Deploying to gh-pages from @ c2c52d9 🚀

Author: nikic

_sources/php7/internal_types/strings/zend_strings.rst.txt

@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ This also brings us to the next topic: refcount management. Rather than using ra
     return zend_string_copy(str);
 
 Unlike ``GC_ADDREF()``, the ``zend_string_addref()`` function will handle immutable strings properly. However, the
-function that is used most often by far is ``zend_string_copy()``. This function also only increments the refcount,
+function that is used most often by far is ``zend_string_copy()``. This function not only increments the refcount,
 but also returns the original string. This makes code more readable in practice.
 
 While a ``zend_string_dup()`` function that performs an actual copy of the string (rather than only a refcount

php7/internal_types/strings/zend_strings.html

@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ <h2>Memory management<a class="headerlink" href="#memory-management" title="Link
 </pre></div>
 </div>
 <p>Unlike <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">GC_ADDREF()</span></code>, the <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">zend_string_addref()</span></code> function will handle immutable strings properly. However, the
-function that is used most often by far is <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">zend_string_copy()</span></code>. This function also only increments the refcount,
+function that is used most often by far is <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">zend_string_copy()</span></code>. This function not only increments the refcount,
 but also returns the original string. This makes code more readable in practice.</p>
 <p>While a <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">zend_string_dup()</span></code> function that performs an actual copy of the string (rather than only a refcount
 increment) also exists, the behavior is often considered confusing, because it only copies non-immutable strings.