Adapt Nostr comments to NIP-20

[fiatjaf]

For maximum interoperability.

See here: nostr-protocol/nips#19

Open for debate and improvements.

[barefoot-88]

Can someone explain the difference between this and our current implementation? I'm not super technical, so I'll try my best to keep up.

Perhaps we could also discuss this on tomorrow's Platform WIP call @ 1PM UTC.

[MTG2000]

@johnsBeharry
We've reached a relative conclusion regarding how the structure of the system could look like.
(And it's most likely won't be made into a new separate NIP, (which is mostly a good thing))

So if you would like to take a look at the discussion in the link above or add anything, please do so.

[Giszmo]

I think this issue can be closed as the hard link between url and thread is not desired. As I understood on a call today, bolt-fun wants to change the url which would break the comments.

Also as kind-1 is currently used, it is implied that engagement with other social clients is desired. Sadly that currently does not work as:

• The original post - the Story - cannot be found on nostr and isn't linked with comments neither
• The comments don't show on bolt.fun as here, a special tag is required

I suggest to implement threaded replies as per kind-1 events, with the story generating just a minimal nostr event linking to bolt.fun and the replies being nostr-replies without limiting tags so that bolt-fun turns compatible with Astral, Damus and the other nostr apps.