Use icechunk 2 and latest zarr-python#650
Conversation
|
/condalock |
| stack_data==0.6.3 | ||
| stackstac==0.5.1 | ||
| starlette==0.50.0 | ||
| stackstac==0.5.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Flagging this downgrade.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm, so this is because stackstac=0.5.1 pins to pandas<3 (gjoseph92/stackstac#254). So we'll need to decide whether to pick stackstac=0.5.1 or pandas=3.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think the image could reasonably drop stackstac since it is not being maintained gjoseph92/stackstac#270 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's hold off on dropping it until we really do need pandas=3. I'm a bit reluctant to drop stackstac being a heavy user of it in the past (odc-stac works, but it's always felt more cumbersome). Also hoping that https://github.com/developmentseed/lazycogs might mature a bit in this STAC->xarray space in a few months to act as another alternative.
| timezonefinder==8.2.1 | ||
| tinycss2==1.5.1 | ||
| timezonefinder==8.2.2 | ||
| tinycss2==1.4.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These ones should be ok to ignore.
| bottleneck==1.6.0 | ||
| bounded-pool-executor==0.0.3 | ||
| bqplot==0.12.45 | ||
| bqplot==0.12.37 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
flagging this downgrade
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Downgrade happening because bqplot>=0.12.38,<=0.12.46 is pinning to pandas<3. I was gonna recommend the new release bqplot=0.12.46 that just came out, but it appears the backport for pandas 3 support wasn't applied correctly (see bqplot/bqplot#1700 (comment)) 😅.
| stack_data==0.6.3 | ||
| stackstac==0.5.1 | ||
| starlette==0.50.0 | ||
| stackstac==0.5.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm, so this is because stackstac=0.5.1 pins to pandas<3 (gjoseph92/stackstac#254). So we'll need to decide whether to pick stackstac=0.5.1 or pandas=3.
| timezonefinder==8.2.1 | ||
| tinycss2==1.5.1 | ||
| timezonefinder==8.2.2 | ||
| tinycss2==1.4.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These ones should be ok to ignore.
| bottleneck==1.6.0 | ||
| bounded-pool-executor==0.0.3 | ||
| bqplot==0.12.45 | ||
| bqplot==0.12.37 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Downgrade happening because bqplot>=0.12.38,<=0.12.46 is pinning to pandas<3. I was gonna recommend the new release bqplot=0.12.46 that just came out, but it appears the backport for pandas 3 support wasn't applied correctly (see bqplot/bqplot#1700 (comment)) 😅.
Yeah let me put that pin and see what the diff looks like. Might also be reasonable to wait for bqplot to implement pandas 3 support if they are working on it. |
|
/condalock |
weiji14
left a comment
weiji14
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Didn' see any significant downgrades anymore, should be ok to merge once CI passes.
3 participants
Icechunk v2 is required for v2 stores, but can still be used for reading and writing v1 stores as well.