeting.