fix(http-client): expose types to allow naming HttpClient with middle… #716
jsdwAnnotations
1 error and 9 warnings
|
Benchmarks
# :warning: **Performance Alert** :warning:
Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold `2`.
| Benchmark suite | Current: 22198bbe6f4befb91312bd241f87daca18f84a58 | Previous: bb3c537e7204d8988bf264a39b22ddd11350a9ea | Ratio |
|-|-|-|-|
| `async/http_concurrent_conn_calls/fast_call/2` | `374057` ns/iter (`± 30033`) | `163241` ns/iter (`± 5819`) | `2.29` |
| `async/http_concurrent_conn_calls/fast_call/4` | `580338` ns/iter (`± 62977`) | `208912` ns/iter (`± 171843`) | `2.78` |
| `async/http_concurrent_conn_calls/fast_call/8` | `991786` ns/iter (`± 62256`) | `357274` ns/iter (`± 575291`) | `2.78` |
| `async/ws_custom_headers_handshake/1kb` | `221094` ns/iter (`± 16948`) | `87266` ns/iter (`± 2691`) | `2.53` |
| `async/ws_custom_headers_handshake/2kb` | `216698` ns/iter (`± 26998`) | `87842` ns/iter (`± 3575`) | `2.47` |
| `async/ws_custom_headers_handshake/4kb` | `208407` ns/iter (`± 26539`) | `92832` ns/iter (`± 2349`) | `2.24` |
| `async/http_concurrent_conn_calls/fast_call/16` | `1650353` ns/iter (`± 122829`) | `625387` ns/iter (`± 1046003`) | `2.64` |
| `async/http_concurrent_conn_calls/fast_call/32` | `3004726` ns/iter (`± 219330`) | `1154217` ns/iter (`± 1706053`) | `2.60` |
| `async/http_concurrent_conn_calls/fast_call/64` | `5043075` ns/iter (`± 501944`) | `2223859` ns/iter (`± 3255530`) | `2.27` |
This comment was automatically generated by [workflow](https://github.com/paritytech/jsonrpsee/actions?query=workflow%3ABenchmarks) using [github-action-benchmark](https://github.com/marketplace/actions/continuous-benchmark).
Comment was generated at https://github.com/paritytech/jsonrpsee/commit/22198bbe6f4befb91312bd241f87daca18f84a58#commitcomment-174677578
|
|
Benchmarks
Performance alert! Previous value was 2223859 and current value is 5043075. It is 2.2677134656468776x worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 2
|
|
Benchmarks
Performance alert! Previous value was 1154217 and current value is 3004726. It is 2.6032591791664825x worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 2
|
|
Benchmarks
Performance alert! Previous value was 625387 and current value is 1650353. It is 2.6389307740646992x worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 2
|
|
Benchmarks
Performance alert! Previous value was 92832 and current value is 208407. It is 2.2449909513960704x worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 2
|
|
Benchmarks
Performance alert! Previous value was 87842 and current value is 216698. It is 2.4669064912001093x worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 2
|
|
Benchmarks
Performance alert! Previous value was 87266 and current value is 221094. It is 2.5335640455618456x worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 2
|
|
Benchmarks
Performance alert! Previous value was 357274 and current value is 991786. It is 2.775981459608032x worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 2
|
|
Benchmarks
Performance alert! Previous value was 208912 and current value is 580338. It is 2.77790648694187x worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 2
|
|
Benchmarks
Performance alert! Previous value was 163241 and current value is 374057. It is 2.2914402631691795x worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 2
|