Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

That is a very early draft, not a final specification, there is no guarantee the added "typ" will not be changing.

In v6.x you can use modifyAssertion to manage these customizations, in v5.x only the assertion's payload can be customized. However, there's should be no need to adopt the draft just yet as no authorization server should be enforcing the use of the typed assertion.

FWIW the reason for this bis document is already resolved in both v5.x (since v5.7.1) and v6.x (since 6.0.0)

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by alierbay
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants