Skip to content

Commit 2473b19

Browse files
committed
final
1 parent 05b85c4 commit 2473b19

5 files changed

Lines changed: 326 additions & 6 deletions

File tree

.gitignore

Lines changed: 7 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
1+
.Rproj.user
2+
.Rhistory
3+
.RData
4+
.Ruserdata
5+
*.rda
6+
.DS_Store
7+
*.Rproj

doc/perturbation-supp.pdf

385 KB
Binary file not shown.

doc/perturbation-supp.tex

Lines changed: 317 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,317 @@
1+
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
2+
% \usepackage[top=1in,left=1in, right = 1in, footskip=1in]{geometry}
3+
\usepackage[top=1in,footskip=1in]{geometry}
4+
5+
\usepackage{graphicx}
6+
\usepackage{xspace}
7+
%\usepackage{adjustbox}
8+
9+
\usepackage{multirow}
10+
\usepackage{booktabs}
11+
12+
\usepackage{pdflscape}
13+
14+
\usepackage{grffile}
15+
16+
\newcommand{\comment}{\showcomment}
17+
%% \newcommand{\comment}{\nocomment}
18+
19+
\newcommand{\showcomment}[3]{\textcolor{#1}{\textbf{[#2: }\textsl{#3}\textbf{]}}}
20+
\newcommand{\nocomment}[3]{}
21+
22+
\newcommand{\jd}[1]{\comment{cyan}{JD}{#1}}
23+
\newcommand{\swp}[1]{\comment{magenta}{SWP}{#1}}
24+
\newcommand{\bmb}[1]{\comment{blue}{BMB}{#1}}
25+
\newcommand{\djde}[1]{\comment{red}{DJDE}{#1}}
26+
27+
\newcommand{\eref}[1]{Eq.~(\ref{eq:#1})}
28+
\newcommand{\fref}[1]{Fig.~\ref{fig:#1}}
29+
\newcommand{\Fref}[1]{Fig.~\ref{fig:#1}}
30+
\newcommand{\sref}[1]{Sec.~\ref{#1}}
31+
\newcommand{\frange}[2]{Fig.~\ref{fig:#1}--\ref{fig:#2}}
32+
\newcommand{\tref}[1]{Table~\ref{tab:#1}}
33+
\newcommand{\tlab}[1]{\label{tab:#1}}
34+
\newcommand{\seminar}{SE\mbox{$^m$}I\mbox{$^n$}R}
35+
36+
\usepackage{amsthm}
37+
\usepackage{amsmath}
38+
\usepackage{amssymb}
39+
\usepackage{amsfonts}
40+
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % make sure fancy dashes etc. don't get dropped
41+
42+
\usepackage{lineno}
43+
\linenumbers
44+
45+
\usepackage[pdfencoding=auto, psdextra]{hyperref}
46+
47+
\usepackage{natbib}
48+
\bibliographystyle{chicago}
49+
\date{\today}
50+
51+
\usepackage{xspace}
52+
\newcommand*{\ie}{i.e.\@\xspace}
53+
54+
\usepackage{color}
55+
56+
\newcommand{\Rx}[1]{\ensuremath{{\mathcal R}_{#1}}\xspace}
57+
\newcommand{\RR}{\ensuremath{{\mathcal R}}\xspace}
58+
\newcommand{\Rres}{\Rx{\mathrm{res}}}
59+
\newcommand{\Rinv}{\Rx{\mathrm{inv}}}
60+
\newcommand{\Rhat}{\ensuremath{{\hat\RR}}}
61+
\newcommand{\Rt}{\ensuremath{{\mathcal R}(t)}\xspace}
62+
\newcommand{\tsub}[2]{#1_{{\textrm{\tiny #2}}}}
63+
\newcommand{\dd}[1]{\ensuremath{\, \mathrm{d}#1}}
64+
\newcommand{\dtau}{\dd{\tau}}
65+
\newcommand{\dx}{\dd{x}}
66+
\newcommand{\dsigma}{\dd{\sigma}}
67+
68+
\newcommand{\rx}[1]{\ensuremath{{r}_{#1}}\xspace}
69+
\newcommand{\rres}{\rx{\mathrm{res}}}
70+
\newcommand{\rinv}{\rx{\mathrm{inv}}}
71+
72+
\newcommand{\psymp}{\ensuremath{p}} %% primary symptom time
73+
\newcommand{\ssymp}{\ensuremath{s}} %% secondary symptom time
74+
\newcommand{\pinf}{\ensuremath{\alpha_1}} %% primary infection time
75+
\newcommand{\sinf}{\ensuremath{\alpha_2}} %% secondary infection time
76+
77+
\newcommand{\psize}{{\mathcal P}} %% primary cohort size
78+
\newcommand{\ssize}{{\mathcal S}} %% secondary cohort size
79+
80+
\newcommand{\gtime}{\tau_{\rm g}} %% generation interval
81+
\newcommand{\gdist}{g} %% generation-interval distribution
82+
\newcommand{\idist}{\ell} %% incubation-period distribution
83+
84+
\newcommand{\total}{{\mathcal T}} %% total number of serial intervals
85+
86+
\usepackage{lettrine}
87+
88+
\newcommand{\dropcapfont}{\fontfamily{lmss}\bfseries\fontsize{26pt}{28pt}\selectfont}
89+
\newcommand{\dropcap}[1]{\lettrine[lines=2,lraise=0.05,findent=0.1em, nindent=0em]{{\dropcapfont{#1}}}{}}
90+
91+
\begin{document}
92+
93+
\begin{flushleft}{
94+
\Large
95+
\textbf\newline{
96+
Supplementary Information for \textit{Interplay between climate and childhood mixing can explain a sudden shift in RSV seasonality in Japan}
97+
}
98+
}
99+
\newline
100+
\\
101+
Sang Woo Park\textsuperscript{1,2,3,*}, Inga Holmdahl\textsuperscript{3,4}, Emily Howerton\textsuperscript{3}, Wenchang Yang\textsuperscript{5}, Rachel E. Baker\textsuperscript{6}, Gabriel A. Vecchi\textsuperscript{4,5,7}, Sarah Cobey\textsuperscript{2}, C. Jessica E. Metcalf\textsuperscript{3,4,8}, Bryan T. Grenfell\textsuperscript{3,4,8}
102+
\\
103+
\bigskip
104+
\textbf{1} School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
105+
\\
106+
\textbf{2} Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
107+
\\
108+
\textbf{3} Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
109+
\\
110+
\textbf{4} High Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
111+
\\
112+
\textbf{5} Department of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
113+
\\
114+
\textbf{6} Department of Epidemiology, Brown School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
115+
\\
116+
\textbf{7} Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
117+
\\
118+
\textbf{8} Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton, NJ, USA
119+
\bigskip
120+
121+
*Corresponding author: sangwoopark@snu.ac.kr
122+
\end{flushleft}
123+
124+
\pagebreak
125+
126+
\setcounter{figure}{0}
127+
\setcounter{equation}{0}
128+
\renewcommand{\thefigure}{S\arabic{figure}}
129+
\renewcommand{\theequation}{S\arabic{equation}}
130+
\renewcommand{\thetable}{S\arabic{table}}
131+
132+
\section*{Supplementary Materials}
133+
134+
\subsection*{Supplementary Table}
135+
136+
\begin{table}[ht]
137+
\centering
138+
\begin{tabular}{l|l|l|r}
139+
\hline
140+
\textbf{Island} & \textbf{Variable} & \textbf{Coefficient} & \textbf{p-value} \\
141+
\hline
142+
\multirow{5}{*}{Hokkaido} & Intercept & 4.28*** & $7.28\times 10^{-5}$ \\
143+
& Humidity & 1.26** & 0.0011 \\
144+
& Humidity$^2$ & -0.02 & 0.082 \\
145+
& Temperature & -0.13 & 0.051 \\
146+
& Temperature$^2$ & -0.02*** & $7.75 \times 10^{-6}$ \\
147+
\hline
148+
\multirow{5}{*}{Honshu} & Intercept & 6.73*** & $5.4 \times 10^{-13}$ \\
149+
& Humidity & 0.38 & 0.19 \\
150+
& Humidity$^2$ & 0.03* & 0.011 \\
151+
& Temperature & 0.03 & 0.80 \\
152+
& Temperature$^2$ & -0.02*** & $0.00012$ \\
153+
\hline
154+
\multirow{5}{*}{Shikoku} & Intercept & 12.25*** & $<2 \times 10^{-16}$ \\
155+
& Humidity & 0.43 & 0.30 \\
156+
& Humidity$^2$ & -0.01 & 0.67 \\
157+
& Temperature & -0.84*** & $0.00021$ \\
158+
& Temperature$^2$ & 0.02* & 0.013 \\
159+
\hline
160+
\multirow{5}{*}{Kyushu} & Intercept & 9.91*** & $<2 \times 10^{-16}$ \\
161+
& Humidity & 0.52 & 0.068 \\
162+
& Humidity$^2$ & 0.01 & 0.27 \\
163+
& Temperature & -0.59*** & $0.00046$ \\
164+
& Temperature$^2$ & 0.00 & 0.60 \\
165+
\hline
166+
\multirow{5}{*}{Ryukyu} & Intercept & 14.07 & 0.056 \\
167+
& Humidity & -0.90 & 0.060 \\
168+
& Humidity$^2$ & 0.04** & $0.0073$ \\
169+
& Temperature & 0.15 & 0.86 \\
170+
& Temperature$^2$ & -0.01 & 0.56 \\
171+
\hline
172+
\end{tabular}
173+
\caption{
174+
\textbf{Bivariate quadratic regression of estimated transmission rate against mean specific humidity and mean temperature.}
175+
P-values were obtained from a two-sided t-test based on the estimated standard errors from the regression model.
176+
We did not adjust for multiple comparisons.
177+
*$p<0.05$, **$p<0.01$, ***$p<0.001$.
178+
}
179+
\end{table}
180+
181+
\pagebreak
182+
183+
\begin{table}[ht]
184+
\centering
185+
\begin{tabular}{l|l|l}
186+
\hline
187+
\textbf{Island} & \textbf{Humidity model} & \textbf{Temperature model} \\
188+
\hline
189+
Hokkaido & 0.44 & 0.52\\
190+
\hline
191+
Honshu & 0.39 & 0.29\\
192+
\hline
193+
Shikoku & 0.63 & 0.72\\
194+
\hline
195+
Kyushu & 0.77 & 0.77\\
196+
\hline
197+
Ryukyu & 0.59 & 0.47\\
198+
\hline
199+
\end{tabular}
200+
\caption{
201+
\textbf{Comparisons of R squared values from univariate quadratic regression of estimated transmission rate against mean specific humidity and mean temperature.}
202+
}
203+
\end{table}
204+
205+
206+
\pagebreak
207+
208+
\subsection*{Supplementary Figures}
209+
210+
\begin{figure}[!pth]
211+
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../figure/figure1_cog.pdf}
212+
\caption{
213+
\textbf{Estimates of center of gravity (i.e., the mean timing of an epidemic) across all prefectures, stratified by island.}
214+
Hokkaido and Ryukyu islands each contain only one prefectures: Hokkaido and Okinawa, respectively.
215+
The center (horizontal line), lower bounds, and upper bounds of the box plot correspond to median, lower quartile (25th percentile), and upper quartile (75th percentile), respectively.
216+
The whiskers indicate the range of values that extend up to 1.5 times the interquartile range beyond the lower and upper quartiles.
217+
Outliers, which fall outside this range, are plotted individually.
218+
}
219+
\end{figure}
220+
221+
222+
223+
\begin{figure}[!pth]
224+
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../figure/figure_map.pdf}
225+
\caption{
226+
\textbf{Colored map of Japan.}
227+
Each of five major islands are marked by different colors.
228+
}
229+
\end{figure}
230+
231+
\pagebreak
232+
233+
\begin{figure}[!pth]
234+
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../figure/figure_joint_climate.pdf}
235+
\caption{
236+
\textbf{Joint relationship between the estimated periodic seasonal transmission rates and mean specific humidity across all five islands.}
237+
Points represent the estimates across 52 weeks in each island.
238+
The line represent a generalized additive model fit using cubic spline basis.
239+
Shaded regions represent the corresponding 95\% confidence intervals (n=260).
240+
}
241+
\end{figure}
242+
243+
\pagebreak
244+
245+
\begin{figure}[!pth]
246+
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../figure/figure_comb_sirs_npi_temp.pdf}
247+
\caption{
248+
\textbf{Relationship between the estimated periodic seasonal transmission rates and mean temperature.}
249+
Points represent seasonal transmission rate estimates across 52 weeks versus average humidity across 2013--2020.
250+
Blue lines and regions represent the corresponding locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) estimates and corresponding 95\% confidence intervals (n=52).
251+
Red lines and regions represent the corresponding quadratic regression fits and corresponding 95\% confidence intervals (n=52).
252+
}
253+
\end{figure}
254+
255+
\pagebreak
256+
257+
\begin{figure}[!pth]
258+
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../figure/figure_comb_sirs_npi_temp_hum.pdf}
259+
\caption{
260+
\textbf{Relationship between the mean weekly temperature and mean weekly humidity.}
261+
}
262+
\end{figure}
263+
264+
\pagebreak
265+
266+
\begin{figure}[!pth]
267+
\begin{center}
268+
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{../figure/figure_ryukyu_sirs_change.pdf}
269+
\caption{
270+
\textbf{A lack of increase in susceptible pool explains constant seasonality in Ryukyu island.}
271+
(A) Predicted effects of the proportion of infected $i(0)$ and susceptible $S(0)$ at the beginning of season on center of gravity.
272+
Points represent the estimated values for $i(0)$ and $s(0)$ between 2013 and 2019, showing the last two digits of a given year.
273+
The white vertical dashed line represents the $i(0)$ value used for simulating epidemic dynamics in panel B.
274+
(B) Changes in epidemic trajectories that would be caused by an increase in the susceptible proportion at the beginning of season for a fixed value of $i(0)$.
275+
}
276+
\end{center}
277+
\end{figure}
278+
279+
280+
\pagebreak
281+
282+
\begin{figure}[!pth]
283+
\begin{center}
284+
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{../figure/figure_hokkaido_sirs_change.pdf}
285+
\caption{
286+
\textbf{Estimated change in susceptibility for Hokkaido island and counterfactual simulations assuming an increased susceptibility.}
287+
(A) Predicted effects of the proportion of infected $i(0)$ and susceptible $s(0)$ at the beginning of season on center of gravity.
288+
Points represent the estimated values for $i(0)$ and $s(0)$ between 2013 and 2019, showing the last two digits of a given year.
289+
The white vertical dashed line represents the $i(0)$ value used for simulating epidemic dynamics in panel B.
290+
(B) Changes in epidemic trajectories that would be caused by an increase in the susceptible proportion at the beginning of season for a fixed value of $i(0)$.
291+
}
292+
\end{center}
293+
\end{figure}
294+
295+
296+
\pagebreak
297+
298+
\begin{figure}[!pth]
299+
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../figure/figure_comb_sirs_npi2.pdf}
300+
\caption{
301+
\textbf{Summary of SIRS model fits to RSV outbreaks across major islands in Japan.}
302+
(A) Comparisons of observed cases (points) across the five major islands and fitted epidemic trajectories (red lines).
303+
(B) Estimated periodic seasonal transmission rates before (red) and after (blue) the change in seasonality of RSV outbreaks.
304+
(C) Estimated proportion of the susceptible pool over time.
305+
In panels A--C, lines represent the estimated median of the posterior distribution (n=8000).
306+
In panels A--C, shaded regions represent the 95\% credible intervals from the posterior distribution (n=8000).
307+
(D) Estimated proportion of the susceptible pool on the 26th week of each year.
308+
Points represent median from n=8000 posterior samples.
309+
Error bars represent the 95\% credible interval in our estimates (n=8000 posterior samples).
310+
}
311+
\end{figure}
312+
313+
\pagebreak
314+
315+
\bibliography{perturbation}
316+
317+
\end{document}

doc/perturbation.pdf

-192 Bytes
Binary file not shown.

doc/perturbation.tex

Lines changed: 2 additions & 6 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -546,18 +546,14 @@ \section*{Figures}
546546
\textbf{Summary of SIRS model fits to RSV outbreaks across major islands in Japan.}
547547
(A) Comparisons of observed cases (points) across the five major islands and fitted epidemic trajectories (red lines).
548548
(B) Estimated periodic seasonal transmission rates.
549-
Lines represent the estimated median of the posterior distribution (n=8000 posterior samples).
550-
Shaded regions represent the 95\% credible intervals from the posterior distribution (n=8000 posterior samples).
551549
(C) Relationship between the estimated periodic seasonal transmission rates and mean specific humidity.
552550
Points represent seasonal transmission rate estimates across 52 weeks versus average humidity across 2013--2020.
553551
Blue lines and regions represent the corresponding locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) estimates and corresponding 95\% confidence intervals (n=52).
554552
Red lines and regions represent the corresponding quadratic regression fits and corresponding 95\% confidence intervals (n=52).
555553
(D) Estimated relative changes in transmission, capturing the impact of NPI measures.
556-
Lines represent the estimated median of the posterior distribution (n=8000 posterior samples).
557-
Shaded regions represent the 95\% credible intervals from the posterior distribution (n=8000 posterior samples).
558554
(E) Estimated proportion of the susceptible pool.
559-
Lines represent the estimated median of the posterior distribution (n=8000 posterior samples).
560-
Shaded regions represent the 95\% credible intervals from the posterior distribution (n=8000 posterior samples).
555+
In panels B, D, and E, lines represent the estimated median of the posterior distribution (n=8000 posterior samples).
556+
In panels B, D, and E, shaded regions represent the 95\% credible intervals from the posterior distribution (n=8000 posterior samples).
561557
}
562558
\label{fig:fig2}
563559
\end{figure}

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)