Skip to content

CIS/TRANS for consecutive double bonds #50

Description

@fgrunewald

A curious problem arises for cis trans definition of consecutive double bonds. Should the smiles be C1=CC=C(C=C1)/C=C/C=C//C2=CC=CC=C2 or C1=CC=C(C=C1)/C=C/C=C/C2=CC=CC=C2. I think commonly one symbol is used. In either case our annotation fails since the middle atom only get's assigned one classification based on the first bond

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions