Replies: 6 comments 3 replies
-
cC.: @LukasHirt, @pascalwengerter, @kulmann, @individual-it, @phil-davis |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Just to point it out: this is only about unit tests, there are also integration and acceptance tests in web, that would still stay in the And that is also the only slight disadvantage I can think of the proposal. Will people be confused to find some tests (integration/acceptance) in the generally I don't have any strong opinions about where the unit tests should live, as long as its uniform across the project we would need to add these items into the model above:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
another point that came to my mind a second ago while writing tests.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have the same thoughts as @individual-it regarding having 2/3 tests in dedicated folder and rest next to files. What adds a bit to the confusion then is again as pointed out already that the What I am also considering is, how do we then make clear separation what is integration test and what is unit test? Integration test behave a lot like unit tests - they are directly tied to a component. They are also called |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
what to do next with this discussion? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We've decided to go with a dedicated |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
In Web currently we use two places where tests are located.
We need to discuss and then decide what location fits best.
I'd like to propose following:
this brings following benefits:
other projects that do it that way:
history:
misc
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions