|
| 1 | +\documentclass[12pt]{article} |
| 2 | +% \usepackage[top=1in,left=1in, right = 1in, footskip=1in]{geometry} |
| 3 | +\usepackage[top=1in,footskip=1in]{geometry} |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +\usepackage{graphicx} |
| 6 | +\usepackage{xspace} |
| 7 | +%\usepackage{adjustbox} |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +\usepackage{multirow} |
| 10 | +\usepackage{booktabs} |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +\usepackage{pdflscape} |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +\usepackage{grffile} |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +\newcommand{\comment}{\showcomment} |
| 17 | +%% \newcommand{\comment}{\nocomment} |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +\newcommand{\showcomment}[3]{\textcolor{#1}{\textbf{[#2: }\textsl{#3}\textbf{]}}} |
| 20 | +\newcommand{\nocomment}[3]{} |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +\newcommand{\jd}[1]{\comment{cyan}{JD}{#1}} |
| 23 | +\newcommand{\swp}[1]{\comment{magenta}{SWP}{#1}} |
| 24 | +\newcommand{\bmb}[1]{\comment{blue}{BMB}{#1}} |
| 25 | +\newcommand{\djde}[1]{\comment{red}{DJDE}{#1}} |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +\newcommand{\eref}[1]{Eq.~(\ref{eq:#1})} |
| 28 | +\newcommand{\fref}[1]{Fig.~\ref{fig:#1}} |
| 29 | +\newcommand{\Fref}[1]{Fig.~\ref{fig:#1}} |
| 30 | +\newcommand{\sref}[1]{Sec.~\ref{#1}} |
| 31 | +\newcommand{\frange}[2]{Fig.~\ref{fig:#1}--\ref{fig:#2}} |
| 32 | +\newcommand{\tref}[1]{Table~\ref{tab:#1}} |
| 33 | +\newcommand{\tlab}[1]{\label{tab:#1}} |
| 34 | +\newcommand{\seminar}{SE\mbox{$^m$}I\mbox{$^n$}R} |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +\usepackage{amsthm} |
| 37 | +\usepackage{amsmath} |
| 38 | +\usepackage{amssymb} |
| 39 | +\usepackage{amsfonts} |
| 40 | +\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % make sure fancy dashes etc. don't get dropped |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +\usepackage{lineno} |
| 43 | +\linenumbers |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +\usepackage[pdfencoding=auto, psdextra]{hyperref} |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +\usepackage{natbib} |
| 48 | +\bibliographystyle{chicago} |
| 49 | +\date{\today} |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +\usepackage{xspace} |
| 52 | +\newcommand*{\ie}{i.e.\@\xspace} |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +\usepackage{color} |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +\newcommand{\Rx}[1]{\ensuremath{{\mathcal R}_{#1}}\xspace} |
| 57 | +\newcommand{\RR}{\ensuremath{{\mathcal R}}\xspace} |
| 58 | +\newcommand{\Rres}{\Rx{\mathrm{res}}} |
| 59 | +\newcommand{\Rinv}{\Rx{\mathrm{inv}}} |
| 60 | +\newcommand{\Rhat}{\ensuremath{{\hat\RR}}} |
| 61 | +\newcommand{\Rt}{\ensuremath{{\mathcal R}(t)}\xspace} |
| 62 | +\newcommand{\tsub}[2]{#1_{{\textrm{\tiny #2}}}} |
| 63 | +\newcommand{\dd}[1]{\ensuremath{\, \mathrm{d}#1}} |
| 64 | +\newcommand{\dtau}{\dd{\tau}} |
| 65 | +\newcommand{\dx}{\dd{x}} |
| 66 | +\newcommand{\dsigma}{\dd{\sigma}} |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +\newcommand{\rx}[1]{\ensuremath{{r}_{#1}}\xspace} |
| 69 | +\newcommand{\rres}{\rx{\mathrm{res}}} |
| 70 | +\newcommand{\rinv}{\rx{\mathrm{inv}}} |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +\newcommand{\psymp}{\ensuremath{p}} %% primary symptom time |
| 73 | +\newcommand{\ssymp}{\ensuremath{s}} %% secondary symptom time |
| 74 | +\newcommand{\pinf}{\ensuremath{\alpha_1}} %% primary infection time |
| 75 | +\newcommand{\sinf}{\ensuremath{\alpha_2}} %% secondary infection time |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +\newcommand{\psize}{{\mathcal P}} %% primary cohort size |
| 78 | +\newcommand{\ssize}{{\mathcal S}} %% secondary cohort size |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +\newcommand{\gtime}{\tau_{\rm g}} %% generation interval |
| 81 | +\newcommand{\gdist}{g} %% generation-interval distribution |
| 82 | +\newcommand{\idist}{\ell} %% incubation-period distribution |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +\newcommand{\total}{{\mathcal T}} %% total number of serial intervals |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +\usepackage{lettrine} |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +\newcommand{\dropcapfont}{\fontfamily{lmss}\bfseries\fontsize{26pt}{28pt}\selectfont} |
| 89 | +\newcommand{\dropcap}[1]{\lettrine[lines=2,lraise=0.05,findent=0.1em, nindent=0em]{{\dropcapfont{#1}}}{}} |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +\begin{document} |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +\begin{flushleft}{ |
| 94 | + \Large |
| 95 | + \textbf\newline{ |
| 96 | + Supplementary Information for \textit{Interplay between climate and childhood mixing can explain a sudden shift in RSV seasonality in Japan} |
| 97 | + } |
| 98 | +} |
| 99 | +\newline |
| 100 | +\\ |
| 101 | +Sang Woo Park\textsuperscript{1,2,3,*}, Inga Holmdahl\textsuperscript{3,4}, Emily Howerton\textsuperscript{3}, Wenchang Yang\textsuperscript{5}, Rachel E. Baker\textsuperscript{6}, Gabriel A. Vecchi\textsuperscript{4,5,7}, Sarah Cobey\textsuperscript{2}, C. Jessica E. Metcalf\textsuperscript{3,4,8}, Bryan T. Grenfell\textsuperscript{3,4,8} |
| 102 | +\\ |
| 103 | +\bigskip |
| 104 | +\textbf{1} School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea |
| 105 | +\\ |
| 106 | +\textbf{2} Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA |
| 107 | +\\ |
| 108 | +\textbf{3} Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA |
| 109 | +\\ |
| 110 | +\textbf{4} High Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA |
| 111 | +\\ |
| 112 | +\textbf{5} Department of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA |
| 113 | +\\ |
| 114 | +\textbf{6} Department of Epidemiology, Brown School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA |
| 115 | +\\ |
| 116 | +\textbf{7} Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA |
| 117 | +\\ |
| 118 | +\textbf{8} Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton, NJ, USA |
| 119 | +\bigskip |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +*Corresponding author: sangwoopark@snu.ac.kr |
| 122 | +\end{flushleft} |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | +\pagebreak |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | +\setcounter{figure}{0} |
| 127 | +\setcounter{equation}{0} |
| 128 | +\renewcommand{\thefigure}{S\arabic{figure}} |
| 129 | +\renewcommand{\theequation}{S\arabic{equation}} |
| 130 | +\renewcommand{\thetable}{S\arabic{table}} |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | +\section*{Supplementary Materials} |
| 133 | + |
| 134 | +\subsection*{Supplementary Table} |
| 135 | + |
| 136 | +\begin{table}[ht] |
| 137 | +\centering |
| 138 | +\begin{tabular}{l|l|l|r} |
| 139 | +\hline |
| 140 | +\textbf{Island} & \textbf{Variable} & \textbf{Coefficient} & \textbf{p-value} \\ |
| 141 | +\hline |
| 142 | +\multirow{5}{*}{Hokkaido} & Intercept & 4.28*** & $7.28\times 10^{-5}$ \\ |
| 143 | + & Humidity & 1.26** & 0.0011 \\ |
| 144 | + & Humidity$^2$ & -0.02 & 0.082 \\ |
| 145 | + & Temperature & -0.13 & 0.051 \\ |
| 146 | + & Temperature$^2$ & -0.02*** & $7.75 \times 10^{-6}$ \\ |
| 147 | +\hline |
| 148 | +\multirow{5}{*}{Honshu} & Intercept & 6.73*** & $5.4 \times 10^{-13}$ \\ |
| 149 | + & Humidity & 0.38 & 0.19 \\ |
| 150 | + & Humidity$^2$ & 0.03* & 0.011 \\ |
| 151 | + & Temperature & 0.03 & 0.80 \\ |
| 152 | + & Temperature$^2$ & -0.02*** & $0.00012$ \\ |
| 153 | +\hline |
| 154 | +\multirow{5}{*}{Shikoku} & Intercept & 12.25*** & $<2 \times 10^{-16}$ \\ |
| 155 | + & Humidity & 0.43 & 0.30 \\ |
| 156 | + & Humidity$^2$ & -0.01 & 0.67 \\ |
| 157 | + & Temperature & -0.84*** & $0.00021$ \\ |
| 158 | + & Temperature$^2$ & 0.02* & 0.013 \\ |
| 159 | +\hline |
| 160 | +\multirow{5}{*}{Kyushu} & Intercept & 9.91*** & $<2 \times 10^{-16}$ \\ |
| 161 | + & Humidity & 0.52 & 0.068 \\ |
| 162 | + & Humidity$^2$ & 0.01 & 0.27 \\ |
| 163 | + & Temperature & -0.59*** & $0.00046$ \\ |
| 164 | + & Temperature$^2$ & 0.00 & 0.60 \\ |
| 165 | +\hline |
| 166 | +\multirow{5}{*}{Ryukyu} & Intercept & 14.07 & 0.056 \\ |
| 167 | + & Humidity & -0.90 & 0.060 \\ |
| 168 | + & Humidity$^2$ & 0.04** & $0.0073$ \\ |
| 169 | + & Temperature & 0.15 & 0.86 \\ |
| 170 | + & Temperature$^2$ & -0.01 & 0.56 \\ |
| 171 | +\hline |
| 172 | +\end{tabular} |
| 173 | +\caption{ |
| 174 | +\textbf{Bivariate quadratic regression of estimated transmission rate against mean specific humidity and mean temperature.} |
| 175 | +P-values were obtained from a two-sided t-test based on the estimated standard errors from the regression model. |
| 176 | +We did not adjust for multiple comparisons. |
| 177 | +*$p<0.05$, **$p<0.01$, ***$p<0.001$. |
| 178 | +} |
| 179 | +\end{table} |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | +\pagebreak |
| 182 | + |
| 183 | +\begin{table}[ht] |
| 184 | +\centering |
| 185 | +\begin{tabular}{l|l|l} |
| 186 | +\hline |
| 187 | +\textbf{Island} & \textbf{Humidity model} & \textbf{Temperature model} \\ |
| 188 | +\hline |
| 189 | +Hokkaido & 0.44 & 0.52\\ |
| 190 | +\hline |
| 191 | +Honshu & 0.39 & 0.29\\ |
| 192 | +\hline |
| 193 | +Shikoku & 0.63 & 0.72\\ |
| 194 | +\hline |
| 195 | +Kyushu & 0.77 & 0.77\\ |
| 196 | +\hline |
| 197 | +Ryukyu & 0.59 & 0.47\\ |
| 198 | +\hline |
| 199 | +\end{tabular} |
| 200 | +\caption{ |
| 201 | +\textbf{Comparisons of R squared values from univariate quadratic regression of estimated transmission rate against mean specific humidity and mean temperature.} |
| 202 | +} |
| 203 | +\end{table} |
| 204 | + |
| 205 | + |
| 206 | +\pagebreak |
| 207 | + |
| 208 | +\subsection*{Supplementary Figures} |
| 209 | + |
| 210 | +\begin{figure}[!pth] |
| 211 | +\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../figure/figure1_cog.pdf} |
| 212 | +\caption{ |
| 213 | +\textbf{Estimates of center of gravity (i.e., the mean timing of an epidemic) across all prefectures, stratified by island.} |
| 214 | +Hokkaido and Ryukyu islands each contain only one prefectures: Hokkaido and Okinawa, respectively. |
| 215 | +The center (horizontal line), lower bounds, and upper bounds of the box plot correspond to median, lower quartile (25th percentile), and upper quartile (75th percentile), respectively. |
| 216 | +The whiskers indicate the range of values that extend up to 1.5 times the interquartile range beyond the lower and upper quartiles. |
| 217 | +Outliers, which fall outside this range, are plotted individually. |
| 218 | +} |
| 219 | +\end{figure} |
| 220 | + |
| 221 | + |
| 222 | + |
| 223 | +\begin{figure}[!pth] |
| 224 | +\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../figure/figure_map.pdf} |
| 225 | +\caption{ |
| 226 | +\textbf{Colored map of Japan.} |
| 227 | +Each of five major islands are marked by different colors. |
| 228 | +} |
| 229 | +\end{figure} |
| 230 | + |
| 231 | +\pagebreak |
| 232 | + |
| 233 | +\begin{figure}[!pth] |
| 234 | +\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../figure/figure_joint_climate.pdf} |
| 235 | +\caption{ |
| 236 | +\textbf{Joint relationship between the estimated periodic seasonal transmission rates and mean specific humidity across all five islands.} |
| 237 | +Points represent the estimates across 52 weeks in each island. |
| 238 | +The line represent a generalized additive model fit using cubic spline basis. |
| 239 | +Shaded regions represent the corresponding 95\% confidence intervals (n=260). |
| 240 | +} |
| 241 | +\end{figure} |
| 242 | + |
| 243 | +\pagebreak |
| 244 | + |
| 245 | +\begin{figure}[!pth] |
| 246 | +\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../figure/figure_comb_sirs_npi_temp.pdf} |
| 247 | +\caption{ |
| 248 | +\textbf{Relationship between the estimated periodic seasonal transmission rates and mean temperature.} |
| 249 | +Points represent seasonal transmission rate estimates across 52 weeks versus average humidity across 2013--2020. |
| 250 | +Blue lines and regions represent the corresponding locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) estimates and corresponding 95\% confidence intervals (n=52). |
| 251 | +Red lines and regions represent the corresponding quadratic regression fits and corresponding 95\% confidence intervals (n=52). |
| 252 | +} |
| 253 | +\end{figure} |
| 254 | + |
| 255 | +\pagebreak |
| 256 | + |
| 257 | +\begin{figure}[!pth] |
| 258 | +\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../figure/figure_comb_sirs_npi_temp_hum.pdf} |
| 259 | +\caption{ |
| 260 | +\textbf{Relationship between the mean weekly temperature and mean weekly humidity.} |
| 261 | +} |
| 262 | +\end{figure} |
| 263 | + |
| 264 | +\pagebreak |
| 265 | + |
| 266 | +\begin{figure}[!pth] |
| 267 | +\begin{center} |
| 268 | +\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{../figure/figure_ryukyu_sirs_change.pdf} |
| 269 | +\caption{ |
| 270 | +\textbf{A lack of increase in susceptible pool explains constant seasonality in Ryukyu island.} |
| 271 | +(A) Predicted effects of the proportion of infected $i(0)$ and susceptible $S(0)$ at the beginning of season on center of gravity. |
| 272 | +Points represent the estimated values for $i(0)$ and $s(0)$ between 2013 and 2019, showing the last two digits of a given year. |
| 273 | +The white vertical dashed line represents the $i(0)$ value used for simulating epidemic dynamics in panel B. |
| 274 | +(B) Changes in epidemic trajectories that would be caused by an increase in the susceptible proportion at the beginning of season for a fixed value of $i(0)$. |
| 275 | +} |
| 276 | +\end{center} |
| 277 | +\end{figure} |
| 278 | + |
| 279 | + |
| 280 | +\pagebreak |
| 281 | + |
| 282 | +\begin{figure}[!pth] |
| 283 | +\begin{center} |
| 284 | +\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{../figure/figure_hokkaido_sirs_change.pdf} |
| 285 | +\caption{ |
| 286 | +\textbf{Estimated change in susceptibility for Hokkaido island and counterfactual simulations assuming an increased susceptibility.} |
| 287 | +(A) Predicted effects of the proportion of infected $i(0)$ and susceptible $s(0)$ at the beginning of season on center of gravity. |
| 288 | +Points represent the estimated values for $i(0)$ and $s(0)$ between 2013 and 2019, showing the last two digits of a given year. |
| 289 | +The white vertical dashed line represents the $i(0)$ value used for simulating epidemic dynamics in panel B. |
| 290 | +(B) Changes in epidemic trajectories that would be caused by an increase in the susceptible proportion at the beginning of season for a fixed value of $i(0)$. |
| 291 | +} |
| 292 | +\end{center} |
| 293 | +\end{figure} |
| 294 | + |
| 295 | + |
| 296 | +\pagebreak |
| 297 | + |
| 298 | +\begin{figure}[!pth] |
| 299 | +\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../figure/figure_comb_sirs_npi2.pdf} |
| 300 | +\caption{ |
| 301 | +\textbf{Summary of SIRS model fits to RSV outbreaks across major islands in Japan.} |
| 302 | +(A) Comparisons of observed cases (points) across the five major islands and fitted epidemic trajectories (red lines). |
| 303 | +(B) Estimated periodic seasonal transmission rates before (red) and after (blue) the change in seasonality of RSV outbreaks. |
| 304 | +(C) Estimated proportion of the susceptible pool over time. |
| 305 | +In panels A--C, lines represent the estimated median of the posterior distribution (n=8000). |
| 306 | +In panels A--C, shaded regions represent the 95\% credible intervals from the posterior distribution (n=8000). |
| 307 | +(D) Estimated proportion of the susceptible pool on the 26th week of each year. |
| 308 | +Points represent median from n=8000 posterior samples. |
| 309 | +Error bars represent the 95\% credible interval in our estimates (n=8000 posterior samples). |
| 310 | +} |
| 311 | +\end{figure} |
| 312 | + |
| 313 | +\pagebreak |
| 314 | + |
| 315 | +\bibliography{perturbation} |
| 316 | + |
| 317 | +\end{document} |
0 commit comments